Belle results relevant to LHC Pheno-07 May 8, 2007 Madison Wisc. S.L. Olsen U of Hawai’i
CKM Global Fit (Sep.2006) CKM is “correct” at tree level
B0B0 B0B0 B0B0 V cb V tb V* V tb J/ KSKS KSKS sin2 1 from B f CP + B B f CP interf. V* 2 td Sanda, Bigi & Carter:
Next step: use b s penguins Example: no KM phase SM: sin2 1 = sin2 1 from B J/ K S (b c c s) unless there are other, non-SM particles in the loop eff V td + 11 B B, ’, 11 _ * *
SMNP? i.e. > 0.1 for M NP LHC ~ ~s ~ x b g ~ t
2006: 1 with b s Penguins Smaller than b ccs in all of 9 modes Smaller than b ccs in all of 9 modes Theory tends to predict positive shifts (originating from phase in Vts) Naïve average of all b s modes sin2 eff = 0.52 ± deviation between penguin and tree (b s) (b c) Naïve average of all b s modes sin2 eff = 0.52 ± deviation between penguin and tree (b s) (b c)
History of sin2 1 sin2 1 from b ccs decays (2007) 3.1 3.9 2.8 2.6 0.15 eff sin2 1 (b qqs decays) (Belle&BaBar average)
~s ~ x How to make small? Tune the squark mixing terms is there enough freedom to do this? Make the squark masses degenerate invoke a GIM-like mechanism Make the SUSY mass scale very high (~few TeV) not much fun for LHC experimenters b g ~
B B Decays w/ “Missing E(>1 )” B decay constant Lattice QCD SM : BSM : sensitive to New Physics from H
B (nearly invisible decays) N= 680k eff.= 0.29% purity = 57% N= 680k eff.= 0.29% purity = 57% Charged B Tag-side: Full reconstruction 449M BB Υ(4S) e (8GeV) e+(3.5GeV) B B signal 4-momentum determined B meson beam ! 4-momentum determined B meson beam !
Missing momentum Missing momentum B candidate event
B results Belle Hadronic tag e eff D l tag e First evidence, 3.5 No clear signal Belle BaBar PRL97, (2006).hep-ex/
We measure Branching fraction Product of B meson decay constant ƒ B and CKM element |V ub | Compare with Babar preliminary
Constraints on H mass r H =1.13 0.51 Use known f B and |V ub | Ratio to the SM BF. excluded
BXsBXs W +, H +
Nakao
NNLO calculation (298 26) x M. Misiak et al, hep- ph/ , PRL 98,022002(2007) Theory News NNLO theory
Error on BF Central value of BF 95% CL lower limit on H + mass from exp and NNLO M. Misiak et al, hep-ph/ , PRL 98, (2007) BaBar/Belle/CLEO avg M(H + )>295 GeV 300 GeV
BB BXsBXs 350- Look here or here
Validate the E ECL simulation using double-tagged events (with on the signal side) Signal reconstruction (purity ~ 90%) Extra Calorimeter Energy MC: B + B – : 494 ± 18 B 0 B 0 : 8 ± 2 Combined: 502 ±18 Data: 458 _