Divorce and mobility: Who moves from the family home after separation? Clara H. Mulder and Michael Wagner Universities of Amsterdam, Cologne.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The parenthood effect: what explains the increase in gender inequality when British couples become parents? Pia Schober London School of Economics.
Advertisements

Income inequality within couples and redistribution through the tax-benefit system: the case of the UK Holly Sutherland Institute for Social and Economic.
Pia Schober London School of Economics
1 Cooperation and conflict within couples: The gendered distribution of entitlement to household income GeNet Conference, Cambridge March 2009 Jérôme.
Final Project Conference : Making work pay in Western Balkan countries: the case of Serbia and Macedonia FREN, Serbia and UACS, Macedonia.
Chapter 6 Labor Mobility Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Groupe GEPP OFCE - 28/6/ 2007 Does the division of domestic labour differ after a marital separation ? Anne Solaz INED.
The Effects of Informal Care on Paid-work Participation in Great Britain Ursula Henz Presentation at the BSPS 2004 conference, University of Leicester,
Dagmar Kutsar and Kairi Kasearu University of Tartu, Estonia ISCI 3rd International Conference, York July, 2011.
Education and entitlement to household income. A gendered longitudinal analysis of British couples Jerome De Henau and Susan Himmelweit IAFFE annual conference,
Trends in living arrangements of older adults in Belgium Anne Herm, Luc Dal and Michel Poulain.
1 Legal separation impact on individuals’ social networks in Italy Evidences from the European Community Household Panel Lorenzo Todesco Department of.
Parental Divorce and Gender Equality in Sweden Michael Gähler and Livia Sz. Oláh Presentation at the eighth meeting of the European Network for the Sociological.
University as Entrepreneur A POPULATION IN THIRDS Arizona and National Data.
WHO IS BOSSED BY WHOM IN THE NETHERLANDS? WOUT ULTEE & MAARTEN WOLBERS RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN RC 28 SUMMER 2011 MEETING IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY IOWA.
Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences Research Institute for Sociology Michael Wagner On the links between unemployment, partnership stability.
Mate Selection Marital Happiness. Divorce Distribution by Length of Marriage 20 to 24 years of age.
Residential mobility and migration of the separated Peteke Feijten and Maarten van Ham University of St Andrews.
Chapter 14 Divorce Divorce in the United States Macro Factors Contributing to Divorce Micro Factors Contributing to Divorce Consequences of Divorce for.
Chapter 9 Labor Mobility Copyright © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Labor Economics, 4 th edition.
The impact of job loss on family dissolution Silvia Mendolia, Denise Doiron School of Economics, University of New South Wales Introduction Objectives.
Separation and intergenerational family obligations. Evidence from the Netherlands (and Flanders) 8th meeting of the European Network for the Sociological.
1 Cooperation and conflict within couples: The gendered distribution of entitlement to household income ESPE Conference, Seville June 2009 Jérôme.
Cohabitation Shannon N. Davis Carolina Population Center
Exploring living arrangements of divorced families in the Netherlands Wilma Bakker and Clara H. Mulder Antwerp, June 2009.
1 The Effect of Benefits on Single Motherhood in Europe Libertad González Universitat Pompeu Fabra May 2006.
FENICs Female Employment and Family Formation in National Institutional Contexts Women’s Entry into Motherhood in France, Sweden, East and West Germany,
The family context and residential choice: A challenge for new research Clara H. Mulder University of Amsterdam / AMIDSt.
Post-divorce daily life of parents: a comparison between single mothers and co-parents Wilma Bakker and Lia Karsten University of Amsterdam.
The third International Population Geography Conference Liverpool, June 2006 Proximity of adult children to their elderly parents in the Netherlands.
Causes of Poverty in the UK. What is Poverty?  “Individuals, families and groups in the population can be said to be in poverty when they lack the resources.
Full time and part time employment Coventry population in employment by gender Source: Annual Population Survey, Office for National Statistics
