S a (T 1 ) Scaling Nilesh Shome ABS Consulting. Methodology Developed in 1997 (Shome, N., Cornell, C. A., Bazzurro, P., and Carballo, J. (1998), “Earthquake,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Y.P. Wang 1, W.H. Liao 2 and C.L. Lee 2 1 Professor of Civil Engineering 2 Research Assistant Professor of NHMRC National Chiao-Tung University Y.P. Wang.

Advertisements

PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting PEER 2002 Annual Meeting uHelmut Krawinkler Seismic Demand Analysis.

Ground Motions Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Steve Kramer

Response Spectrum Analysis as per Indian IS: 1893 (Part 1)-2002

Nirmal Jayaram Nilesh Shome Helmut Krawinkler 2010 SCEC Annual Meeting A statistical analysis of the responses of tall buildings to recorded and simulated.

Record Processing Considerations for Analysis of Buildings Moh Huang California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program California Geological Survey Department.

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models SCEC GMSV Workshop: Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications Nicolas Luco, Research Structural.

Lecture 2 January 19, 2006.

Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Earliest approach taken to seismic hazard analysis Originated in nuclear power industry applications Still used for.

GMSM Mission and Vision Jennie Watson-Lamprey October 29, 2007.

PEER Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles May 22, 2002 Geotechnical Uncertainties for PBEE.

Inelastic Displacement Surface Method Tom Shantz CALTRANS- Division of Research and Innovation.

GMSM Methodology and Terminology Christine Goulet, UCLA GMSM Core Members.

Instrumented Moment Frame Steel Buildings Models Erol Kalkan, PhD California Geological Survey PEER-GMSM First Work Shop, Berkeley Oct

1 Workshop on GMSM for Nonlinear Analysis, Berkeley CA, October 26, 2006 ATC-63 Selection and Scaling Method Charles Kircher Curt B. Haselton Gregory G.

Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Hemangi Pandit Joel Conte Jon Stewart John Wallace.

#1 212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations Lecture.

The use of risk in design: ATC 58 performance assessment procedure Craig D. Comartin.

Demand and Capacity Factor Design: A Performance-based Analytic Approach to Design and Assessment Sharif University of Technology, 25 April 2011 Demand.

Yousef Bozorgnia, Mahmoud Hachem, Kenneth Campbell PEER GMSM Workshop, UC Berkeley October 27, 2006 Attenuation of Inelastic Spectra and Its Applications.

Code Minimum Base Shear Requirements February 2007 Joe Maffei RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE.

Overview of GMSM Methods Nicolas Luco 1 st Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification (GMSM) for Nonlinear Analysis – 27 October 2006.

Review of GMSM Solicitation and Methods Nicolas Luco, On behalf of The PEER GMSM Program 2 nd Annual PEER Ground Motion Selection & Modification (GMSM)

First a digression The POC Ranking the Methods Jennie Watson-Lamprey October 29, 2007.

Assessing Effectiveness of Building Code Provisions Greg Deierlein & Abbie Liel Stanford University Curt Haselton Chico State University … other contributors.

A Genetic Algorithm Solution for the Problem of Selection and Scaling of Ground Motion Records Arzhang Alimoradi and Farzad Naeim John A. Martin & Associates.

1 Structural Responses – Preliminary Results and Observations PEER GMSM Program Workshop, Richmond CA, October 29, 2007 Curt B. Haselton, PhD, PE Assistant.

PEER-SCEC WORKSHOP ON GROUND MOTION SIMULATION AND BUILDING RESPONSE SIMULATION with focus on long period ground motions and tall buildings PEER Nov 2,

Selection of Time Series for Seismic Analyses

Roberto PAOLUCCI Department of Structural Engineering

1 2. Reliability measures Objectives: Learn how to quantify reliability of a system Understand and learn how to compute the following measures –Reliability.

