Tracking Chandra Science Productivity Publication Metrics special thanks to John Bright, Arnold Rots, and Sherry Winkelman (Archive Group) and Mihoko Yukita.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use ERIC to find Research Reports Use Detailed records to evaluate items Use the Subject Thesaurus.
Advertisements

John Cunniffe Dunsink Observatory Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies Evert Meurs (Dunsink Observatory) Aaron Golden (NUI Galway) Aus VO 18/11/03 Efficient.
INFORMATION SOLUTIONS Citation Analysis Reports. Copyright 2005 Thomson Scientific 2 INFORMATION SOLUTIONS Provide highly customized datasets based on.
What are the characteristics of academic journals
Lecture №2 State System of Scientific and Technical Information.
CXC Response to June 04 Report 1.Bakeout Status: Paul Plucinsky 2.CIAO upgrade information: Jonathan McDowell 3.DS9 and visualization scripts: Jonathan.
Chandra Calibration Status ACIS 1.Gain corrections for epochs 28 and 29 (Nov – April 2007) were released in CALDB 3.4 on May 16, Gain corrections.
CXC The Chandra Bibliography Database Arnold Rots, Sherry Winkelman, Sarah Blecksmith, John Bright Chandra Data Archive Operations Group, CXC/SAO Stéphane.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Apr 2007 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed.
Chandra Science Workshops Paul J Green  CXC-sponsored annual summer workshops focus on X-ray- related science topics.  Workshop size (80-120) and length.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11 Peer Review Proposal Numbers:  668 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
Chandra Users' Committee, 27 April 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12  CfP Release: Dec  GTO Deadline: 11 March 2010  GO Deadline: 18 March.
I. Balestra, P.T., S. Ettori, P. Rosati, S. Borgani, V. Mainieri, M. Viola, C. Norman Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times - Venice, March 2006.
Users' Committee, 25 Oct 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12 Peer Review  June 2010, Hilton, Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 12 
Chandra Users’ Committee, 9-10 Apr 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
CXC Manager’s Status Report Chandra User Committee Meeting Roger J. Brissenden 25 June 2002.
Understanding LMXBs in Elliptical Galaxies Vicky Kalogera.
Director's Office Chandra Users’ Committee, Sept 2007 Chandra Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed (based on time)  48 LP, 10.
Cumulative  Deviation of data & model scaled  to 0.3  99%  90%  95% HD 36861J (rp200200a01) Probability of Variability A Large ROSAT Survey.
Chandra Users’ Committee, 6-7 Apr 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11  CfP Release: Dec  POG, final A Eff : 15 Jan 2009  GTO: 43 proposals.
1 Do More Searching in Less Time Fall Term 2010 Helen B. Josephine
TRENDS ANALYSIS OVERSIGHT Dan Schwartz Development and Operations Science Support/ Technical Support Team 12 January 2004 CXC Users Committee SOT/DAS.
MetaSearch Finding a particular article, e.g. “Using SFX to identify unexpressed User Needs”
Web of Science: An Introduction Peggy Jobe
The Publication of Research Information: Does Astronomy’s Present Portend a More General Future? Michael J. Kurtz Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
CXC Chandra Users' Committee Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle proposals *6.4 oversubscribed (based on time) GTO for review: due 3 rd April.
Research Methods in MIS Instructor: Dr. Deepak Khazanchi.
Tracking Chandra Science Productivity Publication Metrics special thanks to Mihoko Yukita (CDO) Sherry Winkelman (Archive Group) Paul J. Green (CDO)
Reviewing the Literature PE 357. Why a Lit Review? Helps round out the problem Identifies what has been done Identifies potential methodology and procedures.
