ScholarSpace and Scholarly Communication: A Needs Assessment Beth Tillinghast.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
Advertisements

Scholarly publishing distribution models In traditional model, libraries/others serve as mediators between information and researchers by buying books.
MAIN MESSAGE key reasons enumerated ->please read speaker notes Research. Report. Reposit. Deposit your scholarly research - it’s as easy as 1, 2, 3 id.
Open Access Publishing with Wiley. Gold v Green Open Access Gold or pay to publish Open Access: Article is made freely accessible online to anyone anywhere.
Institutional Repository for CDU What’s in your bottom drawer? Ruth Quinn, Director Library and Information Access Charles Darwin University.
Promoting Open Digital Scholarship - A Canadian Library Perspective Leila Fernandez Rajiv Nariani Marcia Salmon York University Libraries, Canada.
Institutional repositories and libraries : being visible Nor Edzan Che Nasir Library University of Malaya.
Institutional Repositories
OPEN ACCESS 101 WHAT EVERY FACULTY, RESEARCHER, AND STUDENT SHOULD KNOW Yuan Li Scholarly Communications Librarian Princeton University Library.
IT Task Force Report Recommendation 4.b Create Open Access models and policies for CSU scholarship and other information. The Libraries should: –Work with.
Journals Full Text Resources Including MedIND. For Scholarly Information We start with Bibliographic Databases having references to journals and other.
Implementing an Institutional Repository Pre-Conference 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 by Carol Hixson University Librarian, University.
Introduction to Open Access Morag Greig, University of Glasgow.
If We Build It, Will They Come (Eventually)? : Scholarly Communication and Institutional Repositories A Presentation to the NASIG 2005 Conference May 20.
Faculty Self-Archiving: The Gap between Opportunity and Practice Denise Troll Covey Carnegie Mellon University Libraries DLF Forum – November 2007.
Protecting Your Scholarship: Copyrights, Publication Agreements, and Open Access Harvard University Office for Scholarly Communication May 11, 2009 Kenneth.
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository Delivered to Technical Services Staff Dr. John Archer Library University of Regina September 21,
Institutional Repositories Tools for scholarship Mary Westell University of Calgary AMTEC Conference May 26, 2005.
Committee Charges Identify and implement local actions in response to the scholarly communications issues raised by the committee. Consider actions that.
Greater Reach for your Research: Author’s Rights & the Shifting Landscape of Scholarly Communication Lisa Goddard & Shannon Gordon Memorial University.
Daniela Nastasie, PhD BEng(Hons) AALIA Senior Metadata Librarian Repository and Archive Metadata Services UniSA Library Open Access Publishing and UniSA.
Carol Hixson Dean, Nelson Poynter Memorial Library and Alex Brice Associate Professor, College of Education Promote and Publish Your Work A Presentation.
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES The work of UNICA in the context of new modes of publication and dissemination Dr Paul Ayris Chair, UNICA Scholarly Communications.
From Berlin back to Business OPEN Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service Mimi Seyffert Manager: Digitisation and Digital Services.
Presented by Ansie van der Westhuizen Unisa Institutional Repository: Sharing knowledge to advance research
Developing Effective Scholarly Communication Advocates: A Case Study Pam Brannon Sara Fuchs Electronic Resources & Libraries 2008 March 19, 2008.
Alternative Models of Scholarly Communication: The "Toddler Years" for Open Access Journals and Institutional Repositories Greg Tananbaum President The.
Open Journal Systems Project or The UB Libraries as Publisher: Information and Roles for Liaison Librarians Charles Lyons Library Liaison Summit December.
DAEDALUS Project William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
Sociologists for Women in Society: Open Access Publishing Panel Julie G. Speer Summer Meeting 2010 August 15, 2010.
5-7 November 2014 DR Workflow Practical Digital Content Management from Digital Libraries & Archives Perspective.
Login / Upload / Share Deposit your scholarly research - it’s as easy as 1, 2, 3 MAIN MESSAGE key reasons enumerated ->please read speaker notes id / who.
