CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

An Overview of Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Promotion Nancy M. Ostrove, Ph.D. Risk Communication Advisory Committee May 15, 2008.
© 2013 Sri U-Thong Limited. All rights reserved. This presentation has been prepared by Sri U-Thong Limited and its holding company (collectively, “Sri.
CONFIDENTIAL © 2012 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of.
Substantiation of Health Claims in Advertising: Probiotics Richard L. Cleland Division of Advertising Practices Federal Trade Commission.
Silicon Valley Apps for Kids Meetup Laura D. Berger October 22, 2012 The views expressed herein are those of the speaker, and do not represent the views.
Development of Guidance Documents Jennifer Scharpf, M. P. H
Medication Guides Nancy M. Ostrove, Ph.D. Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications.
The AMA Code of Ethics Could Egyptian Marketing Professionals Agree on a List of Rules, Perhaps Similar to This? The IMI Journal. Members of the AMA are.
Enforcement in the Pharmaceutical Industry Michael K. Loucks First Assistant U.S. Attorney United States Attorney’s Office District of Massachusetts October.
RAC Study Group Chapter 16
FEDERAL REGULATIONS OF MEDICATIONS Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Protect consumers from adulterated and misbranded foods, drugs, cosmetics, or devices.
ISO 9001 Interpretation : Exclusions
Cross-Labeling: Legal and Regulatory Issues David M. Fox Hogan & Hartson LLP th Street, NW Washington, DC
INTERNET and CODE OF CONDUCT
Standards and Guidelines for Web Page Publishing December 9, 2009.
© 2009 Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Meredith Manning Partner May 20, 2009 FDA’s Internet Ad Warnings: Implications for Social Media National.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board The Clarified ISAs, Audit Documentation, and SME Audit Considerations ISA Implementation Support Module.
Notice of Privacy Practices Nebraska SNIP Privacy Subgroup July 18, 2002 Michael J. Brown, MHA, CPA Vice-President, Administrative & Regulatory Affairs,
Regulation of Drug Marketing Introduction to Drug Law and Regulation FDLI Workshop April 28-29, 2003 Teaneck, New Jersey Philip Katz Crowell & Moring LLP.
August, 2005 Slide 1 MANAGING RISKS OF OFF-LABEL PROMOTION AND CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION The FDA Regulatory and Compliance Symposium Annenberg Hall.
Managing Communication Before Device Approval Bradley Merrill Thompson Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
© 2010 Dorsey & Whitney LLP Social Media Friday, September 17, 2010 The Committee on Finance & Information Technology (CFIT)
Presented by: Heather Ward and Jason Cook Date: October 28, 2011 Presented by: > Proprietary and Confidential. For FAA Use Only. The Value of Private Loan.
The Regulatory Authority for Off-Label Promotion
Off Label Promotion of Medical Devices presented by Bradley Merrill Thompson Epstein Becker & Green P.C. June 21, 2006.
Voluntary Codes MassMEDIC Meeting Are You Ready to Comply with Massachusetts’ New Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Code of Conduct Law? Linda D. Bentley,
Legal Issues Impacting Clinical Trials Medical Device Clinical Trials Update June 19, 2009.
20__ Fredrikson & Byron P.A A Practical Path -- Does the First Amendment Matter? Presented by Bob Klepinski
Securities Fraud Material misrepresentation. Unfairness as fraud? Kirby Lumber Santa Fe Minority (Green) 95%5%
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
Virtual Business CREATING A WEB PRESENCE Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.
Planned Emergency Research Exception from Informed Consent Requirements September 2007.
CONFIDENTIAL © 2014 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of.
Key Compliance Risks in Clinical Trials Kathleen Meriwether Principal, ERNST & YOUNG, LLP Fraud Investigation & Dispute Services.
A Focus on CME and Grants Nancy Coddington, PhD Senior Director, Compliance Operations AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP And Terry Hisey Deputy Managing Principal.
Chapter 19: Ethical Responsibilities Chapter 19 Ethical Responsibilities.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
FleetBoston Financial HIPAA Privacy Compliance Agnes Bundy Scanlan Managing Director and Chief Privacy Officer FleetBoston Financial.
FIRMA April 2010 SOCIAL NETWORKING Christine M. Farquhar Managing Director, Compliance J.P. Morgan U.S. Private Banking.
Regulatory Issues in Investment Research Brian McDonnell Associate
FDLI Introduction to Medical Device Law and Regulation Other Postmarket Controls Philip Katz (202) October 29, 2002 Washington,
Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
© 2009 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP which may not be reproduced,
Promotion & Enforcement FDA’s Social Media Guidance.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
General Regulatory Issues in the Development of Drugs Intended for Treatment of Chronic Illness Sharon Hertz, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthetic,
©2007 Fredrikson & Byron P.A. Presented by
Chapter Dental Public Health & Research Contemporary Practice for the Dental Hygienist Copyright ©2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Promotion of Prescription Drugs and Biologics Thomas O. Henteleff Kleinfeld, Kaplan and Becker LLP Company logo here.
FDA Regulation of Pharmaceutical Marketing Tom Casola Executive Director Commercial Operations Merck & Co., Inc.
1 ETHICAL LAWYERING Spring, 2006 Class MR 7.3(a) A lawyer shall not by in-person, live telephone or real-time electronic contact solicit professional.
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. Reprints.
FDA Draft Guidance Good Reprint Practices for the Distribution of Medical Journal Articles and Medical or Scientific Reference Publications on Unapproved.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Privacy and Security Considerations in Research and Clinical Trials February 28, 2013 Joanna K. Napp, J.D., M.P.H. Chief Privacy Officer and Compliance.
Disclaimer This presentation is intended only for use by Tulane University faculty, staff, and students. No copy or use of this presentation should occur.
Advertising and Solicitation. MR 7.3(a) – p. 126 A lawyer shall not by in-person live telephone or real-time electronic contact solicit professional employment.
Complaint Handling Medical Device Reporting May 19, 2016 Rita Harden, Director Customer Relations & Regulatory Reporting.
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
The secure site rendering issue (all navigation crushed together as a list at the top of the page) is a compatibility issue with Internet Explorer only.
HIPAA Training Workshop #3 Individual Rights Kaye L. Rankin Rankin Healthcare Consultants, Inc.
UNITED ADVISORY PARTNERS.
Whistleblower Program
Analysis of the Proposed Sunshine Rule: Legal Considerations
Generic Medical Device Company (“MDC”)
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
The Zyprexa and Bextra Settlements
SOCIAL NETWORKING Christine M. Farquhar Managing Director, Compliance J.P. Morgan U.S. Private Banking.
© 2013 Sri U-Thong Limited. All rights reserved
Presentation transcript:

