Digitization Projects: Internal Development vs. Outsourcing Production or D.I.Y. vs. The Pros.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WITHIN REACH – BEYOND IMAGINATION Selkirk College Management Information Systems.
Advertisements

OCLC Digital Archive Overview Judith Cobb LIPA Meeting July 2006.
Digital & Preservation Resources Managing the digital collection life cycle.
ICOLC October 4, 2001 OCLC Services. Purpose Libraries’ web-based information portal needs –Maximize consortia’s role in their members’ use of database.
Got Paper? Thinking about going paperless or at least as paperless as possible? NAMVBC-2013.
Presented to MCPS Teaching and Learning Committee January 6, 2014.
EuroCRIS Best Practices & Solutions Members Helping Members Move Forward.
ARCHIVE IMAGING SEARCHABLE VIA THE WEBPAC Marthie de Kock The Hong Kong Institute of Education 9 December 2002.
DCAPE Project Update Richard MarcianoChien-Yi Hou Caryn Wojcik University of University of State of Michigan North Carolina North Carolina Records Management.
Staying the Course: Digital Project Case Study: Voices of World War II Marilyn Carbonell, Assistant Director for Collection Development Missouri Library.
UCLA Digital Library UC Digital Library Forum August 5, 2002 UCLA Digital Library Presenter: Curtis Fornadley Senior Programmer/Analyst.
Lancaster County Digitization Project Lancaster County Digitization Project The Birth of a Digital Cooperative ACRL/DVC & ACLCP Joint Meeting, 18 March.
Building a Collaborative Digitization Project Using CONTENTdm: An Overview of The Technology Used for the HBCU-CUL Digitization Initiative May 22, 2006.
Beyond the Shelf: Providing Access to Historic Microfilmed Materials A presentation for EDUCAUSE Mary Molinaro University of Kentucky Libraries.
Persistent Digital Archives and Library System (PeDALS) A Guide for Wisconsin State Agencies.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Digitization Lifecycle Solutions: An Integrated Approach ALA Annual 2005.
University Library Senior Design Theses: Moving to an electronic collection by collaborating with the School of Engineering Susan Boyd Special Libraries.
© LNB Latvian Digital Library as a Resource for Life-long Learning Uldis Straujums Lecturer, University of Latvia, Information System Designer, National.
Ira Revels Digital Project Manager Cornell University Library.
Mark Phillips Digital Projects Department University of North Texas Annexation of Texas Project.
Managing Your Grant Roberta Teliska Vice President for Sponsored Programs Operations The Research Foundation of SUNY October 6, 2008.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center CONTENTdm ® Digital Collection Management Software Ron Gardner, OCLC Digital Services Consultant ICOLC Meeting April.
NAPHSIS Making EVVE a Reality by Garland Land NAPHSIS Executive Director.
Natick Public Schools Technology Update January 26, 2009 Dennis Roche, CISA Director of Technology.
Digitization Panel August 12, 2010 Christopher C. Brown, coordinator Mike Culbertson, Colorado State U. James Mauldin, GPO.
Updated Technology Purchase Plan Purchases to be split between the remaining funds in ($52,000) and the capital request for ($60,000) Projects.
Ms. Irene Onyancha ISTD/Library & Information Management Services United Nations Economic Commission for Africa The Second Session of the Committee on.
Choosing Delivery Software for a Digital Library Jody DeRidder Digital Library Center University of Tennessee.
Columbia Spectator Archive Project Behind the Scenes Stephen Paul Davis Director, Columbia Libraries Digital Program November 20, 2014.
U T A H A C A D E M I C L I B R A R Y C O N S O R T I U M.
The Portal to Texas History: Harnessing Technology to Enable Collaboration with Small Museums and Libraries CNI, December 6, 2005 Cathy Nelson Hartman.
Bringing the Library to You: Integrating Library Resources into Online Classrooms ACRL/CNI/EDUCAUSE Joint Virtual Conference - Innovate and Motivate: Next.
Creating an IR: Planning and Policies Stacy Nowicki, Kalamazoo College Christopher Raab, Franklin & Marshall College NITLE DSpace Virtual User Community.
Brigid Burke Technical Services & Digital Projects Librarian Fairleigh Dickinson University.
