Aurelio Bay Institut de Physique des Hautes Energies July 13-25, 2000, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHCb Alignment 12 th April 2007 S. Viret Coseners Forum « LHC Startup » 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Advertisements

Burkhard Schmidt for the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb upgrade Outline: Present LHCb detector and trigger LHCb upgrade – main drivers Overview of the sub-detector.
03 Aug NP041 KOPIO Experiment Measurement of K L    Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO collaborations Contents Physics Motivation.
7 Nov 2002Niels Tuning - Vertex A vertex trigger for LHCb The trigger for LHCb ….. and the use of the Si vertex detector at the first and second.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
FPCP 2003 : 3-6 June 2003 Ecole Polytechnique, Paris Status and Prospects of ATLAS and CMS for B Physics and CP Violation Fairouz Ohlsson-Malek LPSC-Grenoble/IN2P3/ATLAS.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
CERN June HERA-LHC Workshop Status and startup for physics with LHCb G. Passaleva (INFN-Firenze) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration.
LHC SPS PS. 46 m 22 m A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS - ATLAS As large as the CERN main bulding.
FPCP 2002, 05/16-18/2002 p. 1 Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityCDF Run II Status Status of CDF and Prospects Flavor Physics and CP Violation.
6 th International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons July 2, 2004 Rare B Decays at LHC Sébastien VIRET Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique.
Status and Expected Performance of the LHCb Experiment Pascal PERRET Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire Clermont-Ferrand Université Blaise Pascal –
Description of BTeV detector Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The BTeV Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug , 2000 Columbus, Ohio.
1 The LHCb Vertex detector 15/9/2003 Physics –Goals –Properties and consequences LHCb –Overview of the detector Vertex –Specifications –Silicon stations.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
FPCP04, Daegu, 9 Oct 2004P J Dornan - Imperial College London1 B-Physics at the LHC P J Dornan Imperial College, London.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
1 Performance of the LHCb VELO Outline LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb VELO LHCb VELO VELO performance.
Physics Performance of LHC-B Neville Harnew University of Oxford Beauty-97, Los Angeles October Outline Introduction The LHC-B Experiment New.
June 28, 2002BEACH2002 B Physics at the Tevatron B Physics at the Tevatron Jack Cranshaw Texas Tech University For the CDF and D0 Collaborations.
RICH detectors for LHCb Tito Bellunato INFN Milano-Bicocca On behalf of the LHCb RICH collaboration 10th International Conference on Instrumentation for.
Cano Ay, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, B mixing and flavor oscillations at DØ Cano Ay University Mainz for the DØ Collaboration 23 may.
1 Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Marcel Merk NIKHEF Representing the LHCb collaboration 19 th.
DIS 2004, Strbske Pleso,April LHCb experiment sensitivity to CKM phases and New Physics from mixing and CP violation measurements in B decays LHCb.
Performance of the LHCb RICH detectors On behalf of the LHCb-RICH Collaboration Sajan Easo Rutherford-Appleton Laboratory IEEE-NSS: Dresden, Germany,
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
High precision and new CP violation measurements with LHCb Michael Koratzinos, CERN EPS HEP 99 Tampere,15 July 1999.
1 1 The LHCb Upgrade Outline LHCb Detector LHCb Detector Selected Physics Results Selected Physics Results Upgrade Plans Upgrade Plans Summary Summary.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
The LHCb Muon System and LAPE Participation Burkhard Schmidt CERN - EP/LHB Presented at the CNPq Workshop Rio de Janeiro, 12 January 1999.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
1 LHCb: Reoptimized Detector & Tracking Performance LHCb: Reoptimized Detector & Tracking Performance Gerhard Raven NIKHEF and VU, Amsterdam Representing.
2 nd Workshop on CKM Unitarity Triangle – April 5-9, 2003, DurhamMassimiliano Ferro-Luzzi 1 The LHCb trigger strategy and performance Overview Level-0Detectors,
Clara MatteuzziFPCP, Paris 2-6 june 2003 The LHCb experiment: status and physics program Clara Matteuzzi On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Università.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
1 The LHCb Upgrade Outline LHCb Detector LHCb Detector Selected Physics Results Selected Physics Results Upgrade Plans Upgrade Plans Test beam campaign.
23/02/07G. Vidal-Sitjes, VCI2007 Vienna Conference on Instrumentation1 The LHCb RICH detector G. Vidal-Sitjes on behalf of the LHCb RICH team Outline:
Burkhard Schmidt, CERN on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb upgrade 1.
27/02/2014 INSTR14 S.Filippov1 First Years of Running for the LHCb Calorimeter System Sergey Filippov (Institute for Nuclear Research of RAS, Moscow) on.
Magnetic Shielding Studies of the LHCb RICH Photon Detectors Mitesh Patel, Marcello Losasso, Thierry Gys (CERN )
The Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detectors for LHCb Antonis Papanestis CCLRC – RAL On behalf of the LHCb RICH group.
Design and performance of the ALICE Muon Spectrometer
The LHCb Calorimeter system
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Hadron Physics Lecture Week
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
LHCb Status and Prospects Doris Eckstein (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics Chungli, Taiwan,
LHCb Physics, Status, and Perspectives
Particle Identification in LHCb
The Pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH
FRONTIERS OF MATTER XI th RENCONTRES DE BLOIS
LHCb Status and Prospects Doris Eckstein (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics Chungli, Taiwan,
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
The LHCb vertex detector
Overview of LHCb Poland Ukraine Brazil UK Switzerland France Spain
July 13-25, 2000, Hanoi, Vietnam Aurelio Bay Institut de Physique
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
T. Bowcock University of Liverpool For the LHCb Collaboration
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
B Physics at the LHC Neville Harnew University of Oxford.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
LHCb Trigger LHCb Trigger Outlook:
How can we study the magnetic distortion effect?
Presentation transcript:

Aurelio Bay Institut de Physique des Hautes Energies July 13-25, 2000, Hanoi, Vietnam

SM ~V ub     from B  X u + from  m:      B0B0 B0B0 B0B0 J  K s WW t t CP Asym ~ sin[2(  new )] t d b t W W b d ~     ~V td  The Unitary Triangle Im Re

+ New FCNC     = cte from B  X u + from  m:     + r new   new B0B0 W t t ~     d b b d NEW FCNC Unchanged  r new NEWNEW   new  +

SM + New FCNC ~V ub     from B  X u + from  m:     +r new   new B0B0 B0B0 B0B0 J  K s WW t t CP Asym ~ sin(2(  new )) t d b t W W b d ~     d b b d NEW FCNC Unchanged   r new NEWNEW  The Unitary Triangle Im Re

 from B d  D* - n  +, D* + n  -, etc. Idem with B s decays:    s new  from CP in B s  J     s new   from CP in B s  D s  K , D s  K  compare the two  determinations (then combine them) B d  D*  n  vs B d  D*  n  B d  D*  n  vs B d  D*  n  From 2(  new ) +    CP in B  J/  K s ~ 2(  +  new ) We want to measure , we need to select hadronic decay channels, we want to study the B s system, have K/  separation, access to Br < 10  ….

BABAR, BELLE, CLEO-III, CDF, D0, HERA-B will test CKM at the O( 3 ) level. LHCb is a second generation experiment for CP violation studies in the B and Bs meson systems. The goal is to obtain precise and overconstrained determination of CKM elements, including terms beyond O( 3 ). This will permit to detect deviations from the Standard Model description and thus to probe New Physics. Second generation means: –High statistics is needed to study B u,d,s decays with Br < 10  7 –Excellent proper time resolution –Excellent particle identification –Efficient and flexible triggering scheme, including a selection on hadrons. High statistics can be obtained by LHCb because –B production cross section at 14 TeV: –LHCb running luminosity:  fi LHCb overlook Rate(bb) = 10 5 sec  1 : 0.5% total inelastic  bb ≈ 500  b   cm  s 

LHCb LHC beams collide here Magnet dipole Vertex Locator  Œ  [15, 300]  mrad  Œ  4.9  1.9  x z 20 m 10 m Open geometry with (quite) easy access to (almost) all components non-bending plane view

LHCb bending plane

Vertex Locator (VELO) Design work on front-end chip (DMILL and sub-micron technolgies) in progress prototype of R measuring 1/2 plane cm 0 toward spectrometer retract by 3 cm during beam setup cm ≈ 200  m Si single-side R and  measuring planes 220 kchannels, analogue R/O, S/N =15  z ≈ 40  m resolution on interaction point Z  impact parameter [  m] Pt [GeV]

