Regional Air Quality Modeling: Long Range Global Change Simulations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
Advertisements

CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON US AIR QUALITY: EXAMINATION OF OZONE AND FINE PARTICULATE MATTER CONCENTRATIONS AND THEIR SENSITIVITY TO EMISSION CHANGES Tagaris.
CO budget and variability over the U.S. using the WRF-Chem regional model Anne Boynard, Gabriele Pfister, David Edwards National Center for Atmospheric.
Multi-scale and Ensemble Modeling of the Effects of Global Change on Air Quality in the US NW –AIRQUEST Annual Meeting Washington State University Pullman,
A statistical method for calculating the impact of climate change on future air quality over the Northeast United States. Collaborators: Cynthia Lin, Katharine.
QUESTIONS 1.Is hexane more or less reactive with OH than propane? 2.Is pentene or isoprene more reactive with OH?
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
Evaluating the impact of recent changes in
4-km AIRPACT vs 12-km AIRPACT Both with dynamic boundary conditions from MOZART-4 Figures created on 5/29/2011 (corrected corrupted JPROC input file)
Climate, Fire and Air Quality Climate Impacts Group June 1, 2006.
Short-Term Air Quality Forecasts for the Pacific Northwest and Long-Range Global Change Predictions for the US Jack Chen Committee Members: Brian Lamb,
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
2007 Group Meeting Global Climate and Air Pollution (GCAP) at Harvard University Nicky Lam and Joshua Fu University of Tennessee October 12, 2007.
Effects of Siberian forest fires on regional air quality and meteorology in May 2003 Rokjin J. Park with Daeok Youn, Jaein Jeong, Byung-Kwon Moon Seoul.
Sensitivity of U.S. Surface Ozone to Isoprene Emissions & Chemistry: An Application of the 1°x1 ° North American Nested GEOS-CHEM Model GEOS-CHEM Model.
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Background Air Quality in the United States Under Current and Future Emissions Scenarios Zachariah Adelman, Meridith Fry, J. Jason West Department of Environmental.
Page 1GMES - ENSEMBLES 2008 ENSEMBLES. Page 2GMES - ENSEMBLES 2008 The ENSEMBLES Project  Began 4 years ago, will end in December 2009  Supported by.
Modeling Aerosol Formation and Transport in the Pacific Northwest with the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Susan M. O'Neill Fire.
Prediction of Future North American Air Quality Gabriele Pfister, Stacy Walters, Mary Barth, Jean-Francois Lamarque, John Wong Atmospheric Chemistry Division,
National/Regional Air Quality Modeling Assessment Over China and Taiwan Using Models-3/CMAQ Modeling System Joshua S. Fu 1, Carey Jang 2, David Streets.
Impact of Emissions on Intercontinental Long-Range Transport Joshua Fu, Yun-Fat Lam and Yang Gao, University of Tennessee, USA Rokjin Park, Seoul National.
EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS.
The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins.
The Impact of Pine Beetle Kill on Monoterpene Emissions and Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation in Western North America Ashley R. Berg (CSU) and Colette.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division Uncertainty Analysis of Ozone Formation and Emission Control Responses using High-order Sensitivities Di Tian,
A comparison of PM 2.5 simulations over the Eastern United States using CB-IV and RADM2 chemical mechanisms Michael Ku, Kevin Civerolo, and Gopal Sistla.
WRAP Experience: Investigation of Model Biases Uma Shankar, Rohit Mathur and Francis Binkowski MCNC–Environmental Modeling Center Research Triangle Park,
. s Yuqiang Zhang 1, J. Jason West 1, Meridith M. Fry 1, Raquel A. Silva 1, Steven J. Smith 2, Vaishali Naik 4, Zachariah Adelman 1, Susan C. Anenberg.
Western States Air Quality Study Background Air Quality Modeling University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON) May.
