1 D-Space and Deform Closure: A Framework for Holding Deformable Parts K. “Gopal” Gopalakrishnan, Ken Goldberg IEOR and EECS, U.C. Berkeley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Contact Mechanics B659: Principles of Intelligent Robot Motion Spring 2013 Kris Hauser.
Advertisements

1 Motion and Manipulation Configuration Space. Outline Motion Planning Configuration Space and Free Space Free Space Structure and Complexity.
Robot Grasp Planning using Parallel Sampling to Estimate Uncertainty in Pose, Shape, and Mechanics Melissa Goldstein Edward Lee Frank Ong Josh Goldberg.
AERSP 301 Finite Element Method
Configuration Space. Recap Represent environments as graphs –Paths are connected vertices –Make assumption that robot is a point Need to be able to use.
CAGING OF RIGID POLYTOPES VIA DISPERSION CONTROL OF POINT FINGERS Peam Pipattanasomporn Advisor: Attawith Sudsang 1.
Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Robot Grasping of Deformable Objects Yan-Bin Jia (joint work with Ph.D. students Feng Guo and Huan.
LECTURE SERIES on STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION Thanh X. Nguyen Structural Mechanics Division National University of Civil Engineering
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements Practical considerations in FEM modeling Prof. Suvranu De.
Some Ideas Behind Finite Element Analysis
CST ELEMENT Constant Strain Triangular Element
Section 4: Implementation of Finite Element Analysis – Other Elements
ECIV 720 A Advanced Structural Mechanics and Analysis
ECIV 720 A Advanced Structural Mechanics and Analysis
Putting the Turing into Manufacturing: Algorithmic Automation and Recent Developments in Feeding and Fixturing Ken Goldberg, UC Berkeley.
Motion Planning. Basic Topology Definitions  Open set / closed set  Boundary point / interior point / closure  Continuous function  Parametric curve.
Configuration Space CS 326 A: Motion Planning
1 Dissertation Workshop: Algorithms, Models and Metrics for the Design of Workholding Using Part Concavities K. Gopalakrishnan IEOR, U.C. Berkeley.
Gripping Parts at Concave Vertices K. “Gopal” Gopalakrishnan Ken Goldberg U.C. Berkeley.
1 Last lecture  Path planning for a moving Visibility graph Cell decomposition Potential field  Geometric preliminaries Implementing geometric primitives.
1 Computing Deform Closure Grasps K. “Gopal” Gopalakrishnan, Ken Goldberg IEOR and EECS, UC Berkeley.
Algorithms, Models and Metrics for Workholding using Part Concavities. K. Gopalakrishnan IEOR, U.C. Berkeley.
Planning Paths for Elastic Objects Under Manipulation Constraints Florent Lamiraux Lydia E. Kavraki Rice University Presented by: Michael Adams.
Algorithmic Robotics and Motion Planning Dan Halperin Tel Aviv University Fall 2006/7 Algorithmic motion planning, an overview.
1 D-Space and Deform Closure: A Framework for Holding Deformable Parts K. “Gopal” Gopalakrishnan, Ken Goldberg IEOR and EECS, U.C. Berkeley.
Gripping Sheet Metal Parts at Vertices K. Gopalakrishnan A Project for CS 287.
BINARY MORPHOLOGY and APPLICATIONS IN ROBOTICS. Applications of Minkowski Sum 1.Minkowski addition plays a central role in mathematical morphology 2.It.
CS 326 A: Motion Planning robotics.stanford.edu/~latombe/cs326/2003/index.htm Configuration Space – Basic Path-Planning Methods.
Mechanics of Rigid Bodies
UMass Lowell Computer Science Advanced Algorithms Computational Geometry Prof. Karen Daniels Spring, 2004 O’Rourke Chapter 8 Motion Planning.
1 Computing Deform Closure Grasps K. “Gopal” Gopalakrishnan Ken Goldberg UC Berkeley.
ECIV 720 A Advanced Structural Mechanics and Analysis Lecture 12: Isoparametric CST Area Coordinates Shape Functions Strain-Displacement Matrix Rayleigh-Ritz.
1 D-Space and Deform Closure: A Framework for Holding Deformable Parts K. “Gopal” Gopalakrishnan, Ken Goldberg IEOR and EECS, UC Berkeley.
1 D-Space and Deform Closure: A Framework for Holding Deformable Parts K. “Gopal” Gopalakrishnan, Ken Goldberg IEOR and EECS, U.C. Berkeley.
