Major Management & Systems Engineering Ideas for Reducing Costs Peter Wizinowich NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparison of Major Contract Types
Advertisements

TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Utah’s Use of CMGC & Project Delivery
NGAO Construction Project Cost Estimation: Initial Thoughts Richard Dekany NGAO Team Meeting #12 December 13, 2007.
The Outsourcing Process
ICS Management Poor management is the downfall of many software projects Software project management is different from other engineering management.
NGAO System Design Review Response Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting June 18, 2008.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max, Sean Adkins for NGAO Team SSC Meeting February 20, 2008.
Build to Cost Meeting: Goals, Agenda & New Directions Peter Wizinowich NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
1 NGAO Instrumentation Studies Overview By Sean Adkins November 14, 2006.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. ~ March 20, 2009 February 5, 2009 DRAFT.
NGAO Report February 18, 2009 Waimea NGAO Report February 18, 2009 Waimea P. Wizinowich for the NGAO Team.
What should we propose to ATI? Peter Wizinowich NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
1 Keck NGAO Proposal: Management Overview Presenter: P. Wizinowich SSC Meeting June 21, 2006.
NGAO System Design: AO System (WBS 3.2) & Laser Facility (WBS 3.3) Design Inputs & Outputs Peter Wizinowich NGAO Team Meeting #9 August 24, 2007.
Build to Cost Directions & Guidelines Peter Wizinowich SSC Meeting November 3, 2008.
NGAO Meeting #3 Introduction NGAO Meeting #3 Peter Wizinowich December 13, 2006.
NGAO Cost Estimation Guidelines Richard Dekany January 25, 2008.
NGAO Management Update Peter Wizinowich NGAO Meeting #11 November 5, 2007.
NGAO System Design Phase Management Report - Replan NGAO Meeting #6 Peter Wizinowich April 25, 2007.
Centers for IBM e-Business Innovation :: Chicago © 2005 IBM Corporation IBM Project October 2005.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
NGAO Team Meeting Management Peter Wizinowich May 26, 2009.
NGAO System Design Phase System & Functional Requirements Documents NGAO Meeting #6 Peter Wizinowich April 25, 2007.
NGAO: Cost Comparison with First Light TMT AO Peter Wizinowich, Richard Dekany, Don Gavel with input & review by Brent Ellerbroek SSC Meeting November.
NGAO Team Meeting Management Peter Wizinowich March 19, 2009.
7M701 1 Software Engineering Project Management Sommerville, Ian (2001) Software Engineering, 6 th edition Ch. 4
NGAO Meeting #5 Introduction NGAO Meeting #5 Peter Wizinowich March 7, 2007.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. December 2, 2008 DRAFT.
Trade Study Report: NGAO versus Keck AO Upgrade NGAO Meeting #5 Peter Wizinowich March 7, 2007.
What Requirements Drive NGAO Cost? Richard Dekany NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
SPAWAR HQ (General Fund) Navy ERP Implementation Lessons Learned – Comptroller View.
MnDOT Project Management History and Future MnDOT – ACEC/MN Annual Conference March 5, 2013 Earle Brown Heritage Center.
©Ian Sommerville 2006Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 5 Slide 1 Project management.
©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 4 Slide 1 Concerned with activities involved in ensuring that software is delivered: on.
1 Outsourcing: Managing the relationship Example: Reclining chair project FIGURE 12.1.
State of Maine NASACT Presentation “Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation Procurement” 1 Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation.
Chapter 3: Project Management Omar Meqdadi SE 2730 Lecture 3 Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering University of Wisconsin-Platteville.
Assigning Resources A schedule is not complete until all the resources necessary to complete the project have been committed or assigned.
Project management Lecture 10. Topics covered Management activities Project planning Project scheduling Risk management.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 3. Cost Estimate Gines, Fisher 2.Are the estimated cost and proposed schedule ranges realistic, consistent with the technical and budgetary.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Baseline Jim Yeck NSLS-II Deputy Project Director NSLS-II PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
USArray Year 10 IRIS CoCom Meeting Chicago April 9-10, 2012.
January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
CSEM01 - wk8 - Software Planning1 Software Planning CSEM01 SE Evolution & Management Anne Comer Helen Edwards.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.3 Infrastructure and Installation Sims, Edwards 1.Does the conceptual design and planned implementation satisfy the performance specifications.
TOF Project Construction Project Plan
Project Management Yonsei University 2 nd Semester, 2012 Sanghyun Park.
January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
Chapter 14 Pricing and Estimating. Pricing and Estimating Many managers regard pricing as an art ! Many managers regard pricing as an art ! Information.
TOF Preliminary Design and Safety Review Project Management Controls R. L. Brown.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin© 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Outsourcing: Managing Interorganizational Relations Chapter 12.
LISA News from ESA O. Jennrich LISA Project Scientist.
Project Management.
Strykowsky 1Project Review November 2, 2005 NCSX Project Review November 2, 2005 Cost and Schedule Ron Strykowsky.
Keck Next Generation AO Next Generation Adaptive Optics Meeting #2 Caltech November 14, 2006 P. Wizinowich for NGAO Executive Committee.
Design Visualization Visualize building early in the process to support and accelerate the decision making process. Schedule Visualization Visualize construction.
Not for Distribution Outside of MBP1 April 11, 2012.
IT-301 Project Management I: Unit 4: Cost Management.
Cost and Schedule Breakout Session Paul Weinman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
NCSX Strykowsky 1Independent Project Review (IPR) June 8-9, 2004 NCSX Project Review June 8-9, 2004 Cost, Schedule, and Project Controls Ron Strykowsky.
Rob Connatser NSS Instrument Work Packages and XLPM.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Science Priorities and Implications of Potential Cost Savings Ideas
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Managing Outgoing Subawards April 18, 2017
NGAO System Design Project Plans and Schedule
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Major Management & Systems Engineering Ideas for Reducing Costs Peter Wizinowich NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008

