1 Nevada Great Basin Community Velocity Model Workshop Welcome from All of Us at the Nevada Seismological Lab: Convenor: J. Louie (cell 775-229-3835) Arrangements:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. Louie, UNR 7/27/2005 Project Title: Assembling Crustal Geophysical Data for Geothermal Exploration in the Great Basin CPS Identifier: Principal.
Advertisements

J. Louie 9/5/2005 OutlineOutline 1.Refraction Microtremor for Shallow Vs 2.ReMi-Borehole Comparison 3.Los Angeles Transect 4.Las Vegas Transect 5.Effect.
Update: 2014 Nevada Seismicity Nevada Earthquake Safety Council May 2014.
CyberShake Project and ShakeMaps. CyberShake Project CyberShake is a SCEC research project that is a physics-based high performance computational approach.
Body and Surface Wave Seismic Tomography for Regional Geothermal Assessment of the Western Great Basin Glenn Biasi 1, Leiph Preston 2, and Ileana Tibuleac.
Lessons we have learned from seismological observations in the Taiwan region Jer-Ming Chiu CERI/Dept. of Earth Sciences University of Memphis March 19,
1 CVM Efforts in Wellington, New Zealand John Louie, Nevada Seismological Lab Collaborators: R. Benites, G. McVerry, & W. R. Stephenson, GNS Science S.
Shallow Shear Velocity and Seismic Microzonation of the Urban Las Vegas Basinwww.seismo.unr.edu/hazsurv Rasmussen, Tiana; Smith, Shane B.; and Louie, John.
IMW Strategic Planning August 14, “Options for Political Activism to Get Increased Funding” John G. Anderson Director, Nevada Seismological Laboratory.
Using Data from the Trans- California Seismic Refraction Profile to Illustrate the Utility of Travel-Time Diagrams Magali Billen U. C. Davis, Dept. of.
Brief Overview, Current Activities & ARRA Improvements David Oppenheimer – USGS Menlo Park.
1 Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging Project California Energy Commission Workshop Dr. Stuart Nishenko PG&E April 27, 2015.
Predicting Earthquake Shaking and hazard John N. Louie, Nevada Seismological Lab. with UNR undergraduate interns: Will Savran, Brady Flinchum, Colton Dudley,
J. Louie, GBCVM Workshop 1/14/2008 The Model Assembler Community Modeling Environment and Initial Ground-Motion Computations for Reno and Las Vegas J.
Las Vegas Valley Seismic Response Project Catherine Snelson, Wanda Taylor, and Barbara Luke University of Nevada Las Vegas John Louie, John Anderson, and.
SESAC September 13, “Thoughts on the USGS role in the Intermountain West, in the context of hazard evaluation in extensional settings” John G. Anderson.
Science for a changing world The USGS and the Development of the Nevada Great Basin Community Velocity Model.
J. Louie 2/24/2005 Refraction Microtremor for Shallow Shear Velocity in California Urban Basins John Louie, Nevada Seismological Lab UNR students: J. B.
Réunion PARIS 29/06/2006 QSHA WP2 Status report 1 WP2 - Source characterization and Determination of earthquake scenarios WP-2-1: Seismo-tectonic investigation.
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
J. Louie 18/8/2005 Refraction Microtremor for Shallow Shear Velocity in Urban Basins John Louie, Nevada Seismological Lab (at GNS & VUW through July 2006–
Application of empirical Green’s functions for the construction and validation of the GBCVM Morgan P. Moschetti and Michael H. Ritzwoller Center for Imaging.
California Integrated Seismic Network Strategy for Success Woody Savage David Oppenheimer ANSS-IMW Strategic Planning Meeting August 14, 2006 Salt Lake.
David von Seggern Joint Seismic Tomography/Location Inversion in the Reno/Carson City Area Leiph Preston & David von Seggern Nevada Seismological Laboratory.
Jan. 14, 2008Southern Great Basin & Las Vegas1 3D Models of the Southern Great Basin and Ground Motion in Las Vegas Arthur Rodgers Seismology Group Atmospheric,
E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Statewide 3D Community Fault Model (SCFM) A statewide community-based, object-oriented, 3-D representation of.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency US NRC Approach for Seismic Hazard Assessments INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON LESSONS LEARNED FROM STRONG EARTHQUAKES.
Next-Level ShakeZoning for Earthquake Hazard Definition in the Intermountain West John N. Louie, with Will Savran, Brady Flinchum, Gabriel Plank, Will.
Major Ongoing Ground Motion Research Programs at PEER Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER, University of California, Berkeley.
Brief history, Current Activities & ARRA Improvements David Oppenheimer – USGS Menlo Park.
Overview of CISN Operations and Products David Oppenheimer USGS Menlo Park, CA.
1 SCEC Broadband Platform Development Using USC HPCC Philip Maechling 12 Nov 2012.
Research opportunities using IRIS and other seismic data resources John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Michael Wysession, Washington.
Earthquake Hazard Class Mapping by Parcel in Las Vegas Valley John N. Louie Nevada Seismological Laboratory Satish K. Pullammanappallil Aasha Pancha, Travis.
10 Sept 2006SCEC/USGS Workshop: CA 3D Seismic Velocity Model The Role of Ambient Noise Tomography in Developing the California 3-D Seismic Velocity Model:
Computational Seismology at LLNL: A National Lab Perspective Arthur Rodgers Atmospheric, Earth and Environmental Sciences Department Lawrence Livermore.
Earthquake Engineering GE / CEE - 479/679 Topic 13. Wave Propagation 2
J. Louie, GNS Science 3 July 2007 Computing Scenario Shaking for Nevada Urban Areas with the Model Assembler Community Modeling Environment (MA-CME) J.
Some Thoughts on IMW And Opportunity We represent a big area of the ANSS national program Bob Smith Univ. of Utah.
EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models Role of SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation Technical Activity Group (GMSV TAG) in SEISM Project.
Next Generation Attenuation Models for Central & Eastern US (NGA-East) Stakeholder Workshop: Introduction March 7, 2008 Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER.
Session 1A – Ground Motions and Intensity Measures Paul Somerville Andrew Whittaker Greg Deierlein.
WRAP Update WESTAR Meeting San Francisco April 25, 2011.
Loss-Estimation Modeling of Earthquake Scenarios for Each County in Nevada Using HAZUS-MH Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 06-1 University.
Lg Q Across the Continental US Dan McNamara and Rob Wesson with Dirk Erickson, Arthur Frankel and Harley Benz.
Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E.
GEON2 and OpenEarth Framework (OEF) Bradley Wallet School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma
Validation of physics-based ground motion earthquake simulations using a velocity model improved by tomographic inversion results 1 Ricardo Taborda, 1.
CISN: Draft Plans for Funding Sources: OES/FEMA/ANSS/Others CISN-PMG Sacramento 10/19/2004.
On Optimization Techniques for the One-Dimensional Seismic Problem M. Argaez¹ J. Gomez¹ J. Islas¹ V. Kreinovich³ C. Quintero ¹ L. Salayandia³ M.C. Villamarin¹.
06/22/041 Data-Gathering Systems IRIS Stanford/ USGS UNAVCO JPL/UCSD Data Management Organizations PI’s, Groups, Centers, etc. Publications, Presentations,
Simulation of Seismic-Wave Propagation Through the Lake Tahoe Basin, Calif.-Nevada: A Scenario Approach to Probabilistic Shaking Hazard Gretchen C. Schmauder.
Surface-wave Derived Focal Mechanisms in Mid-America R. B. Herrmann 1, C. J. Ammon 2 and H. M. Benz 3 1 Saint Louis University, 2 Pennsylvania State University,
Next-Level ShakeZoning for Earthquake Hazard Definition in the Intermountain West John N. Louie, Will Savran, Brady Flinchum, Gabriel Plank, Graham Kent,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Preliminary Analysis of High- Resolution P-Wave Seismic Imaging Profiles Acquired Through Reno,
Unified Structural Representation (USR) The primary mission of the USR Focus Area has been the development of a unified, object-oriented 3-D representation.
J. Louie, SSA 4/12/2007 Computing Scenario Shaking For Nevada Urban Areas With The Model Assembler Community Modeling Environment (MA-CME) J. Louie and.
Fundamental Review of State Government Seismological Laboratory John Anderson, Director.
NGA Project Review and Status Norm Abrahamson NGA Workshop #5 March, 2004.
Nevada ShakeZoning Model of the 5/22/15 Caliente M5.3 Event  136 km from Las Vegas I15- I515 interchange  Two overpasses suffered joint-fill damage –
Data Integration Challenges Building 3-D models of earth structure via integration of geological and geophysical data - schemes, data models, and work.
Earthquake Site Characterization in Metropolitan Vancouver Frederick Jackson Supervisor – Dr. Sheri Molnar.
On Optimization Techniques for the One-Dimensional Seismic Problem
NGA-East Tentative Plan
Building a Las Vegas Seismic Model
LA Basin Story Tectonics Geology Faults Velocity Structure Seismicity
Computing Scenario Shaking For Nevada Urban Areas With The Model Assembler Community Modeling Environment (MA-CME) J. Louie and L. Preston Nevada Seismological.
Reno . . Las Vegas Wells . The Wells earthquake was thought to be less likely than a magnitude-6 in Las Vegas. USGS J. Louie, NESC 5/7/2008.
Reno . . Las Vegas Wells . USGS J. Louie, Brown Univ. 11 March 2008.
Reno . . Las Vegas Wells . The Wells earthquake was thought to be less likely than a magnitude-6 in Las Vegas. USGS J. Louie, NESC 5/7/2008.
Presentation transcript:

