Measuring the Effects of Congestion and Request Location on Transit Signal Priority Matt Dorado Erin Qureshi River Hwang Portland State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development of Standards for Transit Priority Paul R. Olson, P.E. PTOE FHWA Western Resource Center.
Advertisements

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet Orange Grove Boulevard Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias Engineering Associate Kittelson & Associates Bill Cisco Senior.
Bus Priority in Portland - Lessons Learned
T3 Webinar September 2012 Performance Measures Edward J. Smaglik September 18 th, 2012.
Overview of MOST: A Hands On Approach to Signal Timing Training Federal Highway Administration Webinar 15 April 2009 Michael Kyte, MOST Principal Investigator.
Automated Bicycle Data Collection: A Case Study from Portland, OR Western District Annual ITE Meeting June 26th, 2012 Presenter: Sirisha Kothuri
Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology.
Air Quality and Multimodal Evaluation of an Adaptive Traffic Signal System: a case study on Powell Boulevard (Portland, Oregon) Courtney Slavin Dr. Miguel.
Miroslav Vujic University of Zagreb Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences Zagreb, 10 October 2013 CIVITAS-ELAN 8.2. Public Transport Priority and Traveler.
Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Integrating Dynameq into Long Range Planning Studies Model City 2011 – Portland, Oregon Richard Walker - Portland Metro Scott.
1 NATMEC 2008 Christopher Monsere Kristin Tufte, Robert L. Bertini, and Soyoung Ahn Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory Maseeh College of Engineering.
Lec 16, Ch16, pp : Intersection delay (Objectives)
Transportation Engineering
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 3 Introduction to Transport Lecture 4: Traffic Signal.
MTC Technology Transfer Seminar Transit Signal Priority Abbas Mohaddes, President & CEO October 22, 2003.
Transit Signal Priority Work Group Report 7/30/13
Vehicle Flow.
Gresham Traffic Signal System Optimization A Comprehensive Evaluation of Corridor Performance After Deploying Adaptive Signal Control.
N TELEGRAPH RD Vehicle Position vs. Signal Timing for the Intersection of Telegraph Road and Maple Road Position 1: Vehicle entering intersection 0.1 seconds.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
TSP Must Fit Within An Overall Agency ITS Plan. Transit Priority Data Needs Vehicle Location –Speed Door & Lift Status –Predictions Passenger Counting.
Improving Travel Time-Delay Functions for the Highway 217 Corridor Study Using a Regional ITS Data Archive Robert L. Bertini, Ph.D, P.E. Portland State.
CEE – Spring 2005 Lectures 10 to 11 (Chapters 21, 22) Analysis of Signalized Intersections.
Peter Koonce TRB Annual Meeting January 9, 2005 Best Practices for Signal Operations Best Practices for Signal Operations – Lessons Learned from the Portland.
3rd Street Light Rail Process and Challenges of Developing Transit Signal Priority Javad Mirabdal, Jack Fleck & Britt Thesen Department of Parking and.
1Prepared by AC Transit Service Development Transit Signal Priority For the San Pablo Rapid Bus.
RT-TRACS A daptive Control Algorithms VFC-OPAC Farhad Pooran PB Farradyne Inc. TRB A3A18 Mid-Year Meeting and Adaptive Control Workshop July 12-14, 1998.
Congestion Management Innovations in Oregon Christopher Monsere Assistant Professor Portland State University Civil and Environmental Engineering Director,
Bus Management System in SEOUL Metropolitan Area.
Introduction Nablus is the largest city in the West Bank after Jerusalem. 150,000 inhabitants live in Nablus. Nablus has the largest university in the.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
University of Maryland Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering By G.L. Chang, M.L. Franz, Y. Liu, Y. Lu & R. Tao BACKGROUND SYSTEM DESIGN DATA.
Transit Priority Strategies for Multiple Routes under Headway-based Operations Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park, USA.
1 Combined Arterial Performance Status Report Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory Maseeh College of Engineering and Computer Science Portland.
TRB 88th Annual Meeting, Washington DC January, 2009 Huan Li and Robert L. Bertini Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting Washington, DC January.
More on Modeling / Tools…  What do we have now?  Where do things go wrong?  How can I match the right tool?
Envision Central Texas Presentation Cellular Mass Transit (CMT) by Richard Shultz Concerned Citizen March 24, 2008.
Traffic Engineering Studies (Travel Time & Delay Studies)
Robert L. Bertini Sirisha M. Kothuri Kristin A. Tufte Portland State University Soyoung Ahn Arizona State University 9th International IEEE Conference.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP): Deployment Issues and R&D Needs as Identified by Practitioners Hallie Smith Brendon Hemily.
Validating Predicted Rural Corridor Travel Times from an Automated License Plate Recognition System: Oregon’s Frontier Project Presented by: Zachary Horowitz.
1 Arterial Performance Measurement Mathew Berkow, Michael Wolfe, Christopher Monsere and Robert L. Bertini Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory.
Stochastic Optimization Method for Coordinated Actuated Traffic Control May 16, 2008 Joyoung Lee and Byungkyu “Brian” Park, Ph.D Presented at VISSIM UGM.
1 Congestion Measurement Mark Hallenbeck TRAC. 2 Historical Use of volume data –AADT –AWDT, –Hourly volumes To estimate delays Can produce a reasonable.
1 Using Automatic Vehicle Location Data to Determine Detector Placement Robert L. Bertini, Christopher Monsere, Michael Wolfe and Mathew Berkow Portland.
Using Signal Systems Data and Buses as Probes to Create Arterial Performance Measures Mathew Berkow, Michael Wolfe, John Chee, Robert Bertini,
Portland State University 11 By Maisha Mahmud Li Huan Evaluation Of SCATS Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System.
NEW STARTS/SMALL STARTS. New Starts Eligibility  Based on the results of planning and Alternatives Analysis  At least 50% or more of the total project.
Use of HITL in Bus Priority Design Kevin Balke, Ph.D., P.E. TransLink ® Research Center Director Texas Transportation Institute Hardware-in-the-Loop Symposium.
1 NATMEC 2008 Christopher Monsere Robert L. Bertini, Mathew Berkow, and Michael Wolfe Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory Maseeh College of Engineering.
26 June 2006Institute of Transportation Engineers District 6 Annual Meeting Intelligent Transportation Systems Lab Christopher M. Monsere Research Assistant.
Transit Signal Priority: Managing Expectations Kevin N. Balke, Ph.D., P.E TransLink ® Research Center Director Texas Transportation Institute Transportation.
30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Robert L. Bertini and Huan Li Conference for the Australian Institutes of Transport Research.
July 13, 2005ITE District 6 Annual Meeting Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages.
Abstract The City of Portland, in collaboration with TriMet (Portland’s regional transit service provider) and the Oregon Department of Transportation,
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
I-270/MD 355 Simulator: An Intelligent Online Traffic Management System Dr. Gang-Len Chang Nan Zou Xiaorong Lai University of Maryland Saed Rahwanji Maryland.
Overview of King County Transit Signal Priority Program T3 Webinar January 22, 2008.
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
Traffic Signals & ITS to Encourage Walking & Cycling
1 TRB 88 th Annual Meeting January 12, 2009 – TRB 88 th Annual Meeting Mathew Berkow, Robert L. Bertini, Christopher Monsere, Michael Wolfe, Portland State.
Pavement Replacement Priority in Seattle Ali Boyum, Kayla Dantzler, John Mayfield, Derek Van De Wege.
City of Portland - Isolated Timing Operations January 9, 2005 Isolated Timing Operations - Workshop on Best Practices for Signal Timing Bill Kloos Signals.
A presentation by Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Broward Boulevard Presentation to the Broward MPO TCC and CIR March 2012 Agenda Item NA-1, Attachment.
MODULE 4, LESSON 5 Developing Service: Calculating Capacity.
1 CPA Request to expand the Oaks Mall Activity Center and change land use to Mixed Use 87 acres 8000 Block of W Newberry Rd.
Thinking Inside the Box
D Line TAC Meeting #1: D Line Rapid Bus Project Planning City of Richfield Transportation Commission July 12, 2017 Katie Roth, Project Manager.
City of Alexandria Virginia Transportation and Environmental Services
Presentation transcript:

Measuring the Effects of Congestion and Request Location on Transit Signal Priority Matt Dorado Erin Qureshi River Hwang Portland State University

Outline  Introduction  Objective  Study Design  Test Scenarios  Results  Conclusions/Future Research

Introduction  Transit Signal Priority Concept  “Smart bus” knows location and schedule status  Bus communicates priority request to signal  Local controller provides priority

Onboard System PCMIA CardControl Head

Priority Call Sequence

TSP Criteria  Is the bus within Portland city limits?  Is the bus on route?  Are the bus doors closed?  Has the request already been sent?  Is the bus behind schedule ?

Signal Timing Green Extension Standard Plan 46 seconds 25.5 seconds39 seconds 19 seconds 39.5 seconds 34.5 seconds32 seconds 27.5 seconds Green extension allows bus to get through the signal

Signal Timing Red Truncation 39.5 seconds 34.5 seconds32 seconds 27.5 seconds 29.5 seconds 42 seconds23 seconds 35 seconds Standard Plan Red truncation allows bus to get started through the intersection sooner

Objective To evaluate the relationship between Congestion and the distance at which a bus calls for Signal Priority.

Modeling Single intersection Intersection of NE 33rd Ave and Sandy Blvd Portland,Oregon

Hardware-in-the-Loop Set up showing desktop computer, CID, and 170 Controller

Study Design  Software - Vissim, Sychro  TOD Plans – Not used  Approach v/c ratios - 1.1, 0.9, 0.7, 0.5  Volumes , 1330, 1040, 735 V/hr  Buses - Route 12, 15 min headways, staggered starts

Study Design  Data Collection  Three Categories – Travel Time, Waiting Time, Delay  Travel Times – Fixed 1000 ft section  Waiting time  Delay – Buses only

Signal Timing Red Truncation 39.5 seconds 34.5 seconds32 seconds 27.5 seconds 29.5 seconds 42 seconds23 seconds 35 seconds Standard Plan

Scenarios Bus stop locations – Far and Near Call distance vs v/c Call Distancev/c Ratio 420 feet feet feet

Results-Avg Travel Times Table 1 Average Travel Times Detector Length v/cDirection280 ft350 ft420 ft 1.1 East West East West East West East West

Results – Farside

Results - Nearside

Results – Delay Farside

Results – Delay Nearside

Results - Wait Time Farside

Results - Wait Time Nearside

Conclusions/Further Research Near side Far side Call button 2 Hour Cycles

Acknowledgments  TriMet  Paul Zebell, Willie Rotich, Bill Kloos - City of Portland  Connie Hotard - PTV America  Peter Koonce, Selman Altun - Kittelson and Associates  Dr. Robert Bertini, Dr. Chris Monsere, Erin Qureshi, River Hwang, Neil Byrne, and Office of Academic Affairs - Portland State University

Thank You