Voting Naked: A Feasible Election System or Just a Recurring Nightmare Presented by: Danita McRae Daniel Bramell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electronic Voting Ian Brown (with some slides from Matt Bishop, UC Davis)
Advertisements

Research & Development Workshop on e-Voting and e-Government in the UK - February 27, 2006 Votinbox - a voting system based on smart cards Sébastien Canard.
1 Henrik Nore, Project Manager E-vote2011project Norway COE workshop observation - Oslo
GSM BASED VOTING MACHINE Project Guide: Mr. Gulshan Dubey Lecturer ECE Department Project Team: Himanshu Rewal Vikas Anand Abhishek Bose Sunil Kumar Vikas.
Online Voting System State Election Commission, Gujarat
Good or Bad?.  One of the closest contests in US history  Florida was the pivotal state  Neither Democrat Al Gore nor Republican George W. Bush had.
Lesson Objectives: By the end of this lesson you will be able to: 1.Identify the universal qualifications for voting in the United States. 2.Explain the.
ETen E-Poll ID – Strasbourg COE meeting November, 2006 Slide 1 E-TEN E-POLL Project Electronic Polling System for Remote Operation Strasbourg.
ICT IN THE ELECTORAL PROCESS: LESSONS LEARNED Susanne Caarls International Electoral Affairs Symposium May 2012.
Internet Voting Technology and policy issues. Selective History of Voting (US) early 1800’s: public oral voting at County Hall 1800’s: free-form, non-secret.
Registration Must register at least 25 days before the election You can register by mail, or at post offices, DMVs, libraries, and schools Must submit.
Administration of Absentee Ballot Programs Barry C. Burden (University of Wisconsin) Brian J. Gaines (University of Illinois)
Electrons Chapter 7 Section 2.
1.7.6.G1 © Family Economics & Financial Education –March 2008 – Financial Institutions – Online Banking Funded by a grant from Take Charge America, Inc.
Ronald L. Rivest MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
Internet Voting Technology and policy issues David Wagner UC Berkeley.
Midterm Exam. Problem 1: Short Answer Access Control –Subject, object, rights Common Criteria –Government Assurance Standard Originator Controlled Access.
ONLINE NATIONAL ELECTION VOTING SYSTEM
Electronic Voting (E-Voting) An introduction and review of technology Written By: Larry Brachfeld CS591, December 2010.
Internet Voting. What is Internet Voting? Internet voting is: an election process whereby people can cast their votes over the Internet, most likely through.
Vote By Mail A County Perspective Dolores Gilmore, Elections Manager
Voting and Elections.
Estonia 2005 the first practice of Internet voting Epp Maaten Councillor of the Elections Department Chancellery of the Riigikogu Strasbourg, 23 November.
Election Day November Election Day Read “Election Day” worksheet Read p.170 in Ohio, The Buckeye State Complete Cloze Activity “Democratic System.
Internet voting in Estonia Epp Maaten Councillor of the Elections Department Chancellery of the Riigikogu.
Internet Voting: Weighing the Pros and Cons By: Forest Marie “The Case for Internet Voting” By: Joe Mohen and Julia Glidden “Gauging the Risks of Internet.
Objectives Analyze how the administration of elections in the United States helps make democracy work. Define the role of local precincts and polling places.
Central Electoral Commission of The Republic of Lithuania THE LITHUANIAN CONCEPT OF VOTING VIA INTERNET FOR ELECTIONS AND REFERENDA Approved by the Seimas.
States control most of election law and procedure Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted (R) Nationwide: 500,000+ office holders of over 90,000 positions!
An Internet Voting System Manager Yonghua Li Kansas State University October 19, 2001 MSE Project - Phase I.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting Vote-by-Phone David Flater / Sharon Laskowski National Institute of Standards and Technology
Chapter 7: The Electoral Process Section 2
Elections Americans vote at extreme levels –Elections are held almost everyday besides Sundays and holidays –500,000 office holders are elected in the.
Political Participation Voter Registration Reasons for Low Voter Turnout.
Electronic Voting Ronald L. Rivest MIT Laboratory for Computer Science.
1 The Evolution of Internet Voting By Ka Ling Cheung.
SEMINAR TOPIC ON GLOBAL WIRELESS E-VOTING
Nathanael Paul CRyptography Applications Bistro February 3, 2004.
1 The Promise of Equality in Voting Still Not a Reality for Americans with Disabilities Granite State Independent Living “Tools for Living Life on Your.
1 The report on the scope of e-voting in elections Marianne Riise, senior adviser Strasbourg 23 and 24 November 2006 The Ministry of Local Government and.
Objectives Analyze how the administration of elections in the United States helps make democracy work. Define the role of local precincts and polling places.
Online voting: a legal perspective
E-voting Bringing the voting process to the technology age.
BY: CHRIS GROVES Privacy in the Voting Booth. Reason for Privacy Voters worry that their vote may be held against them in the future  People shouldn’t.
Being a Voter Ch. 23, Sec. 1 Pp General Elections Vote for candidates, new laws, constitutional amendments, and new taxes.
The Administration of Elections Extent of Federal control Elections need to be free, honest, and accurate Most election law in the U.S. is State Law.
Security risks in a network. Remote access  When you connect a computer to a network it is visible to all other computers on the network. When you connect.
E-Government, E-Voting, and the Future Jordan Weiler.
Section 2: Voter Qualifications. Objectives: * Identify the universal requirements for voting in the United States. * Explain the other requirements that.
Association of World Election Bodies Contents ICT–based Election Management Voter Registration and Identification Voting and Counting Examples.
What is electronic voting An electronic voting (e-voting) system is a voting system in which the election data is recorded, stored and processed primarily.
Secure, verifiable online voting 29 th June 2016.
Lesson 7: The Voting Process. Who is able to vote? To be able to vote in Ontario provincial elections, you must: –Be a Canadian citizen, –Be at least.
Elections: The Primary System
EVoting 23 October 2006.
The Electoral Modernisation Programme in the United Kingdom
How do Elections Work? Section 2 (pages ).
Ronald L. Rivest MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
The Right to Vote.
October 15 October 30 by 5:00 p.m. November 3 by 5:00 p.m. November 6
Elections: The Primary System
The Voters Role in Government
Chapter 7: The Electoral Process Section 2
Chapter 7: The Electoral Process Section 2
Chapter 7: The Electoral Process Section 2
ELECTION DAY REGISTRATION NOVEMBER 8, 2016
Chapter 7: The Electoral Process Section 2
Qualifications and Procedures for Voting
Chapter 7 Section 2.
Chapter 6 Voters and Voter Behavior
Presentation transcript:

Voting Naked: A Feasible Election System or Just a Recurring Nightmare Presented by: Danita McRae Daniel Bramell

eVoting Possibilities  Poll Site Internet Voting  Kiosk Voting  Remote Internet Voting

Definition of Internet Voting  “An election system that uses electronic ballots that would allow voters to transmit their voted ballot to election officials over the Internet” (CA Report on Internet Voting)  Internet voting means casting a secure and secret electronic ballot

Poll Site Internet Voting  Similar to traditional voting in that it would be held at a local polling site  Staffed by election officials  Computer terminals set up in place of current election booths  Ability to vote from anywhere in state or district

Kiosk Voting  Voting terminals located in various convenient locations such as malls, libraries, and schools  Still monitored by election officials to address security and privacy concerns  Would provide more accessible mobile terminals to increase voter convenience

Remote Internet Voting  Allows people to vote from home or personal computer  Eliminate stress of having to travel to polling site and waiting in long lines  Enables for more demographic studies of the voting populous

Is there really a need for Internet voting?  Increased voter turnout  Accurate counts of election results  Creates an alternative for demographic groups that exhibit a low voter turnout  More efficiently tallies absentee ballots  Reduce cost of elections in the long-run  Could be inevitable because of the increasing reliance on computers and the Internet

Problems with Internet Voting  Must discover a way of electronically authenticating voters to prevent people from voting under a false identity  Inaccessibility to each person in accordance with the voting rights act  Would need some sort of security measure such as biometrics to ensure security  Problem of “mass-cheating” where hackers could flood the server with activity preventing people from voting

Problems with Internet Voting  Could expose the weakest part of the election process…voter registration  Could cost more because of the sophisticated technology involved  Permission for states to use Internet voting must be granted by the federal government (Voting Rights Act of 1965)

Projected Households with Internet Access in California

Arizona Democratic Election

Digital Divide  Could increase problems that exist due to the digital divide because the disproportionate number of households with Internet access  Digital Divide violates Constitutional Rights of the 15 th Amendment and the Voting Rights Act of 1965

Security Concerns  Is the technology advanced enough to be able to sufficiently secure the voting process  Could hackers find ways to vote illegally under a different profile or could they prohibit people from voting  there are 40,000 cases of credit card and personal identity fraud on the Internet each year - Who is to say that will not be a problem for voting

Conclusions  Internet Voting may be an inevitable step because of the growing dependence on the Internet  But it is a step that is to be taken very carefully because of the concerns with efficiency and security and until these concerns are addressed, Internet Voting is more of a dream than a reality