Debate IV: Critical Listening & Flowcharting Doris L. W. Chang.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

LD: Lincoln-Douglas Debate History:  Illinois senatorial debates between Abraham Lincoln & Stephen Douglas  Became high school competitive.

Advertisements

POLICY DEBATE An Introduction by Rich Edwards Baylor University.

Flowing Welcome! Please take a seat, we will being shortly.

Anatomy of a debate Austin Layton.

The Structure of a Debate Constructive Speeches 1AC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 2NC: 3 Minutes 1NC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 1AC: 3 Minutes 2AC: 8.

The Structure of a Debate Constructive Speeches 1AC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 2NC: 3 Minutes 1NC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 1AC: 3 Minutes 2AC: 8.

Summary Speeches clarity, destruction and magic. Recap: Role of a Whip Speaker Identify the “clash points” aka the voting issues. Destroy the opposition’s.

Lincoln-Douglas Debate An Examination of Values. OBJECTIVES: The student will 1. Demonstrate understanding of the concepts that underlie Lincoln-Douglas.

THE BASICS COACHING SESSION. WHAT DO YOU NEED TO KNOW? What happens in a debate? What do you say in your speech? How do you give a good speech? How do.

Debate I: Basics & Formats

Debate II: Speaker Responsibilities

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

A rgument, Counter-argument, Refutation Drills Doris L. W. Chang Debate III:

Using Debates in English Lessons A Communicative Approach.

The Debate Flowchart. What is a flow? The debate flow is an organization of notes that keeps track of and help development of all of the arguments made.

What Is Debate? Components and Process of a Debate.

Public Forum Debate Partner debate.

Team Policy Debate Orientation

DEBATE FINAL EXAM STUDY GUIDE Spring Debate Final Exam Study Guide Define terms using the answers here; if the answers aren’t complete, use Google.

FLOWING! (AND FILING BASICS). Filing basics Many new debaters lose debates because they have misplaced parts of their files. Following these simple rules.

ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES

Rebuttal. What to Do In a Rebuttal The goal of refutation is to answer your opponent’s arguments. The steps of the refutation process include:  Identifying.

4 minute Affirmative Constructive This speech is prepared ahead, rehearsed and should be perfectly timed. It is a presentation of the affirmative's position.

8.1.4 Can it still be factored? Factoring Completely I can factor out a common factor.

Debate Pointers A debate Exhibition. Case case: set of arguments supported by evidences anatomy of a case: definition: clarifies the motion/limits debate.

APUSH – J ANUARY 6 Objectives: To synthesize all the information you received about the Civil War and Reconstruction and present the information in debate.

Week 1. Q. From where did LD debate come? Q. Where policy debate involves federal policy, what does LD involve? Q. LD involves which civilization?

 Comes from a series of recorded historical debates that took place between Stephen Douglas and Abraham Lincoln in 1858  Lincoln was arguing that slavery.

Stoa Speech and Debate Lincoln Douglas Value Debate Judge Orientation.

AN INTRODUCTION COMPETITION DEBATES. DEBATE Debate is essentially the art of arguing a point, policy or proposition of value. When participating in a.

October 18, 2012 How is the Declaration of Independence organized?

How to Flow And why you should do it – always, all the time, in every round.

Individual Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.

 If you can convince the judge that passing your affirmative plan is a good idea, you will win the debate. Essentially, you need to prove that the affirmative.

The Structure of a Debate Constructive Speeches 1AC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 2NC: 3 Minutes 1NC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 1AC: 3 Minutes 2AC: 8.

Basic Structure of a Round. a) Before the Round Pre-flowed arguments.

FILING BASICS Staying organized is crucial.

Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation

Affirmative vs. negative

Debate Orientation.

Debate 101: Essential Skills for the Classroom and Beyond

ANSWER SHEET LISTENING (PartⅠ~ Ⅳ) READING (PartⅤ ~ Ⅶ) NO

Types of Debate Lincoln/Douglas Public Forum Policy

Objective The student will be able to:

Unit III! Persuasive speaking and Debates!

8th Annual Great Corporate Debate

Debate I: Basics & Formats

Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation

Plotting Points In A Coordinate System

Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation

Quadrants and Reading Ordered Pairs

Analyze a problem Conduct research Utilize principles of argumentation

ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES

Debate Orientation.

Transformations.

Speaker Responsibilities

Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation

Graphing on the Coordinate Plane

Rebuttal Rebuttal is the process of defending arguments against attack; Rebuttal is an additional speech allowed each speaker following the constructive.

Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation

POLICY DEBATE An Introduction by Rich Edwards Baylor University.

ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES

Graphing on the Coordinate Plane

POLICY DEBATE An Introduction by Rich Edwards Baylor University.

Flowing & Cross-Examination

Strategic Debate Design concise, compelling arguments that can stand up under almost immediate attack from a skilled opponent.

Debate Basics Review.

Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation

Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation

Presentation transcript:

Debate IV: Critical Listening & Flowcharting Doris L. W. Chang

Presentation Outline  What is “flow sheeting” (flowcharting)?  Why do we take a flow in a debate?  What to flow?  How to flow?  Practice time

What is Flow Sheeting?  It is “the term many debaters use to describe the process of taking notes during a debate” (Goodnight 15).  It is a system for taking notes that will enable the debaters to record key arguments and refute them in debate rounds.  It is the key to successful refutation and thus, the key to winning a debate.

Functions of Flow Sheeting?  Flow sheeting helps to  Follow the flow of the debate and accurately record all principal arguments of the debaters  It is the key to successful refutations and rebuttals in a debate  To refute: 1. summarize the arguments  2. analyze the problems of the arguments  3. show the refutation’s impact on the arguments.  Step 1 requires effective flow sheeting skills

What to Flow  Sample Case Flow Sheet (Goodnight 16)Case Flow Sheet  Sample Plan Flow Sheet (Goodnight 17)

How to Flow 1. Prepare separate flow sheets for case, plan, and others 2. See samples, partition the flow sheets, divide 8 vertical columns according to debaterssamples 3. Number the sheets for effective organization 4. Develop an abbreviation system for notes

5. Use arrows to mark how arguments are refuted and answered 6. Use 2 different colors for the aff. and neg. 7. Follow individual arguments horizontally  Arguments may be organized different by various debaters, follow the arguments instead of following individual debaters’ outline How to Flow

Confusing Flow I. Argument 1 a. Evidence 1 b. Evidence 2 II. Argument 2 a. Evidence 1 b. Evidence 2 III. Argument 3 a. Evidence 1 b. Evidence 2 1 AC I. Refutation 2 a. Evidence 1 b. Evidence 2 II. Refutation 1 a. Evidence 1 b. Evidence 2 III. Refutation 3 a. Evidence 1 b. Evidence 2 1 NC

Ideal Flow I. Argument 1 a. Evidence 1 b. Evidence 2 II. Argument 2 a. Evidence 1 b. Evidence 2 III. Argument 3 a. Evidence 1 b. Evidence 2 1 AC I. Refutation 2 a. Evidence 1 b. Evidence 2 II. Refutation 1 a. Evidence 1 b. Evidence 2 III. Refutation 3 a. Evidence 1 b. Evidence 2 1 NC

Practice Time Read the sample argumentation-refutation speeches on LDTs and create a flow chart that 1. Outlines the aff. arguments and evidences 2. Shows how the neg. refutes the aff. Argument 3. Which arguments/evidences have been successfully refuted? 4. Which arguments have not been refuted? 5. How will you respond as the 2nd AC?

Work Cited Goodnight, Lynn. Getting Started in Debate. 2nd Ed. Lincolnwood, Chicago: NTC, 1994.