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Device Labeling, Advertising, and Promotion IMDMC Reg. 101 June 25, 2015 Lynn C. Tyler

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Part One: Regulatory Framework for Product Promotion “Label” is a: – display of written, printed, or graphic matter upon the immediate container of any article.... “Labeling" is: – all labels and other written, printed, or graphic matter (1) upon any article or any of its containers or wrappers, or (2) accompanying such article.

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Definitions “Accompanying”: – Is interpreted liberally to mean more than physical association with the product – Extends to posters, tags, pamphlets, circulars, booklets, brochures, instruction books, direction sheets, etc., depending on how they are used – Includes labeling that is brought together with the device after shipment or delivery for shipment in interstate commerce. – Can also include website content and other information a manufacturer posts online But what of a tweet or a post on a discussion board?

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. What is required? FDA specifically requires certain information, prominently displayed (unless exempt): – Established name of the product – Name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor – Net quantity of contents – Adequate directions for use and adequate warnings Use means intended use - the objective intent of the persons legally responsible for the labeling of devices Label approved by FDA along with device

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. FDA Regulation of Advertising Advertising – Not defined in the FD&C Act – FDA likes to treat advertising as labeling According to an appellate court decision: "Most, if not all advertising, is labeling.… Congress did not, and we cannot, exclude from the definition printed matter which constitutes advertising.” – Advertising includes: Journal and magazine ads Television or radio commercials Direct mail or communications Certain online promotion – FDA regulates restricted device advertising and labeling

