P07202: Motor Module – Robotic Platform 100kg Robert Saltarelli:Project Manager Erich Hauenstein:Mechanical Member Dustin Collins:Mechanical Member Jasen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USB Controlled IO Module Jon Knoll Dave Wolowicz Sponsored by: Dr. Kin Li A 499a Project.
Advertisements

Greg Beau SerajAnanya. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design.
Autonomous Sensor and Control Platform Rover Tae Lee Josh Reitsema Scott Zhong Mike Chao Mark Winter.
BHEL – Electronics Division, Bangalore
The Player Guitar Advised by T Baird Soules Team members: Joshua Libby, Stephen Monska, Simon Leung, Robert Williams.
Motor Control Lab Using Altera Nano FPGA
L.
1. P09203 – 1kg Robotic Motor Module Gen 2 Platform This project is Sponsored by the Kate Gleason Foundation.  Team Members:  Lauren Farnsworth → Team.
1 Autonomous Parallel Parking Alex Braun & Sergey Katsev.
Motion Tracking Recorder 360 (MTR-360) Group #1 Lee Estep Philip Robertson Andy Schiestl Robert Tate.
R I T Team Members: Dan Lester → Team Lead Chris Feuerstein → Lead Engineer/Electrical Lead Mike Schwec → Electrical Support Jacob Hillmon → Electrical.
In Order of Presentation: Ishaan Sandhu DannY Kang Arslan Qaiser Eric Otte Anuar Tazabekov Capacitive Rain Sensor for Automatic Wiper Control.
Nandini Vemuri (EE) Jason Jack (CE) Ryan Schmitt (CE) Jeff Howe (EE) John Corleto (CE) Emily Phillips (EE) Power Distribution Subsystem Wireless Communication.
ZigBee Calvin Choy David Kim Jason Chong Devin Galutira.
R I T Advisors: Dr. Wayne WalterMechanical Engineering Dept. Faculty Jeffrey WebbTeacher’s Assistant Team Members: Aman Verma EE - Electrical Craftsman.
The Player Guitar Advised by T Baird Soules Team members: Joshua Libby, Stephen Monska, Simon Leung, Robert Williams.
Team GPS Rover Critical Design Review Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
R I T Team Members: Nandini Vemuri → Team Lead, System Testing, Motor Expert Jason Jack → GUI Design, Microcontroller Expert, Website Administrator John.
P07202: Motor Module – Robotic Platform 100kg Robert Saltarelli:Project Manager Erich Hauenstein:Mechanical Member Dustin Collins:Mechanical Member Jasen.
Target Control Electronics Upgrade 08/01/2009 J. Leaver P. Smith.
MSD P07302End of Project Review1 Motor Controller Subsystem MSD P07302 Project Sponsor: KGCOE Project Members: D. ShenoyProject Manager S. TallauSoftware.
Nandini Vemuri (EE) Jason Jack (CE) Ryan Schmitt (CE) Jeff Howe (EE) John Corleto (CE) Emily Phillips (EE) Power Distribution Subsystem Wireless Communication.
Robotic Vehicle Platform: Background Presentation Steven Rois (ME) Chris Wakeley (ME) Kenneth Smith (ME) Andrew Krall (ME)
R I T Team Members: Dan Lester → Team Lead Chris Feuerstein → Lead Engineer/Electrical Lead Mike Schwec → Electrical Support Jacob Hillmon → Electrical.
System Level. Total Costs 3 fully powered and steering, 4 idler modules Prototyping Costs (1 fully powered and steering, tested on bench): –Power.
DC Motor Control  mouse EE 496 Advisor: Dr. Tep Dobry.
For Electric Vehicle Team Members Pramit Tamrakar- Electrical Engineering Jimmy Skadal- Electrical Engineering Hao Wang- Electrical Engineering Matthew.
MSD P15280 RIT HOT WHEELZ TEST BENCH. AGENDA ❖ Detailed Design Review ➢ Competition Benchmarking ➢ Mechanical ●Motor Mount & Baseplate ●Modular Cart.
