Mountain Pine Beetle Data Presented by Anina Hundsdörfer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Northern Coniferous Forest. White Spruce (Picea glauca) Characteristics  Height: 40’ – 100’  Diameter: 1’ – 2’  Needles: evergreen, ½ - ¾’’ long, blue-
Advertisements

How to Measure & ID Week 1 Day 3
Jaclyn Ramaley / Winter Ecology / Spring 2010 Foundation Conifer of the Subalpine Forest Limber Pine / Pinus flexilis Mountain Research Station – University.
The effect of trees on snowpack: live versus dead lodgepole pines in subalpine forest Dylan Brown Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station,
What Do You See? Message of the Day: Even when using the correct equipment, unforeseen errors may occur.
Conifers of North Idaho Douglas Fir Western Larch Western White Pine Ponderosa Pine Lodgepole Pine Western Hemlock Grand Fir Engelmann Spruce Subalpine.
FVS Regeneration Imputation Don Vandendriesche USDA Forest Service Forest Management Service Center Growth and Yield Group.
Physical Evidence used to Establish Reference Conditions for the Southwest Jemez CFLR Project In order to set goals that underlie restoration treatments,
Mixed Conifer Forests. * ~8,000-10,000 ft elevation * inches of precipitation/annually * very complex and heterogeneous in structure, composition,
Vegetation Types in Yosemite Valley Vegetation TypeHectares% Mixed Conifer95049 Meadow1478 Riparian20811 Black oak985 Live oak41021 Other1286.
Forest Pests and Diseases near Lewistown, MT Amy Eckert Forest Pathologist.
Cruising Approaches  Area Based Methods  Tree Based Methods.
Modelling Natural Regeneration in Mountain Pine Beetle Affected Stands A Hybrid Model Approach Derek Sattler, M.Sc. Candidate Faculty of Forestry. University.
Species Nomenclature ScientificTaxonomic, Latin CommonRegular English name TradeIndustry or region specific.
FOR 474: Forest Inventory Plot Level Metrics from Lidar Heights Other Plot Measures Sources of Error Readings: See Website.
Modeling Branch Characteristics In Douglas-fir & Western Hemlock.
What Do You See? Message of the Day: Even when using the correct methods, unforeseen errors may occur.
Linking spatial and temporal patterns in resource availability, individual performance, & population dynamics.
Lab 1 Pacific NW Tree and Understory Species. Conifer trees 1. Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) 2. Western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) 3. Western.
What Do You See? Message of the Day: The management objective determines whether a site is over, under, or fully stocked.
Forest Health Monitoring Presented By Allison Kanoti.
White Fir, Abies concolor Images from
Lifecycle of a Tree. Lifecycle of Trees How to Measure & ID Week 1 Day 3 It is important that students understand the biology of trees to further be aware.
Seedling Seed Sapling Mature Oak Snag. Like all living things trees have a life cycle: Birth Growth Aging Death.
Impact of Aspect on Stand Density and Species Frequency in Gordon Gulch Brian Owens II University of Colorado, Boulder.
Ecological determinants of nest-site selection by a keystone engineer: the red-naped sapsucker Chris Floyd, Jessica Lowney, and Evan Weiher Department.
Interagency Whitebark Pine Health Monitoring Program for the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem Cooperating Organizations: Greater Yellowstone Coordinating.
FOR 274: Forest Measurements and Inventory
Chapter 1: Classifying Organisms (AKA as ‘read this chapter if you have insomnia’!)
2010 Western Mensurationists Meeting Response of crown and canopy structure to stand density regime in western conifers Doug Maguire Giustina Professor.
Tree distribution patterns in the southwest Jemez Mountains Kamal Humagain 1, Robert Cox 1, and James Cain 2 1 Texas Tech University 2 New Mexico State.
Modeling Crown Biomass for Three North Idaho Conifers Ann Abbott Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow Forestry Sciences Laboratory and University of.
Tree Data National Manual Version 1.61 Section 5.0.
Ministry of Forests Resources Inventory Branch Growth and Yield Section Provincial PSP Training - Establishment June 2001 June 2001.
Post-fire recovery in black spruce forests Analysis Summary October 2007 Jill Johnstone.
©2013 Delmar Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in.
Carbon Sequestration Total carbon sequestered to date: over 80 kg Oakville Trafalgar H.S. and Appleby College sequestered kg and 19.62kg, respectively.
VEGETATION ANALYSIS.
1 Elizabeth McGarrigle Ph.D. Candidate University of New Brunswick Dr. John A. Kershaw University of New Brunswick.
Effect of retained trees on growth and structure of young Scots pine stands Juha Ruuska, Sauli Valkonen and Jouni Siipilehto Finnish Forest Research Institute,
Mountain Pine Beetle Detection and Management in Alberta Ground Survey Procedures Course Revised 11/2010.
Effects of Regeneration Abundance on Predicted Development of Interior Douglas-fir Stands By Cornel Lencar Graduate Student, Faculty of Forestry University.
State Tree Identification Created by Rick, Sarah, Tyler, and Mo.
How we measure forests David W. MacFarlane Dept. of Forestry MSU.
1 Single year drought impacts on trees and forests Steve D’Eon, R.P.F. Program Forester.
__________. Introduction Importance – Wildlife Habitat – Nutrient Cycling – Long-Term Carbon Storage – Key Indicator for Biodiversity Minimum Stocking.
Dead/Dying Douglas-fir Granite Creek area Dead/Dying Douglas-fir Harvest up to 95% of dead/dying trees
Conifer Mortality Estimates Using Forest Inventory and Analysis’s Annual Inventory System Michael T. Thompson Forest Inventory and Analysis Interior West.
By: Marissa Cheyne. Spruce Beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis) Hosts- Engelmann spruce, rarely lodge pole pine Attack Trees less than 12 inches diameter.
Examining Overstory-Regeneration Relationships in Interior Douglas-fir Stands Using Ripley’s K(t) Statistic Katrina Froese (M.Sc. Candidate), Valerie LeMay.
Mistletoe By Paige Heilman.
Steven Katovich USDA Forest Service Exotic and Invasive Insects and Pathogens new and expanding threats.
Cumulative BSLB Catch from Mostly found within 80Km radius of Halifax Outside 80Km small numbers found except Glenholme (45) First find outside.
Subalpine Forests. *Flagged trees-trees sculpted by predominant winds.
Fairy Lake Rx Burn Monitoring Stated objectives:  Mimic light to moderate ground fire  To minimize the mortality of mature whitebark pine (
Forestry 280: Hand lens cross- sections,Woods 1-27 Images are courtesy of the USDA Forest Service, Center for Wood Anatomy Research.
TREE DATA National Manual Version Subplot Number Coded separately from tree number.
Horticulture Plant ID. Abies grandis Grand Fir Family –Pinaceae –Evergreen Tree Water –Moderate to regular Sun –Full sun or light shade Notes –Cones grow.
Establishing Plots.
Original Power Point Created by Howard Henderson
Panther Creek Lidar Sets and Growth Estimation
Evergreens for Duluth.
Interception Interception is the amount of water retained in vegetation It never reaches soil and evaporates back to atmosphere In heavily forested regions.
Individual Snag Detection
By: Jacie Pressett Credit to Utah State University Extension
FOR 274: Forest Measurements and Inventory
What Do You See? Water relaxes us – fire fascinates us
Species Nomenclature Scientific Taxonomic, Latin
Tree Species Identification
Presentation transcript:

