States and International Environmental Regimes. Today: Examine IR theories that focus on states as units of analysis in explaining cooperation Are these.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IR2501 Theories of International Relations
Advertisements

International Relations Theory
POSC 2200 – Theoretical Approaches
GV505-week 4 1. Group level of Analysis/Institutional Factors 2. State/Structural Factors.
Theories of International Relations
Liberalism Central Assumptions and Propositions View of history: progressive change possible – Material: prosperity through technological progress, economic.
RealPolitik or Power Politics
Week 2: Major Worldviews January 10, 2007
The Prisoners’ Dilemma and IR theories International Relations.
Outline Prisoners’ Dilemma Security Dilemma Structural realism (Waltz)
Realist and Neorealist Theories of War
What are the properties of a billiard (or pool or snooker) ball? How do they behave?
International Relations Grand Debates
Neo-realists – neo-liberals The debate to date. Neo-realism Neo-Liberalist.
Plan for Today: 1. Wrap-up of points from Sagan & Waltz debate. 2. Evaluation of decisionmaking approaches. 3. Introduction to constructivism.
Institutions and their role in shaping European Security
IR 501 Lecture Notes (2) Realism
MIT-Harvard Conference Cyber International Relations (ECIR)
Neo-Liberal Institutionalism. The Prisoners’ Dilemma Player 2 Player 1.
Constructivism in I.R..
Realism. Assumptions  States: unitary, rational actors -Treaty of Westphalia (1648)  Anarchy: no central government  Survival: primary objective 
Alternatives to Realism: Pluralist Liberalism and Globalism.
GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College.
Institutions and Environmental Cooperation. Today Types of global environmental problems The role of international institutions (regimes): realist vs.
Levels of Analysis.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORIES: CONSTRUCTIVISM
Week 2: Major Worldviews January 10, 2007
Theories of International Relations- Liberalism Robert Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Power and Interdependence (1977)  The liberal conceptualization.
Outline News items Iran nuclear agreement How to prepare for quizzes Main takeaways for today Revisit power from end of last class Structure for comparing.
Notes on bargaining 1.What is bargaining 2.Bargaining power 3.Issue of communication.
Three perspectives on international politics IR theories: Constructivism.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY INTRODUCTION HC 35.
Κονστρουκτιβισμός
International Relations Theory- Images Realism Pluralism Globalism.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORIES: PLURALISM OR LIBERALISM
Theories in International Relations: Neo-Liberalism
Homework 1. What is this study based on? How did the group determine levels of corruption? 2. How have the countries at the top of the list (least corrupt.
IR theories: Institutionalism
Plan for Today: Forms of Liberalism in IR 1.Introducing major shared principles of liberalism – domestic and international. 2.Summary introduction to liberal.
 10 questions  1 minute per question  Quiz ends at 10:10am  If you have any concerns that your I>clicker is not working, get out a piece of paper.
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 4: Neo-Realism/ Structural Realism.
PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Idea-Based -isms.
Neo-Liberal Institutionalism Idealism tainted by Realism.
Plan for Today: Forms of Liberalism in IR  Delving in detail into newer forms of liberalism: 1.“English school”. 2.Liberal Interdependence. 3.Neoliberal.
1. Prescriptions to resolve ethnic conflict (finishing). 2. What is terrorism? 3. How well do our existing theories deal with terrorism? 4. Is terrorism.
©2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. ©2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Thinking Theoretically: Putting.
Introducing the IR Paradigms
International Relations
POL 3080 Approaches to International Relations Introduction
KYLE IR 101. WHAT IS IT? DEFINITION Study of international events and actors.
WHY DO ALL STATES FIGHT? THE THIRD IMAGE -Even nice leaders and nice states fight. -Very different states and people behave similarly and predictably -Some.
‘Anarchy is What States Make of It’
The Great Debates in International Relations 1 st Great Debate (20s & 30s) 2 nd Great Debate (50s-80s) 3 rd Great Debate (80s & on)
The Frontier of IPE: the Evolution of Ideas Stephan Haggard Taiwan National University June 5, 2004.
Government S-1740 Lecture 3: Explaining Law Compliance INTERNATIONAL LAW Summer 2008.
WEEK 3 THE THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. Vocabulary Focus Positivism is a philosophic system which considers that truth can be verified only by facts.
PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Liberalisms and Idealisms.
IR 306 Foreign Policy Analysis
Theories about integration and enlargement Lecture 2.
International Relations
Outline Prisoners’ Dilemma Security Dilemma Structural realism (Waltz)
Alternatives to Realism: Pluralist Liberalism and Globalism
Lecture 8.1 LIBERALISM A. Alternative to realism
Introduction to International Relations
Case Study 1: Grading Rubric
INTERNATIONAL REGIMES
IR Theory No Limits Debate.
Theories of International Relations
Presentation transcript:

States and International Environmental Regimes

Today: Examine IR theories that focus on states as units of analysis in explaining cooperation Are these useful theoretical lenses?

Realism - Assumptions Anarchic system = no central authority; self-help States want to survive States potentially dangerous (military capability) Uncertain about intentions of other states Rational – strategic calculations how to survive

Realism Implications about state behavior Maximize power Fear each other Follow own interest defined as security and maximization of RELATIVE power War is means not an end Non-security issues (particularly environment, human rights) of secondary, if any, importance Cooperation unlikely (although “not impossible”) Institutions – irrelevant b/c reflect distribution of power

Neoliberal Institutionalism Assumptions States unitary, rational actors Anarchy: no government, but governance possible States follow own interests Interests can be issue specific (e.g. economy, environment, security, etc.) Cooperation possible – governance without government Institutions – important for cooperation

Role of Institutions Facilitate Cooperation: –institutionalize iteration (long-term calculations and reciprocity conducive to cooperation) -provide information (monitor, change of strategy) -credible commitments -issue linkage -reduce transaction costs (make agreements and monitoring less costly to administer) -resolve distribution conflicts

Constructivism: Assumptions Society of states Commonly accepted norms and principles (such as sovereignty, procedural rules in treaty negotiation matter) Ideas influence definition of interests and regime formation Power cannot be defined as a simple function of resources; it is also situational

Structural Power vs. Bargaining Leverage Structural power F (security, production, finance, knowledge and ideas) Bargaining power F (strategic position, bargaining rules, coalitions) E.G. Brazil and Indonesia may be low on structural power, but have a lot of bargaining power in biodiversity negotiations.

Key Differences Definition of power Definition of interests Prospects for international governance Role of institutions

Interpreting environmental cooperation: Realism? -focus on hegemon, interests, power relations Liberal institutionalism? -focus on interests, institutions, effects Constructivism? -focus on norms, ideas, networks that spread ideas Other factors? -domestic politics; non-state actors; transnational actors