Field Testing & Monitoring of Structural Performance University of California, Los Angeles 7 NCEEJuly 21-24, 2002 George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mechanics Based Modeling of the Dynamic Response of Wood Frame Building By Ricardo Foschi, Frank Lam,Helmut Prion, Carlos Ventura Henry He and Felix Yao.
Advertisements

Development of an In-Situ Test for Direct Evaluation of the Liquefaction Resistance of Soils K. H. Stokoe, II, E. M. Rathje and B.R. Cox University of.
Steven Chase 1, Yaw Adu-Gyamfi 2 and Paul Fuchs 3 1&2 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Virginia 3 Fuchs Consulting Inc.
Advanced Site Monitoring and Characterization of Site Dynamic Properties Mourad Zeghal, Tarek Abdoun and Vicente Mercado Department of Civil and Envir.
ISEE: Internet-based Simulation for Earthquake Engineering Part (I): The Database Approach Yuan-Sen YANG, Shiang-Jung WANG, Kung-Juin WANG, Keh-Chyuan.
Prepared By: Kopila Sharma  Enables communication between two or more system.  Uses standard network protocols for communication.  Do.
가상 BIT 캠퍼스 구축을 위한 연구동향 (Environmental sciences 분야 ) 서울대학교 생명과학부 천종식.
UC Davis 1 A NEES Geotechnical Centrifuge Facility at Davis
NEESGrid: Early Experiences in CyberInfrastructure Charles Severance University of Michigan Sakai Project, NEESGrid Project, OGCE Project
1 Design of a Low-Power Wireless Structural Monitoring System for Collaborative Computational Algorithms Yang Wang, Prof. Kincho H. Law Department of Civil.
4 th NEES Annual MeetingKenneth H. Stokoe, II Washington, DCJune 22, 2006 Collaborative Activities of a NEES Equipment Site: Examples from
UB Node Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES)
UC Berkeley Reconfigurable Reaction Wall NEES Equipment Site NSF NEES Awardees Meeting Video-Teleconference.
9/28/01Colorado-NEES1 Fast Hybrid Test Platform for Seismic Performance Evaluation of Structural Systems P.I.s: P. Benson Shing Enrico Spacone University.
Teleoperation and Teleparticipation of Instructional Shake Tables Using the NEES Cyberinfrastructure S.J. Dyke 1, Z. Jiang 2, R. Christenson 2, X. Gao.
University of Kansas A KTEC Center of Excellence 1 Victor S. Frost Director, Information & Telecommunication Technology Center Dan F. Servey Distinguished.
Monitoring Structural Response to Earthquakes using Wireless Sensor Networks Judith Mitrani June 18, 2002.
Multiaxial Subassemblage Testing (MAST) System C. French, A. Schultz, J. Hajjar, C. Shield, R. Dexter Department of Civil Engineering D. Ernie Department.
NEESGrid - A Collaborative Portal Study Charles Severance University of Michigan NEESGrid SI Team
The Performance of a Wireless Sensor Network for Structural Health Monitoring Jeongyeup Paek, Nupur Kothari, Krishna Chintalapudi, Sumit Rangwala, Ramesh.
Structural Monitoring and Evaluation Tools at Caltech: Instrumentation and Real-Time Data Analysis S C Bradford, T H Heaton, J L Beck California Institute.
California Integrated Seismic Network Strategy for Success Woody Savage David Oppenheimer ANSS-IMW Strategic Planning Meeting August 14, 2006 Salt Lake.
Improving Laboratories with Internet Controlled Equipment and Internet Student Support Jim Henry, Ph.D., P.E. Charles Knight, Ph.D., P.E. College of Engineering.
Performance University of California, Los Angeles Field Testing & Monitoring of Structural Performance NSF NEES Awardee Meeting September 28, 2001.
Computer Based Instrumentation: Hands-On and Remote Operation Masoud Naghedolfeizi, Ph.D, Fort Valley State University Jim Henry, Ph.D., P.E. University.
Parhum Delgoshaei Chelsea Green Vinod K. Lohani Virginia Tech Virginia Tech Virginia Tech AbstractAssessment Applications of Dataflow Programming in Sustainability.
Distributed Control Systems Emad Ali Chemical Engineering Department King SAUD University.
1 Customer Network Operations Center. 2 Agenda Overview Benefits Value Additional Services Questions Monitoring Options.
Foundation Flexibility and Damping from Forced Vibration Testing of Field Structure Lisa M. Star Michael J. Givens George Mylonakis Jonathan P. Stewart.
An Internet-based Educational Platform for Earthquake Engineering Laboratory Experiments Chencheng Wu, Le Yu, Shirley J. Dyke, Christopher Beeler and Jian.
Computer Aided Design, Manufacturing & Measurement Integration August Coordinate Measurement System Committee Albuquerque, New Mexico Richey-McIvor-Sandwith.
ITW Structural and Strength of Materials Teaching Laboratory Civil & Materials Engineering UIC November 2009.
