Magnetic Diagnostics for GLAST-III Tokamak M. A. Naveed, Aqib javeed and GLAST Team National Tokamak Fusion Programme Islamabad Pakistan IAEA First Technical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Magnetic field.
Advertisements

Electricity & Magnetism
Chapter 30. Induction and Inductance
Electromagnetic Induction Inductors. Problem A metal rod of length L and mass m is free to slide, without friction, on two parallel metal tracks. The.
Chapter 27 Sources of the magnetic field
Chapter 28 Sources of Magnetic Field
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture 9 – Electromagnetic Induction.
Selected Problems from Chapters 29 & 30. I 5I rd-r.
A coil is wrapped with 340 turns of wire on the perimeter of a circular frame (radius = 8.1 cm). Each turn has the same area, equal to that of the frame.
CHAPTER 9 Electrical Design of Overhead Lines
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10 : Running a discharge / diagnostics.
Physics of Fusion power Lecture 7: Stellarator / Tokamak.
Physics 121 Practice Problem Solutions 11 Faraday’s Law of Induction
Chapter 29 Electromagnetic Induction and Faraday’s Law HW#9: Chapter 28: Pb.18, Pb. 31, Pb.40 Chapter 29:Pb.3, Pb 30, Pb. 48 Due Wednesday 22.
INDUCTANCE Plan:  Inductance  Calculating the Inductance  Inductors with Magnetic materials.
Chapter 29 Electromagnetic Induction and Faraday’s Law
Unit 5: Day 8 – Mutual & Self Inductance
Written by Dr. John K. Dayton MAGNETIC FIELDS THE MAGNETIC FIELD FORCES ON MOVING CHARGES THE MAGNETIC FIELD OF A LONG, STRAIGHT WIRE THE MAGNETIC FIELD.
Induction and Inductance Chapter 30 Magnetic Flux.
Inductance and AC Circuits. Mutual Inductance Self-Inductance Energy Stored in a Magnetic Field LR Circuits LC Circuits and Electromagnetic Oscillations.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 33 Inductance, Electromagnetic Oscillations, and AC Circuits.
Nov PHYS , Dr. Andrew Brandt PHYS 1444 – Section 003 Lecture #20, Review Part 2 Tues. November Dr. Andrew Brandt HW28 solution.
Chapter 7. Steady magnetic field 1 EMLAB. B (Magnetic flux density), H (Magnetic field) Magnetic field is generated by moving charges, i.e. current. If.
General electric flux definition
SUNIST SUNIST- Sino UNIted Spherical Tokamak Status of SUNIST spherical tokamak in 2006 HE Yexi, ZHANG Liang, *FENG Chunhua, FU Hongjun, GAO Zhe, TAN Yi,
Mar 24, 2014PHYS PHYS 1442 – Section 004 Lecture #17, Review for test 2 Monday March Dr. Justin Griffiths for Dr. Brandt Loose ends and.
General electric flux definition The field is not uniform The surface is not perpendicular to the field If the surface is made up of a mosaic of N little.
Remote operation of the GOLEM tokamak Gent University, December 14, 2009 Jan Stockel Institute of Plasma Physics, Prague Vojta Svoboda.
Chapter 29 Electromagnetic Induction and Faraday’s Law
Self Inductance. A variable power supply is connected to a loop. The current in the loop creates a magnetic field. What happens when the power supply.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Ampère’s Law.
Magnetic Field Chapter 28 opener. A long coil of wire with many closely spaced loops is called a solenoid. When a long solenoid carries an electric current,