1 On the Existence of Form- Closure Configurations on a Grid A.Frank van der Stappen Presented by K. Gopalakrishnan.
1 Single Robot Motion Planning Liang-Jun Zhang COMP Sep 22, 2008.
ANALYSIS OF STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN ROOTS OF BOLT THREADS Gennady Aryassov, Andres Petritshenko Tallinn University of Technology Department of Mechatronics.
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements
General Procedure for Finite Element Method FEM is based on Direct Stiffness approach or Displacement approach. A broad procedural outline is listed.
Review (2 nd order tensors): Tensor – Linear mapping of a vector onto another vector Tensor components in a Cartesian basis (3x3 matrix): Basis change.
Central Force Motion Chapter 8
Motion and Stress Analysis by Vector Mechanics Edward C. Ting Professor Emeritus of Applied Mechanics Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN National Central.
Shape Matching for Model Alignment 3D Scan Matching and Registration, Part I ICCV 2005 Short Course Michael Kazhdan Johns Hopkins University.
Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Robot Grasping of Deformable Planar Objects Yan-Bin Jia (with Ph.D. students Feng Guo and Huan Lin.
1 20-Oct-15 Last course Lecture plan and policies What is FEM? Brief history of the FEM Example of applications Discretization Example of FEM softwares.
Algorithms, Models and Metrics for the Design of Workholding Using Part Concavities K. Gopalakrishnan, Ken Goldberg, IEOR, U.C. Berkeley.
CS B659: Principles of Intelligent Robot Motion Configuration Space.
Planning for Deformable Parts. Holding Deformable Parts How can we plan holding of deformable objects?
Geometric Objects and Transformation
Computation of Force Closure Grasps from Finite Contact Point Set Nattee Niparnan Advisor: Dr. Attawith Sudsang.
11/11/20151 Trusses. 11/11/20152 Element Formulation by Virtual Work u Use virtual work to derive element stiffness matrix based on assumed displacements.
Robot Grasp Planning using Parallel Sampling to Estimate Uncertainty in Pose, Shape, and Mechanics Melissa Goldstein Edward Lee Frank Ong Josh Goldberg.
Illustration of FE algorithm on the example of 1D problem Problem: Stress and displacement analysis of a one-dimensional bar, loaded only by its own weight,
COMP322/S2000/L281 Task Planning Three types of planning: l Gross Motion Planning concerns objects being moved from point A to point B without problems,
UNC Chapel Hill M. C. Lin Introduction to Motion Planning Applications Overview of the Problem Basics – Planning for Point Robot –Visibility Graphs –Roadmap.
1 Dissertation Workshop. Algorithms, Models and Metrics for the Design of Workholding using Part Concavities. K. Gopalakrishnan IEOR, U.C. Berkeley. Thesis.
1 Dissertation Workshop. Algorithms, Models and Metrics for the Design of Workholding using Part Concavities. K. Gopalakrishnan IEOR, U.C. Berkeley. Thesis.
The Spinning Top Chloe Elliott. Rigid Bodies Six degrees of freedom:  3 cartesian coordinates specifying position of centre of mass  3 angles specifying.
Computation on Parametric Curves Yan-Bin Jia Department of Computer Science Iowa State University Ames, IA , USA Dec 16, 2002.
Two Finger Caging of Concave Polygon Peam Pipattanasomporn Advisor: Attawith Sudsang.
Basic Geometric Nonlinearities Chapter Five - APPENDIX.
University of Pennsylvania Vijay Kumar 1 Stability of Enveloping Grasps Vijay Kumar GRASP Laboratory University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA
NUS CS 5247 David Hsu Configuration Space. 2 What is a path?
Real-Time Configuration Space Transforms for Obstacle Avoidance Wyatt S. Newman and Michael S. Branicky.
ECIV 720 A Advanced Structural Mechanics and Analysis
Implementation of 2D stress-strain Finite Element Modeling on MATLAB
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
8-1 Introduction a) Plane Stress y
Presentation transcript:

1 D-Space and Deform Closure: A Framework for Holding Deformable Parts K. “Gopal” Gopalakrishnan, Ken Goldberg IEOR and EECS, U.C. Berkeley.

2 Workholding: Rigid parts Contact Mechanics: Number of contacts –[Reuleaux, 1876], [Somoff, 1900] –[Mishra, Schwarz, Sharir, 1987], –[Nguyen, 1988] –[Markenscoff, Papadimitriou, 1990] Immobility, 2 nd Order Form Closure –[Rimon, Burdick, 1995] Immobilizing three finger grasps –[Ponce, Burdick, Rimon, 1995] [Mason, 2001]

3 Workholding: Rigid parts Caging Grasps –[Rimon, Blake, 1999] Summaries of results –[Bicchi, Kumar, 2000] –[Mason, 2001] C-Spaces for closed chains –[Milgram, Trinkle, 2002] Fixturing hinged parts –[van der Stappen et al, 2002] Antipodal Points for Curved Parts –[Jia 2002]

4 C-Space C-Space (Configuration Space): [Lozano-Perez, 1983] Dual representation of part position and orientation. Each degree of part freedom is one C-space dimension. y x  /3 (5,4) y x  (5,4,-  /3) Physical space C-Space

5 Avoiding Collisions: C-obstacles Consider: a blue part collides with a point Obstacle A at a set of configurations. The set in C-space is the C-obstacle, CA. In C-space, the part shrinks to a point and the obstacle grows accordlingly CA c = C free. Physical space C-Space x y

6 Workholding and C-space “Finger bodies” are obstacles. For planar rigid part, C-space has 3 dimensions. Physical space C-Space x  y

7 Form Closure A part is grasped in Form Closure if any infinitesimal motion results in collision. Form Closure = isolated point in C-free. Physical space C-Space x  y

8 Elastic Fingers [Hanafusa and Asada, 1982] Physical Models [Joukhadar, Bard, Laugier, 1994] Bounded Force Closure [Wakamatsu, Hirai, Iwata, 1996] Learned Grasps of Deformable Objects [Howard, Bekey, 1999] Holding Deformable Parts

9 Path Planning for Elastic Sheets and Bodies [Kavraki et al, 1998, 2000] Fabric Handling [Henrich and Worn, 2000] Robust manipulation with Vision [Hirai, Tsuboi, Wada 2001]

10 Deformable parts “Form closure” insufficient: Can always escape by deforming the part.

11 Deformable Polygonal parts Modeling Deformation: Planar Mesh N Nodes Edges Triangular elements. Polygonal perimeter.

12 Deformation Space (D-Space) Each node has 2 DOF D-Space: 2N-dimensional space of mesh node positions. A “deformation” q is a point in D-Space Analogous to configurations in C-Space 30-dimensional D-space

13 D-Space: Example Example part: 3-node mesh, 2 fixed. D-Space: 2D Nominal deformation: q0. Deformations in D-Space x y Physical space D-Space q0q0

14 Topology violating deformation Undeformed part Allowed deformation Self Collisions

15 D T : Topology Preserving Subspace x y Physical space D-Space D T  D-Space. DTDT DTC:DTC:

16 D-Obstacles x y Physical space D-Space Collision of any mesh element with obstacle. A Physical obstacle A i defines a deformation- obstacle DA i in D-Space. A1A1 DA 1