RICH K–  separation > 3  1<p< 100 GeV/c large aerogel rings small C 4 F 10 CF 4 rings pixel HPD Gas CF 4 Gas C 4 F 10 Aerogel 

pedestal 1 p.e. 2 p.e. 3 p.e. 4 p.e. RICH R&D DEP prototype pixel HPD Photodetectors options: HPDs and multianode PMTs single photoelectron resolution QE = 400 nm spatial resolution ~1 mm large area ~2.9 m 2, active: ~ 70%  325 kchan. binary readout B stray field up to 100 gauss radiation dose < 3kRad/year Pion beam: large rings in aerogel and small rings in C 4 F 10 threshold

Other Systems oMagnet: Warm dipole 4 Tm MW t TDR ok oTracker Inner: (40x60 cm 2 ) triple GEM, Si 3 stations Outer: straw-tube drift chambers  p/p = 0.3 % [5, 200] GeV/c  (M B  ) =15 MeV/c 2  (M D  ) = 4 MeV/c 2 oCalorimeter (design completed) Pre-shower sandwich Pb - scintillators ECAL Shashlik type, 25 X 0 HCAL Fe + scintillating tiles, 5.6 R/O by wave-length shifting fibers and PMTs  MUON Resistive Plate Chambers (RPC) + Wire and Cathode Pad Chambers (WPC/CPC) for high rate regions

HCAL Fe+scintillating tiles ECAL Shashlik Joint Calorimeter Test GeV HCAL resolution % GeV preshower ECAL resolution %

LHCb Trigger Efficiency L0(%)L1(%)L2(%)Total(%)  ehall B d  J/  (ee)K S + tag B d  J/  (  )K S + tag B s  D s K + tag B d  DK      B d     + tag for reconstructed and correctly tagged events where the hadron trigger is important where the lepton trigger is important Tags considered (so far): –muon or electron from other b-hadron b  lepton –charged kaon from other b-hadron b  c  s Overall tag efficiency = 40% Overall mistag rate = 30% Tags considered (so far): –muon or electron from other b-hadron b  lepton –charged kaon from other b-hadron b  c  s Overall tag efficiency = 40% Overall mistag rate = 30%

Trigger System ~30 % ~10% Running luminosity 2 x Running luminosity 2 x LHC: 40 MHz L0:1 MHz L1:40 KHz Output:200 Hz High P T electrons High P T hadrons High P T muons Pileup Veto L0 decision unit L1 Trigger 3D reconstruction of secondary vertices L2+L3 Trigger Full event information Latency: 4  s < 2 ms B 0      Inelastic pp interactions hadron trigger threshold

DsKDsK DsDs GeV/c 2 Mass, decay time resolutions and particle ID  Measurements of  m s with a significance >5: up to  ps   x s  B s -B s oscillations with B s  D s   m s  30 ps  B s  D s K separation from B s  D s  B s  D s K separation from B s  D s  DsKDsK DsDs GeV/c 2  m = 11 MeV/c 2 Mass(D s K) with RICHwithout RICH

LHCb CP Sensitivities in 1 year Parameter Channels+c.c. No of events  (1 year)  B d   P/T = 30°, |P/T|=0.20  0.02,  =90° 2  -5  B d 0     =50° 5  2  +  B d  D*(incl.)   +  =0 12   B d  J/  K s 100k <0.6   -2  B s  D s K  (  m s =15ps -1 ) - 12  (45ps -1 )  B d  DK*   B s  J/  50k 0.6  B s oscillations x s B s  D s  35k up to 75 (5  ) Rare Decays B s   11 s/b=3.5 B d  K 0*  4500 s/b=16 B d  K *  26k s/b=1 See yellow Book CERN !

Inner Tracker Vertex Detector RICH, Calorimeters Muon System L0 & L1 Trigger, DAQ Computing Outer Tracker Magnet installation LHCb schedule (and conclusion) Magnet 1998 Technical Proposal 1999 LHCb approved LHCb ready for LHC « day one » and for many years of B physics at “nominal LHCb luminosity” Technical Design Reports Detector and DAQ installation