The Inefficient Market What Pays Off and Why Part 2: Why Prentice Hall 1999 Visit our web-site at HaugenSystems.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Efficient Market Hypothesis
Advertisements

Stock Market Efficiency
Overreaction and bias in the stock market Back to forecasting Current stock value = PV future dividends P = D 1 /(r -g) D 1 = next expected dividend.
Fin2802: Investments Spring, 2010 Dragon Tang
Market Efficiency Chapter 10.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. The Efficient Market Hypothesis CHAPTER 8.
Capital Investments and Stock Returns Sheridan Titman K. C. John Wei Feixue Xie (Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 39, 2004, pp )
5 - 1 CHAPTER 5 Risk and Return: Portfolio Theory and Asset Pricing Models Portfolio Theory Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) Efficient frontier Capital.
LECTURE 9 : EMPRICIAL EVIDENCE : CAPM AND APT
On the determinants of stock returns Objective Present recent empirical evidence on the determinants of stock returns.
© 2008 Pearson Education Canada7.1 Chapter 7 The Stock Market, the Theory of Rational Expectations, and the Efficient Markets Hypothesis.
Return, Risk, and the Security Market Line
The Inefficient Stock Market What Pays Off and Why (Prentice Hall, 1999) Visit our web-site at HaugenSystems.com.
Market efficiency Specific meaning of the term “market efficiency” in financial economics: “security prices fully reflect all available information” So…
The Inefficient Stock Market What Pays Off and Why (Prentice Hall, 1999) Visit our web-site at HaugenSystems.com.
Price and Earnings Momentum: An Explanation Using Return Decomposition Qinghao Mao K.C. John Wei Hong Kong University of Science and Technology NTUICF.
Financial management: lecture 9 Corporate Financing and Market Efficiency Where to get money for good projects.
The Inefficient Market Prentice Hall 1999 Visit our web-site at HaugenSystems.com What Pays Off and Why Part 1: What Pays Off Abridged.
R&D-Intensity, Mispricing, and Stock Returns in Taiwan Stock Market.
Corporate Financing and Market Efficiency “If a man’s wit be wandering, let him study mathematics” – Francis Bacon, 1625.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Behavioral Finance and Technical Analysis CHAPTER 19.
CHAPTER 13 Investments Empirical Evidence on Security Returns Slides by Richard D. Johnson Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
CHAPTER 5: Risk and Return: Portfolio Theory and Asset Pricing Models
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Return, Risk, and the Security Market Line
Chapter 12 Return, Risk and the Security Market Line
Kirt C. Butler, Multinational Finance, South-Western College Publishing, 3e 21-1 Chapter 21 International Asset Pricing 21.1The Traditional CAPM 21.2The.
Price patterns, charts and technical analysis: The momentum studies Aswath Damodaran.
A History of Risk and Return
Finance - Pedro Barroso
1.  Early 1970’s, Fama & MacBeth did a famous study testing the CAPM.  They found weak evidence that portfolios of stocks with higher betas had higher.
COMM W. Suo Slide 1. COMM W. Suo Slide 2  Random Walk - stock price change unpredictably  Actually stock prices follow a positive trend.
Size Effect Matthew Boyce Huibin Hu Rajesh Raghunathan Lina Yang.
Chapter 06 Risk and Return. Value = FCF 1 FCF 2 FCF ∞ (1 + WACC) 1 (1 + WACC) ∞ (1 + WACC) 2 Free cash flow (FCF) Market interest rates Firm’s business.
Chapter 10 Capital Markets and the Pricing of Risk.
Chapter 8 The Efficient Market Hypothesis. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Efficient Market Hypothesis.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Efficient Markets & The Behavioral Critique CHAPTE R 8.
1 Mutual Fund Performance and Manager Style. J.L. Davis, FAJ, Jan/Feb 01, Various studies examined the evidence of persistence in mutual fund performance.
Chapter 14.  To make informed decisions about a company  Generally based on comparative financial data ◦ From one year to the next ◦ With a competing.
Investments, 8 th edition Bodie, Kane and Marcus Slides by Susan Hine McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Jie Zhang, HKPU Forecasted Earnings per Share and the Cross Section of Expected Returns Ling Cen K.C. John Wei Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Chapter Return, Risk, and the Security Market Line McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 12.
The Inefficient Market Prentice Hall 1999 Visit our web-site at HaugenSystems.com What Pays Off and Why Part 1: What Pays Off.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin CHAPTER 8 Index Models.
The Inefficient Stock Market What Pays Off and Why (Prentice Hall, 1999) Visit our web-site at HaugenSystems.com.
CHAPTER 3 Risk and Return: Part II
Index Models The Capital Asset Pricing Model
Slide 9-1 Market Efficiency 1. Performance of portfolio managers 2. Anomalies 3. Behavioral Finance as a challenge to the EMH 1/7/
12-1. Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin 12 Return, Risk, and the Security Market Line.
I wish … I could understand how monkeys can pick up stocks in an efficient market!!!
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Efficient Markets & The Behavioral Critique CHAPTER 8.
Accounting Information and Market Efficiency – Theory and Evidence 1.
Return, Risk, and the Security Market Line. The return on any stock traded in a financial market is composed of two parts.  The normal, or expected,
The New Finance. CHAPTER ONE SEARCH FOR THE GRAIL.
1.  In 1970s, Princeton professor Burton Malkiel wrote an influential book titled “A Random Walk Down Wall Street”  He said that stock prices follow.
Portfolio risk and return
EFFICIENT MARKETS. The Efficient Market Hypothesis Most tests of EMH:  How fast information is incorporated in prices  Not whether information is correctly.
Behavioral Finance Fama French March 24 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
1 Mutual Fund Performance and Manager Style. J.L. Davis, FAJ, Jan/Feb 01 Various studies examined the evidence of persistence in mutual fund performance.
1 Prospect theory, mental accounting, and momentum Grinblatt and Han JFE (2005)
1 Arbitrage risk and the book- to-market anomaly Ali, Hwang and Trombley JFE (2003)
Momentum and Reversal.
Are Financial Markets Efficient ?
What Factors Drive Global Stock Returns?
Momentum Effect (JT 1993).
CH14 Operating-Income-Based Valuation
Stock Market Efficiency
Figure 7.1 Efficient Frontier and Capital Market Line
Presentation transcript:

The Inefficient Market What Pays Off and Why Part 2: Why Prentice Hall 1999 Visit our web-site at HaugenSystems.com

Why.

The Topography of the Stock Market the Stock Market

True Abnormal Profit l Best estimate (using all relevant information and state-of-the-art analysis) of the risk adjusted, present value of a firms future abnormal profits.

True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit Growth Stocks Value Stocks Efficient Market Line under- priced stock The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space

willproduceexcessreturn True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit Efficient Market Line over- priced stock The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Growth Stocks Value Stocks

willproduceexcessreturn True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit Efficient Market Line willproduce deficient return The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Growth Stocks Value Stocks

Imprecision

Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space

Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space

Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space

Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space

Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space

Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space

Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space

Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space

Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space

Efficient Market Line Priced Abnormal Profit True Abnormal Profit

The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line Priced Abnormal Profit True Abnormal Profit

The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line Priced Abnormal Profit True Abnormal Profit

The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line Priced Abnormal Profit True Abnormal Profit

The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line Priced Abnormal Profit True Abnormal Profit

Available assets IMPRECISION: Different prices for stocks with the same TRUE Abnormal Profit The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

Available assets IMPRECISION: Stocks with the same price have different TRUE abnormal profit The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

Available assets low B / P decile or high E / B decile high B / P decile or low E / B decile The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

Bias

The Market Over- reacts to Success and Failure

Mean-reversion in Relative Profitability How Fast? Fuller, Huberts, and Levinson

Relative Subsequent Growth in Highest, High, Low and Lowest Quintiles of E/P Ratio Low and Lowest Quintiles of E/P Ratio-10%-8%-6%-4%-2%0%2%4%6%8%10% Growth in Earnings per Share Relative to Middle Quintile Lowest E/P(Growth) Low E/P High E/P Highest E/P (Value) 1 Year ahead 2 Years ahead 3 Years ahead 4 Years ahead 5 Years ahead 6 Years ahead 7 Years ahead 8 Years ahead Number of Years After Ranking

Is the Market Surprised by the Speed of Mean- reversion? La Porta, Lakonishok, Shleifer, & Vishny