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Fundamental Prohibition The term misbranded means: – “False or misleading in any particular” False generally is understood to mean a statement that in any material respect is untrue Misleading is less clear (to whom and how much?) – Twin goals of: Safety and effectiveness Preventing economic fraud

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Fundamental Prohibition (continued) Examples of false labeling include: – Incorrect, inadequate, or incomplete identification – Omitting other required information – Unsubstantiated claims of therapeutic value – Substitution of parts or material – Inaccuracies concerning condition, state, treatment, size, shape, or style Examples of misleading labeling include: – Ambiguity, half-truths, and trade puffery – Expressions of opinion or subjective statements – Failure to reveal material facts, consequences that may result from use, or the existence of difference of opinion

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Fundamental Prohibition (continued) Examples of other objectionable labeling practices include – Deceptive pictorial matter – Misleading testimonials – Misleading list of parts or components – Use of brand or trade names instead of “established names”

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. FTC Regulation of Advertising FTC has jurisdiction over advertising for a non- restricted device FTC applies three requirements – Adequate substantiation – No deception, from the standpoint of the reasonable consumer – Fairness Agency influenced by lawyers who focus on consumers and how they are affected

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Part Two: Claim Substantiation Topics – Generally – Comparative claims – Establishment claims

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Claim Substantiation Generally Refers to the evidence needed to support a claim regarding some feature or performance of the device – Must support both express and implied claims – In labeling, revolves around the FD&C Act “false and misleading” language – In advertising, FTC standard requires firm to have a reasonable basis in objective evidence before the claim is made

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. FTC Factors for Adequate Substantiation Type of product Type of claim Benefits of a truthful claim Cost/feasibility of developing substantiation for the claim Consequences of a false claim Amount of substantiation that experts in the field believe is reasonable

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Comparative Claims These compare the device to another device FDA considers them inherently misleading – Requires that such claims be supported by sound scientific data, usually a rigorous study that directly compares the devices FTC does not have that same predisposition, instead favoring useful comparisons – But likewise requires rigorous scientific evidence, again a study or studies comparing the devices

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Establishment Claims These are claims that declare or even suggest that a device’s superiority has been scientifically proven Both FDA and FTC require the company to have at least the level of evidence stated or implied in the claim – There is also a baseline of support required – Studies must be able to withstand criticism

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Part Three: Off-Label Promotion Off-Label Use Rules – Basic Intended Use Framework – Definition First Amendment Issues

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Basic Intended Use Framework Under 21 CFR 801.4, the words “intended use” … refer to the objective intent of the persons legally responsible for the labeling of devices. The intent is determined by such persons' expressions or may be shown by the circumstances surrounding the distribution of the article. This objective intent may, for example, be shown by labeling claims, advertising matter, or oral or written statements by such persons or their representatives. It may be shown by the circumstances that the article is, with the knowledge of such persons or their representatives, offered and used for a purpose for which it is neither labeled nor advertised. …

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Judging Intended Use 1.Words a.External (e.g. labeling, sales lit., advertising, sales pitches) b.Internal (e.g. business planning, sales force memos, training programs) 2.Actions, for example a.Design features (i.e. uniquely medical features) b.Distribution (e.g. medical sales and distribution channels) c.Where do your sales people visit? 3.Circumstances (inferences), for example a.How legitimate are non medical uses b.Actual sales volume

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Off-Label Use If an intended use is for other than the approved indication: – The lack of approval for the new intended use makes the device “adulterated” – The lack of adequate labeling makes the device “misbranded”

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. First Amendment FDA’s authority to regulate off-label promotion has been limited by the courts – any such regulation must be narrowly tailored to achieve a legitimate FDA purpose Recent important cases: – Sorrell v. IMS Health (2011) (Vermont statute prohibiting the sale of prescriber information for pharmaceutical “detailing” was unconstitutional ) – U.S. v. Caronia (2012)(government cannot prosecute drug firms and their reps for speech promoting the lawful, off-label use of an FDA-approved drug)

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Impact of the Litigation FDA cannot infringe on the right of medical device companies to promote their products if other, less restrictive measures can achieve FDA's objectives, such as: – Disclaimers and warning labels – Disclosures – Limitations on non-speech related activity – Narrowing of speech restrictions But, don’t want to go here because of huge risks, including criminal penalties and debarment