1 Nevada Great Basin Community Velocity Model Workshop Welcome from All of Us at the Nevada Seismological Lab: Convenor: J. Louie (cell ) Arrangements: Lori McClelland Generously Funded by the USGS NEHRP-NIW External Grants Program, Mark Petersen, Regional Coordinator Welcome from All of Us at the Nevada Seismological Lab: Convenor: J. Louie (cell ) Arrangements: Lori McClelland Generously Funded by the USGS NEHRP-NIW External Grants Program, Mark Petersen, Regional Coordinator

2ObjectivesObjectives  Organize a Nevada community seismic- velocity modeling effort for the western Great Basin  Goal is predicting earthquake ground motions in urban areas and other sensitive sites.  The CVM will: address seismic velocities at the crustal, basin, and geotechnical scales; and address seismic velocities at the crustal, basin, and geotechnical scales; and contribute directly toward an overall Great Basin Community Velocity Model. contribute directly toward an overall Great Basin Community Velocity Model.  Organize a Nevada community seismic- velocity modeling effort for the western Great Basin  Goal is predicting earthquake ground motions in urban areas and other sensitive sites.  The CVM will: address seismic velocities at the crustal, basin, and geotechnical scales; and address seismic velocities at the crustal, basin, and geotechnical scales; and contribute directly toward an overall Great Basin Community Velocity Model. contribute directly toward an overall Great Basin Community Velocity Model.