Field Guide to Periodical Types How to tell if an article is from an Academic/Scholarly/Peer-Reviewed Periodical Created by Jennifer Freer. Last updated.
Literature Reviews Library Workshop March 11, 2013.
Setting up a Profile LRC Information Literacy Series: 7 (Google Scholar Citations) By Shri Ram.
How to Write a Scientific Paper Hann-Chorng Kuo Department of Urology Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital.
Not all Journals are Created Equal! Using Impact Factors to Assess the Impact of a Journal.
Doing your literature review: an overview Katy Jordan Librarian, Economics & International Development Library & Learning Centre.
How to Use Google Scholar An Educator’s Guide
Writing a research paper in science/physics education The first episode! Apisit Tongchai.
1 Scopus as a Research Tool March Why Scopus?  A comprehensive abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature and quality web sources.
Research Paper Assignment CS 435 Winter, As an important part of the course requirement, each student will participate in a group project to prepare.
Suzaku, XMM-Newton and Chandra Observations of the Central Region of M 31 Hiromitsu Takahashi (Hiroshima University, Japan) M. Kokubun, K. Makishima, A.
1 Gravitational lensing with neutrinos Results, paper and public plots J.P. Gómez-González, S.Mangano,
Web of Science User’s guide. What is Web of Science? How to Register? How to use Web of Science Main screen of Web of Science How to do a search General.
April , 2006 HEASARC Users Group Roger Brissenden 1 HEASARC Supported Activities at SAO Roger Brissenden.
1 DATABASE INTERNATIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PERIODICAL LITERATURE IN THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES ONLINE.
A New Technique for Fitting Colour-Magnitude Diagrams Tim Naylor School of Physics, University of Exeter R. D. Jeffries Astrophysics Group, Keele University.
Ian F. C. Smith Writing a Journal Paper. 2 Disclaimer / Preamble This is mostly opinion. Suggestions are incomplete. There are other strategies. A good.
Swift as a Rapid Wide Field Follow-up Instrument John Nousek & Jamie Kennea Penn State University Phil Evans University of Leicester International Workshop.
1 Do More Searching in Less Time Winter Term 2013 Helen B. Josephine
Takayasu Anada ( anada at astro.isas.jaxa.jp), Ken Ebisawa, Tadayasu Dotani, Aya Bamba (ISAS/JAXA)anada at astro.isas.jaxa.jp Gerd Puhlhofer, Stefan.
How to Write Literature Review ww.ePowerPoint.com
Oxlip+. What is Oxlip+? A tool for finding & linking to databases – Online collections of (scholarly) materials – Includes full text / indexes / range.
Arnold H. Rots & Sherry L. Winkelman Chandra Data Archive Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Rots & Winkelman - IAU XXIX 2015, FM31.
GO Program: Past, Present & Future Koji Mukai Suzaku Guest Observer Facility.
Research Methodology II Term review. Theoretical framework  What is meant by a theory? It is a set of interrelated constructs, definitions and propositions.
Successful Web searches!. If you type your keywords into Google, you’ll get millions of hits! Is that useful?
Creating a data set From paper surveys to excel. STEPS 1.Order your filled questionnaires 2.Number your questionnaires 3.Name your variables. 4.Create.
OxLIP+ Electronic Resources Gillian Beattie Angela Carritt.
Research Methodology SEMESTER 1, 2016/17 June th 2016 BY COE FYP COMMITTEE 1.
HST’s Productivity and Impact Jill Lagerstrom Daniel Apai.
Writing for Academic Journals
WRITING CHEMICAL RESEARCH PAPERS
The Role of the ADS in Software Discovery and Citation
Proposal Cycle: Updates and Plans
Introduction of KNS55 Platform
Supersoft X-ray sources in M31
Journal evaluation and selection journal
The Scientific Method Short Video of Big Bang Theory: click on picture.
Dr John Corbett USP-CAPES International Fellow
Presentation transcript:

Tracking Chandra Science Productivity Publication Metrics special thanks to John Bright, Arnold Rots, and Sherry Winkelman (Archive Group) and Mihoko Yukita (CDO) Paul J. Green (CDO)

Which Metrics? PhD dissertations papers citations pages subgroups all publications refereed papers highly cited papers certain journals

Chandra Bibliography Database Queries the ADS weekly: Queries the ADS weekly: (Title or Abstract) contains (AXAF OR Chandra OR X-ray) (Title or Abstract) contains (AXAF OR Chandra OR X-ray) Requires additional human scanning, culling, and categorization. Requires additional human scanning, culling, and categorization. Database now current and backfilled. Database now current and backfilled. Allows public searches that link data ←→ literature Allows public searches that link data ←→ literature CXC internal also links to PropDB, allows many statistics to be derived CXC internal also links to PropDB, allows many statistics to be derived Archive Group – A. Rots, S. Winkelman, J. Bright

Tabulated Bibliographic Categories Tabulated Bibliographic Categories 1. Presents specific Chandra observations 2. Refers to published Chandra results 3. Predicts Chandra results (could be either astrophysical theory or data extrapolation) 4. Describes instrumentation, software or operations 5. Cannot be classified and any of these FLAGS may accompany the above categories A) Complementary observations A) Complementary observations B) Simulations or Follow-up Analysis B) Simulations or Follow-up Analysis C) Astrophysical theory that explains Chandra results C) Astrophysical theory that explains Chandra results D) Instrument flags (ACIS, HRC, HETG, LETG, HRMA, PCAD, EPHIN) D) Instrument flags (ACIS, HRC, HETG, LETG, HRMA, PCAD, EPHIN) E) Operations E) Operations F) Software F) Software

Definition of "Chandra Paper" Presents specific Chandra observations explaining theory, or followup Category 1 + (all, any, none) Category 1 + (all, any, none) Category 2 + (flag A, B, or C required) Category 2 + (flag A, B, or C required) in other words 1 + (2A, 2B, or 2C) in other words 1 + (2A, 2B, or 2C)

Currently Available Categories and Variables Science Category Science Category Proposal Category Proposal Category (VLP, LP, GTO, GO, TOO, DDT, CAL) † Exposure Time Exposure Time N papers N papers N citations N citations † These are mutually exclusive definitions in the Chandra databases, e.g., a TOO from a General Observer is not also counted as a GO.

SCIENCE CATEGORIES 1. Solar System 1. Solar System 2. Stars and WD 2. Stars and WD 3. WD Binaries and CVs + 3. WD Binaries and CVs + BH and NS Binaries BH and NS Binaries 4. SN, SNR and Isolated NS 4. SN, SNR and Isolated NS 5. Normal Galaxies: Diffuse Emission + 5. Normal Galaxies: Diffuse Emission + Normal Galaxies: X-ray Populations 6. Active Galaxies and Quasars 6. Active Galaxies and Quasars 7. Clusters of Galaxies 7. Clusters of Galaxies 8. Extragalactic Diffuse Emission and Surveys + Galactic Diffuse Emission and Surveys 8. Extragalactic Diffuse Emission and Surveys + Galactic Diffuse Emission and Surveys

Proposal Categories Mutually exclusive in the Chandra databases † Mutually exclusive in the Chandra databases † GO GO GTO GTO TOO TOO DDT DDT LP (first defined for Cycle2) LP (first defined for Cycle2) VLP (first defined for Cycle5) VLP (first defined for Cycle5) N.B. V/LP status is optional even over the nominal 300/1000ksec limits. For complete stats, best to tally by exposure time. † e.g., a TOO from a General Observer is not also counted as a GO.

Totals by Proposal Cycle PAPERSCITATIONS

Totals by Proposal Cycle Includes  Refereed Chandra papers only  Statistics through May  Includes all proposal types GO, GTO, TOO, DDT (no CAL) Statistics best for Cycle1 Strong ramp-down, reflected strongly in ksec -1 plots as well

Citations per ksec by Cycle How would you know that statistics are best for Cycle1? check linked plot data check totals plots

Example of Linked Plot Data # Values for Citations_by-cycle.txt # CycleCitations N_Proposals Cycle Cycle Cycle Cycle Cycle Statistics best for Cycle1

Totals by Exposure Time Σ(Papers referring to any Chandra Target in an Approved Program) in bins by Total Program Approved Exposure Time Σ(Citations to Papers referring to any Chandra Target in an Approved Program) in bins by Total Program Approved Exposure Time

Citations/ksec by Exposure Time with Cycles Appears as if short observations have greatest impact/ksec. Σ N i=1 {(Citations to Targets in each Program)/(Total ksec in Program)}/N

Large Projects Have Longer Citation Lag

Conclusions Short exposures appear to provide a larger science return per ksec. Short exposures appear to provide a larger science return per ksec. Relative productivity (papers) and impact (citations) of larger projects appears to have a longer latency. Relative productivity (papers) and impact (citations) of larger projects appears to have a longer latency. Some results have large impact but do not produce large N papers or N citations Some results have large impact but do not produce large N papers or N citations