Dual Income Why and How to Make it Work Balancing Work and Family.
Kathleen Dunmore Three Dragons 13 October 2010 Modelling demand for older persons accommodation.
Divorce Introduction to Family Studies. Divorce How has the divorce rate changed over time? How is the divorce rate measured? Who is more likely to divorce?
Centre for Market and Public Organisation Understanding the effect of public policy on fertility Mike Brewer (Institute for Fiscal Studies) Anita Ratcliffe.
Singlehood, Cohabitation, Civil Unions,
Separation: Consequences for Wealth in Later Life Caroline Dewilde Karel Van den Bosch Aaron Van den Heede SHARE-Meeting Odense, 21/07/2010.
Great Depression Web Quest.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 48.
Centre for Market and Public Organisation Understanding the effect of public policy on fertility Mike Brewer (Institute for Fiscal Studies) Anita Ratcliffe.
Centre for Market and Public Organisation Using difference-in-difference methods to evaluate the effect of policy reform on fertility: The Working Families.
Childbearing in Canada HHS 4M Unit #4. How many is enough? The present situation in Canada shows that couples are beginning to have children later in.
Household fluidity and family networks: Methodological challenges Part 2: Netherlands Kinship Panel Study Clara Mulder.
PKSS Community Survey – Analysis and Conclusions Sep 11 th, 2009.
 Remember – TWO discussion questions required for this week – both are required  Project 3 Grades/Feedback  Read project description  Use the grading.
Welfare Regimes and Poverty Dynamics: The Duration and Recurrence of Poverty Spells in Europe Didier Fouarge & Richard Layte Presented by Anna Manzoni.
Using Egalitarian Items to Measure Gender Role Equality: a Cross National Experiment Michael Braun GESIS-ZUMA Mannheim, Germany 3 rd ESRC Research Methods.
HAOMING LIU JINLI ZENG KENAN ERTUNC GENETIC ABILITY AND INTERGENERATIONAL EARNINGS MOBILITY 1.
EDTECH Module 7 Technology Survey by J.D. Winterhalter.
Tasks and Opportunities Within Indian Families Sripad Motiram Lars Osberg Department of Economics, Dalhousie University, Halifax Canadian Economics Association.
Who supports whom? Co-residence between young adults and their parents Maria IacovouMaria Davia Funded by JRF as part of the Poverty among Youth: International.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 14: Divorce and Remarriage.
Introduction to Family Studies
Effects of social origin on educational decisions and the transitions from education to first job Lachezar Nyagolov :Institute for the Study of Societies.
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November , 2007 Relative employment positions of partners and gender relations in Russia and France Ariane Pailhé (INED) Oxana.
The Division of Labour within the household: Is There any Escape from Traditional Gender Roles? Catherine Sofer (Paris School of Economics and University.
Development and Fertility How are they related among countries? within countries?
Lower conference - Volos, Grece. 10/11 september 2007 How much does it cost to stay at home? Career interruptions and the gender wage gap in France. Dominique.
Some sociological aspects on gender discrimination at work in Croatia Branka Galić Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of sociology Zagreb,
The American Family 50 years of change. Change… The American family has undergone tremendous change in the last 50 years. Some argue that family life.
Marriage vs. Common Law Common law relationship refers to an intimate relationship between two people who are not legally married. The term “common-law”
Why and How to Make it Work Balancing Work and Family
Sait Bayrakdar, Philipp Lersch, Sergi Vidal & Rory Coulter
Chapter 14, Work and Family
Why and How to Make it Work Balancing Work and Family
Research-Based Answers to Frequently Asked Questions About: Remarriage
The Family in Cross-Cultural Perspective
Centre for Market and Public Organisation
Presentation transcript:

Divorce and mobility: Who moves from the family home after separation? Clara H. Mulder and Michael Wagner Universities of Amsterdam, Cologne

Research aim Explain who leaves the joint home upon separation: the man, the woman, or both Previous research: Not that much. Some studies for Germany, Denmark, U.K. (see paper)

