Frequency Response of LIGO Interferometers Andrew Weber University of Maryland (no relation) SURF Student Lecture Series Advisor: Andri Gretarsson.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition EE 3512 – Signals: Continuous and Discrete Objectives: Response to a Sinusoidal Input Frequency Analysis of an RC Circuit.

Advertisements

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W E2 Amplitude Calibration of the Hanford Recombined 2km IFO Michael Landry, LIGO Hanford Observatory Luca Matone, Benoit.

Marcus Ng Mentor: Alan Weinstein Co-mentor: Robert Ward

Lecture 23 Filters Hung-yi Lee.

Sinusoidal Waves. Objective of Lecture Discuss the characteristics of a sinusoidal wave. Define the mathematical relationship between the period, frequency,

Stefan Hild, Andreas Freise, Simon Chelkowski University of Birmingham GWADW, ELBA, May 2008 Virtual Interferometry for future GW detectors.

LIGO-G W Proposed LHO Commissioning Activities in May 02 Fred Raab 29 Apr 02.

Lecture 16: Continuous-Time Transfer Functions

NSF : Nov. 10, LIGO End to End simulation overview  Time domain simulation written in C++  Like MATLAB with Interferometer toolbox  Major physics.

Angular Noise in a Suspended Interferometer with DC Readout Royal Reinecke Co-Mentors: Alan Weinstein and Rana Adhikari.

Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory1 Characterization of LIGO Input Optics University of Florida Thomas Delker Guido Mueller Malik Rakhmanov.

LIGO- G060XXX-00-R E2E meeting, September How to design feedback filters? E2E meeting September 27, 2006 Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech.

LIGO Response to High Frequency Gravitational Waves Implications for Calibration Hunter Elliott Mentors: Rick Savage, Greg Mendell, Malik Rakhmanov.

Circuits II EE221 Unit 5 Instructor: Kevin D. Donohue Passive Filters, low-Pass and Band-Pass filters.

Introduction to Frequency Selective Circuits

TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,

The tendency to reduce the cost of CVGs results in metallic resonator. In comparison to quartz resonator CVG, it has much lower Q-factor and, as a result,

Virgo Control Noise Reduction

GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,

G R DC Readout for Advanced LIGO P Fritschel LSC meeting Hannover, 21 August 2003.

1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.

Lecture 5. Tunable Filters Δf defines as the frequency difference between the lowest- and the highest-frequency channels and  f as the spacing between.

Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.

Displacement calibration techniques for the LIGO detectors Evan Goetz (University of Michigan)‏ for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April 2008 APS meeting.

Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.

1 Chapter 5 Sinusoidal Input. 2 Chapter 5 Examples: 1.24 hour variations in cooling water temperature Hz electrical noise (in USA!) Processes are.

EE 1270 Introduction to Electric Circuits Suketu Naik 0 EE 1270: Introduction to Electric Circuits Lecture 17: 1) Sinusoidal Source 2) Complex Numbers.

Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.

LIGO Surf Project Q Of the Thermal Noise Interferometer Adam Bushmaker Mentor: Dr. Eric Black LIGO-G D.

LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.

1 The Virgo noise budget Romain Gouaty For the Virgo collaboration GWADW 2006, Isola d’Elba.

Calibration in the Front End Controls Craig Cahillane LIGO Caltech SURF 2013 Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jamie Rollins Presentation to Calibration Group 8/21/2013.

LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.

M. Mantovani, ILIAS Meeting 7 April 2005 Hannover Linear Alignment System for the VIRGO Interferometer M. Mantovani, A. Freise, J. Marque, G. Vajente.

G Z Test Mass Butterfly Modes and Alignment Amber Bullington, Stanford University Warren Johnson, Louisiana State University LIGO Livingston Detector.

The status of VIRGO Edwige Tournefier (LAPP-Annecy ) for the VIRGO Collaboration HEP2005, 21st- 27th July 2005 The VIRGO experiment and detection of.

Modeling of the Effects of Beam Fluctuations from LIGO’s Input Optics Nafis Jamal Shivanand Sanichiro Yoshida Biplab Bhawal LSC Conference Aug ’05 LIGO-G Z.

Development of a Readout Scheme for High Frequency Gravitational Waves Jared Markowitz Mentors: Rick Savage Paul Schwinberg Paul Schwinberg.

