A regional perspective: South East European Network on QF Prof. Mile Dželalija, PhD Bologna Process: Development of Qualifications Framework Meeting of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 IMPLEMENTING THE MALTA QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK FOR LIFELONG LEARNING THE KEY CHALLENGES TIPTOE Conference: Working on EQF – From Framework to Practice.
Advertisements

Compatibility of NQFs with QF-EHEA: Analysis of Verification Reports Bryan Maguire 2 nd Regional Meeting of Ministers of Education Strasbourg, November,
EUROPEAN UNION EDUCATION POLICY TOOLS PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
“Articulating the work on NQF, QA and recognition ” JULY 2008, Cetinje.
In Europe, When you ask the VET stakeholders : What does Quality Assurance mean for VET system? You can get the following answer: Quality is not an absolute.
Challenges in Professional Higher Education : Competences, Learning Outcomes and Convergence Through eyes of a soldier… Prof. Žarko Nožica, Ph. D. EURASHE.
NQF SERBIA 2009 NQF SERBIA 2009 current state and SWOT analyses Ljubljana, June 2009.
Bologna Process in Albania and its NQF versus EQF Bratislava 2008 by Aleksander Xhuvani Rajmonda Buhaljoti Miranda Kullolli.
Ministry of Civil Affairs of Bosnia and Herzegovina The Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The Self-Certification process (Croatian example) Prof. Mile Dželalija, PhD Regional Network on Qualifications Frameworks for South East Europe, Fourth.
1 Development of National Qualification Frameworks Gerald Burke Monash University – ACER Centre for the Economics of Education and Training (CEET) Regional.
Developing a National Qualifications Framework: the Georgian experience General Overview Nodar Surguladze Deputy Minister Ministry of Education and Science.
ASPECTS OF NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK WORK AND ROLE OF SECTOR COMMISSIONS Workshop on Recognition & Flexible Learning Paths Miločer, 5th – 6th July.
Croatian Qualifications Framework (CROQF; HKO) ~ current results ~ Marina Tatalović Croatian Government Regional Network on Qulifications Frameworks for.
Tempus “QUASYS” Dubrovnik, October 11-12, Harmonization with European Trends in Higher Education Prof. dr. Pero Lučin Vice-Rector University of Rijeka.
NQF TURKEY current state, developments, ıssues and challenges Prof. Dr. Selda Önderoğlu Bologna Expert Turkish National Team of Bologna Experts Cetinje,8-9.
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Yerevan, Armenia, 2008 European qualifications framework Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis,
Nedeljko Latinović Biotechnical Faculty University of Montenegro Kick-off meeting on TEMPUS HR-TEMPUS-JPHES project "Lifelong learning.
The Perspectives from Universities Regarding Implementation of Indonesia Qualification Framework Gerardus Polla Rector of BINUS University 29 April 2009.
The Framework of Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area Azerbaijan Seminar Baku, 12th June 2007 Stuart Garvie National Qualifications Authority.
TEMPUS AND BOLOGNA PROCESS IN BIH TEMPUS AND BOLOGNA PROCESS IN BIH BERGEN – LONDON PHASE Tempus Information Day, Sarajevo, June 7, 2006.
1 Joint TFBHC and ERI SEE Cluster of Knowledge: Development of National Qualifications Frameworks Croatian Qualifications Framework.
Recognition of prior learning: report Micheline Scheys Bologna-Seminar, Amsterdam, december 2008.
Mile Dželalija & Slodoban Uzelac: Development of the Croatian Qualifications Framework, Nov 2007 Development of the Croatian Qualifications Framework prof.
1 National qualifications frameworks in Europe – developments and challenges Jens Bjornavold, Helsinki 17 June 2010.
national qualification framework and the learning outcomes based education Petar Bezinović University of Rijeka and Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.
1 Implementation of the Dutch national Qualifiation Framework, the NLQF June 17, 2010 Karin van der Sanden Projectleader NLQF Dutch Ministry of Education.
Croatian Qualifications Framework Law on the CROQF Prof. Dr. Mile Dželalija University of Split President of the MB of the Agency for Science and Higher.
WHAT MAKES A SUCCESSFUL QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCY? CEENQA WORKSHOP FRIDAY, 23 MAY 2014 Hotel Sirius-Pristina.
Realising the European Union Lisbon Goal The Copenhagen process and the Maaastricht Communiqué: Martina Ní Cheallaigh DG Education and Culture.
Tuning of Higher Education Programmes on the Basis of Profiles, Competences and Learning Outcomes WHYHOWWHAT.
Bologna self-certification Implications and challenges.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
Bob Johnson, ECBE, SEEC 11 Nov Qualification Frameworks and Credit - Articulation with Europe Bob Johnson Commissioner for Credit Rating European.
REGIONAL NETWORK ON QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK FOR SOUTH EAST EUROPE Cetinje, 8-9 July 2008 QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS: ROLE AND IMPORTANCE FROM A REGIONAL.
1 FIRST STAGE OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM IN CROATIA – TASKS OF AUTHORISED BODIES.
Towards a European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning Consultation Jens Bjornavold, European Commission, Directorate-General for Education.
THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA MINISTRY OF HIGHER EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY e: Kotnikova 38, 1000 Ljubljana p:
Bologna Process in Croatia Melita Kovačević University of Zagreb Consortia Meeting of the Tempus Project UM-JEP Moving Ahead with the Bologna Process.
Bureau Zuidema Jolanda Botke Postbus AC Leusden 033 – april 2009 EQF in our project.
IPA Component IV - Human Resources Development - European Union Program for Croatia Project office: Lastovska 23, 1000 Zagreb, Project office: Lastovska.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Education and Culture Life Long Learning: Education and Training policies School Education and Higher education.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Skopje, June 2009 Nadezda Uzelac MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.
NQF developments and the governance of the process: practices and challenges Involvment of different stakeholders Prof. Mile Dželalija, PhD National Correspondent.
THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA THE NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK OF ARMENIA AND OBJECTIVES OF ITS IMPLEMENTATION.
I. ROMANIAN LEGISLATION CONCERNING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF JOINT DEGREE STUDY PROGRAMMES.
Tallinn, 19 November 2009 Mike Coles Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, London The EQF – a platform for collaboration, integration and reform.
Quality Assurance in Education - Independence - Responsibility - Transparency - Openness - Regularity (Periodic Review)
After Lisbon: Challenges for the Sport Education and Training Sector Dr. Karen Petry, German Sport University Cologne Sport & EU 5 th Annual Conference:
1 The Irish Experience Dr. Norma Ryan Director, Quality Promotion Unit University College Cork- National University of Ireland Cork Sarajevo 5 th December.
Making the AzQF compatible to the EQF, what does it mean? Olav Aarna Estonian Qualifications Authority, Kutsekoda.
The Framework of Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
Development of qualifications system in Ukraine:
XXIV Konferencja Metodyczna
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, London
Recognition of prior learning: report
Student Study and Work Placement Mobility
PROGRESS AND CHANGES IN
Recognition of prior learning: report
Senior project leader at CIEP Former President of ENQA
The Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area
The process of self-certification The Romanian Experience
BOLOGNA SEMINAR COUNCIL OF EUROPE FORUM QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS
Ministry of civil affairs of BiH Update on KOBIH: Development and implementation of the qualification framework of BiH ETF Seminar, Kiev, 10 March 2016.
Regional network on Qualifications Frameworks in South East Europe
The Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area
Republic of Macedonia - Ministry of Education and Science
National Correspondents for Qualifications Frameworks (QF-EHEA)
Presentation transcript:

A regional perspective: South East European Network on QF Prof. Mile Dželalija, PhD Bologna Process: Development of Qualifications Framework Meeting of National Correspondents, Strasbourg, 9-10 November 2009

Contents:  Bologna process in Croatia  (Common) Croatian QF design and implementation  Internationalization during design and implementation  SEE Network (challenges and benefit)  Conclusions

Bologna process in Croatia:  In 2005/2006 formally introduced – all short, first and second cycles  In 2006/2007 – mid and third cycles  Binary system – academic and professional orientation  LO and ECTS  Bachelor ( ECTS) / Master ( ECTS) / PhD (3 y/180 ECTS)  Short cycle (professional), ECTS  Mid-cycle (academic), ECTS.

UNDERGRADUATE ( ECTS) GRADUATE ( ECTS) PG School GRADUATE ( ECTS) UNDERGRADUATE ( ECTS) ( ECTS) Bachelor (U/P) 8-YEAR PRIMARY SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL GYMNASIUMS 3-YEAR SECONDARY SCHOOLS UP TO 1 YEAR MONTH YEAR 4-YEAR SECONDARY SCHOOLS 5.2 ACADEMIC Master-spec DOCTORAL Study PhD mr. sc. (old) 8.1 Master / Spec. Croatian Qualifications Framework “Pristupnik”

(Common) Croatian QF

ORIENTATION CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW PROGRESS DESIGN TESTING MSES Committee (Govern.) (all partners) Trainers of the sectoral WGs, and CROQF promotors 25+1 sectoral WGs Baseline of the CROQF (Govern.) Action Plan CROQF Concepts Standard of qualifications The role of the WGs CROQF – Introduction to qualifications Curriculums and programs COORDIN. and DEVELOP. Operational Team CROQF

Why Croatian QF ?