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Part Four: Marketing in a Regulated Environment Different Stages of Promotion General Risk Areas – Unsolicited Requests – Trade shows – Scientific meetings – Websites – Social media – Distributing reprints on risk and unapproved uses – SEC disclosure and investor communications Good Promotional Practices

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Basic Rules For Development Stage Communication Thou Shalt Not Discuss Beyond the Anticipated Approved Label – Whatever the company says now about its upcoming product will create an impression in the minds of the customers who may ultimately be asked to purchase that product. – If the company describes uses that do not ultimately get approved, the company will be creating an off-label promotion situation once the product is introduced into commercial distribution. Thou Shalt Tell the Truth – Both FDA and FTC would have difficulty proceeding against the company for statements made in advance of any product being placed in commercial distribution. (But other laws may still be relevant.) – However, once the opportunity to acquire the product exists, any prior statements made would be evaluated for their truthfulness. Being truthful means, among other things, the statements made are adequately supported by valid scientific evidence at the time they are made.

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Investigational Device Labeling Rules Promotion and commercialization of devices subject to an IDE is prohibited – Promotion of clinical trial results (needs to be bona fide scientific exchange) Tone Context – Disclosure of commercial price – Taking or being prepared to take orders – Prolonging the investigation

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Unsolicited Requests re: off-label uses Not result of action taken by firm that, even indirectly, prompts request for information about off-label use Public request – Respond if at all only when firm’s product is named in the request – Limit response to contact information for firm’s medical or scientific department (not sales) – Do not include any information about off-label use Private request – Respond only to person making request – Answer only specific question asked (if broad ?, narrow it first) – Truthful, non-misleading, accurate, balanced (benefits and risks) – Response should be scientific in nature, not promotional – Response generated by scientific or medical personnel, not sales or marketing – Response should include approved label and other information from Guidance – Maintain records about response

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Best Practices: Trade Shows Train marketing personnel extensively in permitted disclosures Consider having clinical personnel present to respond to questions that are off-label Maintain a separate space for international uses Control disclosures regarding pending 510(k)s

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Special Rules: Trade Shows Special Rules—510(k) Pending – For 510(k) pending devices, special accommodation to account for infrequent trade shows – Show demo model, with conspicuous statement that not cleared, 510(k) pending – No performance claims – Can explain intended use and existence of basic features – Can collect business leads – But do not take orders, or be prepared to take orders, that might result in contracts of sale for the device unless limited to research or investigational use (e.g., no discussion of commercial price)

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Scientific Meetings – Two Types “Controlled” – speakers under the control of the sponsor (e.g., employees, consultants) – Investigator meetings – Speaker training – Trade show booths “Supported” - speakers are not under the sponsor’s control but sponsor provides support for the program – Sponsored CME

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Meetings – Controlled Communications Regulated as promotional material Remarks should: – Be consistent with intended use – Conform to rules applicable to unsolicited requests Also consider rules applicable to: – Dissemination of written materials – Appropriate locations – Interactions with healthcare professionals – Speaker agreements

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Meetings – Supported Communications Unregulated scientific exchange, unless sponsor is in a position to influence the presentation of information about its products In determining independence, FDA will consider: – Sponsor's control over content and speakers – Meaningful disclosure of sponsor support, relationships with speakers, regulatory status of any unapproved uses discussed – Focus of the program (e.g., on a single product or single company’s products when alternatives are available) – Relationship between provider and sponsor – Etc.

