Environmental health indicators Caroline Wicks March 17, 2006 Cooperative Oxford Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting Overview
Advertisements

RESEARCH ON SUSTAINABLE RANGELAND MANAGEMENT. Research Needs in the 21 st Century 1.Does the indicator assess the criterion? 2.At what scales are the.
Prioritized Sites for Amphipod TIE Study Identify 12 potentially toxic inter-tidal sites Sample four sites at a time to find two suitable sites for amphipod.
GESTION DES MILIEUX ET BIODIVERSITE From local production of data to global relevant assessments Example of the french approach Copenhagen, 30 October.
Ecosystem health index and the annual report card Ben Longstaff 4-August-2005 Presentation to TMAW.
What is an M and E Plan?. Organizing the Work of M and E An M and E System -- the 12 components as a whole – Sets out broad vision at national level An.
Status of Instream Flow Science in the Southeastern US Mary M. Davis, Ph.D., Technical Advisor Southern Instream Flow Network.
Introduction: Towards an Integrated Reporting System for Marine Protected Areas in the Baja to Bering Sea (B2B) Commission for Environmental Cooperation.
Economics of Nitrogen and Water Quality Anthony Dvarskas Stony Brook University May 19,
Cross Cutting Group B: Ammonia policy context and future challenges Chair: Till Spranger Rapporteur: Zbigniew Klimont Attendees: 13.
1 STARMAP: Project 2 Causal Modeling for Aquatic Resources Alix I Gitelman Stephen Jensen Statistics Department Oregon State University August 2003 Corvallis,
Modeling and Forecasting Climate Change, Biophysical Impacts, and Ecological and Economic Implications: Discussion John Antle Agricultural and Resource.
Therapeutic exercise foundation and techniques Therapeutic exercise foundation and concepts Part II.
State Partnerships: Coastal & Environmental Issues Facing the MACOORA States November 17, 2009 MACOORA Kate Zultner Coastal States Organization
Viewing Measures via the Matrix: Do we have what we need? Angela Me With Jennifer Madans, Barbara Altman, and Beth Rasch Ottawa, January 2003 Second meeting.
PAGE # 1 Presented by Stacey Hancock Advised by Scott Urquhart Colorado State University Developing Learning Materials for Surface Water Monitoring.
Distribution Function Estimation in Small Areas for Aquatic Resources Spatial Ensemble Estimates of Temporal Trends in Acid Neutralizing Capacity Mark.
Marcel Kok PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
1 Indicators for fisheries management: a French experience Marie-Joëlle Rochet, Verena Trenkel, Jean- Charles Poulard, and Jacques Bertrand Robert Bellail,
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
Performance Measurement and Analysis for Health Organizations
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com ASSESSMENT.
Prospects and Perils for Urban Forestry and Ecosystem Services: Applications and Research J. Morgan Grove 1, Austin Troy 2, Matthew Wilson 3 1 Northern.
Water quality and river plume monitoring in the Great Barrier Reef: an overview of methods based on ocean colour satellite data Michelle Devlin 1, Caroline.
Visualizing riverine landscapes Pool/riffle Landscape Microhabitat.
Environmental Indicators and Sustainability Experiences from the United States Experiences from the United States Brian Lane Strategic Planner The Rocky.
The Collaborative Environmental Monitoring and Research Initiative (CEMRI) A Pilot in the Delaware River Basin Peter S. Murdoch, USGS Richard Birdsey,
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook LINKING.
Pablo Sánchez Jerez Just Bayle Sempere Celia Ojeda Aitor Forcada Francisca Gimenez-Casalduero Carlo Valle Damian Fernandez-Jover Pablo Arechavala Jose.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Monitoring Principles Stella Swanson, Ph.D.. Principle #1: Know Why We Are Monitoring Four basic reasons to monitor:  Compliance Monitoring: to demonstrate.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Benthic Community Assessment Tool Development Ananda Ranasinghe (Ana) Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) Sediment.
Objectives: 1.Enhance the data archive for these estuaries with remotely sensed and time-series information 2.Exploit detailed knowledge of ecosystem structure.
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
Criterion 1: Conservation of Biological Diversity Indicator Refinement: What is the state of Indicator Science? 1. Overview of the Criterion 2. Review.
Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research an intergovernmental organization for global change research socio-economic implications international.
1 What this Broadcast Will Cover Day One Indicators and Attributes Changes from Version 3 to Version 4 Ecological Sites, State and Transition Models, and.
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
Global Environmental Change and Food Systems Scenarios Research up to date Monika Zurek FAO April 2005.
Ecosystem variability, preparing an integrated (ecosystem) assessment of the North Sea Andrew Kenny (CEFAS, UK) ICES/NAFO Symposium Santander 2011.
ECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES ICES cooperative research report.
Anne Schlegel VA DEQ November 16, Two Discussion Topics Presentations at the recent SAP meeting Glance at a couple of the “take homes” from 2 of.
Recommendations for Applying the Critical Elements Methodology.
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
Climate Change Response Framework projects Presentation to the Forest Community Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity in the Context of Climate Change Workshop.
LTER issues – May 2015: Thanks for electing me! Thanks to Scott Collins! Plans for this meeting: – Science Council does science: Movement of inorganic.
What is Good Monitoring? Environmental Evaluator’s Network Ottawa, September 2010.
Landscape Animation Summary of an experimental approach to inform the use of camera dynamics in visualization.
Using indicators for program management and program assessment Draft framework with examples Donna Podger (916)
Analysis and Critical Thinking in Assessment 1. What is the problem? Gathering information Using information to inform decisions/ judgment Synthesising.
Using Regional Models to Assess the Relative Effects of Stressors Lester L. Yuan National Center for Environmental Assessment U.S. Environmental Protection.
Adaptation and Adaptive Water Management: Reforming Laws and Institutions to Cope with Uncertainty Carl Bruch IUCN Academy of Environmental Law Conference.
Rocky Harris Defra UK Issue 6 Biodiversity accounts and indices.
ECOSTAT workshop “Hydromorphology and WFD classification Oslo, Norway, October 2015 (back-to-back with ECOSTAT) Organised in close collaboration.
Rocky Harris United Kingdom Revision of SEEA 2003 Options for the structure of Part III on applications.
Mitigation, Enhancement and Monitoring Session 9 Health in SEA.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
Philippines – Australia Basic Education Assistance for Mindanao Beam Pre-service Workshop “Authentic Assessment”
Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks
Implementation Guide for Digital Health
Statistical Methods for Model Evaluation – Moving Beyond the Comparison of Matched Observations and Output for Model Grid Cells Kristen M. Foley1, Jenise.
The French National Agency on Water and Aquatic Environments
AS LEVEL Paper One – Section A / B
Delivering Conservation
Study on non-compliance of ozone target values and potential air quality improvements in relation to ozone.
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Presentation transcript:

Environmental health indicators Caroline Wicks March 17, 2006 Cooperative Oxford Laboratory

Ecological indicators summary Hershner et al A practical concept of aquatic ecosystem health. –What is ecosystem health? How can it be used to develop indicators? –Literature review of concepts of health –Metrics approach to cut down on amount of data needed –Valuation of health –Conclusions Ecosystem health is anthropocentric Assessed health of given system should reflect capacity to provide desired services “Health” should incorporate understanding that services are not uniformly nor consistently valued.

Guidelines for indicator selection Hershner et al. Continued –Developing indicators A focus on the capacity of system to service human interests Practical Underlying metric should have a reasonable cost:information ratio Base metric on parameters already on management list Identifying threshold of indicator is more important than highly resolved response along gradient (theory only).

Guidelines for indicator selection Wardop et al Developing and communicating a taxonomy of Ecological Indicators: A Case Study from the Mid-Atlantic. In press. –There is lack of indicators that are at a spatial and temporal scale that are relevant to managers. –Framework elements Spatial and/or temporal scale of issue being addressed Specific questions to be answered –Snapshot of current state –ID of causative factors –Communication to the public –Future – estimating trajectory of condition or assessing vulnerability –Evaluate the effectiveness of management actions Context of the question (Reference site)

Evaluation of CBP’s Indicators Hershner et al Assessment of Chesapeake Bay Program Selection and Use of Indicators. In press. –Evaluated 82 indicators based on five functions: Condition, Evaluate, Diagnostic, Communicate and Future Condition – has explicit reference condition or some other means of characterizing status Evaluation – has a clear relationship to a management objective or action Diagnostic – based on an equivocal dose-response relationship such that only one set of circumstances could produce the same indicator value Communication – is simplified, easy to interpret, and clearly linked to program goals and objectives Future – forecasts future conditions based on current information, based on statistical correlation, based on a cause and effect linkage

Where should CBP go from here? Diagnostic indicators –A diagnostic indicator requires careful integration of management objectives, ecological understanding, and monitoring design –Only Chl a and Secchi depth are diagnostic indicators –What are the steps towards getting CBP to use diagnostic indicators? Future indicators –No indicator was developed explicitly for predicting future conditions. Rather, current indicators show trends, which forecasting is based on. –EcoCheck already moving in this direction Spatial and temporal scales –Low resolution time scales: mostly annual, very few that are seasonal –Low resolution spatial scales: on an estuary or river scale, not local