-1.0%-0.5%0.0%0.5%1.0%1.5%2.0% Three day rate of return -2.0%-1.5% Value Growth First year following ranking Second year following ranking Third year following ranking Fourth year following ranking Fifth year following ranking Returns of Growth and Value Stocks Around Earnings Announcement Dates Around Earnings Announcement Dates

Implications for Market’s Topography

Available assets low B / P decile or high E / B decile high B / P decile or low E / B decile The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit PricedAbnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

Available assets low B / P decile or high E / B decile high B / P decile or low E / B decile The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit PricedAbnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

Available assets low B / P decile or high E / B decile high B / P decile or low E / B decile The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit PricedAbnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

Available assets low B / P decile or high E / B decile high B / P decile or low E / B decile The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit PricedAbnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

Available assets low B / P decile or high E / B decile high B / P decile or low E / B decile The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit PricedAbnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

Available assets low B / P decile or high E / B decile high B / P decile or low E / B decile The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit PricedAbnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

Available assets low B / P decile or high E / B decile high B / P decile or low E / B decile The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit PricedAbnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

Available assets low B / P decile or high E / B decile high B / P decile or low E / B decile The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit PricedAbnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

Available assets low B / P decile or high E / B decile high B / P decile or low E / B decile The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit PricedAbnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

Available assets low B / P decile or high E / B decile high B / P decile or low E / B decile The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit PricedAbnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

Available assets low B / P decile or high E / B decile high B / P decile or low E / B decile The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit PricedAbnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

Available assets low B / P decile or high E / B decile high B / P decile or low E / B decile The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit PricedAbnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

Available assets low B / P decile or high E / B decile high B / P decile or low E / B decile The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space BIAS: Overreaction to Abnormal Profit True Priced over- priced Efficient Market Line under- priced True Abnormal Profit PricedAbnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Available assets Value investors head West GrowthinvestorsheadNorth PricedAbnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Available assets PureGrowth willunderperform GARP willoutperformmarket PricedAbnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

The Relative Positions of The Deciles

The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Super Stocks Stupid Stocks Priced Abnormal Profit

What’s Behind the Payoff to Profitability? Imprecision - you can buy more profitable companies without having to pay more expensive prices.

The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

What’s Behind the Payoff to Cheapness? Imprecision & bias - you can buy cheaper stocks without sacrificing profitability & market exaggerates the length of the short-run.

The Position of Portfolios in Abnormal Profit Space Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

Efficient Market Line True Abnormal Profit Priced Abnormal Profit

What’s Behind the Negative Payoff to Risk?

How long has the payoff to risk been negative? Let’s look at the history of the cumulative relative performance of the low volatility portfolio and the S&P 500 stock index.

Cumulative Difference in Return Between Low Volatility Portfolio and S&P % -25% -15% -5% 5% 15%25%CumulativeDifference

Cumulative Difference in Return Between Low Volatility Portfolio and S&P % -25% -15% -5% 5% 15% 25% CumulativeDifference

Cumulative Difference in Return Between Low Volatility Portfolio and S&P % -25% -15% -5% 5% 15% 25% CumulativeDifference

Two Theories Explaining the Negative Payoff to Risk

I. Over-valued and Risky Growth Stocks l Expensive growth stocks tend – To produce low future returns – To be more risky l Fama/French 1992 Table II

Book to Market Equity of Portfolios Ranked by Beta Beta Book to Market Equity

II. Agency Problems of Financial Analysts* *Sias, Financial Analysts’ Journal, 1996 l Studies NYSE stocks l Forms size deciles in each year l Within each size decile, he forms 3 equal- numbered groupings based on percentage institutionally held l Computes volatility using weekly data

Median Institutional Holdings, Capitalization, and Volatility by Capitalization Institutional Holdings Sorted Portfolios, NYSE Firms, Portfolio Smallest Decile 2 Decile 3 Decile 4 Decile 5 Decile 6 Decile 7 Decile 8 Decile 9 Largest Institutional Holdings (%) HighLow Confidence Level (High minus Low) % % % % % % % % % % Capitalization ($millions) HighLow Confidence Level (High minus Low) % % % % % % % % 1, , % 3, , % Annualized Standard Deviation Of Weekly Returns (%) HighLow Confidence Level (High minus Low) % % % % % % % % % %

There May be Two Causes for the Inversion in the Relationship Between Risk and Expected Return l The market’s tendency to over-price the more volatile, growth stocks l The attraction of institutional investors to the more newsworthy, volatile stocks

What’s Behind the Technical Payoffs to Price History? Short-term reversals Intermediate momentum Long-term reversals

Short-term Reversals l Price pressure. l Reversals of over-reactions to new information.