3 Objectives (cont.)  Will hear from experts who have constructed other CVMs  Assess what CVM features most affect predicted ground motions  Prioritize our needs for geological and velocity data  We are not assessing sources  Will hear from experts who have constructed other CVMs  Assess what CVM features most affect predicted ground motions  Prioritize our needs for geological and velocity data  We are not assessing sources

4ProductsProducts  Develop at the workshop: succinct statement of research and data needs that can immediately be included in the next USGS NEHRP-NIW RFP.  Louie will write (with help) a white paper by March  Available at the website to those writing NEHRP proposals.  Develop at the workshop: succinct statement of research and data needs that can immediately be included in the next USGS NEHRP-NIW RFP.  Louie will write (with help) a white paper by March  Available at the website to those writing NEHRP proposals.

5 Last Year’s Nevada Priorities   Improve and validate 3D velocity models needed for waveform modeling of the effects of basin- and near-surface-geology: For Reno-Carson City, and Las Vegas Using a variety of techniques including Vs30, tomography, inversion of seismograms, correlations with incorporation of geology, etc. Incorporate results into the Community Velocity Model   Improve and validate 3D velocity models needed for waveform modeling of the effects of basin- and near-surface-geology: For Reno-Carson City, and Las Vegas Using a variety of techniques including Vs30, tomography, inversion of seismograms, correlations with incorporation of geology, etc. Incorporate results into the Community Velocity Model

6 Last Year’s Nevada Priorities   Test the sensitivity of shaking to velocity structure at various scales As a guide to identifying those parts of the velocity model most in need of further study   Use ANSS data in Reno/Carson, and Las Vegas To find empirical site response, validate predictions of 3D velocity models, and improve ground motion prediction approaches.   Prepare scenario ground motion models based on waveform modeling For earthquakes on major faults affecting Reno/Carson and Las Vegas.   Test the sensitivity of shaking to velocity structure at various scales As a guide to identifying those parts of the velocity model most in need of further study   Use ANSS data in Reno/Carson, and Las Vegas To find empirical site response, validate predictions of 3D velocity models, and improve ground motion prediction approaches.   Prepare scenario ground motion models based on waveform modeling For earthquakes on major faults affecting Reno/Carson and Las Vegas.

7 Next Year’s Nevada Priorities   Develop a Western Basin & Range CVM: To cover the entire region with existing geological and geophysical information, plus embedded details for the Reno- Carson City Urban Corridor (including Tahoe), and the Las Vegas Metro area (including Pahrump Valley). Validate the CVM during its development by generating synthetics from the 3-d model for recordings of moderate earthquakes and explosions. Revise the model to incorporate validation results.   Develop a Western Basin & Range CVM: To cover the entire region with existing geological and geophysical information, plus embedded details for the Reno- Carson City Urban Corridor (including Tahoe), and the Las Vegas Metro area (including Pahrump Valley). Validate the CVM during its development by generating synthetics from the 3-d model for recordings of moderate earthquakes and explosions. Revise the model to incorporate validation results.