Ground Motion Parameters Measured by triaxial accelerographs 2 orthogonal horizontal components 1 vertical component Digitized to time step of

Direct Displacement Design Methodology for Woodframe Buildings

Preliminary Investigations on Post-earthquake Assessment of Damaged RC Structures Based on Residual Drift Jianze Wang Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Kaoshan.

Comparison of Recorded and Simulated Ground Motions Presented by: Emel Seyhan, PhD Student University of California, Los Angeles Collaborators: Lisa M.

CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS

Task 3—Development and verification of simplified design tools Juan Vargas – Junior in Civil Engineering – Vice President SCU SHPE Mark Aschheim – Professor,

PEER EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE-ENGINEERING INTERFACE: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH PERSPECTIVE Allin Cornell Stanford University SCEC WORKSHOP Oakland, CA.

Static Pushover Analysis

Performance-based Earthquake Engineering – A Very Short Introduction (why taking Dynamics of Structures) Dr. ZhiQiang Chen UMKC Spring,2011.

GROUND MOTION INTENSITY MEASURES THAT CORRELATE TO ENGINEERING DEMAND PARAMETERS Jonathan Bray and Thaleia Travasarou University of California, Berkeley.

IMPLEMENTATION OF SCEC RESEARCH IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING ONGOING PROJECTS SCEC PROPOSAL TO NSF SCEC 2004 RFP.

The kinematic representation of seismic source. The double-couple solution double-couple solution in an infinite, homogeneous isotropic medium. Radiation.

The 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering

University of Palestine

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models Role of SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation Technical Activity Group (GMSV TAG) in SEISM Project.

Session 1A – Ground Motions and Intensity Measures Paul Somerville Andrew Whittaker Greg Deierlein.

Along-wind dynamic response

PEER 2G02 – Code Usage Exercise: OpenSees Zhaohui Yang UCSD 2/15/2005.

NEEDS FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING

Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)

Nonlinear Performance and Potential Damage of Degraded Structures Under Different Earthquakes The 5 th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering “Facing.

Semi-Active Tuned Mass Damper Systems K.J. Mulligan, M. Miguelgorry, V. Novello, J.G. Chase, G. Rodgers, & B. Horn, J.B. Mander, A. Carr & B.L. Deam.

Jennie Watson-Lamprey COSMOS Annual Meeting Technical Session November 9, PEER GMSM Program: Recommendations for Selection and Scaling of Ground.

Response of MDOF structures to ground motion 1. If damping is well-behaving, or can be approximated using equivalent viscous damping, we can decouple.

1J. Baker Jack Baker Civil & Environmental Engineering Stanford University Use of elastic & inelastic response spectra properties to validate simulated.

Department of Civil Engineering National Taiwan University National Taiwan University Generation of Uniform Hazard Accelerogram Representing from “Dominant.

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models Post-Earthquake Building Tagging Nicolas Luco Research Structural Engineer USGS – Golden, CO Potential.

Progress towards Structural Design for Unforeseen Catastrophic Events ASME Congress Puneet Bajpai and Ben Schafer The Johns Hopkins University.

Ground Motions and Liquefaction – The Loading Part of the Equation

Progress towards Finding Stable Scaling Intensity Parameter IDA analyses were applied to 6-story building for more than 25 near – fault fling and forward.

Novel Approach to Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Modeling Vladimir Graizer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Erol Kalkan California Geological Survey.

Seismic analysis of Bridges Part II

(PERFORMANCE-BASED PLASTIC DESIGN)

Motion Graphs Position-Time (also called Distance-Time or Displacement-Time) d t At rest.

Determination of Fragility Curves

Design Spectra.

Notes on the Intensity Measure Breakout Session - PEER Annual Meeting - Jan. 17, 2002 · Testbeds will not provide definitive answers as to the best.

Design Spectra.