Improving Access to Latin American Microfilm LASER March, 2004 Teresa Chapa, UNC Chapel Hill Emily Stambaugh, Wake Forest Univ.
Digitization An Introduction to Digitization Projects and to Using the Montana Memory Project.
Digitization An Introduction to Digitization Misheck Nyaluso University of Malawi College of Medicine.
2006/2007 Annual Report Working together to advance research and learning... through innovative, collaborative information access.
CBSOR,Indian Statistical Institute 30th March 07, ISI,Kokata 1 Digital Repository support for Consortium Dr. Devika P. Madalli Documentation Research &
Continuing the work of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Presented by: Jeff Stauffer WebJunction Service Manager Date: 3 February 2005.
Digital Commons & Open Access Repositories Johanna Bristow, Strategic Marketing Manager APBSLG Libraries: September 2006.
1 The Paperless Office: Myth or Reality? City of Phoenix Finance Tax Division May 23, 2013.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center OCLC Union List Users Group Meeting Cathy Kellum Product Manager, WorldCat Resource Sharing Services ALA Chicago June.
1 12 Chapter 12 Business Plans for Implementing Electronic Commerce.
NELA Newspapers Pilot Project Preservation and Digitization of Northeast Los Angeles Community Newspapers Kate Dundon cdlrsandbox.org/wordpress/nelanewspapers.
Digitization & Digital Preservation
Tips For Surviving Digitization In a Small Organization Notes From The Trenches Renée DesRoberts The First Time Digitizer NEA Spring Meeting March 28-29,
1 « Luxembourg, 18 April 2007 « Virtual Library of Official Statistics « Dissemination Working Group.
DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF NOAA VIRTUAL LIBRARIES: THE INTERSECTION OF TRADITIONAL LIBRARY KNOWLEDGE AND CUTTING EDGE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES Dottie Anderson.
NC Shared ILS (Integrated Library System) Library Cooperation Summit Boone, NC August 12, 2009.
ERM E-Gov Initiative Transfer of Permanent Geospatial Data Records to NARA Briefing for FGDC Coordination Group Bruce Ambacher, NARA September 2, 2003.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center RESPOND Project An OCLC Update for AMICAL participants.
The Florida Electronic Library and the State Digitization Scene Priscilla Caplan Central Florida Workshop for Museum and Library Personnel.
Gumberg Library at Duquesne University Overview of Digitization Projects Rob Behary, MLS, MBA.
Chang, Wen-Hsi Division Director National Archives Administration, 2011/3/18/16:15-17: TELDAP International Conference.
Grant Writing for Digital Projects September 2012 IODE Project Office IODE Project Office Oostende, Belgium Oostende, Belgium Sustainability and.
CENTRAL/WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS AUTOMATED RESOURCE SHARING Digitization GOALS & THEIR LOGISTICS Michael J. Bennett Digital Initiatives Librarian C/WMARS,
CONTENTdm A proven solution September A complete digital collection management software solution Stores, manages and provides access for all digital.
The world’s libraries. Connected. CONTENTdm ® Digital Collection Management Solutions Learn what to consider when outsourcing your library’s digitization.
CENTRAL/WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS AUTOMATED RESOURCE SHARING Digitization GOALS & THEIR LOGISTICS Michael J. Bennett Digital Initiatives Librarian C/WMARS,
CENTRAL/WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS AUTOMATED RESOURCE SHARING Digital Repositories Build It & They Will Come Michael J. Bennett Access Services Supervisor C/WMARS,
Rebecca L. Mugridge LFO Research Colloquium March 19, 2008.
Grant Writing 2012 Grant Writing for Digital Projects September 2012 IODE Project Office IODE Project Office Oostende, Belgium Oostende, Belgium.
Improving the Discovery and Access of Archival Content Through the Institutional Repository: ScholarWorks at Boise State JULIA STRINGFELLOW CIMA ANNUAL.
Digital Asset Management at Michigan Tech
Pre-Course Assignment
SCSU Technology Update FY05
STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE PERSONNEL OFFICE (SPO)
WNYLRC RBDB Grant Writing Workshop
OCLC, WorldCat and Connexion
Presentation transcript:

Digitization Projects: Internal Development vs. Outsourcing Production or D.I.Y. vs. The Pros

Project Motivations Do It Yourself - F&M In 2001/02, the F&M Library was interested in creating its first digital collection. The 2002 LSTA grant application provided the catalyst to conceptualize (and potentially fund) the library’s first digital project! The Pros - Olive In 2003/4, the College Archives was interested in digitizing the F&M student newspaper to increase access and ensure ongoing preservation. Olive software provided the means to achieve these goals, and create a keyword searchable index for the first time.

Project Scope Do It Yourself - F&M Digitize 325 pieces (644 pages) of military and family correspondence from the Reynolds Family Papers. Digital content managed with Cumulus software and hosted on the F&M library web server. The Pros - Olive Digitize and OCR 14 years ( ) of the F&M student newspaper, The College Reporter. Scan 6 reels of 35mm microfilm and perform Olive distillation and processing (5,510 pages) OCLC to host Olive data and web interface for three years.

Project Funding Do It Yourself - F&M Initial project funded through 2002 Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) grant award of $15,000. F&M contributed $4,000 in indirect costs for professional conservation of letters, and participation in the Digital Training Workshop, Cornell Univ. The Pros - Olive Initial project fees funded through the Friends of the Library and the office of former F&M president Richard Kneedler. Ongoing storage fees absorbed into Electronic Resources annual budget cycle.

Project Staffing Do It Yourself - F&M F&M Archives and Special Collections: 1 administrator, 3 technicians LSTA granting agency: 1 administrator Total 5 (F&M 4, Other 1) The Pros - Olive F&M Archives and Special Collections: 1 administrator OCLC Preservation Service Centers: 1 administrator, 3 technicians OCLC Digital and Preservation Solutions: 2 administrators, 2 technicians Total 9 (F&M 1, Other 8)

Project Technology Do It Yourself - F&M Epson 1660 Scanner with Epson Smart Panel driver software. Powerbook G4 Laptop Cumulus 5.5 Single User Edition image management software. Microsoft Word (MS Office 2000) Microsoft Windows 2000 Server The Pros - Olive Scanning and PipeX  distillation of all newspaper images. ActivePaperArchive  created and sent to OCLC Olive Hosting, Dublin, Ohio. Olive web interface customized for F&M. All image files and metadata recorded on to DVD and shipped to F&M.

Project Initial Costs Do It Yourself - F&M Grant Equipment and Supplies $7, Grant Staff (part-time) $3, Total - $10, The Pros - Olive Scanning and Distillation of 5,510 pages $7, Olive Hosting for 3 years ($.10 per page) $1, $1,000 set up fee. Other Charges (DVDs, shipping, etc.) $55.00 Total - $9,760.80

Project Maintenance Do It Yourself - F&M Windows 2000 Server maintenance, security, and upgrades. Web interface maintenance and statistics. The Pros - Olive Virtually no maintenance Olive Hosting contracts, invoices, etc.

Project Ongoing Costs Do It Yourself - F&M Virtually no short-term ongoing costs, standard server and software upgrades. Note: potential long-term costs in migrating content and images to another system. The Pros - Olive Olive Hosting fee of $.10 per page. For the F&M newspaper, a cost of $551 per year for current content ( ). Hosting fees will increase as new content is added.

Project Timelines Do It Yourself - F&M LSTA grant monies received September Quarterly grant progress reports due Sept 2002, Dec 2002, and March Project finished May 31, Final grant report submitted June Total - 9 months The Pros - Olive OCLC quote sent to F&M in January F&M microfilm scanned in February ActivePaperArchive  produ ced and sent to Dublin, Ohio in April Olive Hosting of F&M content and web interface established in May Total - 5 months

Project Conclusions - D.I.Y. Benefits to D.I.Y. More control of project staff, procedures, timeline, final web interface. Little to no ongoing costs, contracts, or invoicing. Once completed, technical infrastructure in place for future D.I.Y. projects. Driver vs. Passenger Challenges to D.I.Y. Greater technical proficiency needed. Hiring and training of project staff. Available space and technical infrastructure to support “scanning shop.” Ongoing web server maintenance and security.

Project Conclusions - The Pros Benefits to Outsourcing Very quick from start to finished product. Very little institutional staff needed. Only cursory technical knowledge needed. Standardization of scanning technologies, file types, web interfaces, etc. Passenger vs. Driver Challenges to Outsourcing Potential vendor instability, price increases. Less control of project details, timeline, final web interface. Can cost more than D.I.Y., especially storage and licensing costs over time.

Future Projects Do It Yourself - F&M F&M will serve as a pilot institution for the new OCLC Content Cooperative Project. The project will explore a new method of uploading digital content directly into WorldCat using the Connexion cataloging tool. The Pros - Olive F&M has digitized the next 22 years ( ) of The College Reporter, and will make the expanded collection available to the public in December 2005.

Christopher M. Raab Archives and Special Collections Librarian Franklin and Marshall College PO Box 3003 Lancaster, PA Tel F&M Archives & Special Collections