8 Next Year’s Nevada Priorities   Develop new data for incorporation into the Western Basin & Range CVM: Western Basin & Range RegionWestern Basin & Range Region Develop a regional map of shallow shear velocities and densities from existing measurements for inclusion in the CVM, and for use in ShakeMap. Develop a regional map of shallow shear velocities and densities from existing measurements for inclusion in the CVM, and for use in ShakeMap. Las Vegas Metro Area (including Pahrump Valley)Las Vegas Metro Area (including Pahrump Valley) Construct a model for the structure of the edges of the Pahrump basin, consistent with fault models, for inclusion in the CVM. Construct a model for the structure of the edges of the Pahrump basin, consistent with fault models, for inclusion in the CVM. Obtain generalized depths of important impedance contrasts in Las Vegas Valley for inclusion in the CVM. Obtain generalized depths of important impedance contrasts in Las Vegas Valley for inclusion in the CVM. Reno/Carson City Urban Corridor (including Tahoe)Reno/Carson City Urban Corridor (including Tahoe) Construct cross sections of the significant basins, consistent with available geological and geophysical data sets, for inclusion in the CVM. Construct cross sections of the significant basins, consistent with available geological and geophysical data sets, for inclusion in the CVM. Collect shallow Vs measurements at uncharacterized ANSS sites, and on geologic units not well characterized. Collect shallow Vs measurements at uncharacterized ANSS sites, and on geologic units not well characterized. Compile and develop a detailed shallow shear-velocity model for the Urban Corridor using existing geological and geophysical data. Compile and develop a detailed shallow shear-velocity model for the Urban Corridor using existing geological and geophysical data. Obtain generalized depths of important impedance contrasts in the Urban Corridor. Obtain generalized depths of important impedance contrasts in the Urban Corridor.   Develop new data for incorporation into the Western Basin & Range CVM: Western Basin & Range RegionWestern Basin & Range Region Develop a regional map of shallow shear velocities and densities from existing measurements for inclusion in the CVM, and for use in ShakeMap. Develop a regional map of shallow shear velocities and densities from existing measurements for inclusion in the CVM, and for use in ShakeMap. Las Vegas Metro Area (including Pahrump Valley)Las Vegas Metro Area (including Pahrump Valley) Construct a model for the structure of the edges of the Pahrump basin, consistent with fault models, for inclusion in the CVM. Construct a model for the structure of the edges of the Pahrump basin, consistent with fault models, for inclusion in the CVM. Obtain generalized depths of important impedance contrasts in Las Vegas Valley for inclusion in the CVM. Obtain generalized depths of important impedance contrasts in Las Vegas Valley for inclusion in the CVM. Reno/Carson City Urban Corridor (including Tahoe)Reno/Carson City Urban Corridor (including Tahoe) Construct cross sections of the significant basins, consistent with available geological and geophysical data sets, for inclusion in the CVM. Construct cross sections of the significant basins, consistent with available geological and geophysical data sets, for inclusion in the CVM. Collect shallow Vs measurements at uncharacterized ANSS sites, and on geologic units not well characterized. Collect shallow Vs measurements at uncharacterized ANSS sites, and on geologic units not well characterized. Compile and develop a detailed shallow shear-velocity model for the Urban Corridor using existing geological and geophysical data. Compile and develop a detailed shallow shear-velocity model for the Urban Corridor using existing geological and geophysical data. Obtain generalized depths of important impedance contrasts in the Urban Corridor. Obtain generalized depths of important impedance contrasts in the Urban Corridor.

9 Next Year’s Nevada Priorities   Delete: Test the sensitivity of shaking to velocity structure at various scales As a guide to identifying those parts of the velocity model most in need of further study   Keep: Use ANSS data in Reno/Carson, and Las Vegas To find empirical site response, validate predictions of 3D velocity models, and improve ground motion prediction approaches.  Western Basin & Range  Update: Prepare scenario ground motion models based on waveform modeling with the Western Basin & Range CVM. For earthquakes on major faults affecting Reno/Carson and Las Vegas.   Delete: Test the sensitivity of shaking to velocity structure at various scales As a guide to identifying those parts of the velocity model most in need of further study   Keep: Use ANSS data in Reno/Carson, and Las Vegas To find empirical site response, validate predictions of 3D velocity models, and improve ground motion prediction approaches.  Western Basin & Range  Update: Prepare scenario ground motion models based on waveform modeling with the Western Basin & Range CVM. For earthquakes on major faults affecting Reno/Carson and Las Vegas.

10 Schedule- Monday AM  8:00Louie Introduction, thanks, and workshop objectives  Status of CVM efforts in Nevada 8:20 Louie Crustal thickness in the northern Sierra and northern Nevada 8:20 Louie Crustal thickness in the northern Sierra and northern Nevada 8:40 Anderson Need for accurate velocity models in NV network seismol 8:40 Anderson Need for accurate velocity models in NV network seismol 9:00 von Seggern Joint seismic tomography/relocation, Reno-Carson 9:00 von Seggern Joint seismic tomography/relocation, Reno-Carson 9:20 Rodgers 3-d models of the southern Great Basin, and shaking in LV 9:20 Rodgers 3-d models of the southern Great Basin, and shaking in LV 10:20 Luke Shear wave velocity profiling in Las Vegas valley 10:20 Luke Shear wave velocity profiling in Las Vegas valley 10:40 Pancha Need for an accurate Reno velocity model … 10:40 Pancha Need for an accurate Reno velocity model … 11:00 Henry Three-dimensional geologic complexity of the Truckee Meadows basin from geologic mapping 11:00 Henry Three-dimensional geologic complexity of the Truckee Meadows basin from geologic mapping 11:20 Liberty Geophysical characterization of the Hot Creek Valley, central Nevada 11:20 Liberty Geophysical characterization of the Hot Creek Valley, central Nevada 11:40 Moschetti Application of empirical Green's functions in the construction and validation of the Great Basin CVM 11:40 Moschetti Application of empirical Green's functions in the construction and validation of the Great Basin CVM  8:00Louie Introduction, thanks, and workshop objectives  Status of CVM efforts in Nevada 8:20 Louie Crustal thickness in the northern Sierra and northern Nevada 8:20 Louie Crustal thickness in the northern Sierra and northern Nevada 8:40 Anderson Need for accurate velocity models in NV network seismol 8:40 Anderson Need for accurate velocity models in NV network seismol 9:00 von Seggern Joint seismic tomography/relocation, Reno-Carson 9:00 von Seggern Joint seismic tomography/relocation, Reno-Carson 9:20 Rodgers 3-d models of the southern Great Basin, and shaking in LV 9:20 Rodgers 3-d models of the southern Great Basin, and shaking in LV 10:20 Luke Shear wave velocity profiling in Las Vegas valley 10:20 Luke Shear wave velocity profiling in Las Vegas valley 10:40 Pancha Need for an accurate Reno velocity model … 10:40 Pancha Need for an accurate Reno velocity model … 11:00 Henry Three-dimensional geologic complexity of the Truckee Meadows basin from geologic mapping 11:00 Henry Three-dimensional geologic complexity of the Truckee Meadows basin from geologic mapping 11:20 Liberty Geophysical characterization of the Hot Creek Valley, central Nevada 11:20 Liberty Geophysical characterization of the Hot Creek Valley, central Nevada 11:40 Moschetti Application of empirical Green's functions in the construction and validation of the Great Basin CVM 11:40 Moschetti Application of empirical Green's functions in the construction and validation of the Great Basin CVM