Presentation transcript:

S a (T 1 ) Scaling Nilesh Shome ABS Consulting

Methodology Developed in 1997 (Shome, N., Cornell, C. A., Bazzurro, P., and Carballo, J. (1998), “Earthquake, Records, and Nonlinear MDOF Responses”, Earthquake Spectra ). Verified based on the results of nonlinear time-history analysis of a 5-story structure and a 20-story structure. Worked quite well for single-frequency-dominated structures, but tall multi-frequency dominated structures showed some dependency on higher- mode spectral accelerations (or shape of spectrum). S a (T 1 ) scaling introduced some bias for tall structures.

Procedure Randomly select small number of records from a specified M-R bin of records. Scale the selected records to the target S a (T 1 ) before nonlinear time-history analysis.

Verification Nonlinear analysis results for a 5-story and a 20-story steel MRF were used for the verification of the methodology. Results from the Strength-Reduced 5-Story Structure Results are available in term of maximum interstory ductility (i.e., ratio of max story drift and yield displacement of that story,  ). The interstory drift percentages are in general 0.8 to 1.1 times ductility. Results from unscaled records are compared with the results from the records scaled to the median S a (T 1 ) of a M-R bin of 20 records.

Comparison of Results from Direct (Unscaled) Records with the Results from the Records Scaled to the Median S a (T 1 ) CaseUnscaled RecordsScaled Records   M = 5.25 – 5.75 R = 5-25 km 0.12g M = 6.5 – 7.0 R = km 0.09g  Scaling the records to the median S a (T 1 ) of the bin of records does not introduce any bias.

Comparison of Results for the 5-Story Structure from “Direct” Records with the Results from the Records Scaled to the Median S a (T 1 ) CaseUnscaled RecordsScaled Records  Drift M = 5.25 – 5.75 R = 5-25 km 1.5g M = 6.5 – 7.0 R = km 1.5g  No strength reduction of the structure was employed.  All the records in Bin-I and Bin-II were scaled first by a constant factor.

Limitations Scaling of records to a target S a (T 1 ) introduces bias in the response of tall multi-frequency dominated structures. Cornell and co-workers introduced vector-based demand hazard calculations from the results of drift|S a (T 1 ),S a (T 2 ). The S a (T 1 )-scaling does work well with the near-source records. Luco and Cornell introduced an improved IM instead of S a (T 1 ) which can be used for ordinary as well as near- source records to improve the results. Baker and Cornell introduced a vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. If the records are selected for nonlinear structural analysis based on the epsilon of the record, the bias in the results can be reduced significantly.

Objective of PEER Ground Motion Selection & Modification (GMSM) Study Estimation of median MIDR for a given earthquake event (MIDR|M,R) and for a given event conditioned on a S a (T 1 ) (MIDR|M,R,S a ). The cumulative distribution function of MIDR for a given earthquake event and for a given event conditioned on a S a (T 1 ). Number of records = 7.

M = 7, R=10km, Fault Style=strike-slip, V s (30m) = 400 m/s

 First randomly select 7 events out of 9 distinct events from the bin of records.  Randomly select one record from each of the 7 selected events.

Estimation of Median MIDR For a Given Earthquake Event Scale the selected records to the median S a (T 1 ) for the event. Estimate the median MIDR from the results of scaled records. For a Given Earthquake Event Conditioned on S a (T 1 ) Scale the selected records to the target S a (T 1 ). Estimate the median MIDR from the results of scaled records.

Cumulative Distribution Function Distribution is assumed to be lognormal. For a Given Earthquake Event where   1 is the slope of the MIDR curve (MIDR =  0.(S a )  1 ). Typical values of  1 are 0.85 for low-rise buildings, 1.0 for mid-rise buildings and 1.15 for high-rise buildings.   Sa|M,R is the dispersion of S a for the given event. This can be obtained from the attenuation functions. For the strength-reduced 5-story structure: Compare the   = 0.62 for the unscaled records. Note 20 records have been used for the unscaled as well as scaled records.

Cumulative Distribution Function (contd.) For a Given Earthquake Event Conditioned on S a (T 1 ) Dispersion of MIDR can be estimated directly from the results of scaled records.