Thoughts on minimum strength & stiffness requirements for seismic design Greg Deierlein Stanford University PEER/SF-AB Tall Building Discussion Feb. 23,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Design of Seismic-Resistant Steel Building Structures

Advertisements

1 LESSLOSS Sub Project 7 Techniques and Methods for Vulnerability Reduction Barcelona 18 th May 07 – Lisbon 24 th May 07 LESSLOSS Dissemination Meeting.

Seismic Performance Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings SPEAR International Workshop Joint Research Centre, Ispra, 4 th -5 th April 2005.

PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting PEER 2002 Annual Meeting uHelmut Krawinkler Seismic Demand Analysis.

Example Effects of NEES Research on Structural Design Practice Bill Holmes Rutherford + Chekene San Francisco March 3, NEES Governance Board Workshop.

Seismic Design Guidelines for Tall Buildings Ronald O. Hamburger Senior Principal Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc. Quake Summit 2010 October 8, 2010.

Performance-based guidelines and regulations

Nirmal Jayaram Nilesh Shome Helmut Krawinkler 2010 SCEC Annual Meeting A statistical analysis of the responses of tall buildings to recorded and simulated.

Utilizing Steel Plate Shear Walls for Seismic Hazard Mitigation

PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting PEER 2002 Annual Meeting uPractical Application of the PEER Limit State Checking Methodolgy uAllin Cornell uwith F. Jalayer,

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models SCEC GMSV Workshop: Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications Nicolas Luco, Research Structural.

Building Systems (Seismic)

by: Jon Heintz, S.E. & Robert Pekelnicky

Structural models Christine Goulet, Presenter

H. Krawinkler, 2/22/07 P-Delta and Minimum Base Shear.

Quantifying risk by performance- based earthquake engineering, Cont’d Greg Deierlein Stanford University …with contributions by many 2006 IRCC Workshop.

The use of risk in design: ATC 58 performance assessment procedure Craig D. Comartin.

Demand and Capacity Factor Design: A Performance-based Analytic Approach to Design and Assessment Sharif University of Technology, 25 April 2011 Demand.

1 Workshop on GMSM for Nonlinear Analysis, Berkeley CA, October 26, 2006 Structural Models: OpenSees and Drain RC Frames and Walls Curt B. Haselton - PhD.

Modeling Decision Variables: Dollars, Deaths, and Downtime Judith Mitrani-Reiser (JHU) James L. Beck (Caltech) PEER Annual Meeting San Francisco, CA January.

Code Minimum Base Shear Requirements February 2007 Joe Maffei RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE.

Framework for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Helmut Krawinkler, Stanford U. PEER Summative Meeting – June 13, 2007.

Overview of GMSM Methods Nicolas Luco 1 st Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification (GMSM) for Nonlinear Analysis – 27 October 2006.

Section 2.1 Overview Types of NL Models Inelastic Model Attributes

Simulated Deformations of Seattle High-Rise Buildings from a Hypothetical Giant Cascadian Earthquake Tom Heaton Jing Yang (Ph.D. thesis) Caltech Earthquake.

Simulations of Flexible Buildings in Large Earthquakes

Assessing Effectiveness of Building Code Provisions Greg Deierlein & Abbie Liel Stanford University Curt Haselton Chico State University … other contributors.

Charles A. Kircher, Ph.D., P.E.

1 Structural Responses – Preliminary Results and Observations PEER GMSM Program Workshop, Richmond CA, October 29, 2007 Curt B. Haselton, PhD, PE Assistant.

Seismic Performance Assessment of Flat Plate Floor Systems John W. Wallace, Ph.D., P.E. Thomas Hyun-Koo Kang, Ph.D. Student Department of Civil and Environmental.

Colorado State University

RETAINING STRUCTURES. Theories of lateral earth pressure will be used in this chapter to design various types of retaining walls. In general,

Theories of lateral earth pressure will be used in this chapter to design various types of retaining walls. In general, retaining walls can be divided.

How detailed should a model be? Pierre Hoogenboom Delft University of Technology.

Incremental Dynamic Analyses on Bridges on various Shallow Foundations Lijun Deng PI’s: Bruce Kutter, Sashi Kunnath University of California, Davis NEES.

Greg Deierlein, Paul Cordova, Eric Borchers, Xiang Ma, Sarah

Seismic Performance of Outriggered Tall Buildings

Seismic Analysis Concepts - Prof SH Lodi

Seismic Design of Concrete Structure.

PEER EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE-ENGINEERING INTERFACE: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH PERSPECTIVE Allin Cornell Stanford University SCEC WORKSHOP Oakland, CA.