11 Schedule- Monday PM 1:30 Louie The MA-CME modeling environment and initial scenario ground-motion computations for Reno and Las Vegas 1:30 Louie The MA-CME modeling environment and initial scenario ground-motion computations for Reno and Las Vegas  USGS objectives, funding, internal & external projects, and collaborations 1:50 Odum NEHRP-NIW priorities, funding, internal projects and the Nevada CVM 1:50 Odum NEHRP-NIW priorities, funding, internal projects and the Nevada CVM  Status and results of Utah CVM 2:10 Magistrale The Wasatch Front CVM 2:10 Magistrale The Wasatch Front CVM  Other CVM efforts- their advice 2:40 Sydnor Applications of shear-wave velocity to the Building Code 2:40 Sydnor Applications of shear-wave velocity to the Building Code 3:00-3:40Break for coffee and discussion 3:00-3:40Break for coffee and discussion 3:40 Wills Preparing maps of Vs30 based on geologic maps 3:40 Wills Preparing maps of Vs30 based on geologic maps 4:10 Rodgers The 1906 modeling effort, and lessons learned 4:10 Rodgers The 1906 modeling effort, and lessons learned 4:40 Louie for Keller Open Earth Framework: Building 3-d models via integration of geological and geophysical data 4:40 Louie for Keller Open Earth Framework: Building 3-d models via integration of geological and geophysical data 4:50 Louie CVM efforts in Wellington, New Zealand 4:50 Louie CVM efforts in Wellington, New Zealand  5:00Questions, wrap-up, charge for Tuesday discussions 1:30 Louie The MA-CME modeling environment and initial scenario ground-motion computations for Reno and Las Vegas 1:30 Louie The MA-CME modeling environment and initial scenario ground-motion computations for Reno and Las Vegas  USGS objectives, funding, internal & external projects, and collaborations 1:50 Odum NEHRP-NIW priorities, funding, internal projects and the Nevada CVM 1:50 Odum NEHRP-NIW priorities, funding, internal projects and the Nevada CVM  Status and results of Utah CVM 2:10 Magistrale The Wasatch Front CVM 2:10 Magistrale The Wasatch Front CVM  Other CVM efforts- their advice 2:40 Sydnor Applications of shear-wave velocity to the Building Code 2:40 Sydnor Applications of shear-wave velocity to the Building Code 3:00-3:40Break for coffee and discussion 3:00-3:40Break for coffee and discussion 3:40 Wills Preparing maps of Vs30 based on geologic maps 3:40 Wills Preparing maps of Vs30 based on geologic maps 4:10 Rodgers The 1906 modeling effort, and lessons learned 4:10 Rodgers The 1906 modeling effort, and lessons learned 4:40 Louie for Keller Open Earth Framework: Building 3-d models via integration of geological and geophysical data 4:40 Louie for Keller Open Earth Framework: Building 3-d models via integration of geological and geophysical data 4:50 Louie CVM efforts in Wellington, New Zealand 4:50 Louie CVM efforts in Wellington, New Zealand  5:00Questions, wrap-up, charge for Tuesday discussions