Beijin, China2nd RCM - IAEA - CRP On Joint Research Using Small Tokamaks 1 Highlights on EGYPTOR Progress By H. Hegazy Plasma Physics Dept., NRC, Atomic.
Magnetic Fields Due to Currents
ELECTROMAGNETIC CANNON Reporter: Hsieh, Tsung-Lin Taiwan.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 32: Inductance, Electromagnetic Oscillations, and AC Circuits.
Inductance and AC Circuits. Mutual Inductance Self-Inductance Energy Stored in a Magnetic Field LR Circuits LC Circuits and Electromagnetic Oscillations.
Thursday March 31, PHYS Dr. Andrew Brandt PHYS 1444 – Section 02 Lecture #16 Thursday Mar 31, 2011 Dr. Andrew Brandt HW7 Ch 27 is due Fri.
Chapter 29 Electromagnetic Induction and Faraday’s Law
HT-7U CASIPP 1 The Engineering Design of the Poloidal Field System of HT-7U Tokamak PF Group of HT-7U Team Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plasma.
29. Electromagnetic Induction
Inductance.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 28 Sources of Magnetic Field.
PHYSICS 222 EXAM 2 REVIEW SI LEADER: ROSALIE DUBBERKE.
SI leader: Rosalie Dubberke
Monday, Apr. 16, 2012PHYS , Spring 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 1444 – Section 004 Lecture #20 Monday, April 16, 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Today’s homework.
Magnetic Field of a Solenoid
Review 2. Example 1 How does the electric field vary with distance for: a) a point charge b) a charged wire c) an infinite charged sheet.
Monday, April 23, PHYS , Spring 2007 Dr. Andrew Brandt PHYS 1444 – Section 004 Lecture #19 Monday, April 23, 2007 Dr. Andrew Brandt Inductance.
GOLEM operation based on some results from CASTOR
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais – Laboratório Associado de Plasma 1 3rd IAEA TM on ST – STW2005 Determination of eddy currents in the vacuum.
ASIPP Magnetic Diagnostics of HT-7U Tokamak Shen Biao Wan Baonian Institute of Plasma Physics, CAS P.O.Box 1126, Hefei, Anhui , P.R.China (e_mail:
Quiz 1 Borderline Trouble Deep Trouble.
Presentation Course: Power System Presented BY: M.Hamza Usman Roll No# BSEE Date: 10, November Section(B) To: Sir, Kashif Mehmood.
Chapter 28 Sources of Magnetic Field Ampère’s Law Example 28-6: Field inside and outside a wire. A long straight cylindrical wire conductor of radius.
Design of a feedback control system for KTX Hong Li, on behalf of KTX team The 17th International RFP Workshop, October , 2015, Hefei 1.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 29 Electromagnetic Induction and Faraday’s Law.
Instrumentation for status monitoring of SST-1 superconducting magnets
Ampère’s Law Figure Arbitrary path enclosing a current, for Ampère’s law. The path is broken down into segments of equal length Δl.
Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics
Design of Interferometer System
Design and Fabrication of Versatile Experiment Spherical Torus (VEST)
PHYS 1444 – Section 02 Lecture #19
Ampère’s Law Figure Arbitrary path enclosing a current, for Ampère’s law. The path is broken down into segments of equal length Δl.
Lecture 9 Magnetic Fields due to Currents Ch. 30
Electromagnetic Theory
PHYS 1444 – Section 003 Lecture #21
Lecture 14. Diagnostic equipment of the accelerators
Chapter 28 Sources of Magnetic Field
Lab: AC Circuits Integrated Science II.
Presentation transcript:

Magnetic Diagnostics for GLAST-III Tokamak M. A. Naveed, Aqib javeed and GLAST Team National Tokamak Fusion Programme Islamabad Pakistan IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June

Outline of the Talk 1.GLAST Tokamak 2.Magnetic Diagnostics 3.Rogowski Coils 4.Magnetic Probes 5.Flux Loops 6. Error fields 7.Initial Results 8.Summary IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June

GLAST-III (Glass Spherical Tokamak)  Its Vessel is of Pyrex  Major radius =20cm  Minor Radius=10 cm  12 TF Coils and Central Solenoid  Capacitor Banks are used for energizing different coils  Central solenoid 2.2mF, 6kV, 40kJ  TF coils 484mF, 450V, 49kJ  Pre-Ionization Source is 2.45 GHz microwave oven Magnetron( 800 Watt) IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June

IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June 2015 GLAST-III 4

Magnetic Diagnostics  Magnetic measurements are fundamental diagnostic for tokamak start up and operation.  GLAST with dielectric chamber facilitates us to install every pick up coil outside the vacuum. No current will be flowing in the chamber so a single Rogowski coil will be providing true plasma current.  Magnetic Probes, Flux loops and Rogowski coil are major magnetic diagnostics in GLAST-III. IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June

Magnetic Probes Measured Parameters Winding Wire Diameter of Probe mm Winding Length cm Total turns DC Resistance (Ohm) Inductance (mH) Big Probes 36 swg Small Probes 36 swg7.5 mm IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June

Calibration of Magnetic Probes Helmholtz Coils SWG 16(5A dc curret Capacity) Hall probe for calibrating 9.5 gauss per ampere The effective area ‘NA’ is given by IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June

Pulse Behavior of Magnetic Probes Pulse generator which is capable of generation pulses of different time durations. IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June

Pulse Behavior of Magnetic Probes  For finding Magnetic field the differential signals are integrated.  Simplest are the RC Integrators.  In these studies 10ms, 22 ms and 47 ms time constant integrators are used. IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June

Fabrication of Rogowski Coil  RG-11 coaxial cable is used. The central conductor serves as return path.  Uniform winding is required so groves are made with dye. Measured Parameters L(µH ) R(Ω) Winding wire Turns per cm Length (cm) Diameter (mm) Sensitivity Vs/A Rogowski-III81.324Swg x10 -8 IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June

Calibration of Rogowski Coil Calibration Setup AC and pulsed sources are used for exiting a multi turn coil having number of turns up to 200 so that Rogowski coil when passed through this multi turn coil encounters a reasonable current to be measured. The LEM current monitor is used as a reference for calibration of Rogowski coils. IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June

Rogowski coil Signal recoded with 47 ms RC integrator Chanel-1: Current signal and Chanel -2: Rogowski signal IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June 2015 Behavior of Rogowski coil along with passive integrator at different values of current. Calibration of Rogowski Coil 12

Flux loops on GLAST-III In GLAST-III loop voltage is measure horizontally at the mid plane of the chamber. Three differential pairs of poloidal flux loops are installed for the poloidal flux measurement at different locations. One of these pairs as shown in Fig is installed on the mid plane d with a single turn of insulated wire installed IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June

Error Field corrections using flux loops  There are some error fields generated in Tokamak because of misalignments and winding inaccuracy of Toroidal field and Ohmic current drive coil systems.  These error fields create problems not only in the startup of Tokamak but also limit the pulse duration.  These fields must also be measured and compensated 14 IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June 2015

Error field minimization Two loops are wrapped in toroidal direction at the mid plane with radii 9.2 cm and 31.8 cm. These loops are connected to each other in such a way that average vertical field in the region where plasma is to be generated is measured. The average vertical magnetic field will be given as: Average vertical Field= Vertical Flux / π( R 2 2 -R 1 2 ) Where R 2 = 31.8 cm R 1 = 9.2 cm IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June

Initial Shots of GLAST-III IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June 2015 (a)Vertical field applied (b)No vertical field applied 16

 The magnetic diagnostics installed presently on GLAST-III tokamak worked well for the initial operation.  The Rogowski coils used with RC integrators worked well for short duration pulses of plasma current.  The pulse source developed for on bench calibration of diagnostics coils helped to evaluate the response of these coils for pulses, nearly of same time scale and shape which are to be measured on the GLAST-III tokamak.  In future magnetic diagnostics for GLAST-III will be improved so that long duration plasma operation becomes possible. For this purpose long integration time constant active integrators will be developed. Summary IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June

Thanks 18 IAEA First Technical Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis 1 – 3 June 2015