TREATMENT IN MORNING VS EVENING DR AMY ROGERS MRCGP CLINICAL RESEARCH FELLOW MEDICINES MONITORING UNIT UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BY Dr. Khaled Helmy Al Mahmora Chest Hospital BY Dr. Khaled Helmy Al Mahmora Chest Hospital Treatment Of Hypertension In Diabetes.
Advertisements

Analysis of the ADVANCE Trial Sapna N. Patel UCSF Pharm. D. Candidate 2008 Preceptor Dr. Craig S. Stern March 28, 2008.
Newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 1544) Randomisation Avoid ACE inhibitors/ beta-blockers (n = 390) Tight BP control (n =
1 Health and Disease in Populations 2002 Week 9 – 2/5/02 Randomised controlled trials 2 Dr Jenny Kurinczuk.
The INSIGHT study - Reliable blood pressure control and additional benefits for hypertensive patients Anthony M Heagerty Department of Medicine Manchester.
Recruitment to Trials. Background Recruitment of participants is a VERY important issue. The general consensus is that most trials under recuit.
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at risk of Ischemic Events Purpose To assess the relative efficacy of the antiplatelet drugs clopidogrel.
Main Trial Design and Trial Status
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT): Design Cannon CP.
Dr. Christina Reith CTSU, University of Oxford ASCEND: A Study of Cardiovascular Events iN Diabetes.
Primary care of hypertensive patients and the risk of acute events Irina Stirbu-Wagner Markus MJ Nielen Maaike Langelaan Robert A. Verheij Joke C. Korevaar.
Current and Future Perspectives on Acute Coronary Syndromes Paul W. Armstrong MD AMI Quebec Montreal October 1, 2010.
Critical Appraisal for MRCGP Jim McMorran Coventry GP GP trainer Editor GPnotebook (
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2009.
Pragmatic Randomised Trials. Background Many clinical trials take place in artificial conditions that do not represent NORMAL clinical practice. Often.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2015.
BHS Guidelines for the management of hypertension BHS IV, 2004 and Update of the NICE Hypertension Guideline, 2006 Guidelines for management of hypertension:
Type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure How explosive is the cocktail?
Use of ABPM to diagnose hypertension
OVBIAGELE B, DIENER H-C, YUSUF S, ET AL., PROFESS INVESTIGATORS. LEVEL OF SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE WITHIN THE NORMAL RANGE AND RISK OF RECURRENT STROKE.
 men Differences in Blood Pressure Documentation and Clinical Practice Variability: Implications for Population Management for Hypertension and Opportunities.
VBWG IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering Study.
Maximum home blood pressure: a novel indicator of target-organ damage in hypertension  Blood pressure variability has recently been shown to be a strong.
HOME AND AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING
Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial.
0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist.
ONTARGET Risk factors and outcomes associated with nonadherence Background ONTARGET compared the efficacy of the ARB telmisartan, the ACE inhibitor ramipril,
Journal Club ADAM WILCOX, PHARMD 1/22/14. Patient Case  DB, 70 yo M  Overall ABPM summary  Avg. BP = 116/62  Daytime = 120/63  Nighttime = 103/58.
Preventing Surgical Complications Prevent Harm from High Alert Medication- Anticoagulants in Primary Care Insert Date here Presenter:
Combination Therapy for Hypertension Summary and Comment by Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM Published in Journal Watch Cardiology December 3, 2008Journal Watch.
The TRial Of Preventing HYpertension (TROPHY) TROPHY.
NICE CG127: Implementation in Primary care Dr Terry McCormack, Whitby.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Glycemic Control: When the Lower is Not the “Better”?
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
Lancet 373: , 2009 Baseline Characteristics of Participants and Study Design of Clinical Trials to Compare Intensive glucose- lowering versus.
Enrollment and Outcomes Fan Fan Hou, et al. N Engl J Med 2006;354:
ALLHAT Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial JAMA 2002;288:
A Controlled Trial of Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) Design Sever PS et al. J Hypertens 2001;19:1139–1147.
Bangalore S, et al. β-Blocker use and clinical outcomes in stable outpatients with and without coronary artery disease. JAMA. 2012;308(13): ?
Applying CRASH-2 (Clinical Randomisation of an Antifibrinolytic in Significant Haemorrhage 2) in a Pre- Hospital Wilderness Context Paul B. Jones PGY1.
Perindopril Remodeling in Elderly with Acute Myocardial Infarction PREAMIPREAMI Presented at The European Society of Cardiology Hot Line Session, September.
How to Read a Journal Article. Basics Always question: – Does this apply to my clinical practice? – Will this change how I treat patients? – How could.
Trial profile Prakash Deedwania, et al. Lancet 2006; 368:
The MICRO-HOPE. Microalbuminuria, Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Reference Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Professor Azeem Majeed Department of Primary Care & Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London. “Using.
Journal Club February 7, 2014 Sadie T. Velásquez, MD.
Angela Aziz Donnelly April 5, 2016
Powered by Infomedica Infomedica Conference Coverage* of 26 th European Meeting on Hypertension and Cardiovascular Protection Paris (France), June 10-13,
Cardiovascular Disease and Antihypertensives The RENAAL Trial Reference Brunner BM, and the RENAAL study group. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular.
Hypertension November 2016
Judith H. Veis, MD, FACP Associate Director, Nephrology
LEADER trial: Primary Outcome
SOCRATES Trial design: Patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either ticagrelor 180 mg load + 90 mg BID or aspirin.
Clinical Reader in Clinical Pharmacology
PS Sever, PM Rothwell, SC Howard, JE Dobson, B Dahlöf,
51st Annual Scientific Session for the LIFE Investigators
Managing Complex Hypertension: What Every Physician Should Know
Resistant Hypertension
Managing Hard-To-Treat Hypertension: What Every Physician Should Know
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Diabetes and CV Risk Reduction: Cardiologists’ Perspectives on the Latest Outcomes Data.
SIGNIFY Trial design: Participants with stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure and resting heart rate >70 bpm were randomized to.
Relative risk of major events with atenolol vs placebo
Hyperkalemia in the Hospital
ACCELERATE Trial design: Patients at high vascular risk were randomized to either evacetrapib 130 mg daily or placebo. They were followed for 30 months.
Hypertension November 2016
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
Presentation transcript:

TREATMENT IN MORNING VS EVENING DR AMY ROGERS MRCGP CLINICAL RESEARCH FELLOW MEDICINES MONITORING UNIT UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE 1

ETHOS Challenge assumptions – Why do we prescribe tablets in the morning? Use IT and data technology – web-based study record linkage Can we improve outcomes without increasing drug exposure? 2 "Social Network Analysis Visualization" by MartinGrandjean - Own work : Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons -

CIRCADIAN VARIABILITY 3 White coat hypertension

PREVIOUS RESEARCH 3 Spanish studies by Hermida et al. Patients taking >1 blood pressure medication at night had a reduction in cardiovascular outcomes of almost 65%. 4 Chronobiol Int 2010;27:

CONT. MAPEC trial results (Hermida et al) Chronobiol Int 2010;27:

POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS Correction of non-dipping pattern Delayed onset of action Duration of action less then 24 hours 6

PROBLEMS WITH MAPEC Randomisation was unclear Very high event rate – unrepresentative population? poor validation of outcomes? Too good to be true? 7

AIM to compare evening versus morning dosing of antihypertensive drugs 8

METHOD Participants sign up online Randomised follow-up Record linkage 9

OUTCOMES Primary APTC events: vascular death hospitalized MI hospitalized stroke SecondaryAdherence Patient reported outcomes eg falls, fractures 10

11

SUB-STUDIES Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Cognitive Function 12 "Microlife WatchBP Home A" by Tennancening - Own work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons -

WHY THIS STUDY? Outcomes matter But, money does too: large study no pharma funding 13

NUMBERS Pilot study: 308 patients 0.84%/yr cardiovascular risk Need to randomise 10,269 people 14

RECRUITMENT Secondary care hypertension clinics BHS research network Primary careletter sent by GP advertising study 15

TIMELINE 16

CURRENT STATUS 17

QUESTIONS? 18