Mountain Pine Beetle Data Presented by Anina Hundsdörfer

B F A E G ? Plot locations

Methodology Total station Shoots a laser beam to prism located next to tree x, y, z coordinates of each tree

Methodology Each tree receives a tag

Methodology Caliper DBH recorded for all trees with DBH>1cm Ultrasound For measuring distance to hypsometer

Methodology Hypsometer Height measurements for all trees (DBH>1cm) Total height (tip of terminal) Lowest branch Lowest live branch Measures distance and angle to object aimed at with a laser beam

Data format TagTspYXZDBHHTBHT1BHT2StatusAttYRBspAttStSeason 1DF Seedling0none 0 1DF Seedling0none 0 2DF Seedling0none 0 2DF Seedling0none 0 3DF Alive0none 0 3DF Seedling0none 0 4LP Snag0none 0 4LP Log0none 0 5LP Log0none 0 5LP Alive0none 0 6DF Alive0none 0 6LP Snag0none 0 415LP Alive2003ILATS LP Alive2004MPBS1 415LP Alive2004TLINnone3 415LP Alive2003IMEXS LP Alive2004IMEXS1 415LP Alive2004ILATS4 415DF Alive0none 0 416LP Alive2004MPBM3

Variables Status Alive: Live tree with DBH > 1.0 cm. Seedling: Live tree from germinants to sapling with a DBH<1.0 cm. Snag: Standing dead tree with an intact terminal Log: Recent year fallen tree that may or may not lying on the ground Stump: Dead tree with a broken terminal, regardless of height Species DF: Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga sp.) FIR: Amabilis fir (Abies amabilis Dougl. ex J. Forbes ) HM: hemlock (Tsuga sp.) LP: lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) TA: trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) WS: white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) WWP: western white pine (Pinus monticola)

Variables cont. DBH Tree diameter at breast height (1.3m) for all live and dead trees Height HT: Total tree height of live and dead trees BHT1: First live branch height measured from the ground. HT - BHT1 = crown depth BHT2: First dead branch height measured from the ground. Infestation AttYR: year of attack: Bsp: beetle species (occasionally more than one attacked one tree) AttSt: attack status: –S: strip attack –M: mass attack –R: Resisted Timing: time of year when the attack occurred –1: June –2: July –3: August –4: September –1.5: mid June/July –3.5: mid August/September

Notes column Notes Dead top: Trees with a dead terminal, either the needles had completely fallen off or died recently. Declining: Trees with poor health and expected to die in the coming years Dying: Trees that were dying. Dying top: Trees with a terminal that was dying. Flat top: Trees had a flat crown due to the death of the terminal some years ago. Leaning: Trees that were tilted, whose height could not be accurately measured.

