Lecture 2 Images of Managing Change Change Management Lecture 2 Images of Managing Change
Images of Managing Controlling… Shaping… Top-down view of management Fayol’s theory of management: planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling. Shaping… Participative style of management Improving the capabilities of people within the organization
Images of Change Outcomes Intended Change: Change is a result of planned action Partially Intended Change: Change may need to be re-modified after it is initially implemented Unintended Change: Forces beyond the control of the change manager
Images of Change Managers Images of Managing Controlling . . . (activities) Shaping . . . (capabilities) Images of Change Outcomes Intended DIRECTOR COACH Partially Intended NAVIGATOR INTERPRETER Unintended CARETAKER NURTURER
Images of Change Managers Director Based on an image of management as control and of change outcomes as being achievable. Supported by the n-step models and contingency theory. Coach Relies upon building in the right set of values, skills and “drills” that are deemed to be the best ones that organizational members will be able to draw on in order to achieve desired organizational outcomes. Related to organizational development approaches.
Images of Change Managers Navigator Control is still seen as at the heart of management action, although a variety of factors external to managers mean that while they may achieve some intended change outcomes, others will occur over which they have little control. Supported by the contextualist and processual theories of change. Interpreter The manager creates meaning for other organizational members, helping them to make sense of various organizational events and actions. Supported by the sense-making theory of organizational change
Images of Change Managers Caretaker The change manager’s ability to control is severely impeded by a variety of internal and external forces beyond the scope of the manager. The caretaker is seen as shepherding their organizations along as best they can. Supported by life-cycle, population-ecology and institutional theories. Nurturer Even small changes may have a large impact on organizations and managers are not able to control the outcome of these changes. However, they may nurture their organizations, facilitating organizational qualities that enable positive self-organizing to occur. Related to chaos and Confucian/Taoist theories.
Questions To what extent are you more comfortable with one or other of the six images? Why is this the case? What are the strengths and limitations of the images that you have identified as most relevant to you? What skills do you think are associated with each image? Are there areas of personal skill development that are needed for you to feel more comfortable in using other images? Have you ever been in an organization that was dominated by particular images? What barriers to alternative images existed in this organization? What strategies could overcome these barriers?
Key Uses of Multiple Images Surfacing our assumptions about change Images simplify & illuminate but also obscure Assessing dominant images of change To what degree are some images seen as natural and not open to negotiation in certain organizations Using multiple images in change Image-in-use might depend on the type of change Image-in-use might depend on the context Image-in-use might depend on the phase of change Multiple change images can also co-exist Skilled change managers are able to swap images or even manage multiple images simultaneously
Green Mountain Case An example of a problem that has been dis-solved Which frame does it fit? How does it look through another frame?