Process for conducting a vote of confidence in a Dean FA-003-078.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
Advertisements

UNLV FACULTY SENATE TENURE & PROMOTION FORUM Oct. 2, 2012 Oct. 2, 2012 Thanks to the Past Chairs: Dr. John Filler Dr. Ceci Maldonado Dr. Nasser Daneshvary.
Proposal for the Process of Faculty Selection to Committees in the School of Undergraduate Studies History As the School of Undergraduate Studies (UGS)
Faculty Forum: March 5, 2008 Shall the Collected Rules and Regulations be revised to adopt the revised Pilot Faculty Grievance Procedure recommended by.
MRFA General Meeting 27 October Agenda Approvals Approval of Minutes (Sept 27, 2010) Officer’s Reports President Treasurer Audit Completion Part-time.
CLA RTP amendments 1. Align with December 10 vote to allow up to 2 members of same academic area to serve at different ranks 2. Specify that two members.
Personnel Policies Workshop Best Practices for Personnel Committees.
Swift Curricular Approvals: What Does it Take? Michigan State University - Office of the Provost – University Curriculum and Catalog Academic Program Submission.
Performance, Merit and Post- tenure Evaluation Processes Proposals for Comment Faculty Senate, April 2014 Office of the Provost.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Article X, Faculty Evaluation Long Beach City College May 10, 2012 Presented by: Dr. Lynn Shaw, CCA President Dr. Cindy Vyskocil, AVP, Human Resources.
Promotion and Tenure at Ohio University Martin Tuck PhD Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
Review of Appendix 16 FA Purpose –Review Appendix 16 for compliance with the Collective Bargaining Agreement Changes –Compliance –Removing.
Review of Appendix 27, 27A, & 27B FA Background In AY the following changes to Appendix 16 were approved: – elimination of the reconsideration.
Faculty Promotion and Tenure Workshop April 8, 2015 Andrea Novak, Ph.D. Office of Faculty Development and Advancement Binder Review.
AS /AA Clarification of the Formation, Dissolution, Merger or Movement of an Academic Department- Resubmission.
Survey of policies affecting tenured and tenure-track faculty Administered by Appalachian State University’s Faculty Senate, March, Preliminary data.
5 Sept 2013 Graduate Studies Committee  Overall GSC  Curriculum Sub- Committee: Issues and Directions.
Getting to Know Your Academic Senate A Guide for Faculty, Staff, and Students of SJSU Why you need to know about the SJSU Academic Senate.
Kim Gingerich, Assistant to V-P, Academic & Provost Lisa Weber, Administrative Secretary, Dean of Science Marie Armstrong, Associate University Secretary.
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
Promotion and Tenure for Chairs, Heads, & Administrators: Twin Cities Arlene Carney Vice Provost for Faculty & Academic Affairs.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate June 12, 2014.
Brown Bag Breakfast Briefing: Responsible Persons with/using Suitable Means of Verification for Effort Certification.
Call Changes APM c: “Each campus shall develop guidelines and checklists to instruct chairs about their duties and responsibilities in connection.
North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES DEPARTMENTAL RPT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP September 26 and September.
Tenure and Promotion Processes Arlene Earley Carney Vice Provost for Faculty and Academic Affairs.
Promotion Process A how-to for DEOs. How is a promotion review initiated? Required in the final probationary year of a tenure track appointment (year.
1 Faculty Motivation and Policies Steven R. Hall Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair of the MIT Faculty.
FA Awarding of Supervisory Units. Purpose Investigate issues related to assignment and awarding of supervisory units and respond to questions.
T&P Guideline Review. T&P Guideline Goals Clear set of guidelines and procedures leading to tenure and promotion to assistant professor – Annual Review.
NOMINATION AND ELECTION CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR OF THE ACADEMIC SENATE AND MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE BASED ON THE ARTICLE III, SECTIONS 9.
Report to the Faculty Senate April 14, 2009 Bryan L. Spangelo, Chair.
Review of Appendix 16 for Compliance with the Collective Bargaining Agreement FA
Faculty Senate Meeting November 19, Agenda I.Call to Order and Roll Call - M. Bruening, Secretary II.Proposed Amendment to the Faculty Bylaws (CRR.
Process for conducting a vote of confidence Cal Poly, Pomona Academic Senate.
THE FACULTY AND THE UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY SENATE.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #7July 14, 2015  PANEL: What do Department Chairs Look for in a Dossier?  Review Clinical Statement of.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #6 July 8, 2014  Review Clinical Statement of Endeavors  Review Supporting Materials Peer Evaluations of.
Professional Development Plans Colleen Mullery Sr. Associate Vice President, Faculty Affairs & Human Resources.
Recommendation: Accept P&T Work Group Implementation Recommendations Subject to recommended modifications.
October 15, 2015 Presented by: Tom Friedman– TRUFA President.
Resolution on selection, duties, and term of Department Heads/Chairs Steering Committee Resolution Information Item.
Proposed Revisions for Regents Policy: Faculty Tenure Arlene Carney Vice Provost for Faculty and Academic Affairs E. Thomas Sullivan Senior Vice President.
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE AUGUST 26, 2016 SUE OTT ROWLANDS, PROVOST.
The Departmental Performance Review Committee
Remarks on the Tenure and Promotion Process
Charge of Committee on LGBTQ Campus Climate (AS /EC)
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Topics How are things?  Concerns, questions, comments?
University Manual FA FA FA
Faculty Senate Meeting September 20, 2016
Tenure Policies Q & A Session
The Departmental Performance Review (PR)
Promotion/Tenure Portfolio
Overview of the Committee on Governance
Faculty Affairs & Development
Current policy is 14 years old ttp://web. csulb
Review of Interim Policy Regarding Appointment of Principal Investigators FA
Current policy is 14 years old ttp://web. csulb
The Departmental Performance Review Committee
Resolution on selection, duties and term of Department Heads/Chairs
Provost Guidelines for Submission of Tenure on Hire Requests to the University Promotion and Tenure Committee.
Senate Meeting Summary
Faculty Leadership Institute, June 17, 2017, Sacramento Sheraton
Mid-Term or Promotion Evaluation
Administrative Committee Review
Mid-Term or Promotion Evaluation
FA Review and Clarification of Appendix 15A
Tenure and Promotion: Crossing the Finish Line
Presentation transcript:

Process for conducting a vote of confidence in a Dean FA

Purpose To establish an internal senate policy for responding to requests for vote of confidence in a dean

Resources All faculty and deans Faculty provided significant comments to the FA committee that are mostly reflected in the policy.

Background The conduct of vote of confidence by the academic senate in the President’s leadership and performance is guided by the precedent set for vote of confidence in President Suzuki. For department chairs, Appendix 15 provides a procedure. Policy is currently under review. No policy or process exists for the dean. The only reference was in the steering committee minutes in 1999 requiring majority of college senators requesting a vote.

Process Petition by a minimum of 25% of college tenured faculty members to EC. Petition must include reason(s) for requesting a vote of confidence. EC verifies that the threshold is met and informs the President and the Dean that a vote of confidence is forthcoming. Copy of the reason(s) for requesting the vote is provided to the President and the Dean.

Process (continued) Dean has 30 days to respond to the reason(s) in the petition if he/she chooses to do so. After 30 days or receipt of the dean’s response the EC asks the Election and Procedure Subcommittee to establish the time line for conducting the vote. EC informs the college constituency (tenured, probationary, FERP if teaching, and full time lecturers) that the vote is forthcoming and provide copies of the reason(s) for requesting the vote and the dean’s response to the constituency.

Process (continued) The only statement on the ballot for the vote of confidence shall be: I have confidence in the leadership of ….. as the Dean of ……. Yes No Vote is taken and the EC informs the college faculty, the President, and the Dean of the voting result. If a simple majority of the college constituency indicate lack of confidence, EC writes a letter to the president requesting investigation of the situation and informing senate and faculty of the steps that will be taken.