Theory: starting points Assumption 1: decision to separate implies at least one partner leaves and is followed by a decision (of one partner or of the couple) about who leaves Assumption 2: staying is generally preferred over moving out (inertia; stress of moving; disruption of housing career) Staying leads to increased housing cost

Situations One partner makes a one-sided decision → that partner moves out A partner cannot afford to stay → that partner moves out (could be both) All other cases: joint decision

How to reach a decision Power: Who is in a better position Who has lower costs or who gains more from moving out: - Fairness rule - Greater inclination to move

Hypotheses

Resources Affording to stay: greater absolute resources (income, education): smaller likelihood of moving Affording to stay and power: greater relative resources (income difference, difference in level of education, age difference): smaller likelihood of moving

Costs of moving (1) Higher if location-specific capital is greater: (and (P): more power)  Individual ownership of the home (P)  One partner lived in the home, other moved in (P)  Local ties: presence of parent(s) in municipality of residence  Local ties: long history of residence

Costs of moving (2) Higher for the partner who has invested more in the partnership  Mostly the woman; asymmetry more salient with greater investments (long duration of partnership, children)

Costs of moving (3) Higher for the partner who gets custody of the children Lower if greater interest in the separation (initiative mainly one partner). Also greater likelihood of one- sided decision

Gains from moving Greater if new partner. Also greater likelihood of one- sided decision

Data set 1 Divorce in the Netherlands 1998 (Scheiding in Nederland or SIN) Selection of those respondents who divorced or separated between 1975 and 1998 and who answered the question who of the partners left the joint home (N=1732)

Data set 2 Netherlands Kinship Panel Study (NKPS), main sample, Waves 1 (2003) and 2 (2007)  Sample a: Those two-sex couples who separated between Waves 1 and 2 (N = 174)  Sample b: Those who had separated recently before Wave 1 (N = 186)

Methods Couple analysis: who moves out  crosstabs male / female / both  Multinomial logit model  Data: SIN and NKPS Sample a Individual analysis: does respondent move  logit models all, male respondents, female respondents, test for difference  Data: (SIN and) NKPS Samples a + b

Results: Relative resources Income: Man tends to move out if woman earns more Education: both tend to move out if both highly educated (unexpected); otherwise no significant differences Age difference: If man older, woman tends to move out and vice versa

Results: who moves out Man moves out more frequently All else equal: woman is more likely to move out Minority of cases: both move out

Results: Absolute resources No signs that those with few resources move out more frequently (rather the opposite)

Results: Location-specific capital (1) Individual homeownership (chisq = 20.45, df = 6, p = 0.002) Male leaves Female leavesBoth leaveN unweighted No Both Man only Woman only

Results: Location-specific capital (2) Other partner moved in: strong negative effect on moving out Parents live close: marked negative effect for women Same municipality as age 15: marked negative effect

Results: other costs of moving (1) Difference in investments. Longer duration of partnership: woman less likely to move out

Results: other costs of moving (2) Children with whom after separation (chisq = , df = 8, p = 0.000) Male leaves Female leavesBoth leaveN unweighted No joint children / elsewhere All with male All with female Divided or co- parents Not with parents

Results: other costs of moving (3) Separation was whose initative (chisq = , df = 4, p = 0.000) Male leaves Female leavesBoth leaveN unweighted Both Male Female Total

Results: Gains of moving New partner: greater likelihood of moving out for both men and women

Conclusions (1) Resources → Support for relative resources, no support for absolute resources Costs of moving: location specific capital → Support Costs of moving: asymmetry of investments in partnership (woman invests more) → Support Costs and gains of moving: custody of children, interest in separation, new partner → Support Overall picture: fairness / justice / entitlement seems important

Conclusions (2) Gender differences: Men move out more frequently, but not conditionally on individual and couple characteristics Individual home-ownership and partner moving in: less frequent for women Child custody: more frequently women Initiative to separate: more frequently women