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Further optimization of the solenoid design A.Efremov, E.Koshurnikov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov, A.Vodopianov GSI, Darmstadt,

NEESR: Near-Collapse Performance of Existing Reinforced Concrete Structures Presented by Justin Murray Graduate Student Department of Civil and Environmental.

Static Pushover Analysis

NEWBuildS Tall Wood Building Design Project – Structural Design and Analysis Zhiyong Chen & Minghao Li University of New Brunswick, University of British.

University of Palestine

Team UCDSESM Yihai Bao, YeongAe Heo, Zhiyu Zong University of California, Davis April 4 th, 2008 Prediction for Progressive Collapse Resistance of a 2D.

RGA Global Headquarters Lateral System Analysis Study

1 Building Collapse Fragilities Considering Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences Using Publicly Available NEEShub Data Yue Li and Ruiqaing Song Michigan Technological.

Jim Kielbaso MS, CSCS Total Performance Training Centers.

Tall Building Initiative Response Evaluation Helmut Krawinkler Professor Emeritus Stanford University On behalf of the Guidelines writers: Y. Bozorgnia,

Seismic of Older Concentrically Braced Frames Charles Roeder (PI) Dawn Lehman, Jeffery Berman (co-PI) Stephen Mahin (co-PI Po-Chien Hsiao.

Nonlinear Performance and Potential Damage of Degraded Structures Under Different Earthquakes The 5 th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering “Facing.

C ONSIDERATION OF C OLLAPSE AND R ESIDUAL D EFORMATION IN R ELIABILITY-BASED P ERFORMANCE E VALUATION OF B UILDINGS Chiun-lin WU 1, Chin-Hsiung LOH 2,

Adaptive Nonlinear Analysis as Applied to Performance based Earthquake Engineering Dr. Erol Kalkan, P.E. United States Geological Survey TUFTS, 2008.

NEESR-SG: Controlled Rocking of Steel-Framed Buildings with Replaceable Energy Dissipating Fuses Greg Deierlein, Paul Cordova, Eric Borchers, Xiang Ma,

Low Level Coded Product Structure Tree

Rapid Construction of Bridge Piers with Concrete Filled Tubes

Characterization of Irregularities in Existing Tall Buildings in San Francisco using GIS Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering MSc.

Seismic Performance of New and Older CBFs Dawn Lehman and Charles Roeder (PIs) Po-Chien Hsiao (GSRs) University of Washington.

Minimum Price $100. Minimum Price $45 Minimum Price $40.

INTRODUCTION Due to Industrial revolution metro cities are getting very thickly populated and availability of land goes on decreasing. Due to which multistory.

Review of Indian Seismic Codes

Agricultural Hall and Annex Easting Lansing, MI

Earthquake resistant buildings

by James D. Cook, Carol H. Flowers, and Barry S. Skikne

ASC Incentive on Call Closure %

Mechanics of Materials Engr Lecture 1

Fig. 4 cTFH1 cells correlate with a boosting of influenza-specific memory B cells. cTFH1 cells correlate with a boosting of influenza-specific memory B.

Find the Perimeter.

For More Details:

Presentation transcript:

Thoughts on minimum strength & stiffness requirements for seismic design Greg Deierlein Stanford University PEER/SF-AB Tall Building Discussion Feb. 23, 2007

20 Story RC SMF Perimeter Frame (Haselton et al., 2006) Design Information (ASCE 7-02) V d /W = V u /W = (pushover) T = 2.6 sec _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ IDA Collapse (median quantities) Sa(T 1 ) = 0.48g (median intensity at collapse) IDR max = (about = ¾ x V u /W = 0.057) RDR max = ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Observations: 1.IDR max = = about ¾ x Vu/W = Sd(T 1 ) = (T/2pi) 2 Sa(T 1 ) = 32 in. 3.System Collapse Drift = x 4 stories = 32 in. 4.Additional Study: ASCE 7-05 design with V d /W = has about one-half the collapse margin of ASCE IDA collapse mechanism

Building Code Criteria (SEI/ASCE 7-02) Minimum Strength: V d = C s W Minimum Stiffness: Drift: Stability: Mechanism Controls: SCWB, capacity design, … Toughness: component detailing, …

Minimum Stiffness & Stability Strength: V d = C s W Stiffness: Identities: & Combine & Rearrange: CsCs C d =5.5 C d =8 Observation: Based on conventional drift (stiffness) requirements, the 0.1 limit on the stability coefficient becomes significant at Cs < 0.04 to 0.05.