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Risks in Interactions with Physicians Government enforcement risks arise in the context of: – Business courtesies Ensure sales personnel follow applicable guidance with respect to gifts, meals, and entertainment – Consulting arrangements Consulting arrangements must be for necessary services pursuant to written agreements in compliance with regulatory requirements – Research grants Grants should be administered outside marketing function, based on objective criteria – Educational activities & meetings Sponsored meetings must take place in locations conducive to educational activities, without providing entertainment and with only modest meals and accommodations

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Websites Who regulates medical device website content? – FTC and FDA Is a website labeling or advertising? – “FDA considers written, printed, or graphic material placed on a manufacturer’s or own label distributor’s Internet website to be labeling.” – “We suggest that you review your current labeling, including … any internet advertising ….” FDA uses conduct prohibited in any medium as a basis of enforcement actions related to websites – New intended use – Promotion of investigational devices

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Best Practices: Websites Monitor linked sites for off-label/ unapproved information – If you link to it directly, you own it – Provide notice that viewer is leaving your site – Observe the “two click” rule for off-label information – Avoid links to chat rooms or sites known to discuss off-label use of the product

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Social Media Guidance Generally, if you cannot present full benefit and risk within the character space limits, then you should not use that outlet for advertising and promotion

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Social media guidance Exception: “A concise disclosure of specific risk information may be presented together with benefit information within the confines of character-space-limited Internet/social media platforms if supplemented by a prominent reference to the presence and location elsewhere of a more complete discussion of the risks associated with the product.”

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Social media – Part Deux (drugs) Guidance defines “interactive promotional media” as including “modern tools and technologies that often allow for real-time communications and interactions (e.g., blogs, microblogs, social networking sites, online communities, and live podcasts).” In general, firms are only responsible for content they control, even if financially sponsor a website Although the FD&C Act requires drug firms to submit copies of promotional materials at the time of their initial dissemination, the draft Guidance states that the FDA will exercise enforcement discretion if the firms submit monthly updates of their promotional material in these types of interactive media

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Guidance on distributing scientific publications on risk (drugs) FDA will not object to the distribution of new risk information that rebuts, mitigates, or refines risk information in the approved labeling, under certain conditions

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Distributing risk information DATA SOURCE – The study or analysis should meet accepted design and other methodologic standards – The study or analysis should also be at least as persuasive as the data sources that underlie the existing risk assessment – The conclusions should be a fair characterization of all relevant safety information – The study or analysis should be published in an independent, peer-reviewed journal

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Distributing risk information DISTRIBUTION – Need cover sheet disclosing: The study design, critical findings, and significant methodological or other limitations of the study That the information is not consistent with the approved labeling That FDA has not reviewed the data Any financial interests or affiliations between the study author(s) and the firm

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Distributing new risk information (cont’d) – The reprint or digital copy should be accompanied by the approved labeling for the product. – The reprint or digital copy, when distributed, should be separate from any promotional material. – Any statements made by a representative of the firm to a recipient concerning the reprint should be consistent with its content and the information in the disclosure cover sheet

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Guidance - Distribution of Scientific Publications on Unapproved Uses Applies to scientific journal articles, scientific or medical reference texts, and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) Establishes a “safe harbor” - as long as firms distribute scientific or medical publications as recommended in the draft guidance, FDA states that it will not use such distribution as evidence of the manufacturer’s intent that the product be used for an unapproved new use (i.e., off-label promotion)

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. SEC Disclosure Requirements SEC’s requirement that companies disclose material information to the investment community, including both positive and negative results of clinical trials, is sometimes inconsistent with FDA’s limitations on disclosure – Clash of pro-speech policy with FDA’s speech restrictions SEC has brought enforcement actions against companies for failure to disclose important information about products in clinical trials

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Investor Communications Regarding Investigational Uses Labeling regulations apply, unless disclosure can be classified as purely business or a scientific exchange Pre-approval off-label information, including study announcements, will be tolerated by FDA if segregated in the investor or news section of a website and/or distributed to the press concurrently with a newsworthy event Must avoid-- – Promotional tone – Claims re: safety or effectiveness – Redistribution – Undue prolonging

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Good Promotional Practices Many leading companies are developing their own GPPs and GRPs Approval processes Essentially a risk management tool—sets the company’s preferred path forward in a gray area Looked upon favorably by regulators if done well Become the basis for training and auditing

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Part Five: Hypothetical Neuro – Infant Stroke Stop – New marketing program (cardiac patients, comparative claims) Product Handling Patient Mobility – All cardiac and COPD patients

CONFIDENTIAL © 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, which may not be disseminated or disclosed to any person or entity other than the intended recipient(s), and may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of the author or presenter. The information on this page is intended for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Questions? Lynn C. Tyler (317)