1 Faculty Activity and Assessment Reporting Report to FAAR Advisory Group November 29, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation, and Institutional Renewal Some Things to Consider Andrea A. Lex, Ph.D. Dean, Planning, Assessment, & Institutional.
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
OVERVIEW Two major initiatives Published Catalog Automated Graduation Certification.
David J. Sammons, Dean UF International Center. Southern Association of Colleges and Schools: SACS is our regional accrediting authority. The last SACS.
M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
Strategic Plan Briefing Session Progress and Challenges Spring
The Nuts and Bolts to Administrative Unit Outcomes (AUOs) Franklin P. Ow, Ph.D East Los Angeles College Assistant Professor, Chemistry Learning Assessment.
Updating Digital Measures Activity Insight Using MS Office David Onder SAIR 2011.
1 Update on the Faculty Activity Repository Project Report to FAR Advisory Group March 19, 2008.
SEM Planning Model.
October Priority 8 Review Team 8: Planning Subcommittee M. DesVignes, D. Kinney, J. Moore, M. Siegel, R. Tillberg Collect and use data systematically.
New Web-Based Course Evaluation Services Available to Schools and Departments Presentation to Faculty Council November 6, 2009.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Digital Measures Managing and Reporting on Faculty Accomplishments Steve Hare Project Manager Office of Institutional Research, Assessment, and Effectiveness.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
UWM CIO Office A Collaborative Process for IT Training and Development Copyright UW-Milwaukee, This work is the intellectual property of the author.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
Technology Support on a University Campus Contingency Theory and Collaboration.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
Office of Space Planning & Management Developed with mission of: Providing strategic and thoughtful planning Efficient management and utilization of both.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Chancellor’s Cabinet September 28, 2004.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Eastern Washington University EWU ODP Maps EWU ODP Maps
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Accreditation, SLOs and You – What are the patient outcomes? or Will the patient survive? Facilitators: Janet Fulks and Phillip Maynard.
Copyright © 2015, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. The Use of SAS Visual Analytics to Support a Data Culture for Student Success PANEL Facilitated.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
Don Dodson, Senior Vice Provost Diane Jonte-Pace, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies Carol Ann Gittens, Director, Office of Assessment Learning Assessment.
Strategic Plan Presentation to Faculty & Staff Spring 2006.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Quality Reports Come from Quality Data Andrew Baldwin College of Management University of Wisconsin- Stout Jan Boyd Information School University of Washington.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
+ using Integrated Planning & Budget In a Participatory Governance Context Realizing our Foothill Vision 20/20.
New Frameworks for Strategic Enrollment Management Planning
SACS Reaffirmation and the QEP Introduction and Welcome – Kay Jordan, Joe Scartelli Administrative Support: Personnel SACS Reaffirmation Overview – Rick.
Planning 101 Overview of integrated planning at SCC
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. Data for Effective Educational Policy Decision-Making:
Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,
Presentation on Outcomes Assessment Presentation on Outcomes Assessment toCCED Mohawk Valley Community College October 11, 2004.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
Accreditation 2007 Undergraduate Council September 26, 2005.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
Accreditation - Fall Standard IB - Institutional Effectiveness The College will develop and implement a comprehensive communication plan. The College.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Texas Woman’s University Academic Degree Program Assessment
Provost Action Plan Update Friday, November 18, 2016
Digital Measures Faculty Activity Insight profile
New Certificate Program
New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program
PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESS
Presentation transcript:

1 Faculty Activity and Assessment Reporting Report to FAAR Advisory Group November 29, 2007

2 Objectives  Facilitate data-driven decision-making for department heads, deans and senior administrators  Improve timeliness, accuracy and consistency of internal and external reporting, including assessment activities  Provide means to showcase faculty contributions to UGA’s instruction, research and service missions  Meet needs of upcoming SACS reaffirmation

3 Background  Cross-functional exploratory group formed in fall 2006 to discuss feasibility and desirability of an institutional system to capture faculty activities  A second exploratory group researched commercial and custom solution alternatives for a system to capture institutional information from student learning assessments

4 Solution Selection Process  Reviewed the known faculty reporting systems and formats in UGA schools and colleges  Identified common data elements for faculty activity system  Vetted need for institutional assessment system with school/college administrators at Special Topics Workshop (Oct. 2006)  Recommended Digital Measures’ Activity Insight as campus-wide solution to meet both needs  Provost decided to support a commercial software solution to meet both sets of goals

5 Opportunities  Create integrated source of faculty activity information  Create integrated source of assessment of student learning outcomes  Provide efficient, flexible, consistent reporting capabilities to satisfy internal and external needs  Use, review and improve accuracy of data from existing authoritative data sources  Enable effective, secure and appropriate campus- wide information sharing

6 SACS Reaffirmation Budget Human Resources Registrar Curriculum Systems OFA/IROVPR Grad School Faculty CVs Faculty OFA/IR In-House School/College FAR Systems Faculty Member Reports Departmental Reports College Reports Digital Measures Faculty Activity Reporting Digital Measures Faculty Activity & Assessment Reporting Current SituationPhase I-Populating FAAR SACS Reaffirmation Assessment Reporting Phase II-Institutional FAAR Assessment Reports Institutional Reports Validating Authoritative Data Authoritative Data Sources

7 Assessment--Dashboard FAAR Unit Assessment Dashboard Existing Processes Undergrad Major Assessment Graduate Program Assessment Program Review Faculty Activity 5-Year Program Planning Unit Data (link to OIR/FACTS) Reporting Annual reports Assessment reports Program review reports Accreditation reports Decision Making Resource allocation Program management Strategic planning Personnel evaluation Existing Needs

8 Undergraduate Major Assessment Program Mission/Goals Institutional/Unit-specific Indicators Student Learning Outcome 1 Actions taken Assessment Data on Learning Outcome Student Learning Outcome 2 Actions taken Assessment Data on Learning Outcome Pre-filled from Existing Reports/ Ongoing use in Depts. FAAR Unit Assessment Dashboard Program-level Actions

9 Benefits to UGA and You  Provide accurate and consistent information for data-driven decision-making  Capture assessment data to facilitate process improvement  Capture faculty contributions to UGA’s instruction, research and service mission  Facilitate reporting for internal and external needs

10 Project Highlights  Completed: Identified common data elements and their authoritative sources Developed a framework for outcomes assessment reporting  In progress: Develop communication plan and training Develop processes for populating system information from program and/or authoritative sources Develop process for data validating and correcting authoritative sources  Phase I implementation: Capture data for upcoming SACS reaffirmation  Phase II implementation: Customize application for specific college needs Continue and expand use of system for continuous improvement and reporting

11 FAAR Working Group Thank you

12 Activities Database Main Menu (FOR PHASE I; draft as of 11/07) General Information Personal and Contact Information Permanent Data Yearly Data Positions Held at UGA Education Faculty Development Activities Attended Licensures and Certifications Workload Information

13 Teaching Academic/Research Advising Directed Student Learning Continuing and Non-Credit Instruction Scheduled Teaching Scholarship/Research Artistic and Professional Performances and Exhibits Contracts, Grants, and Sponsored Research Intellectual Contributions Intellectual Property Presentations

14 Public Service & Outreach Continuing and Non-Credit Instruction Public Service Other Service Institutional Service Professional Service Community Service