OntoWeb SIG 2: Ontology Language Standards Heiner Stuckenschmidt Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam With contributions from: Ian Horrocks and Frank van Harmelen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SWSL Committee Oct. 19, 2003 Semantics Web Services Language Committee: Status Report David Martin SRI International Michael Kifer SUNY-SB
Advertisements

Languages on the Semantic Web Frank van Harmelen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Ian Horrocks University of Manchester.
CH-4 Ontologies, Querying and Data Integration. Introduction to RDF(S) RDF stands for Resource Description Framework. RDF is a standard for describing.
An Introduction to RDF(S) and a Quick Tour of OWL
27 January Semantically Coordinated E-Market Semantic Web Term Project Prepared by Melike Şah 27 January 2005.
CS570 Artificial Intelligence Semantic Web & Ontology 2
The Semantic Web. The Web Today Designed for Human to read Cannot express meaning Architecture: URL –Decentralized: Link structure Language: html.
SIG2: Ontology Language Standards WebOnt Briefing Ian Horrocks University of Manchester, UK.
Of 27 lecture 7: owl - introduction. of 27 ece 627, winter ‘132 OWL a glimpse OWL – Web Ontology Language describes classes, properties and relations.
1 Semantic Web Technologies: The foundation for future enterprise systems Okech Odhiambo Knowledge Systems Research Group Strathmore University.
RDF Briefing Frank van Harmelen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Using the Semantic Web to Construct an Ontology- Based Repository for Software Patterns Scott Henninger Computer Science and Engineering University of.
Descriptions Robert Grimm New York University. The Final Assignment…  Your own application  Discussion board  Think: Paper summaries  Web cam proxy.
Descriptions Robert Grimm New York University. The Final Assignment…  Your own application  Discussion board  Think: Paper summaries  Time tracker.
Ontology and Ontology-Based Applications C. Farkas Some of the slides were obtained from presentations of Ian Horrocks.
Semantic Web Tools for Authoring and Using Analysis Results Richard Fikes Robert McCool Deborah McGuinness Sheila McIlraith Jessica Jenkins Knowledge Systems.
ID4 Helsinki, 25 August 2003 ID4 Helsinki, 25 August 2003 European Semantic Web Research: from Ontoweb to KnowledgeWeb Valentina Tamma University of Liverpool.
From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The Making of a Web Ontology Language
11/8/20051 Ontology Translation on the Semantic Web D. Dou, D. McDermott, P. Qi Computer Science, Yale University Presented by Z. Chen CIS 607 SII, Week.
1 Technologies and Modelling Frameworks XML ontology RDF taxonomy OWL thesaurus Semantic Web.
Computer communication B Introduction to the Semantic Web.
OntoWeb: A Key Enabler for E-Commerce & Knowledge Management Networks Liaison Meeting Barcelona, February Valentina Tamma University.
W3C Tracking – OWL David De Roure GGF Semantic Grid Research Group
OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web D. Fensel, F. van Harmelen, I. Horrocks, D. L. McGuinness, P. F. Patel-Schneider Presenter: Cristina.
Semantic Web Technologies Lecture # 2 Faculty of Computer Science, IBA.
Aidministrator nederland b.v. Adding formal semantics to the Web Jeen Broekstra, Michel Klein, Stefan Decker, Dieter Fensel,
WonderWeb. Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IST Project Review Meeting, 11 th March, WP1: Language Architecture Sean Bechhofer.
The Semantic Web Service Shuying Wang Outline Semantic Web vision Core technologies XML, RDF, Ontology, Agent… Web services DAML-S.
The Semantic Web William M Baker
OWL Capturing Semantic Information using a Standard Web Ontology Language Aditya Kalyanpur Jennifer Jay Banerjee James Hendler Presented By Rami Al-Ghanmi.
Agents on the Semantic Web – a roadmap to the future An arial view from feet.
Technologies and Engineering for Software, Systems and Services W3C and European IST Research Jacques Bus, INFSO E2 W3C Interop.
Chapter 9. 9 RDFS (RDF Schema) RDFS Part of the Ontological Primitive layer Adds features to RDF Provides standard vocabulary for describing concepts.
EU Project proposal. Andrei S. Lopatenko 1 EU Project Proposal CERIF-SW Andrei S. Lopatenko Vienna University of Technology
Automating Instance Migration in Response to Ontology Evolution Mark Fischer – Queen’s Juergen Dingel – Queen’s Maged Elaasar – Carleton Steven Shaw –
NoE Knowledge Web Dissemination Activities Guus Schreiber Scientific Director.
Advanced topics in software engineering (Semantic web)
Semantic Web for the Military User May 7-8, 2003 Preparing the Military for the Revolution of the Semantic Web Preparing the Military for the Revolution.
Strategies for Realizing the Semantic Web Ian Horrocks.
Artificial Intelligence 2004 Ontology
DAML+OIL: an Ontology Language for the Semantic Web.
The future of the Web: Semantic Web 9/30/2004 Xiangming Mu.
CSE 428 Semantic Web Topics Introduction Jeff Heflin Lehigh University.
OIL and DAML+OIL: Ontology Languages for the Semantic Web Sungshin Lim TOWARDS THE SEMANTIC WEB: Ontology-driven Knowledge.
Trustworthy Semantic Webs Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham The University of Texas at Dallas Lecture #4 Vision for Semantic Web.
1 OntoWeb: A Key Enabler for E-Commerce & Knowledge Management Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe.
Agents on the Semantic Web – a roadmap to the future An arial view from feet.
Of 33 lecture 1: introduction. of 33 the semantic web vision today’s web (1) web content – for human consumption (no structural information) people search.
On-To-Knowledge: Dissemination and Use Hans Akkermans Free University Amsterdam VUA.
6 Dec Rev. 14 Dec CmpE 583 Fall 2008OWL Intro 1 OWL Intro Notes off Lacy Ch. 4 Atilla Elçi.
WSDL – Web Service Definition Language  WSDL is used to describe, locate and define Web services.  A web service is described by: message format simple.
CSE 428 Semantic Web Topics Introduction Jeff Heflin Lehigh University.
DAML Language Breakout Deborah L. McGuinness Knowledge Systems Laboratory Stanford University 2/15/01.
The Semantic Web. What is the Semantic Web? The Semantic Web is an extension of the current Web in which information is given well-defined meaning, enabling.
Stefan Decker Stanford University Mike Dean BBN Technologies.
06 Dec Rev. 14 Dec CmpE 583 Fall 2008 OWL Language 1 OWL Language off Lacy Ch. 10 Atilla Elçi.
OWL Web Ontology Language Summary IHan HSIAO (Sharon)
WonderWeb. Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IST WP4: Ontology Engineering Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Michel Klein Vrije Universiteit.
Sharing personal knowledge over the Semantic Web ● We call personal knowledge the knowledge that is developed and shared by the users while they solve.
Chapter 8A Semantic Web Primer 1 Chapter 8 Conclusion and Outlook Grigoris Antoniou Frank van Harmelen.
Semantic and geographic information system for MCDA: review and user interface building Christophe PAOLI*, Pascal OBERTI**, Marie-Laure NIVET* University.
OWL (Ontology Web Language and Applications) Maw-Sheng Horng Department of Mathematics and Information Education National Taipei University of Education.
Building Trustworthy Semantic Webs
OWL Language off Textbook Ch. 10
CmpE 583- Web Semantics: Theory and Practice RULES & RULE MARKUP
Tools for DAML-Based Services, Query Answering, and
Semantic Web Update W3C RDF, OWL Standards, Development and Applications Dave Beckett.
Semantic Markup for Semantic Web Tools:
ONTOMERGE Ontology translations by merging ontologies Paper: Ontology Translation on the Semantic Web by Dejing Dou, Drew McDermott and Peishen Qi 2003.
Tools for DAML-Based Services, Query Answering, and
Presentation transcript:

OntoWeb SIG 2: Ontology Language Standards Heiner Stuckenschmidt Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam With contributions from: Ian Horrocks and Frank van Harmelen

Historical Perspective Ontology inference layer OIL (2000) –Developed by group of (largely) European researchers many of whom worked on OntoKnowledge project DAML ontology language DAML-ONT (2001) –Developed by group of (largely) US researchers working in DAML program Efforts merged in DAML+OIL (2002) –Further development by EU/US joint committee W3C Web Ontology group chartered ( ) –Tasked to develop W3C standard based on DAML+OIL

Goals of the SIG Coordinate cooperation, communication and participation in/with related initiatives and relevant standardization efforts and working groups. Forge additional links with other projects and with industry so as to further inform the language design process, and to stimulate the translation from industrial needs to technical and scientific problems. Disseminate the results of research and of standardization efforts, and to stimulate and support the transfer of research on ontology languages from academia to industry. Provide a forum for cooperation in the development of language extensions and the initiation of further standardization efforts.

Action Points Provide input to the DAML+OIL joint committee, the RDF core working group, and (later) the W3C working group on a web-ontology language. Provide usability reports on various web-ontology languages. Provide challenge problems for web-ontology languages. Establish contacts with other relevant communities (agent community not mentioned !?).

Meetings Heraklion, Crete, June 2001 –Identification of the state of the art –Decision about action points –Challenge problems Amsterdam, Netherlands, December 2001 –Report from standardization –Joint session with tool SIG –Creation of a wish list Cagliari, Sardinia, May 2002 –Workshop on rule markup Innsbruck, Austria, December 2002 –Review of OWL standardization documents

Progress on OWL Requirements document Language overview –High level overview of language features User guide and example ontology Language reference –Based on DAML+OIL language specification Abstract syntax and semantics –Ultimate normative reference Test cases –Designed to test implementation conformance

Semantic Layering Three language “layers” called: –OWL full Union of OWL DL and RDFS –Owl DL Restricted to DL/FOL fragment –OWL Lite Subset of OWL DL Syntactic layering Semantic layering –OWL DL semantics = OWL full semantics (within DL fragment) –OWL Lite semantics = OWL DL semantics (within Lite fragment) Full DL Lite

Related Activities Rule markup language –canonical Web language for rules using XML markup, formal semantics, and efficient implementations. DAML query language –formal language and protocol to use in conducting a query- answering dialogue using knowledge represented in DAML+OIL. DAML services –DAML-based Web Service Ontology (currently named DAML-S), as well as supporting tools and agent technology to enable automation of services on the Semantic Web

Perspectives for MAS Provide feedback on current standard –How well is OWL suited for specifying Ontologies in a multi-agent system ? Propose agent-related extensions –Are there specific language features that are essential for specifying the knowledge of an Agent ? Potential areas: –‘Trust’ layer –Services –Integration with other Languages Special SIG-meeting: Ontologies for MAS ?