ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 How to proceed with the Programme of Measures and the River Basin Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Advertisements

Module 4 Planning SP. What’s in Module 4  Opportunities for SP  Different SP models  Communication plan  Monitoring and evaluating  Working session.
Workshops for implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity through the National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans Module 2 The Biodiversity.
Regulatory Frameworks in OECD countries and their Relevance for India Nick Malyshev Senior Counsellor Public Governance and Territorial Development OECD.
Chinese – EU cooperation on water - Partnerships on Water Challenges 2014 CEWP High Level Conference, 4 th December 2014 Marta Moren Abat DG ENVIRONMENT,
Hydropower Development: Experience of Nepal
1. 2 Content Principles of the Water Framework Directive WFD and Agriculture WFD and CAP.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
IWRM PLAN PREPARED AND APPROVED. CONTENT Writing an IWRM plan The content of a plan Ensuring political and public participation Timeframe Who writes the.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
1 Hsin Chu, August 2012 Regulatory Impact Assessment Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry of economy and finance, Paris
Water.europa.eu Assessment of the River Basin Management Plans – preliminary findings Conference on River Basin Management Planning Ankara, 28 February.
Daniel Baláž, Ján Černecký State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic Nature Conservation and River Monitoring in Slovakia.
Rome Energy Meeting 2008 Rome, November 2008 Investments Opportunities and Project Finance in the Energy Market Luigi Marsullo President Finpublic.
Convention of the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes DRAFT CODE OF CONDUCT ECOSYTEMS AND PES FOR WATER MANAGEMENT.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Expert Meeting November 2007, WMO Geneva Consultation Process Involving Governments and Agencies prior to Adaption of HFA Keynote Presentation Marco.
The EU Water Initiative National Policy Dialogues in Armenia & Moldova Pierre Hecq UNDP Water-CoP Meeting Almaty, October 2007.
INTERCONNEXIONS BETWEEN ECONOMICS AND WFD What room and what role for economics?
JOINING UP GOVERNMENTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Establishing a European Union Location Framework.
Swedish Society for Nature Conservation Water framework directive is a European law which aims at good water status in Europe. The law was taken in 2000.
The EU’s Better Regulation Package Implementation of Impact Assessment Manuel Santiago European Commission DG Enterprise & Industry.
Water scarcity drafting group Salzburg, June Dicembre 2004Brussels, 11 April 2006 Water Scarcity Drafting Group WD meeting Salzburg June 1st and.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
Indicators to Measure Progress and Performance IWRM Training Course for the Mekong July 20-31, 2009.
International Network Network of Basin OrganizationsInternationalOffice for Water PARIS Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER.
Permitting and Inspection. 1. When is decentralization effective? Delegate most permit writing and inspection functions to lowest possible level to effectively.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
Date/event: EEA EIONET Freshwater Workshop 27-28th Sept 2010, Copenhagen Author: Dr Manuel Lago (Ecologic Institute, Berlin) ETC/Water 2010 Overview of.
Implementation of critical studies necessary to promote better planning and efficient management of hydropower projects in an Int’l River Basin context.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB’s Vision for Transportation Research.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
WHAT IS THE ROLE OF ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS? A selection of key economic inputs.
THE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN PRACTICE Case study. RBMP Detailed publication process in the directive...  art. 13: general rules  annex VII: detailed contents.
Water.europa.eu Water Framework Directive - a framework for Community action in the field of water policy Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments
EU Project: Trans-Boundary River Management Phase II and Phase III for the Kura River basin – Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan ( Transboundary.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
INFRASTRUCTURE AND HUMAN SETTLEMENTS Presentation by Delegation of the European Union Consultative Group Meeting Technical Session La Palm, Accra, 23/09/2010.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
An overview of OECD Strategies for Improving Regulatory Performance Regulatory Reform and Building Governance Capacities – New Delhi 3 December 2009 Mr.
Workshop on Disproportionate Costs, 10./ Copenhagen Summary and draft conclusions 11 April 2008.
The EU Water Initiative and the EU ACP Facility New Instruments to promote sustainable development of water resources and affordable access Antonio Garcia-Fragio.
Date/event: Water accounts and economics workshop, 7-8/10/2010, Copenhagen Author: Dr Manuel Lago (Ecologic Institute, Berlin) ETC/Water 2010 Overview.
CDP-GIZ research project – Paris Workshop Gesellschaft für internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH André Lammerding, Head of Programme International Water Stewardship.
Seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia Countries (EECCA) on Water Statistics September 2012 Almaty, Kazakhstan The EU Water Framework.
United Nations Statistics Division Developing a short-term statistics implementation programme Expert Group Meeting on Short-Term Economic Statistics in.
Convention of the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Developing a guidance on water and climate adaptation for the.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
State of play of French progress in cost-effectiveness analysis
CIS-Workshop on River Basin Management Plans
1. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: notifications & infringements, RBMP assessments for the agricultural sector Expert Group on WFD & agriculture.
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
Addressing the challenge of water scarcity and droughts
Outcomes of the International Conference on Water Scarcity and Drought: “the path to climate change adaptation”
ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
Fitness Check of EU Freshwater Policy
WFD and Agriculture Activity under the CIS 2005/2006 Work Programme
Water Framework Directive, Habitats Directive and Inland Waterway Transport Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
Legal issues and compliance checking in WFD implementation SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European.
THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (WFD)
Water scarcity and droughts
Water Scarcity Drafting Group WD meeting Salzburg June 1st and 2nd of 2006 Leaders: Italy & France Pascal Berteaud France 1 Dicembre 2004 Brussels,
Results of the screening of the draft second RBMPs
History EU+Norway Water Directors meeting in Paris Oct 2000 Member States and the European Commission agreed in Paris to developed a Common Strategy.
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Presentation transcript:

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 How to proceed with the Programme of Measures and the River Basin Management Plans? Pierre Strosser

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 What is the starting point? Characterisation of river basins –Pressures & impacts analysis (including identification of heavily modified water bodies) –Economic analysis of water uses (importance of water uses, baseline, cost-recovery) –First risk-assessment –List of protected areas Some consultation of stakeholders performed Article 5 reports sent to the European Commission – with highly variable quality Work on objectives and reference conditions started/under way (e.g. inter-calibration)

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 What are the next steps (1)? Updating monitoring for complying with WFD requirements (operational, investigative, surveillance) Finalising definition of objectives and classification Identifying significant water management issues Revising the characterisation and risk- assessment (so it well supports the discussion on measures)

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 What are the next steps (2)? Defining the programme of measures: –Basic measures, supplementary measures, measures required for reaching good ecological potential (heavily modified water bodies) –Cost-effectiveness analysis –But also: Financial analysis (time derogation) cost-benefit analysis (alternative objective) Other assessment (social issues, affordability, etc)

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 What are the next steps (3)? Building and adopting the river basin management plan (2009) Ensuring pricing coherent with Article 9 requirements Implementing the plan Monitoring, evaluating (revised characterisation and risk-assessment) & updating the plan (second plan)… Enforcement

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 What are the next steps (4)? Within a process ensuring participation of stakeholders and consultation of the public –Working programme –Significant water management issues –Draft river basin management plan Transboundary river basins!

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 A risky business? Doing what we are used to do – a plan that might: –Not tackle priorities & WFD issues –Consider only traditional measures –Be driven by national priorities (transboundary) Preparing a plan that will never be implemented –No money, no people, no interest…

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 What will make it successful (1)? Rapidly clarify/decide on environmental objectives! –Find a emergency route independent of the inter-calibration process –Clarify how « alternative objectives » (derogation) will be decided (scale, issues considered, process)

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 What will make it successful (2)? Organise and structure the information base –GIS, databases & metadata, models… –Already initiated during characterisation, but still significant efforts required to update and to integrate measures –A priority today – to facilitate/more effective long-term planning and policy process

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 What will make it successful (3)? Strengthen the integration between technical, economic, social experts –In particular for successful cost- effectiveness analysis (considering wide range of measures jointly defined)! –But also for (i) environmental cost issues, (ii) cost-benefit assessments –Communication & information for complex technical issues

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 What will make it successful (4)? Integrate in the process and ensure clear tasks/responsibilities for those who –Analyse –Decide –Finance –Implement –Communicate –Enforce Many of them not necessarily from the water community (see inter-sectoral issues) or from the same country (tranboundary issues)

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 What will make it successful (5)? Strengthen participation and consultation (shared ownership as key to successful implementation) –Identifying questions of stakeholders relevant to different WFD that need/can be addressed –Integrating stakeholder knoweldge in assessments –Inform and communicate in a clear and transparent manner –Take stakeholders comments into account – and build mechanisms for adequate reporting

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 What will make it successful (6)? Develop efficient inter-sectoral institutional mechanisms –Building consultation mechanisms between ministries –Ensuring river basin management plans and WFD requirements integrated in other plans/planning processes –Integrating WFD priorities into financing mechanisms (e.g. agriculture/cross- compliance)

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 What will make it successful (7)? Prepare decisions at the right scale –Water body – local issues with a given economic actor –River basin – interconnected issues –Sector level – e.g. defining financial mechanisms for supporting implementation of given sectors, agreeing on level of effort –National level – economic instruments

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 What will make it successful (8)? Ensure that financial issues (sources, allocation…) are well taken care of –Consider diversity of sources of financing (local to national) –Ensure application of Article 9 –Identify new financing mechanisms (e.g. environmental taxes & charges) –Use all opportunities in sector-targeted financing –Do not plan (too much…) out of the scope of financial capability (=> possible time derogation)

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 What will make it successful (9)? Strenghten capacity (for all…) –Process management & animation –Economics –Ecology –Database management –Communication & information

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 What will make it successful (10)? Build a progressive shift in mentality –Changing culture (wider pool of experts, recognition of new role of administration in water management) –Integrate WFD principles into current decisions & projects Does it contribute to reaching the objectives of the WFD? (Article 4) Is it the most cost-effective solution? (Annex III) Do the benefit outweight the costs? (Article 4.7) Are we consistent with the polluter-pays & user pay principle? (Article 9) Have stakeholders been consulted/involved? (Article 14)

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 In conclusion The adoption of the WFD in 2000 has given us a great challenge! The first step is behind us – It has shows willingness but also constraints… The second step will be more difficult – as decisions in terms of measures, sectors targeted, financing…are at stake! Time is still short (in particular for transboundary river basins) But this should not be used as excuse to favour «business as usual» Let’s use effectively the opportunities offered by the WFD for improving good ecological status!

ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 Thanks for your attention….