Plot characteristics PlotsAreaBoundary [m] to correct for edge effects Elevation difference [m] Tree density [trees/ m 2] X leftX rightY upperY lower A plot m 2 ( 1.56 ha) (125m x 125m) B plot m 2 (1 ha) (100m x 100m) E plot m 2 (1 ha) (100m x 100m) F plot m 2 ( 1.56 ha) (125m x 125m) G plot m 2 ( 2.25 ha) (150m x 150m)

Elevation maps A plot B plot E plotF plotG plot

Tree counts StatusA plotB plotE plotF plotG plot live trees dead trees snags logs stumps seedlings total

Species: A plot Speciesabundance 1Logepole Pine3506 2Douglas fir540 3Trembling aspen44 4White spruce10 5Amabilis fir4 6Hemlock1

Spatial Association of Species: A Plot InteractionP-value LP x DF LP x TA LP x WS DF x TA DF x WS TA x WS HM DF TA WS FIR LP

Species: B plot Speciesabundance 1Logepole pine2054 2Trembling aspen1741 3Douglas fir154 4White spruce20 5FIR5 6Maple2 7Hemlock1 8 Western white pine 1

InteractionP-value LP x DF LP x TA LP x WS DF x TA DF x WS TA x WS Spatial Association of Species: B Plot HM DF TA WS FIR Maple HM WWP LP

Spatial Association of Species: E plot Speciesabundance 1Lodgepole pine1775 2White spruce764 3Douglas fir90 InteractionP value LP x DF LP x WS DF x WS

Species: F plot Speciesabundance 1Lodgepole pine4197 2Douglas fir2483 3Amabilis fir404 4White spruce97 5Trembling aspen38 6Hemlock4

InteractionP-value LP x DF LP x TA LP x WS LP x FIR DF x TA DF x WS DF x FIR TA x WS TA x FIR WS x FIR HM DF AS WS FIR HM LP Spatial Association of Species: F Plot

Species’ spatial association: G plot Speciesabundance 1Lodgepole pine4772 2White spruce684 3Douglas fir616 InteractionP- value LP x DF WS x LP DF x WS

Species composition of all plots

Infestation Tree counts YearA plotB plotE plotF plotG plot total Proportion of LP (DBH>8cm) infested0.95%5.69%5.41%0.61%0.41% Surrounding standEndemicIncipientOutbreakEndemic

A plot LP (DBH>min. DBH attacked) 2001 attacks 2002 attacks 2003 attacks 2004 attacks Strip attack Mass attack Resisted attack

B plot LP (DBH>min. DBH attacked) 2001 attacks 2002 attacks 2003 attacks 2004 attacks Strip attack Mass attack Resisted attack

E plot LP (DBH>min. DBH attacked) 2001 attacks 2002 attacks 2003 attacks 2004 attacks Strip attack Mass attack Resisted attack

F plot LP (DBH>min. DBH attacked) 2001 attacks 2002 attacks 2003 attacks 2004 attacks Strip attack Mass attack Resisted attack

G plot LP (DBH>min. DBH attacked) 2002 attacks 2003 attacks 2004 attacks Strip attack Mass attack Resisted attack

Tree vigour: A plot Height [m] live treesdead treesinfested trees mean st. dev min st quantile median rd quantile max DBH [cm] live treesdead treesInfested trees mean st. dev min st quantile median rd quantile max Crown depth [m] live treesdead treesinfested trees mean st. dev min st quantile median rd quantile max

Tree vigour: B plot Height [m] live treesdead treesinfested trees mean st. dev min st quantile median rd quantile max DBH [cm] live treesdead treesInfested trees mean st. dev min st quantile median rd quantile max Crown depth [m] live treesdead trees infested trees mean st. dev min st quantile median rd quantile max

Tree vigour: E plot DBH [cm] live treesdead treesInfested trees mean st. dev min st quantile median rd quantile max DBH [cm] live treesdead treesInfested trees mean st. dev min st quantile median rd quant ile max Crown depth [m] live treesdead treesinfested trees mean st. dev min st quantile median rd quantile max

Tree vigour: F plot Height [m] live treesdead treesinfested trees mean st. dev min st quantile median rd quantile max DBH [cm] live treesdead treesInfested trees mean st. dev min st quantile median rd quantile max Crown depth [m] live treesdead treesinfested trees mean st. dev min st quantile median rd quantile max

Tree vigour: G plot Height [m] live treesdead treesinfested trees mean st. dev min st quantile median rd quantile max DBH [cm] live treesdead treesInfested trees mean st. dev min st quantile median rd quantile max Crown depth [m] live treesdead treesinfested trees mean st. dev min st quantile median rd quantile max