12 Schedule- Tuesday  8:00-9:40 Discussion- What results do we need in a Nevada CVM for ground-motion prediction? We will have an “Official Version”. Datasets are included if difference is significant when tested by CVM group.We will have an “Official Version”. Datasets are included if difference is significant when tested by CVM group. RegionalRegional 1. P-wave tomography- start w/ Hearn- add Preston, Biasi, S. NV, gravity (Jachens) 1. P-wave tomography- start w/ Hearn- add Preston, Biasi, S. NV, gravity (Jachens) 1. Exists: crustal Vs model from TA-EGF (Morgan) 1. Exists: crustal Vs model from TA-EGF (Morgan) 1. Basin geometry 1. Basin geometry What is the database- collaborations? Earthvision, MA-CME (some devel. Needed), Magistrale code- merging/smoothing? What is the database- collaborations? Earthvision, MA-CME (some devel. Needed), Magistrale code- merging/smoothing? 1. Geotech layer 1. Geotech layer 2. Geotech Wills, scope out- ShakeMap, MX Missile files 2. Geotech Wills, scope out- ShakeMap, MX Missile files 2. Catalog of fault dips (add to Qfaults?), Geology (structure and stratigraphy) of basin edges- collaboration with DOE-geothermal? 2. Catalog of fault dips (add to Qfaults?), Geology (structure and stratigraphy) of basin edges- collaboration with DOE-geothermal? 2. Rework of Jachens regional basin gravity with better fault dips 2. Rework of Jachens regional basin gravity with better fault dips Model uncertainties- subject for NSF, DOE proposals? How to honor needs of ultimate customers?Model uncertainties- subject for NSF, DOE proposals? How to honor needs of ultimate customers?  8:00-9:40 Discussion- What results do we need in a Nevada CVM for ground-motion prediction? We will have an “Official Version”. Datasets are included if difference is significant when tested by CVM group.We will have an “Official Version”. Datasets are included if difference is significant when tested by CVM group. RegionalRegional 1. P-wave tomography- start w/ Hearn- add Preston, Biasi, S. NV, gravity (Jachens) 1. P-wave tomography- start w/ Hearn- add Preston, Biasi, S. NV, gravity (Jachens) 1. Exists: crustal Vs model from TA-EGF (Morgan) 1. Exists: crustal Vs model from TA-EGF (Morgan) 1. Basin geometry 1. Basin geometry What is the database- collaborations? Earthvision, MA-CME (some devel. Needed), Magistrale code- merging/smoothing? What is the database- collaborations? Earthvision, MA-CME (some devel. Needed), Magistrale code- merging/smoothing? 1. Geotech layer 1. Geotech layer 2. Geotech Wills, scope out- ShakeMap, MX Missile files 2. Geotech Wills, scope out- ShakeMap, MX Missile files 2. Catalog of fault dips (add to Qfaults?), Geology (structure and stratigraphy) of basin edges- collaboration with DOE-geothermal? 2. Catalog of fault dips (add to Qfaults?), Geology (structure and stratigraphy) of basin edges- collaboration with DOE-geothermal? 2. Rework of Jachens regional basin gravity with better fault dips 2. Rework of Jachens regional basin gravity with better fault dips Model uncertainties- subject for NSF, DOE proposals? How to honor needs of ultimate customers?Model uncertainties- subject for NSF, DOE proposals? How to honor needs of ultimate customers?

13 Schedule- Tuesday  8:00-9:40 Discussion- What results do we need in a Nevada CVM for ground- motion prediction? Reno/Carson City Urban CorridorReno/Carson City Urban Corridor 1. 3-d Geology of basin floor and edges- fault models-> define cross section (1. Carson Range fault system simple geometry model; 2. Basin east-side faults) 1. 3-d Geology of basin floor and edges- fault models-> define cross section (1. Carson Range fault system simple geometry model; 2. Basin east-side faults) 1. assemble existing sections through Reno and Carson Val. (Cashman, Henry) 1. assemble existing sections through Reno and Carson Val. (Cashman, Henry) 1. Abbott basin model- Reno, Eagle Val.- products available from Washoe Co. 1. Abbott basin model- Reno, Eagle Val.- products available from Washoe Co. 2. Oppliger Carson Val. gravity database modeling 2. Oppliger Carson Val. gravity database modeling 2. Carson Range fault system model development-USGS collab 2. Carson Range fault system model development-USGS collab 1. Tahoe Basin model, Karlin, UCSD 1. Tahoe Basin model, Karlin, UCSD 2. Remodeling of reno basin, including new wells, Washoe Co. gravity 2. Remodeling of reno basin, including new wells, Washoe Co. gravity 1. Geotech layer- Louie, Pancha 1. Geotech layer- Louie, Pancha 1. Vs at Carson-Valley ANSS, unmeasured geologic units (by USGS?), Geotech data correlation with Geology 1. Vs at Carson-Valley ANSS, unmeasured geologic units (by USGS?), Geotech data correlation with Geology 1. P-S tomography from Preston 1. P-S tomography from Preston 1. R1, R2, R3 from reflection by USGS? Stephenson-UNLV collab? 1. R1, R2, R3 from reflection by USGS? Stephenson-UNLV collab? 1. Deep basin (>100 m) Vs from UNR (funded FY’08) 1. Deep basin (>100 m) Vs from UNR (funded FY’08) 2. Soil nonlinearity- assembly plus new models 2. Soil nonlinearity- assembly plus new models  8:00-9:40 Discussion- What results do we need in a Nevada CVM for ground- motion prediction? Reno/Carson City Urban CorridorReno/Carson City Urban Corridor 1. 3-d Geology of basin floor and edges- fault models-> define cross section (1. Carson Range fault system simple geometry model; 2. Basin east-side faults) 1. 3-d Geology of basin floor and edges- fault models-> define cross section (1. Carson Range fault system simple geometry model; 2. Basin east-side faults) 1. assemble existing sections through Reno and Carson Val. (Cashman, Henry) 1. assemble existing sections through Reno and Carson Val. (Cashman, Henry) 1. Abbott basin model- Reno, Eagle Val.- products available from Washoe Co. 1. Abbott basin model- Reno, Eagle Val.- products available from Washoe Co. 2. Oppliger Carson Val. gravity database modeling 2. Oppliger Carson Val. gravity database modeling 2. Carson Range fault system model development-USGS collab 2. Carson Range fault system model development-USGS collab 1. Tahoe Basin model, Karlin, UCSD 1. Tahoe Basin model, Karlin, UCSD 2. Remodeling of reno basin, including new wells, Washoe Co. gravity 2. Remodeling of reno basin, including new wells, Washoe Co. gravity 1. Geotech layer- Louie, Pancha 1. Geotech layer- Louie, Pancha 1. Vs at Carson-Valley ANSS, unmeasured geologic units (by USGS?), Geotech data correlation with Geology 1. Vs at Carson-Valley ANSS, unmeasured geologic units (by USGS?), Geotech data correlation with Geology 1. P-S tomography from Preston 1. P-S tomography from Preston 1. R1, R2, R3 from reflection by USGS? Stephenson-UNLV collab? 1. R1, R2, R3 from reflection by USGS? Stephenson-UNLV collab? 1. Deep basin (>100 m) Vs from UNR (funded FY’08) 1. Deep basin (>100 m) Vs from UNR (funded FY’08) 2. Soil nonlinearity- assembly plus new models 2. Soil nonlinearity- assembly plus new models

