Exploratory Study: Vehicle Mileage Fees in Texas Ginger Goodin Richard T. Baker Texas Transportation Institute Research sponsored by the Texas Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IntelliDrive for Safety, Mobility, and User Fee Project Cory Johnson Mn/DOT IntelliDrive Program Engineer.
Advertisements

Sustainability & Business Models Gill Joy – ESYS plc Oscar Struijve – Education for Change.
How to Build a Better Bus Garage: Mn/DOTs Facility Guidebook 18 th National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity Bus Transportation Gerry Weiss, State.
Minnesota Mileage Based User Fee Test Results Cory Johnson, PE Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology MnDOT.
Accountable Care Workgroup December 13, Agenda Call to Order/Roll Call Discussion – Discuss Key Messages/Takeaways from the Accountable Care Workgroup.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE. 2 Implemented in 12 countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, through IUCN regional.
Delivering Guidance in a Group Setting: optimising the potential for personal learning and development in a group context Jane Westergaard Senior Lecturer.
Energy: Can We Get More? Can We Use Less Amy Myers Jaffe Wallace S. Wilson Fellow for Energy Studies James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy Houston.
Colorado Transportation Finance and Implementation Panel Overview Fort Morgan,Colorado September 13, 2007.
I-95 Corridor Coalition MBUF Research for the I-95 Corridor Coalition Gary W. Euler.
1 ITRC Mission ITRC is A state-led coalition working together with industry and stakeholders to achieve regulatory acceptance of environmental technologies.
TRANSPORTATION POLICY COMMITTEE FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL STAFF COUNCIL ALUMNI CENTER APRIL 2, 2003.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
Capacity building for public authorities – EE7 Veronika Czako Project Adviser, EASME.
The Urban Infrastructure Challenge in Canada: Focusing on Housing Affordability and Choice Presentation by CHBA – [Name] to The Municipal Council of [Name]
Texas Transportation Poll Testimony of Ginger Goodin Transportation Policy Research Center Texas A&M Transportation Institute before the Senate Select.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
State Funding of Transportation Tom Howells Wisconsin Motor Carriers Association.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Presentation at the 2014 MD GFOA Summer Conference Holly Sun, Deputy Director of OMB, Prince George’s County, MD and Ph.D. Candidate, George Washington.
New Revenue Subcommittee Recommendations. Criteria Elasticity Elasticity Ability to phase in Ability to phase in User-based User-based Yield Yield Ease.
International Partnership Meeting Thursday, January 17, 2013 Washington D.C. 1.
Oregon’s Road Usage Charge Program - SB810 Implementation 2015 AASHTO Audit Conference July 21, 2015.
1 FNGATSWG-Initial Observations Financing the Next Generation Air Transportation System Working Group (FNGATSWG) July 27, 2005.
“”Capacity and services to road users” Task descriptions Paul van der Kroon, Paris November 2005.
Richard Philp New Zealand Inland Revenue Department Session No. 7 Conclusions for tax policy and revenue administration from compliance studies, perception.
Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Fees What’s been done? What’s happening? What do you need to know? Trey Baker Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University.
EFRAG’s preliminary position on the IASB Supplementary Document Financial Instruments: Impairment Draft comment letter 28 February 2011.
Regulatory Transparency and Interaction with the Government Dr. Konstantin Petrov Head of Section, Policy and Regulation.
Oregon’s Road User Fee Pilot Program Presented to NEACT LaGrande, Oregon August 4, 2005 James Whitty, Manager Office of Innovative Partnerships and Alternative.
The Challenge of Financing Oregon’s Highways
AFREPREN/FWD Summary of the UPEA II Research Findings By Stephen Karekezi, John Kimani and Oscar Onguru.
Domestic Resource Mobilization in Tanzania N. Osoro, L. Rutasitara, J. Aikaeli and G. Kibira
Fuel Poverty. Structure of the Presentation Background: What is fuel poverty? Issues to consider when measuring fuel poverty. Ways to measure fuel poverty.
//plug-in ready michigan //powerpoint// made possible through the generous support of the U.S. Department of Energy plug-in ready michigan an electric.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS vs DEVELOPMENT CHARGES.
1 Presentation to OG6 Canberra, Australia May 2011 Statistical Uses of Administrative Data in Canada.
The Oregon Road User Fee Concept and Pilot Program Presented to National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission Washington DC September.
IntelliDrive SM Strategic Plan 2009 Ted Trepanier SSOM – SCOTE Manchester The IntelliDrive SM logo is a service mark of the U.S. Department of Transportation.
Engaging Communities in Developing a Sustainable Wood Products and Biomass Energy Industry By Gerry Gray Vice President for Policy American Forests.
The Role of IRBs and Ethics Susan Kornetsky, MPH Children’s Hospital, Boston.
Economic Dimensions of Integrated Water Resources Management Training of Trainers Integrated Water Resources Management.
A Citizens’ Guide to Energy Subsidies in Indonesia Learning from international experience Damon Vis-Dunbar, IISD 12 October 2012.
Mileage based user fees and sustainable transportation funding Dr. Adrian Moore Vice President Reason Foundation.
CORNERSTONES TO MANAGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. WHY SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS? Customer Perceptions---Fantasy? Customer Expectations---Reality Customer.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
MBUF 101 Dr. Adrian Moore Vice President Reason Foundation.
Carbon pricing: a key mechanism to drive down urban GHG emissions.
Annual Results Presentation 27 August 2009 Jacob Maroga – Chief Executive Empowering the South African dream.
Year Cents Per Vehicle Mile Forecast of Fuel Taxes on Light Duty Vehicles (Oregon) VHighTech.
Performance Stories Evaluation - A Monitoring Method to Enhance Evaluation Influence Riad Naji, Catriona King, Richard Habgood.
Bridging the Gap: The Role of the Private Sector in Climate Change Adaptation Richard Welford Chairman, CSR Asia Adaptation Knowledge Platform Learning.
Idaho Energy Plan Proposal (RFI) Energy Policy Institute (EPI)
IntelliDrive Safety Workshop July 20, 2010 Stephanie C. Binder National Highway Traffic Safety Administration US Department of Transportation Human Factors.
Role and Responsibilities of the Joint Budget Committee A conceptual framework 3 June 2003.
RESEARCH UNIT INPUT ON OVERSIGHT AND ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL: PETITIONS.
An Optimal Economic Growth Strategy for Alabama Dr. Sam Addy Associate Dean for Economic Development Outreach & Senior Research Economist Montgomery, AlabamaJanuary.
14/02/20081 Urban mobility Griet De Ceuster. 14/02/20082 CONTENTS Mobility concepts in a city: technologies in a mobility perspective Challenges for implementation.
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
Physician Adoption of HIT AHRQ 2007 Annual Meeting September 26, 2007 Melissa M. Goldstein, JD Department of Health Policy School of Public Health and.
2nd African Decent Work Symposium: Yaoundé, Cameroon, 6-8 October THE SOCIAL SECURITY EXTENSION CHALLENGE: INCOME SECURITY AND HEALTH BENEFITS. Dr.
PARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE ASSESSMENT (PGA) OVERVIEW OF PILOT RESEARCH IN CROSS RIVER STATE, NIGERIA Tony Atah, UN-REDD+ Stakeholder Engagement Specialist.
WGA TRANSPORTATION FUELS FOR THE FUTURE INITIATIVE Vehicle Efficiency Committee Report Summary John Boesel Transportation Fuels for the Future Workshop.
Surface Transportation System Funding Alternatives Program Overview 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management, FHWA.
Urban Mobility Management and Emissions Measurement System Boile Maria 1,2 Afroditi Anagnostopoulou 1 Evangelia Papargyri 1 1 Centre for Research and Technology.
Persian Highway Trust Fund
Research Program Strategic Plan
Feedback from ACEA truck manufacturers and next steps
Alternative Solutions to Shrinking Tax Revenues
How to Put Together the Pieces of Road Usage Charge Legislation
Presentation transcript:

Exploratory Study: Vehicle Mileage Fees in Texas Ginger Goodin Richard T. Baker Texas Transportation Institute Research sponsored by the Texas Department of Transportation

Background Fuel taxes are problematic as a long-term funding source – Fuel taxes are primary source of state transportation funding – Fuel consumption is declining – The fuel tax will become a less sustainable and less equitable proxy fee for road use into the future

Estimated Fleetwide Fuel Efficiency of Gasoline Powered Vehicles in Texas Source: Transportation Revenue Estimator and Needs Determination System (TRENDS), Texas Department of Transportation

Composition of the Vehicle Fleet by Vehicle Technology Source: United States Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, “2010 Energy Outlook”

Projected Fuel Tax Revenues Source: Transportation Revenue Estimator and Needs Determination System (TRENDS), Texas Department of Transportation

Background Research and testing underway at state and national levels to explore mileage fee applications Vehicle mileage fees are considered a more sustainable and equitable approach – Reflects actual use – Not affected by increases in fuel efficiency Represents a significant change over current system

Purpose and Scope of Study Purpose of Study To explore vehicle mileage fees as a possible funding mechanism for Texas Study Scope Document the state-of-the-practice in mileage fees Gather input and perspectives from Texans, both driving public and stakeholders Engage a panel of technology experts to provide input on possible deployment options

Study Scope - Focus Groups Recruitment and composition Topics discussed – Transportation funding and fuel tax basics – Mileage fee concept Technology options - low, medium, high tech Payment and transition Focus group findings – Lack of knowledge of fuel tax and transportation funding – Negative reaction to mileage fees – Consistency in concerns raised: privacy, cost, enforcement – Preferences: low tech, no single annual payment, pay-at-the-pump Yoakum – Dallas – Laredo – Abilene - Corpus Christi

Preliminary Findings Challenges: Public Acceptance Barriers Most view implementation as unworkable – Privacy – Cost of administration – Enforcement Rationale has not been adequately established with the general public – No value proposition New funding mechanism raises fairness concerns – Perceived burden on rural and low income drivers – Perceived penalty to fuel-efficient vehicles

Preliminary Findings Opportunities/Potential Application Vehicle mileage fees are seen as logical and sustainable for a long-term solution Mileage fees support a “pay for use” principle more effectively than the fuel tax Simple solutions have greater support (i.e., low tech preferred over high tech) Demonstrations are valuable in showing how the concept might work, particularly demonstrations that address public concerns

Preliminary Findings Technology Panel Public policy design plays a significant role in addressing public concerns over technology applications – Define privacy standards – Establish operating standards and parameters, specifically with respect to the use of data – Define public and private sector roles With clear policy direction, deployment systems can be designed to address public concerns over privacy, administration and enforcement

Preliminary Conclusions Mileage fees are viewed as a logical replacement for the fuel tax, but public resistance is significant Primary recommendation: Test mileage fees as a long-term funding approach through an electric vehicle implementation – Small percentage of vehicle fleet – Electric vehicles fall outside the fuel tax collection system – Public feedback: a logical user group to test

Preliminary Conclusions Advantages of implementation on electric vehicle fleet – Captures a road usage fee from a vehicle group that will not pay fuel taxes – Allows testing of the full range of privacy, system administration and enforcement aspects – Serves as a demonstration for potential phase-in of other vehicle groups Suggested deployment concept – Base system of odometer readings from vehicle inspection – Experimental opt-in system with GPS-based device to allow discounting of out-of-state mileage