Chapter 12 Multiplexing. Objectives (1 of 3) Describe a typical truck data bus. List the key data bus hardware components. Define the word multiplexing.
Sponsor/Customer: Dr. Ferat Sahin Multi Agent Bio-Robotics Lab Faculty Guide: Prof. George Slack Team Members: Matthew LeStrange – Electrical Engineering.
SCADA and Telemetry Presented By:.
Team Spot A Cooperative Robotics Problem A Robotics Academy Project: Laurel Hesch Emily Mower Addie Sutphen.
MUEV Phase III By: Kevin Jaris & Nathan Golick. Introduction Petroleum is a finite resource. Demand for clean energy is driving the increase in the production.
Automatic Shift Controls for ATV Sponsored by: Joel Notaro Polaris Industries Advised by : Professor George Slack Project Family: Modular, Scalable, Open.
Robotic Sensor Network: Wireless Sensor Platform for Autonomous Topology Formation Project: Sponsored By: Advisor: Dr. S. Jay Yang, CEManager: Steven.
LSST Electronics Review – BNL, January LSST Electronics Review BNL January Electronics Development Plan Goals and Plans for
Class-D Garage Band Amplifier Team: Aaron Danielson, Robert Mann, Randall Newcomb, Andrew Russell Sponsor: Nigel Thompson, RT Logic Advisor: Dr. William.
Leo Greiner PIXEL Hardware meeting HFT PIXEL detector LVDS Data Path Testing.
Michael Lisoski Leblanc Meneses Jason Schaer Bryan Staton.
Acquisition Crate Design BI Technical Board 26 August 2011 Beam Loss Monitoring Section William Vigano’ 26 August
Chapter 11 Extending LANs 1. Distance limitations of LANs 2. Connecting multiple LANs together 3. Repeaters 4. Bridges 5. Filtering frame 6. Bridged network.
Hybrid Power Controller (HPC) Final Presentation Senior Design II.
Optical Encoder for a Game Steering Wheel May05-26 Client: Thomas Enterprises Advisors: Dr. James Davis Dr. Douglas Jacobson Team Members: Sam Dahlke,
Mark Randall & Kevin Claycomb Faculty Advisor: David Mitchell Industrial Sponsor: IEEE.
Interfacing to External Devices  Explore Digital Interfaces techniques  Introduce some complex optical devices and how to interface them  Describe methods.
Hybrid Power Controller (HPC) Mid-Semester Presentation Senior Design II.
CNC Assembly: 3 axis rigid PVC structure NEMA 17 Motors and lead screws Off the shelf Router and Specialty collet Vacuum Table to hold down work piece.
BLDC Motor Speed Control with RPM Display. Introduction BLDC Motor Speed Control with RPM Display  The main objective of this.
BASIC AUTOMATIC CONTROLS UNIT 16 ADVANCED AUTOMATIC CONTROLS
Interactive Breadboard Spring 2013 Group 21 - Simon Huynh, Norman Lee, Harrison Hilgers TA Dennis Yuan, Professor Carney.
ECE 445 Group 20 4/23/2012 Kevin Dluzen Jonathan Hall Diyang Qiu.
Different Types of Robots
P9204 – 1kg Robotic Platform System level Design.
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
Components of Mechatronic Systems AUE 425 Week 2 Kerem ALTUN October 3, 2016.
CNC FEED DRIVES.
Introduction to Motors, servos and steppers
Development of T3Maps adapter boards
Energy Management System
P07307: Controls for Dynamic Suspension
Microcontroller Enhancement Design Project
P07203 Dynamometry Laboratory Infrastructure
P07202: Motor Module – Robotic Platform 100kg
GlueX Electronics Review Jefferson Lab July 23-24, 2003
Internet-of-Things (IoT)
MSD P15280 RIT HOT WHEELZ TEST BENCH
ELECTRONIC AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION FOR BICYCLE TA – HERSHEL REGE
Command and Data Handling
Presentation transcript:

P07202: Motor Module – Robotic Platform 100kg Robert Saltarelli:Project Manager Erich Hauenstein:Mechanical Member Dustin Collins:Mechanical Member Jasen Lomnick:Mechanical Member Saul Rosa:Electrical Member Derrick Lee:Electrical Member Muhammad Moazam:Electrical Member Vincent Capra:Electrical Member Sponsor: Gleason Foundation

P07202: Functionality

P07202: Mechanical Design

Machining Very mechanically intense design Hours of machining each day since the beginning of January Over 36 parts on each driven motor module Over 30 of these parts were machined or modified

Machining Machine shop staff was very helpful through out the entire process. Advanced machining techniques were introduced and explained by Rob Kraynik, Dave Hathaway and Steve Kosciol. Rob performed welding for several of the subassemblies

Machining The Brinkman CNC machining lab was needed on 3 parts. The need for precision led to the use of CNC Ease of mass production

Lessons Learned Price is usually a good measure of quality Modification of COTS parts may save money, but does add time to manufacturing Manufacturers models do not always match the actual product. Easy to add to a CAD model ≠ Easy to Machine!! (i.e. precise round plates)

Mechanical Design Modifications Extension of vertical driveshaft and addition of a supporting bearing to handle radial load exerted by spur gear Change from retaining rings to spacers, threaded axles, and washers Simplification of Yoke Sides Simplification of Motor Cage Change to smaller belt Additional washers to support available hardware

Verifying COTS Motor Performance Obtained dynamometer from Dave Krispinsky Fabricated coupling and mounting for motor to attach to dyno Applied several loading conditions to motor and took readings from dynamometer Motor speed was found using timing gun provided by Dr. Kempski

P07202: The H-Bridge First revision prototype on etch board PCB Cleaned copper is written over with sharpie marker. Then the holes for through-hole devices are tapped and drilled out After the necessary leads are soldered on the components can be placed and the revision of the board is ready for testing. Made use of simulated input signals and tested under loading conditions. After several revisions for the steering and drive motors, aftermarket H-Bridges were purchased due to budget constraints. The design schematics, simulations, and PCB Layout files were well documented for possible future use and mass production.

Power Board Originally design but not implemented. Included 6X 5V 1A lines, Battery Monitoring, Battery Indication, and Status Relay to P (Rev A Power Board Layout) No Longer Used

Motor Control Board Xilinx FPGA processor JTAG Programming CAN Communications Interfacing to H-Bridge Encoder Interpretation Built in Multi Stage Regulation Custom PCB design Board Temperature Sensing

P07202: Control and Communications Precise control over system allows for optimal efficiency designs High speed Power savings Fully parallel driven and steering control systems achieves true simultaneous operation CAN protocol is fully addressable and optimizes transmissions optimizes transmissions Significant potential for future functionality Incorporation of PIC soft core Generic I/O headers for interfacing with additional circuitry (e.g. watchdog) Easy to add additional devices over CAN

P07202: Error Protection and Failsafe Operation CAN protocol provides robust protection against noise. Errors of up to 5 consecutives bits can be identified and corrected Differential signal is more immune to noise Shielded, twisted pair cabling used to mitigate risk of interference State encoding ensures that any errors are safely caught operation is returned to idle mode Robust power up routines ensures integrity of system after booting Sophisticated I/O synchronization protects components from errors or potential damage Encoder inputs are properly measured H-bridge lines never activated simultaneously

P07202: CAN Transmission The Node that wins arbitration simply continues to transmit

P07202: Digital Encoders Drive Encoder Steer encoder The US Digital optical encoders were ordered to measure the speed of the modules using the measured RPM from the drive motor shafts. A different model US Digital optical encoder was used to measure the steering angle. An indexing function helped to read and convert the steering motor shaft’s RPM to an angular position. Pin-outs Optical Ring

P07202: Testing 3 Phases –Initial Baseline measurements Signals, Voltage levels –Semi-Integration Partial integration with Mechanical components To show components operate efficiently together –Full Integration (Prototype) Final measurements and stresses tested Reconfirmation of desired specifications Overall design assessed

P07202: Safety Several different fail-safe algorithms are coded into the FPGA for a variety of disturbances: –No wheel contact with ground –Liquid disturbances –Collisions –Communication connection loss Safety fuses are connected to the battery input to avoid burning out the motors and breaches of maximum speed. Current sensors are employed to ensure proper functionality of critical signal lines.

Electrical Budget Driver production cost (electrical) –$ PCB –$17.13 Chips –$22.29 H-bridges (COTS) –$ Encoders –$98.32 Cost of entire project –$ Prototype cost –$334

Mechanical Budget Driver prototype cost –$ Driver production cost –$ Idler prototype/production cost –$ Cost of entire project –$ Difference from original cost projection –$ All modules built

Looking Forward Total cost per driven module –$ Production cost per driven –$865.50

P07202: Questions ?