14 Schedule- Tuesday Las Vegas Metro Area (incl. Pahrump Val.)Las Vegas Metro Area (incl. Pahrump Val.) 1. Geology of Pahrump basin edges- fault models 1. Geology of Pahrump basin edges- fault models 1. Langenheim basin model- LVV. 1. Langenheim basin model- LVV. 2. Roach Val., Coyote Springs basin models 2. Roach Val., Coyote Springs basin models 2. Pahrump basin model from D. Donovan, Hoffard? 2. Pahrump basin model from D. Donovan, Hoffard? 1. Geotech layer- Louie, Luke 2. Nellis assessments (collab w/ Air Force), Geotech correlation with Geology from UNLV? Vs at ANSS sites (w/ USGS?) 1. Geotech layer- Louie, Luke 2. Nellis assessments (collab w/ Air Force), Geotech correlation with Geology from UNLV? Vs at ANSS sites (w/ USGS?) 1. Hearn, Moschetti P-S tomography- too few stations for LVV-Pahrump detail model 1. Hearn, Moschetti P-S tomography- too few stations for LVV-Pahrump detail model 1. R1, R2, R3, reflection, refraction LVV (Snelson), Pahrump from D. Donovan, Hoffard theses? 1. R1, R2, R3, reflection, refraction LVV (Snelson), Pahrump from D. Donovan, Hoffard theses? 1. Deep basin (>100 m) Vs from UNLV 2. Vetted & improved, interstation phase vel, EGF, Abbott’s Pahrump array- collaboration 1. Deep basin (>100 m) Vs from UNLV 2. Vetted & improved, interstation phase vel, EGF, Abbott’s Pahrump array- collaboration Collaborations- New seismic stations for tomography and site response Collaborations- New seismic stations for tomography and site response 2. Soil nonlinearity- assembly plus new models 2. Soil nonlinearity- assembly plus new models Las Vegas Metro Area (incl. Pahrump Val.)Las Vegas Metro Area (incl. Pahrump Val.) 1. Geology of Pahrump basin edges- fault models 1. Geology of Pahrump basin edges- fault models 1. Langenheim basin model- LVV. 1. Langenheim basin model- LVV. 2. Roach Val., Coyote Springs basin models 2. Roach Val., Coyote Springs basin models 2. Pahrump basin model from D. Donovan, Hoffard? 2. Pahrump basin model from D. Donovan, Hoffard? 1. Geotech layer- Louie, Luke 2. Nellis assessments (collab w/ Air Force), Geotech correlation with Geology from UNLV? Vs at ANSS sites (w/ USGS?) 1. Geotech layer- Louie, Luke 2. Nellis assessments (collab w/ Air Force), Geotech correlation with Geology from UNLV? Vs at ANSS sites (w/ USGS?) 1. Hearn, Moschetti P-S tomography- too few stations for LVV-Pahrump detail model 1. Hearn, Moschetti P-S tomography- too few stations for LVV-Pahrump detail model 1. R1, R2, R3, reflection, refraction LVV (Snelson), Pahrump from D. Donovan, Hoffard theses? 1. R1, R2, R3, reflection, refraction LVV (Snelson), Pahrump from D. Donovan, Hoffard theses? 1. Deep basin (>100 m) Vs from UNLV 2. Vetted & improved, interstation phase vel, EGF, Abbott’s Pahrump array- collaboration 1. Deep basin (>100 m) Vs from UNLV 2. Vetted & improved, interstation phase vel, EGF, Abbott’s Pahrump array- collaboration Collaborations- New seismic stations for tomography and site response Collaborations- New seismic stations for tomography and site response 2. Soil nonlinearity- assembly plus new models 2. Soil nonlinearity- assembly plus new models

15 Schedule- Tuesday Who will use the CVM, and how? Who will use the CVM, and how? Simulators, validators Simulators, validators Who does model assembly? Framework? Who does model assembly? Framework? Eastern California, Nevada, Utah CVM; Western Basin & Range CVMEastern California, Nevada, Utah CVM; Western Basin & Range CVM MA-CME adopts Magistrale subroutinesMA-CME adopts Magistrale subroutines Someone assembles refs and sections, rules and 1-d profiles, geotech layers, DOE & YM info?Someone assembles refs and sections, rules and 1-d profiles, geotech layers, DOE & YM info? Who does synthetics and validation? Code? Who does synthetics and validation? Code? Collaborative project with Olsen?Collaborative project with Olsen? Who will use the CVM, and how? Who will use the CVM, and how? Simulators, validators Simulators, validators Who does model assembly? Framework? Who does model assembly? Framework? Eastern California, Nevada, Utah CVM; Western Basin & Range CVMEastern California, Nevada, Utah CVM; Western Basin & Range CVM MA-CME adopts Magistrale subroutinesMA-CME adopts Magistrale subroutines Someone assembles refs and sections, rules and 1-d profiles, geotech layers, DOE & YM info?Someone assembles refs and sections, rules and 1-d profiles, geotech layers, DOE & YM info? Who does synthetics and validation? Code? Who does synthetics and validation? Code? Collaborative project with Olsen?Collaborative project with Olsen?