University of Bergen Library Electronic publishing Bergen – Makerere visit February 2005.
J. WILLARD MARRIOTT LIBRARY Preserving, Promoting and Presenting Research Posters: USpace’s New Poster Archiving Service Lisa Chaufty Western CONTENTdm.
Publishing for the 21 st Century: Open Access for Greater Impact Open Access Week 2010 October 20, 2010.
1 Open Access & Shades of Gre Open Access & Shades of Grey Open Access Increases Visibility of Grey Literature Providing an Essential Complement to Peer-Reviewed.
Alma Swan Key Perspectives Ltd Truro, UK University of Huddersfield OA event, 17 March 2010.
Publishing Trends: Open the University of Florida Presentation to IDS 3931: Discovering Research and Communicating Science October 21, 2010.
DAEDALUS Project: Building Institutional Repositories for Glasgow William J Nixon Service Development Morag Mackie Advocacy.
Scholarly Communication, Author Rights, and GT Library Services Julie G. Speer Faculty Advisory Board Meeting April 14, 2009.
A Publisher’s Perspective on Academic Publishing in the Digital Era Dr Frances Pinter
LORO (Languages Open Resources Online): A Repository for the Department of Languages Anna Comas-Quinn & Hélène Pulker Department of Languages, FELS The.
Be a Leader and Champion of Open Access on Campus to provide wider and easier access to library contents and research output of faculty members, with a.
How Digital Libraries can Create a Culture of Open Access on Campus TCDL 2013.
The use and usefulness of UPeTD: the University of Pretoria’s ETD repository Elsabé Olivier & Ina Louw.
1 ARRO: Anglia Ruskin Research Online Making submissions: Benefits and Process.
Smathers Libraries in Support of UF Research and Scholarship: Open Access and The Presentation to the Latin American Studies Colloquium, March 17,
Alma Swan Key Perspectives Ltd, OASIS, Enabling Open Scholarship.
Uganda Scholarly Digital Library (USDL) Makerere University’s Institutional Repository By Margaret Nakiganda URL:
ScholarSpace & Open UH Mānoa March 2013 Beth Tillinghast Web Support Librarian ScholarSpace & eVols Project Manager UHM Library.
Liaison Futures: View from a University Librarian Anne R. Kenney ARL Liaison Librarian Institute June 2015.
AACP Annual Meeting #RxOA #PharmEd14.  What is Open Access?  Spencer D. C. Keralis Research Associate  Institutional Repositories.
Managing Access at the University of Oregon : a Case Study of Scholars’ Bank by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
Launching the Dean digitally : the Jonathan Jansen Collection in UPSpace eIFL.net in co-operation with the Research Library Consortium Institutional repositories.
Leveraging the Expertise of our Staff and the Information Resources We Manage MIT Libraries Visiting Committee April 13, 2005.
Securing faculty and admin support Monica Hammes University of Pretoria OA&IR Open Access (OA) and Institutional Repository (IR)
Institutional Repository “A university-based institutional repository is a set of services that a university offers to the members of its community for.
BENEFITS OF AN INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY THE REPOSITORY AT ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY.
Open Access Initiatives Memorial University Libraries Lisa Goddard Scholarly Communications Librarian April 2011.
Developing Effective Scholarly Communication Advocates: The Experience at Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia XXVII Annual Charleston ConferenceNovember.
Library Space Design (virtual) Marilyn Billings Scholarly Communication Librarian University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Redefining the Library’s Role through an Institutional Repository Sharon Mader, Dean Jeanne Pavy, Scholarly Communications Librarian Earl K. Long Library.
TOP SCHOLAR Digital Research WKU Mike Binder Dean of Libraries Western Kentucky University Presentation at Council of Academic Deans Retreat,
ScholarSpace UHM’s Institutional Repository Kathleen Luschek Spring 2016 LTEC 690.
Resolution Concerning Scholarly Publishing Alternatives and Authors’ Rights Passed by the UW Faculty Senate, April WHEREAS, the primary mission of.
Our Digital Showcase Scholars’ Mine Annual Report from July 2015 – June 2016 Providing global access to the digital, scholarly and cultural resources.
Institutional Repository and Friends
Beyond the University: The IR and Research Distribution Strategies
Digital Repositories (Marilyn Billings)
The Story of ScholarWorks
Presentation transcript:

ScholarSpace and Scholarly Communication: A Needs Assessment Beth Tillinghast

Today’s Presentation Background setting for the project Background setting for the project Institutional Repositories Institutional Repositories Open Access Open Access Repository Recruitment Concerns Repository Recruitment Concerns Purpose Purpose Methodology Methodology Findings Findings Conclusions Conclusions

Background of Project What is ScholarSpace and what can it do?

Why are Repositories Important? Strive for more control over scholarly output Strive for more control over scholarly output Concern for preservation of digital content Concern for preservation of digital content Desire to showcase unique collections of scholarship Desire to showcase unique collections of scholarship Help support global access to scholarship through Open Access Help support global access to scholarship through Open Access

Open Access What is Open Access? What is Open Access? “ Open-access (OA) literature is digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions. What makes it possible is the internet and the consent of the author or copyright-holder.” Peter Suber It very much supports the peer review process!!

Open Access It represents a shift from traditional scholarly publishing. It represents a shift from traditional scholarly publishing. Faster dissemination of work Faster dissemination of work Greater impact of research Greater impact of research Reduced cost for academic libraries that are providing access Reduced cost for academic libraries that are providing access

ARL 2006 Study - Publication Data (Kyrillidou) ARL 2006 Study - Publication Data (Kyrillidou)

The Success of a Repository “IRs will be successful only if a large percentage of the institutional community voluntarily subscribes to the concept of the repository and routinely participates in it.” Blythe and Chachra, 2005

The Success of a Repository “Content size is one of the most important factors far assessing the achievement of self-archiving.” Probets and Jenkins, 2006 Another study suggests that the success of a repository will be determined eventually by “their uptake and use by researchers.” Shearer, 2003

The Concern Two-thirds (63%) of ARL libraries regarded the recruitment of digital content for the IR as “difficult.” Bailey, 2006 Bailey, 2006 Reasons ?? -Confusion about IRs -Uncertainty over copyright -Doubts about use of scholarship -Fear of plagiarism -Myth about low quality of material -Use of a new technology

What can we do? How can faculty members be encouraged to readily deposit their work to ScholarSpace? How can faculty members be encouraged to readily deposit their work to ScholarSpace? What can the repository developers do to assist and encourage this process? What can the repository developers do to assist and encourage this process? What will be the needs of our researchers who will want to use the repository? What will be the needs of our researchers who will want to use the repository?

The Purpose The purpose of this needs assessment was to understand how best an institutional repository could meet the research needs of faculty and researchers at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. It will thereby guide the development of the institutional repository, in terms of both services and products.

Methodology Developed survey instrument Developed survey instrument Applied for exemption from the Committee on Human Studies Applied for exemption from the Committee on Human Studies Formatted survey into online version Formatted survey into online version Distributed via listservs and web Distributed via listservs and web

Findings Participants Participants 325 usable responses 325 usable responses 50/50 Faculty to Graduate Student 50/50 Faculty to Graduate Student Comfort level with new technologies Comfort level with new technologies Use and distribution of research material Use and distribution of research material 36% for students & 44% for researchers 36% for students & 44% for researchers 60% favored distribution 60% favored distribution 35% unsure 35% unsure

An Insightful Comment “If materials are to be put online, it is hard to imagine who would NOT use the resources. If anything, online access has tremendously broadened the use of materials by people young and old, and from K-12 level children to senior citizens.” Anonymous

Findings … Access Access 57% provided no access 57% provided no access 24% limited access 24% limited access 8% access 8% access

Findings … Table 1. Purpose in keeping digital files. Table 1. Purpose in keeping digital files. Provide long-term preservation of my digital material 15 % Provide long-term preservation of my digital material 15 % Support my teaching and research 14 % Support my teaching and research 14 % Store my digital materials in a centralized site 12 % Store my digital materials in a centralized site 12 % Support the teaching and research of others 10 % Support the teaching and research of others 10 % Make it easy for other researchers or students to 9 % Make it easy for other researchers or students to 9 % my digital materials my digital materials Increase the visibility of my research 8 % Increase the visibility of my research 8 % Enable re-use and re-purpose of my digital content 8 % Enable re-use and re-purpose of my digital content 8 % Maintain and update my materials on a department 7 % Maintain and update my materials on a department 7 % website website

Findings …

Table 2. Factors That Would Encourage the Use of a Repository Table 2. Factors That Would Encourage the Use of a Repository I would be interested in depositing my research if I was … Given more information about the benefits of a repository 24 % Given more information about the benefits of a repository 24 % Given more information about how a repository could 18 % Given more information about how a repository could 18 % assist me with scholarly communication assist me with scholarly communication Given more information about copyright & plagiarism17 % Given more information about copyright & plagiarism17 % Provided training in the submission process15 % Provided training in the submission process15 % Given assistance in copyright issues with my work12 % Given assistance in copyright issues with my work12 % Provided with assistance in submitting my materials11 % Provided with assistance in submitting my materials11 %

Findings …

Concerns Table 3. Concerns About Depositing Work in an Open Access IR Plagiarism and theft of my work18 % Plagiarism and theft of my work18 % Materials are a work in progress 16 % Materials are a work in progress 16 % Confusion about current copyright laws12 % Confusion about current copyright laws12 % IR is not considered professional publishing 9 % IR is not considered professional publishing 9 % A possible loss of files 9 % A possible loss of files 9 % IR materials will not have citation value and will not 8 % IR materials will not have citation value and will not 8 % count towards tenure That I don’t have time to add to my work routine 7 % That I don’t have time to add to my work routine 7 % That a lack of review process will compromise the 7 % That a lack of review process will compromise the 7 % quality of digital materials submitted to an IR quality of digital materials submitted to an IR That the process will not be easy 7 % That the process will not be easy 7 %

Reasons FOR depositing “Rather than looking at the ‘concerns’ about depositing digital material, … researchers should be looking at the reasons for depositing: should be looking at the reasons for depositing: foster collaboration, lead to more grants, develop synergistic relationships, better recognition for all the good work going unnoticed at the UH, encourage collegiality, and sharing of undisclosed research and grey literature with students and other researchers.” and sharing of undisclosed research and grey literature with students and other researchers.”Anonymous

Conclusions Develop a marketing plan Develop a marketing plan Emphasize IR strengths Emphasize IR strengths Stress IR security feature Stress IR security feature Provide training Provide training Develop education program Develop education program

Mahalo A heartfelt thanks to all of You and my ETEC ‘Ohana and especially my advisor, Dr. Fulford!!! Visit ScholarSpace