2 Discussion Points Schedule Leveraging & Collaboration Lower cost approaches Efficiency Responsibility Contingency –Risk reduction –Cost estimation

3 Schedule Each year we carry over the dollars we lose ~5% on the remainder Make procurements early when we can –Will need to make case for long lead procurements at PDR Make sure schedule supports efficiency & team effectiveness

4 Leveraging & Collaboration Leverage work by others even if not our perfect path (IRIS pickoff) Collaborate to reduce costs or risk (laser, MASS) Risk reduction experiments at LAO Understanding & optimizing concepts (MOAO working group) Leverage faculty & students (SAT) Leverage other Keck development activities (MAGIQ, DCS upgrade) Science instrument built with non-NGAO funds (possible telescope time trade)?

5 Lower Cost Approaches To what extent do we want to & can we use lower cost labor between our Institutions? Utilize the best vendors (experience, cost, delivery) Use existing technology where possible Trade between low cost & risk Video conference versus travel

6 Efficiency Full time personnel Make sure resources available when needed Clarity on requirements, deliverables, interfaces, WBS scope, etc. Early identification & resolution of problems Early decision making to keep team moving Identify dependencies & make sure dependent tasks aren’t delayed Stay on schedule

7 Responsibility Everyone responsible for D2C and B2C Project’s success depends on all of us Look for opportunities Think about the cost implications of decisions

8 Contingency Lower risk  less dollars need to be held in contingency Risk reduction ideas: Collaborate with others to ensure lasers available & affordable Utilize LAO for risk reduction experiments Monitor the relevant efforts of others See programmatic & technical risk KAONs for what we proposed for SDR Fixed price contracts lower risk (potentially higher cost up front)

9 Contingency Better cost estimates  less dollars need to be held in contingency Cost estimation ideas: NFIRAOS cost comparison Use of commercial products where possible Quotes Demonstrated experience on similar tasks

10 Cost Comparisons