Intermediate Momentum and Long-term Reversals l Repetition of earnings surprises of the same sign (Bernard & Thomas). l Over-estimating the length of the short- run.

Jegadeesh and Titman* l Observe stock returns around earnings announcement dates. l Compute difference in returns to decile winners and losers over previous six months. l Study spans the period *Journal of Finance, 1993

Cumulative Difference Between Winner and Loser Portfolio Rates of Return at Announcement Dates -5.00% -4.00% -3.00% -2.00% -1.00% 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00%5.00% Cumulative Difference Between Winner and Loser Portfolio Rates of Return Months Following 6-Month Performance Period

Cumulative Difference Between Winner and Loser Portfolio Rates of Return at Announcement Dates -5.00% -4.00% -3.00% -2.00% -1.00% 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00%5.00% Cumulative Difference Between Winner and Loser Portfolio Rates of Return Months Following 6-Month Performance Period

Cumulative Difference Between Winner and Loser Portfolio Rates of Return at Announcement Dates -5.00% -4.00% -3.00% -2.00% -1.00% 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00%5.00% Cumulative Difference Between Winner and Loser Portfolio Rates of Return Months Following 6-Month Performance Period

Building Weak Expected Return Factor Models Brennan Chordia & Subrahmanyam

Methodology l Study 970 NYSE stocks over the period l Rank stocks first by size and form quintiles. Within each quintile, rank by book-to-price and form quintiles again to obtain a total of 25 groupings. l Construct 5 stock portfolios, the returns to which account, as closely as possible, for the correlations among the returns to the 980 stocks. Use the portfolios as factors to explain the time-series of individual stock returns. Do the same with the size and B/P portfolio returns. l In any given month, regress the cross-section of returns to the 25 portfolios on a profile of 13 portfolio characteristics. Do the same with the unexplained returns to the 25 portfolios. l Compute means for the 13 regression coefficients ( ).

Most Important Factors Most Important Factors Study by Haugen & Baker 1979/01 through 1986/ /07 through 1993/12 FactorMeanConfidenceMeanConfidence One-month excess return-0.97%99%-0.72%99% return Twelve-month excess0.52%99%0.52%99% Trading volume/market cap -0.35%99%-0.20%98% Two-month excess return-0.20%99%-0.11%99% Earnings to price0.27%99%0.26%99% Return on equity0.24%99%0.13% 97% Book to price0.35%99%0.39%99% Trading volume trend-0.10%99%-0.09%99% Six-month excess return0.24%99%0.19%99% Cash flow to price0.13%99%0.26%99%

Average Payoffs to the BCS Factor Model Factor Covering Size Book-to-Market Volume of Trading Number of Analysts Dispersion of Earnings Estimates Percentage Bid-Asked Spread Percentage Institutional Ownership 1.00 if in S&P 0 Otherwise Reciprocal of Share Price Dividend – to – Price Two-Month Past Return Five-Month Past Return Eleven-Month Past Return Portfolio Returns Mean Payoff Confidence %.20593%.73098% % % % % % % % % %.15075%.43099% Residual Portfolio Returns Mean Payoff Con f idence % %.55980% % % %.2596%.44898%.73493%.30165% % % % % Residual Stock Returns Mean Payoff Confidence % % % %.21499% % %.17999%.18495%.06960% % % %.77897%

Response l In the case of the 25 portfolios, it’s, proportionately, like trying to estimate the payoffs to 2 factors with 4 plot points. l In the case of the 25 portfolios, the exposures to all factors except size and B/P are likely to be quite homogeneous. l The unexplained (by their factor model) returns to the individual stocks are likely to be small and for the 40 stock portfolios extremely small.

Diversifiable Risk Decreases with the Number of Stocks in a Portfolio Diversifiable Risk Number of Stocks in Portfolio