16 Airport times Monastero- 3:00- Luke Monastero- 3:00- Luke Vincent 2:00- Moschetti Vincent 2:00- Moschetti Rodgers 1:00- Rodgers 1:00- Norris 4:00- Magistrale Norris 4:00- Magistrale Monastero- 3:00- Luke Monastero- 3:00- Luke Vincent 2:00- Moschetti Vincent 2:00- Moschetti Rodgers 1:00- Rodgers 1:00- Norris 4:00- Magistrale Norris 4:00- Magistrale

17 Schedule- Tuesday  10:20-12:00 Discussion- How do we obtain the necessary data and results? How do we obtain the necessary data and results? What methods are cost-effective enough to be funded? What methods are cost-effective enough to be funded? What collaborations are needed? What collaborations are needed? Need a document to take to potential funders Need a document to take to potential funders White paper to USGS, report on meeting to NESC FebWhite paper to USGS, report on meeting to NESC Feb Version, vetted by NESC May, for forums in Reno, LV, including (what will they get out of it):Version, vetted by NESC May, for forums in Reno, LV, including (what will they get out of it): USGS volcano, groundwater wat resUSGS volcano, groundwater wat res Utilities: SPPCo, Nevada Power, TMWA, SNWS, SNWAUtilities: SPPCo, Nevada Power, TMWA, SNWS, SNWA FEMA (security of Dam, CA power trans), NV-DEM, ACE, USBurRec, Army (commander of Hawthorne), Navy, Air Force (LVV-Nellis base engineer colonel- mission integrity & force readiness)FEMA (security of Dam, CA power trans), NV-DEM, ACE, USBurRec, Army (commander of Hawthorne), Navy, Air Force (LVV-Nellis base engineer colonel- mission integrity & force readiness) Gas pipelines, oil pipelinesGas pipelines, oil pipelines Builders: NNBA, WNBA, SNBA- AEG regionsBuilders: NNBA, WNBA, SNBA- AEG regions NRCNRC NDOTNDOT DOE- YMP, NNSA, GMSEC- NSODOE- YMP, NNSA, GMSEC- NSO AEG, ASCE, SEASoN, Reno & Las Vegas Chapt.; AIA?AEG, ASCE, SEASoN, Reno & Las Vegas Chapt.; AIA? NV public works board, fire marshallNV public works board, fire marshall Multi-hazard efforts, emergency managersMulti-hazard efforts, emergency managers  10:20-12:00 Discussion- How do we obtain the necessary data and results? How do we obtain the necessary data and results? What methods are cost-effective enough to be funded? What methods are cost-effective enough to be funded? What collaborations are needed? What collaborations are needed? Need a document to take to potential funders Need a document to take to potential funders White paper to USGS, report on meeting to NESC FebWhite paper to USGS, report on meeting to NESC Feb Version, vetted by NESC May, for forums in Reno, LV, including (what will they get out of it):Version, vetted by NESC May, for forums in Reno, LV, including (what will they get out of it): USGS volcano, groundwater wat resUSGS volcano, groundwater wat res Utilities: SPPCo, Nevada Power, TMWA, SNWS, SNWAUtilities: SPPCo, Nevada Power, TMWA, SNWS, SNWA FEMA (security of Dam, CA power trans), NV-DEM, ACE, USBurRec, Army (commander of Hawthorne), Navy, Air Force (LVV-Nellis base engineer colonel- mission integrity & force readiness)FEMA (security of Dam, CA power trans), NV-DEM, ACE, USBurRec, Army (commander of Hawthorne), Navy, Air Force (LVV-Nellis base engineer colonel- mission integrity & force readiness) Gas pipelines, oil pipelinesGas pipelines, oil pipelines Builders: NNBA, WNBA, SNBA- AEG regionsBuilders: NNBA, WNBA, SNBA- AEG regions NRCNRC NDOTNDOT DOE- YMP, NNSA, GMSEC- NSODOE- YMP, NNSA, GMSEC- NSO AEG, ASCE, SEASoN, Reno & Las Vegas Chapt.; AIA?AEG, ASCE, SEASoN, Reno & Las Vegas Chapt.; AIA? NV public works board, fire marshallNV public works board, fire marshall Multi-hazard efforts, emergency managersMulti-hazard efforts, emergency managers

18 Schedule- Tuesday  12:00-3:00 Working lunch and Discussion- Write and order Nevada CVM priorities for NEHRP RFP Write and order Nevada CVM priorities for NEHRP RFP  3:00 Adjourn  12:00-3:00 Working lunch and Discussion- Write and order Nevada CVM priorities for NEHRP RFP Write and order Nevada CVM priorities for NEHRP RFP  3:00 Adjourn