QUALITY (reliability) of qualifications – (Sustainable employability Citizens mobility Social inclusion) ACCESS to education (Available to all,...) PROGRESSION within the system (Optimal use of resources Personal development,...) AWARD of qualifications (LO, Recognition of other forms of learning,...) TRANSPARENCY of the system (Understanable to all The base for responsibility,...) NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS SYSTEM takes care and responsibility for: Interests and needs of INDIVIDUALS and SOCIETY

QUALITY (reliability) of qualifications – (Sustainable employability Citizens mobility Social inclusion) ACCESS to education (Available to all,...) PROGRESSION within the system (Optimal use of resources Personal development,...) AWARD of qualifications (LO, Recognition of other forms of learning,...) TRANSPARENCY of the system (Understanable to all The base for responsibility,...) NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS SYSTEM takes care and responsibility for: Interests and needs of INDIVIDUALS and SOCIETY Committees NGOs ParentsFonds Centers Agencies Students Universities Chambers and other partners... Employers Unions Schools Ministries Councils Institutes

Within NQS, do we have:  Acceptable integration and collaboration between partners?  Sustainable employability?  Optimal use of all resources in education?  Social inclusion?  Mobility and LLL for all?  Responsibility?  Reliability? ...?

... or in other words, do we have acceptable:  Conceptual understanding?  Access to education?  Progression within education system?  Award and recognition?  Quality (reliability) of qualifications?

If not, how to ensure acceptable, and neutralize other happenings? How to integrate and coordinate all elements in NQS?  CROQF in relation with the EQF and NQFs of other countries

QUALITY (reliability) of qualifications – (Sustainable employability Citizens mobility Social inclusion) ACCESS to education (Available to all,...) PROGRESSION within the system (Optimal use of resources Personal development,...) AWARD of qualifications (LO, Recognition of other forms of learning,...) TRANSPARENCY of the system (Understanable to all The base for responsibility,...) NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS SYSTEM takes care and responsibility for: Interests and needs of INDIVIDUALS and SOCIETY Committees NGOs ParentsFonds Centers Agencies Students Universities Chambers and other partners... Employers Unions Schools Ministries Councils Institutes NQF – an instrument to INTEGRATE and COORDINATE all parts of the NQS, improving: TRANSPARENCY, ACCESS, PROGRESSION, AWARD and QUALITY (reliability) of qualifications, in relation to the interests of individuals and the society.

Other NQF Hrvatski kvalifikacijski okvir

Conceptual understanding Croatian Qualifications Framework

CROQF – minimal number of: Basic ELEMENTS Their basic PROPERTIES DETERMINATION of the basic properties Croatian Qualifications Framework

Qualification Competences Learning Outcomes Basic elements in the CROQF: Croatian Qualifications Framework Their basic properties: LEVEL VOLUME PROFILE QUALITY (2 dimensions)

Knowledge (factual and theoretical) Skills (cognitive, practical and social) Autonomy and responsibility Qualification VALIDATION Learning outcomes Competences Croatian Qualifications Framework

Basic properties (of LO and Q) in CROQF: LEVEL VOLUME PROFILE QUALITY (2 dimensions) Croatian Qualifications Framework

Qualification VOLUME [ECTS/...] [name – 2 dim] PROFILE (LO) LEVEL OF LEARNING OUTCOMES Units of Learning outcomes LEVEL OF QUALIFICATION [name – 2 dim] PROFILE (Q) [2 dim] QUALITY

Documents and guidelines for CROQF Definitions Descriptions Illustrations Examples Q & A Trainings & Excersises 25+1 sectoral WGs Croatian Qualifications Framework

Internationalization during CROQF design and implementation

 As members in the EQF AG, NCPs,...  Individual international experts (ETF, Scotland, UK)  Collaboration with EU countries – very important:  Poland, Austria  Region collaboration – very important  SEE Network

SEE Network

SEE Network consists of:  EU countries  Non-EU countries Common challenges:  Inconsistency and confusion within systems and in the region (old and new degrees)  Common understanding of concepts  LO / ECTS  Comparability of degrees  Involvement of all relevant stakeholders  Raising awareness

The role of the SEE Network

SEE Network is a base for response to the above challenges The role of the Network:  Regular comparison of national systems  Establish mechanisms for regular exchange of experience, documents, tools (meetings, workshops, thematic conferences, internet portal) The CoE provides expertise and support Clear benefit for all countries in the region and EU.

Conclusions:  Internationalization is very important  EQF/QFHE bodies  EU countries and experts  Countries and experts in the region  SEE Network  Within the SEE Network – clear benefit for all countries in the region and EU  The CoE provides expertise and support  Next meeting (2010) in Croatia (common understandings, recognition, old-new degrees,...) Thank you!