Assessment of the Impacts of Global Change on Regional U.S. Air Quality: A synthesis of climate change impacts on ground-level ozone An Interim Report.
Application of Models-3/CMAQ to Phoenix Airshed Sang-Mi Lee and Harindra J. S. Fernando Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University.
Regional Modeling Joseph Cassmassi South Coast Air Quality Management District USA.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Using Dynamical Downscaling to Project.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Simulation of London air quality during June 2006 and the effects of emission control scenarios Andrea Fraser NCAS funded.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Climate Change and Ozone Air Quality: Applications of a Coupled GCM/MM5/CMAQ Modeling System C. Hogrefe 1, J. Biswas 1, K. Civerolo 2, J.-Y. Ku 2, B. Lynn.
Maria Val Martin (CSU) and Colette L. Heald (MIT) J-F Lamarque, S. Tilmes and L. Emmons (NCAR) Thanks to the National Park Service for funding Effects.
MOZART Development, Evaluation, and Applications at GFDL MOZART Users’ Meeting August 17, 2005 Boulder, CO Arlene M. Fiore Larry W. Horowitz
Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
Analysis of Ozone Modeling for May – July 2006 in PNW using AIRPACT3 (CMAQ) and CAMx. Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. EPA Region 10 Nov CMAQ O 3 Prediction.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health J. Jason West Department of Environmental Sciences &
Impact of the changes of prescribed fire emissions on regional air quality from 2002 to 2050 in the southeastern United States Tao Zeng 1,3, Yuhang Wang.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
REGIONAL/GLOBAL INTERACTIONS IN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY Greenhouse gases Halocarbons Ozone Aerosols Acids Nutrients Toxics SOURCE CONTINENT REGIONAL ISSUES:
Importance of chemistry-climate interactions in projections of future air quality Loretta J. Mickley Lu Shen, Daniel H. Cusworth, Xu Yue Earth system models.
Climate Impacts on Air Quality Response to Controls: Not Such an Uncertain Future K.J. Liao, E. Tagaris, K. Manomaiphiboon, A. G. Russell, School of Civil.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
Impact of Temporal Fluctuations in Power Plant Emissions on Air Quality Forecasts Prakash Doraiswamy 1, Christian Hogrefe 1,2, Eric Zalewsky 2, Winston.
The Double Dividend of Methane Control Arlene M. Fiore IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria January 28, 2003 ANIMALS 90 LANDFILLS 50 GAS 60 COAL 40 RICE 85 TERMITES.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
ORIGIN OF BACKGROUND OZONE IN SURFACE AIR OVER THE UNITED STATES: CONTRIBUTION TO POLLUTION EPISODES Daniel J. Jacob and Arlene M. Fiore Atmospheric Chemistry.
Background ozone in surface air over the United States Arlene M. Fiore Daniel J. Jacob US EPA Workshop on Developing Criteria for the Chemistry and Physics.
Using Linked Global and Regional Models to Simulate U.S. Air Quality in the Year 2050 Chris Nolte, Alice Gilliland Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division,
Understanding the impact of isoprene nitrates and OH reformation on regional air quality using recent advances in isoprene photooxidation chemistry Ying.
Adverse Effects of Drought on Air Quality in the US
The 96th AMS Annual Meeting
C. Nolte, T. Spero, P. Dolwick, B. Henderson, R. Pinder
Recent Climate Change Modeling Results
Recent Changes in Eastern U.S. Forests: Implications for Air Quality
Recent Climate Change Modeling Results
The Double Dividend of Methane Control
Intercontinental Transport, Hemispheric Pollution,
Linking Ozone Pollution and Climate Change:
Biogenic Emissions in Southeast Texas
Questions for consideration
Effects of global change on U.S. ozone air quality
Presentation transcript:

Regional Air Quality Modeling: Long Range Global Change Simulations

How will air quality change in the future? IPCC Global Emission Scenarios: A2—Business as usual

Global to Regional Scale Modeling Simulate two 10-year periods  Current 1990 – 1999  Future 2045 – 2054  Sensitivity Analyses Emissions, meteorology & BC effects Land management scenarios IPCC - A2 scenario “Business as usual”

Current Climate Simulation: Comparison to Observations PNW: 15 Obs. Sites NMW: 20 Obs. Sites CMAQ Simulations for current decade at 36 km grid scale vs EPA AIRS monitoring data

Future vs Current Conditions: July Temperatures [K]USASeattlePortlandBoise Current Change current change Daily Average Maximum

Seattle Daytime Meteorology average average maximum maximum curfutcurfutcurfut Temp [K] PBL [m] wind speed [m s -1 ] cloud fraction [%]

Chemical Boundary Condition Changes west north West BC [ppbv] CurrentFuture %  O3O NO X NO Y VOC North BC [ppbv] CurrentFuture %  O3O NO X NO Y VOC up to 500 mb

July Emission Changes: NO X current change anthropogenic current emissions (percent change) USA [1000’s ton/day] NO 2 NO anthropogenic1.9 (61)23.8 (61) biogenic0 (0)4.0 (2)

July Emission Changes: VOC current change biogenic current emissions (percent change) USA [1000’s tonC/day] VOC anthropogenic32.9 (85) biogenic160.1 (-38)

Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity simulations for five July’s: current met, current BC’s, current emissions: CUR future met, future BC’s, future emissions: FUT future met, current BC’s, current emissions: MET current met, future BC’s, current emissions: BC current met, current BC’s, future emissions: EMIS

BC-CUR (6.6 ppbv)MET-CUR (1.4 ppbv) FUT-CUR (10.4 ppbv)EMIS-CUR (4.2 ppbv) CUR (70.1 ppbv) Results: O 3 95th percentile

FUT-CUR: 257% / 69% BC-CUR: 113% / 54% EMIS-CUR: 72% / 27% MET-CUR: 24% / 10% Results: 80 ppbv exceedences CUR: 1435 / 1726 # of U.S. grids with at least one grid hour where 8-hr O 3 > 80 ppbv # of U.S. grid hours/day where 8-hr O 3 > 80 ppbv

PNW 8-hr Average O 3 Distributions Seattle PortlandBoise

CUR: 20.7 μg m -3 Results: 1-hr PM th percentile FUT-CUR: +5.7 BC-CUR: +0.1 EMIS-CUR: MET-CUR: -2.9

CUR: 266 / 1107 Results: 24-hr PM μg/m 3 exceedences FUT-CUR: 400% / 64% BC-CUR: 3% / 0% EMIS-CUR: 1117% / 163% MET-CUR: -83% / -71%

Results: Daily Maximum 24-hr PM 2.5

Land Management Scenario: Widespread Use of Tree Plantations July Isoprene Emission Capacity (30 o C) Current Future Future with Plantations

Changes in 8-hr ozone concentrations for enhanced tree plantations in the future

Summary Jump to the Future: O3 increases of 5 to 10 ppbv significant increases in occurrences above 80 ppbv PM2.5 significant increases--5.7 ug/m 3 above 20 ug/m 3 currently Large increase in number of PM2.5 exceedences of new 24 hr standard Sensitivity Analyses: future O3 changes mainly due to changes in chemical BC and US anthropogenic emissions Increases in BVOC emissions due to climate change are offset by reduction in forested areas Enhanced plantation scenario for carbon sequestration could have significant AQ impact Next Steps Analyses of PNW 12 km decade simulations Further sensitivity analyses New STAR grant focused on uncertainty and ensemble simulations RGI Deposition Study analysis of 12 km current/future decade simulations for N, S, O3 deposition Analysis of AIRPACT-3 long term 2004 evaluation run for N, S, O3, and Hg deposition

Collaborators & Support Collaborating research groups UW: Clifford Mass and Eric Salathe NCAR: Alex Guenther and Christine Wiedinmyer USDA – Forest Service Don McKenzie & Sim Larkin USDA – NRCS Susan O’Neill Funding sources US EPA STAR grant (RD )