Content Trajectories, Instructional Materials, and Curriculum Decisions PROM/SE Ohio Mathematics Associates Institute Spring 2005 PROM/SE Ohio Mathematics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AS/A2 – Making Notes Supporting Students Learning.
Advertisements

Problem- Based Learning in STEM Disciplines Saturday, November 10, 2007 JHU/MSU STEM Initiative.
Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12) Day 2.
 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Training Revised (Grades K-5) Day 2.
2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12)
Increasing the cognitive demand in the classroom Rachel Linney Aoife Kelly.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
Common Core Math: 2 > 4 Super Week Norms Silence your technology Limit sidebar conversations.
1 Welcome to Module 1 Principles of Mathematics Instruction.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
Instructional Demands of the 2011 Mathematics Frameworks Challenges and Opportunities Pioneer Valley Regional School District October 28, 2011 Farshid.
November 8, 2012 Amy Carriere cesa10.k12.wi.us/qnet Those interested in connecting regarding PI34, and PDP come sit and visit!
Our Learning Journey Continues Shelly R. Rider.
Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education PROM/SE Ohio Spring Mathematics Associate Institute April 27, 2005.
Final Session: Whole Group Please sit together with the other associates from your district (as much as possible) April 27, 2005.
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
Common Core Planning for Content & Practice Preparing Los Angeles Students for College and Career.
Using CTS to Develop Formative Assessment Probes
NGSS Performance Expectations Please sit in mixed grade level groups K-12 Alliance.
Understanding the Process and the Product Professional Development Spring, 2012.
Effective Instruction in Mathematics for the Junior learner Number Sense and Numeration.
CCSS Mathematics Leadership Team Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Training for the New Georgia Performance Standards Day 2: Unpacking the Standards.
2014 Mathematics Institutes Grade Band: High School Algebra 1.
9/12/2015 Kevin G. Tucker/University of Belize1 Meaningful Social Studies.
Common Core State Standards Initiative Mathematics FPS Implementation Wednesday October 10,
1 Math CAMPPP 2011 Math at the Beach!!! Grade 5-8 Sandra Fraser Erik Teather.
A research-based Canadian professional learning initiative Day 1 Slide 1 Number and Operations.
Algebraic and Symbolic Reasoning
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
Algebraic Reasoning Content Academy—Grade 5 Round Rock ISD Learning by Doing® Sami Briceño.
Effective Questioning: Gap Closing Grade 9 Student Success Summer Program 2011 Mathematics 7-12.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
CCSS Mathematics Fellows Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
6.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2014 SESSION 6 23 JUNE 2014 TWO-WAY TABLES AND ASSOCIATION.
Curriculum Topic Study Presented by Becky W. Smith Understanding what students need to know about core content and the program of studies.
Physical Education Standards Toolkit (4 hours) OCISS Instructional Services Branch.
What is it we expect students to learn? Curriculum learning tasks need to be clearly stated 1.What policies and practices, regarding curriculum development,
CCSS Mathematics Fellows Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
Our Learning Journey Continues Shelly R. Rider. The Overarching Habits of Mind of a Productive Mathematical Thinker.
Introduction to Curriculum Topic Study – Bridging the Gap Between Standards and Practice.
West Virginia’s Adoption of the Common Core State Standards for High School Mathematics Lou Maynus, NBCT Mathematics Coordinator Office of Instruction,
Unit 1 Lesson 3 Scientific Investigations Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
Educator Effectiveness Academy Day 2, Session 1. Find Someone Who…. The purpose of this activity is to review concepts presented during day 1.
1 Math 413 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction October 2008.
1 Performance Indicators Scope & Sequence Career & Life Skills Instructional Guide Handout #3.
+ Revisiting Collaboration and RtI October 11, 2011 Math Alliance Teaching All Learners Judy Winn Beth Schefelker Mary Ann Fitzgerald.
1. What can effective planning with technology look like? 2. How do we support our teachers in their planning in this digital age? 3. How might TPACK.
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Take One! January 28, How Do I Become A “Good” Teacher?
Science Breakout Session February 2010 New Science/Math Teacher Network.
Major Science Project Process A blueprint for experiment success.
Unit 9 Reflection. “Mathematics in the 21 st Century: What Mathematical Knowledge is Needed for Teaching Mathematics” Deborah Loewenberg Ball 1.What has.
Increasing Cognitive Demand in Mathematics
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning  The pre-requisites for this chapter have not been seen since grade 7 (factoring, line constructions,..);
Linear Growing Patterns and Relations: A Sneak Preview Grade Wendy Telford Grade Wendy Telford.
An Overview of the Communications Standard for School Mathematics? 1.
Formative Assessment February Fraction Action.
PARCC Model Content Frameworks A Review. 2 Structure of the Frameworks Examples of key advances from the previous grade; Fluency expectations or examples.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
1 St. Joseph School District Paul Numedahl September 29, 2010· St. Joseph MO.
Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Chapter Reflections: 1,2,3,5,6 By: Amy Howland.
PROM/SE Ohio Mathematics Associates Institute Spring 2005
Principles to Actions: Establishing Goals and Tasks
A Systemic Approach to Basic Facts
Welcome to Day Three.
Presentation transcript:

Content Trajectories, Instructional Materials, and Curriculum Decisions PROM/SE Ohio Mathematics Associates Institute Spring 2005 PROM/SE Ohio Mathematics Associates Institute Spring 2005

PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute Agenda for 6-8  Identifying “Big Ideas” Trajectories for Measurement:  Area, Perimeter and Area  Instructional Materials and Content Trajectories  Lunch--12:00 p.m.  Mapping Benchmarks & Indicators to Instructional Materials  Reflections & Next Steps

PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute Characteristics of a Coherent Mathematical Trajectory  Every component has a mathematical reason for being included  Designed with awareness of students’ understandings and misunderstandings  Sequence developed with clear sense of developmental levels  Ideas build on each other  Mathematical sequence and connections are defensible  Ideas become increasingly more sophisticated Handout #1

PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute Brainstorming the “Big Ideas” Trajectory  Measurement: Area, Perimeter and Volume  What are the “big ideas” in measurement for  area?  Perimeter?  Volume?  How would you organize these ideas to form a trajectory of mathematical content?

PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute Trajectory Posters  Replace with Measurement bullets Worksheet #1

PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute Low Cognitive Demand  Tasks rely heavily on memorization or following a routine procedure  Require little thinking or reasoning  Focused on correct answers  Explanations focus solely on how a procedure was used and lack a connection to concepts or meaning Handout #2

PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute Middle Grades Task Set  Sort the middle grades tasks for grade 6-8 by levels of cognitive demand  Record the task number and indicate the level (low, moderate, or high) on Worksheet 2A  Share your classifications with your team members  Discuss any differences and why they may have occurred  Try to resolve any disagreements about levels

PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute Moderate Cognitive Demand  Tasks require several different processes and relate two or more mathematical concepts (e.g., multi-step problems)  Procedures are connected to underlying concepts and meanings and cannot just be followed mindlessly  Students are asked to make connections among representations and may be asked to give some explanations.

PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute High Cognitive Demand  Tasks require significant analysis and reasoning  Students have to put ideas together in ways they have not seen before in a lesson or in ways that make connections to other previously learned mathematical concepts  There is no predictable rehearsed approach suggested by the task or example Handout #2

PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute Instructional Materials & Content Trajectories Individually or in Pairs  Identify and record the core mathematical knowledge by lesson on Worksheet 2c  Indicate the developmental level (I, D, S, A)  Indicate the cognitive demand for each lesson (low, moderate, high) Worksheet 2B

PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute Instructional Materials Summary Table Section/ Investigation Core MathematicsDevelop. Level Cognitive Demand Lesson Worksheet 2C

PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute Summary of Instructional Materials Review As a team  What are some areas your materials handled well?  Describe any gaps that you identified.  Identify overlaps and decide upon the importance.  What mathematical content seems to be irrelevant and doesn’t appear to fit?  What issues did you find with developmental levels?  What issues emerged regarding the cognitive demands of tasks?

PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute Mapping to Benchmarks & Indicators  Identify the appropriate Benchmark or Indicator for each idea you listed on Worksheet 2C  Code indicators  Black - at expected grade level  Red - expected at higher grade  Blue - expected at lower grade  Yellow - not addressed at all in instructional materials  Which indicators occur in multiple grade levels? Why?  Where do gaps exist and how might you address them? Worksheet 3a

PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute Building New Tasks from Old  Select 2-3 tasks/problems from your instructional materials that you classified as low cognitive demand tasks.  Identify the mathematics in the task/problem and describe how it relates to the mathematical goals of the lesson.  Modify the problem so that is has a moderate or high cognitive demand  Record problem on chart paper to post  Describe how the revised task pushes students thinking.