17 D-Space: Example Physical space x y D-Space Like C free, we define D free. D free = D T  [  (DA i C )]

18 With more nodes: D free Slice with only node 5 moving. Part and mesh x y Slice with only node 3 moving. x 3 y 3 x 5 y 5 x 5 y 5 x 5 y 5 Physical space D-Space D free = D T  [  (DA i C )]

19 Displacement between a pair of deformations X = q - q 0 : vector of nodal translations. Equivalent to moving origin in D-Space to q 0. q0q0 q X

20 Potential Energy Assume Linear Elasticity. K = FEM stiffness matrix. (2N  2N matrix for N nodes.) Forces at nodes: F = K X. Potential Energy: U(q) = (1/2) X T K X

21 Potential Energy “Surface” U : D free  R  0 Equilibrium: q where U is at a local minimum. Stable Equilibrium: q where U is at a strict local minimum. = “Deform Closure Grasp” q U(q)

22 Potential Energy Needed to Escape from a Stable Equilibrium Consider: Stable equilibrium q A, Equilibrium q B. “Capture Region”: K(q A )  D free, such that any configuration in K(q A ) returns to q A. q A qBqB q U(q) K( q A )

23 U A (q A ) = Increase in Potential Energy needed to escape from q A. = minimum external work needed to escape from q A. U A : Quality Measure q A qBqB q U(q) UAUA Potential Energy Needed to Escape from a Stable Equilibrium K( q A )

24 Quality Measure Example (U A = Energy needed to Escape) U A = 4 JoulesU A = 547 Joules

25 Theorem: Definitions of Deform closure and UA are frame-invariant. Proof: Consider D-spaces D 1 and D 2. - Consider q 1  D1, q 2  D 2. such that physical meshes are identical. Theorem 1: Frame Invariance x y x y D1:D1: D2:D2:

26 There exists distance preserving linear transformation T such that q 2 = T q 1. It can be shown that U A2 (q 2 ) = U A1 (q 1 ) Theorem 1: Frame Invariance x y x y

27 Form-closure of rigid part Theorem 2: Form Closure and Deform Closure  Deform-closure of equivalent deformable part. 

28 High Dimensional. Computing D T and DA i. Exploit symmetry. Computing D free DA i D free DTCDTC

29 Consider obstacle A and one triangular element. Consider the slice D e of D, corresponding to the 6 DOF of this element. Along all other axes of D, D e is constant. Extruded cross-section is a prism. The shape of DA e is same for all elements. Computing DA i

30 Thus, DA is the union of identical prisms with orthogonal axes. Center of D A is the deformation where the part has been shrunk to a point inside A. Similar approach for D T. Computing DA i

31 Two-point Deform Closure: Given contact nodes: Determine optimal jaw separation  *. Future work 

32 If Quality metric Q = U A. Maximum U A trivially at   = 0 Naïve Quality Metric

33 New Quality Metric Plastic deformation. Occurs when strain exceeds e L.

34 New Quality Metric Additional work U L done by jaws for plastic deformation. New Q = min { U A, U L } Stress Strain Plastic Deformation A B C eLeL A B C

35 Potential Energy Surface Potential Energy Jaw 1 position Jaw 2 position

36 Algorithm for U A (  i )

37 Algorithm for U A (  i )

38 U Vertex v (traversed on path of minimum work) U(v) U(v*) Algorithm for U A (  i )

39 Numerical Example Undeformed  = 10 mm. Optimal   = 5.6 mm. Foam Rubber e L = 0.8. FEM performed using ANSYS.

40 x y z Extension to 3D Tetrahedral elements: - 3 DOF per node.

41 D-Space: a “C-Space”-like framework for holding deformable parts. D free = D T  [  (DA i C )] Potential Energy and Deform Closure Thm 1: Frame Invariance Thm 2: Form-Closure Equivalence Symmetry in D free. Quality Metrics, Optimal Deform Closure Summary