Dr. Mark Askelson | 4149 University Avenue Stop 9006, Grand Forks, ND phone | fax Ganged Phased Array Radar – Risk Mitigation.
Earthquake and Structural Health Monitoring of Civil Structures Bob Nigbor
ABSTRACT provides equipment and personnel for the dynamic monitoring and testing of structures in the field. As we have done in previous earthquakes,
NEES Equipment Site University of Minnesota Multi-Axial Subassemblage Testing (MAST) 6 Degree-of-Freedom (DOF) Control Technology Ability.
CS780-3 Lecture Notes In Courtesy of Mengjun Xie.
PolarGrid Geoffrey Fox (PI) Indiana University Associate Dean for Graduate Studies and Research, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University.
University of Missouri - Columbia
Structural Engineering and Earthquake Simulation Laboratory Experimental and Micromechanical Computational Study of Pile Foundations Subjected to Liquefaction-Induced.
Space-Based Network Centric Operations Research. Secure Autonomous Integrated Controller for Distributed Sensor Webs Objective Develop architectures and.
PI on a Mini-PC PI on a Mini-PC Remote Data Collection with Intelligence Roland Heersink Industrial Evolution Chuck Wells OSIsoft.
Teleoperation and Teleparticipation of Instructional Shake Tables Using the NEES Cyberinfrastructure S.J. Dyke 1, Z. Jiang 2, R. Christenson 2, X. Gao.
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN Phone: (765) Fax: (765) Investigation of the Effect of Transfer.
Field Testing & Monitoring of Structural Performance University of California, Los Angeles CPT Truck and RSA Jonathan P. Stewart, co-PI NSF Site VisitJune.
Field Testing & Monitoring of Structural Performance University of California, Los Angeles Project Overview John Wallace, PI NSF Site VisitJune 17-18,
July 21, 2005AESE Fast Hybrid Simulation with Geographically Distributed Substructures Gilberto Mosqueda Boza Stojadinovic Jason P. Hanley (Presenter)
Hybrid Simulation of Structural Collapse
July, 6, 2004 QoS and Dynamic Systems Workshop, ICPADS S. Olariu1, K. Maly2, E. C. Foudriat3 and S. M. Yamany4 {1,2,3}Department of Computer Science,
GVDA NEES Field Facilities: A Resource for Earthquake Engineering (and Seismology) Research and Practice Bob Nigbor UCLA.
MICROPILES RESEARCH AT WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Dr. Adrián Rodríguez-Marek, Dr. Balasingam Muhunthan, and Dr. Rafik Itani Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Multi-Site Soil-Structure-Foundation Interaction Test (MISST) PI: Bill Spencer, Illinois Co-PIs: Amr Elnashai, Dan Kuchma, Illinois Jim Ricles, Richard.
COSMOSMotion Slides.
NEES Cyberinfrastructure Center at the San Diego Supercomputer Center, UCSD George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation Analyzing.
NEES Cyberinfrastructure Center at the San Diego Supercomputer Center, UCSD George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation Enabling.
Deployment of Wisden: In a real environment - Four Seasons Building Deployment of Wisden: In a real environment - Four Seasons Building Results from Deployment:
Wireless monitoring of structures Wireless monitoring of structures Monitoring and numerical modeling of Factor building motions Monitoring and numerical.
Experiment-Based Deployment With the Four Seasons Building Steve Kang Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of California, Los Angeles.
REVEAL Instrument Overview What is REVEAL? Prototype strap-down (vehicle-independent) instrumentation system REVEAL provides the traditional (manned) airborne.
George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation 4 th regular meeting of the NEES preservation advisory committee Stanislav Pejša
NEES Networking Needs The NEES MRE: Where the Infrastructure Community Meets the Cyberinfrastructure Community Kyran (Kim) Mish, Director Center for Computational.
WiMax Monitoring Systems Felix Lopez Wimax360 Contest Participant – Category #4 Draft Version#1.
Instrumentation Symposium 10/9/2010 Nigbor 1 Instrumentation Selection Strategies Robert Nigbor
Improving Laboratories with Internet Controlled Equipment and Internet Student Support Jim Henry, Ph.D., P.E. Charles Knight, Ph.D., P.E. College of Engineering.
Constraints Space Load Capacity Costs Operating hours.
NEESGrid - A Collaborative Portal Study
National Internet2 Day - Sciences and Engineering Overview
Vibration based structural damage detection for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure system.
Jim Henry, Ph.D., P.E. Charles Knight, Ph.D., P.E.
Introducing MagicInfo 6
Presentation transcript:

Field Testing & Monitoring of Structural Performance University of California, Los Angeles 7 NCEEJuly 21-24, 2002 George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation John W. Wallace Joel P. Conte Deborah Estrin Patrick J. Fox Jonathan P. Stewart Daniel Whang

Acknowledgements Funding provided through a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES) – Dr. Priscilla P. Nelson, Director Division of Civil and Mechanical Systems – Joy Pauschke, Ph.D., P.E., NEES Program Director – Thomas L. Anderson, Ph.D. NEES Equipment Project Coordinator

UCLA NEES Personnel John W. Wallace (PI) PhD, UC Berkeley, 1989 Structural Joel P. Conte (co-PI) PhD, UC Berkeley, 1990 Structural Jonathan Stewart (co-PI) PhD, UC Berkeley, 1996 Geotechnical Patrick J. Fox (co-PI) PhD, University of Wisconsin- Madison 1992, Geotechnical Deborah Estrin (co-PI) PhD, MIT, 1985 Computer Science Daniel Whang (Project Manager) PhD, UCLA, 2001 Geotechnical Eunjong Yu (Graduate Student Researcher) William Elmer (Engineering Aide) Colin Means (Engineering Aide) Balaji Vasu (Webmaster)

Project Overview Wireless

Equipment Overview State-of-the-art data acquisition system w/ wireless capabilities Networking equipment to enable near real-time field connectivity to NEESgrid Forced vibration equipment (shakers) Cone penetration truck for rapid soil characterization Structural sensors for acceleration, strain, displacement Custom soil probes for measuring ground vibrations

Data Acquisition System Vendor: Kinemetrics, Inc. True 24-bit resolution/large dynamic bandwidth (155 dB) Quanterra Q330 data loggers are true network devices with wireless capabilities (TCP/IP) Powerful UNIX based data acquisition software program, Antelope – Remote monitoring – Relational database embedded

Local Area Network Sensors/Video Data acquisition system/video server Satellite Campus gigabit backbone NEESpop Visualization portal NEESgrid

Eccentric Mass Shakers MK-14A (1): – Omni-directional – 0 to 4.2 Hz – 20 kips peak force MK-15 (2): – Uni-directional – 0 to 25 Hz – 100 kips peak force – Can be synchronized MK-14B (1): – Omni-directional – 0 to 10 Hz – 50 kips peak force – Rapidly deployable (assembly time < 4 man hours)

Linear Inertial Shaker “Shake Table” – Mass on rails, Actuator – 30 gpm HPS, Accumulators – Digital control system Mounting requirements – Table with Actuator support System Limitations – M s (weight) – 1 to 7 kips – Actuator (+/- 15 inches) – Force (15,000 pounds) Advantages – Random load history – Time domain analysis Mass Actuator

Cone Penetration Truck Vendor: Hogentogler, Inc Site characterization Installation of soil probes to measure ground vibrations during forced vibration tests of full- scale structures

Custom Soil Probes Drive shoe Probe Triaxial accelerometer Cable Deployable/retrievable Triaxial (3 channels) Measure in situ ground accelerations Feed directly to Q330 data loggers

Research Vision Data Collection Point Soil Probes To Command Center Shaker Obtain detailed performance data for linear and nonlinear response of structural systems Address scale and boundary conditions issues commonly associated with lab studies Provide data to study system interactions, e.g. SFSI Develop new sensor (packaging) concepts Obtain high resolution response data to promote advances in simulation

Equipment Integration Pilot Study #1 – Data acquisition Pilot Study #2 – Laboratory testing – Shakers, sensors, data acquisition Pilot Study #3 – Field testing – Soil probes (final) – Satellite system

Pilot Study #2 SDOF steel frame – 15 ft (L) x 13 ft (H) x 6 ft (W) – Structure weight ~3.6 kips Free-vibration testing Forced-vibration testing – Shaker weight ~ 5 kips – Longitudinal direction – Acceleration sensors – Strain sensors

Basic System Identification

LAN for Pilot Study #2 Instruments: Episensors, pulser Real-time Wireless transmission of data from data logger in UCLA structural laboratory to UCLA NEES Office Real-time transmission of data from webserver in UCLA NEES Office to outside world via Antelope Mock run (at UCLA) of real operation scenario in the field Field Trailer UCLA Satellite Link

Pilot Study #3 PS #2 specimen on alternative foundation configurations – Investigate effect on SFSI Shaking in transverse direction Dense instrumentation on structure, ground surface and subsurface

Tele-observable Data Streams Excitation response history Recorded response histories at sensors Deck/foundation transfer functions (fixed base) Deck/foundation transfer functions (flexible base)

Website –