LIGO-G Z Confidence Test for Waveform Consistency of LIGO Burst Candidate Events Laura Cadonati LIGO Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

COMPLEX NUMBERS and PHASORS. OBJECTIVES  Use a phasor to represent a sine wave.  Illustrate phase relationships of waveforms using phasors.  Explain.

LIGO-G D “Bi-linear” Noise Mechanisms in Interferometers Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech GWDAW 15 December 2000.

LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.

Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.

Machine Vision Edge Detection Techniques ENT 273 Lecture 6 Hema C.R.

Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.

Calibration/validation of the AS_Q_FAST channels Rick Savage - LHO Stefanos Giampanis – Univ. Rochester ( Daniel Sigg – LHO )

LIGO-G Z LIGO’s Thermal Noise Interferometer Progress and Status Eric D. Black, Kenneth G. Libbrecht, and Shanti Rao (Caltech) Seiji Kawamura.

Lecture 6 (II) COMPLEX NUMBERS and PHASORS. OBJECTIVES A.Use a phasor to represent a sine wave. B.Illustrate phase relationships of waveforms using phasors.

LOGO Gravitational Waves I.S.Jang Introduction Contents ii. Waves in general relativity iii. Gravitational wave detectors.

The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.

Development of a Readout Scheme for High Frequency Gravitational Waves Jared Markowitz Mentors: Rick Savage Paul Schwinberg.

Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.

Input Mode Matching of LCGT 2012/1/5, Yoichi Aso.

Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors

Detuned Twin-Signal-Recycling

The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment

COMPLEX NUMBERS and PHASORS

Signal recycling R&D at LAL: Influence in Virgo

Electric Circuits Chapter 7 Network Frequency Characteristics

Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling

Squeezed states in GW interferometers

Detection Of High Frequency Gravitational Waves At LIGO W. Butler , A

First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1

CSE 313 Data Communication

Advanced Optical Sensing

Talk prepared by Stefan Hild AEI Hannover for the GEO-team

Comb Driven Double Ended Tuning Fork

DATA COMMUNICATION Lecture-12.

Homodyne detection: understanding the laser noise amplitude transfer function Jérôme Degallaix Ilias meeting – June 2007.

Joint bar-IFO observations

Presentation transcript:

Frequency Response of LIGO Interferometers Andrew Weber University of Maryland (no relation) SURF Student Lecture Series Advisor: Andri Gretarsson

Introduction  To Investigate the Frequency Response of LIGO Interferometers Above the 1 st FSR Analytically Using the E2E model  To Describe the Angular Response Above the 1 st FSR

Leading to a Description of One Arm FP Cavity

Single Round Trip

One Arm Transfer Function Single Round Trip Response Normalized Frequency  (log Hz) Full Round Trip Magnitudes of forward and round trip are equal Only the Phase is different This leads to Zeros at  = ½ (2n-1)

Single Arm Fabry-Perot Use this description for the transfer function and verify with E2E From R. Schilling 1996

Transfer Function for Single Arm FP Cavity Normalized Frequency  Response FP Cavity For LIGO 4 km IFO the second peak is centered about 37.5 kHz

Using the E2E Model One 4 km FP Arm Input: Swept Sine 0-90 kHz Output:

Frequency Response of One Arm, 4 km IFO (E2E model) Single 4 km FP Cavity in E2E 2 nd Peak at 37.5 kHz Same as calculated above

Two Arm FP IFO 2 km Two Arms Plus Recycling Cavity Swept Sine displacement to both mirrors (differential mode)

Frequency Response of 2 Arm, 2 km IFO (E2E model) Peak at 75 kHz or at normalized frequency  = 0.5

What Does This Mean? This Shows that the sensitivity is restored again at multiples of cavity FSR Suggests Search For GWs at Higher Frequencies Might be Possible However… What are the noise characteristics at high frequencies? Is it an interesting place to search?

Angular Response Angle from x-y plane Amplitude 1 st Sensitivity Peak 2 nd Sensitivity Peak Angle from x-y plane Angular response at low frequencies is expected Angular Response high frequencies (37.5 kHz) has zeros at optimal orientation!

Angular Response Angular Response of 1 st and 2 nd Sensitivity Peak Further investigation Need to develop description of 2 arm model Should acquire noise profile at 37.5 kHz Amplitude Angle from x-y axis

Earlier This Summer… Purpose: To suppress the 60 Hz (& higher multiples) power source noise from AS_Q to headphones. “Twin T” Notch Filter