1 The Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) and the U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System Thomas Malone, Ocean.US Office Worth D. Nowlin, Jr., Texas A&M.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Northwest Association Of Networked Ocean Observing Systems (NANOOS)
Advertisements

Future Directions and Initiatives in the Use of Remote Sensing for Water Quality.
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Data Management and Communication (DMAC) Standards Process Julie Bosch NOAA National Coastal Data Development.
SEA-COOS The Southeast Atlantic Coastal Ocean Observing System Harvey Seim, UNC-CH National IOOS Regional observing systems.
1 The Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) and the U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS); with focus on the National Backbone GCOOS Meetings
Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System Ann E. Jochens Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System Regional Association
1 Zdenka Willis Director, National Oceanographic Data Center SEADATANET June 9, 2006.
The U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System Worth D. Nowlin, Jr. Texas A&M University NOAA Coastal Services Center NOAA National Data Buoy Center GCOOS.
SEA-COOS The Southeast Atlantic Coastal Ocean Observing System National IOOS Regional observing systems.
1 IOOS Status of Planning & Implementation Background –Milestones Implementation Plan, Part I –Governance of the IOOS Implementation Plan, Part II –The.
1 Issue: Society Depends on Ecosystem Modeling to Predict Threats and Minimize Risk.
SEA-COOS The Southeast Atlantic Coastal Ocean Observing System National IOOS Regional observing systems.
Alaska Ocean Observing System (AOOS) A Regional Observing System within the Integrated Ocean Observing System Molly McCammon, Executive Director 1007 W.
1 Status & Plans for Implementing the Initial U.S. IOOS Tom Malone Director, OceanUS University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science – 2004.
Development of an Ocean Observing System for the Gulf of Mexico: A Gulf Numerical Laboratory Background Mission Statement: Vision Elements of Design and.
The National Office for Integrated and Sustained Ocean Observing and Prediction Eric J. Lindstrom, Director, Ocean.US Worth D. Nowlin, Jr, U.S. GOOS Steering.
Why Now? Regional, State and Federal Interests in Our and Coasts Why Now? Regional, State and Federal Interests in Our Oceans and Coasts Krista Kamer Program.
Progress Towards a Regional Coastal Ocean Observing System for the Southeast (SEACOOS) Harvey Seim / University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University.
The U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System Worth D. Nowlin, Jr. Texas A&M University NOAA Coastal Services Center NOAA National Data Buoy Center GCOOS.
The Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System (GCOOS) Worth D. Nowlin, Jr. & Ann E. Jochens GCOOS Office/Texas A&M University 1 Recreational Boating.
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
The Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System (GCOOS) Worth D. Nowlin, Jr. & Ann E. Jochens GCOOS Office/Texas A&M University 1 Recreational Boating.
HSRP Spring Meeting May 4, 2011 David M. Kennedy.
Community Resilience: It Takes A Village Civil Society Leadership Symposium December 8, 2009 Margaret A. Davidson NOAA’s Coastal Services Center.
JCOMM Data Buoy Cooperation Panel October 16, 2006 National Data Buoy Center 2006 Review: A Year of Growth Paul F. Moersdorf, PhD, Director.
U.S. IOOS & the Ocean.US Modeling Initiative Background & the Mission of Ocean.US IOOS Conceptual Design Status of Implementation Ocean.US Modeling Initiative.
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
James H. Butler, Acting Director NOAA Strategic Planning Moving NOAA into the 21 st Century Third GOES-R User Conference May 2004, Boulder, Colorado.
Integrated Ocean Observing System -- IOOS -- United States Contribution to the Global Ocean Observing System Kurt Schnebele Ocean.US Deputy of Data Management.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO Ocean Studies Board November 10, 2009.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Symposium on multi-hazard early warning systems for integrated disaster risk management A JCOMM perspective Enhanced early warning for better coastal or.
1 The Integrated Ocean Observing System Where do we go from here? J. Michael Hemsley, PE, CFM Deputy Director for Coastal Operations, OceanUS.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
Southern California Coastal Ocean Observing System SCCOOS me? –You want input from the users? –What products will help EPA with its mission? Relationship.
Recent History Conceptual Design Evolution Funding Developing a User-Driven, Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Tom Malone, Director Ocean.US Office.
Coordinating Monitoring in the Great Lakes Basin Ric Lawson Project Manager Great Lakes Commission National Water Quality Monitoring Council meeting Ann.
Ocean.US and Coastal Ocean Applications and Science Team (COAST) Larry Atkinson September 2004 Corvallis.
Bob Keeley Marine Environmental Data Service Dept. of Fisheries and Oceans Ottawa, Canada Jun, 2006 SeaDataNet Meeting.
Presenters: David M. Kennedy, Director, NOAA Office of Ocean & Coastal Resource Management Margaret A. Davidson, Director, NOAA Coastal Services Center.
Department of Commerce Workshop San Juan, Puerto Rico 17 November 2009 Laura Furgione Assistant Administrator for Program Planning and Integration National.
U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS ® ) IOOS ® Biological Observations Data Project A Multi-Agency Effort to Enable Access to Biological Observations.
NOAA 101 Sarah Schoedinger NOAA, Office of Education November 2, 2006 An overview of the agency for the NOAA/NSTA Symposium on the Ocean’s Role in Weather.
The Physical Observing System: From Monitoring and Predicting Hazards to Long Term Changes Doug Wilson Co-Chairman, IOCARIBE-GOOS U.S. NOAA GEO CZCP Workshop.
FUTURE OF LAND IMAGING U.S. Land Imaging Needs & Long-Term Continuity Future of Land Imaging Interagency Working Group (FLI-IWG) U.S. Group on Earth Observations.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Enabling decision making every day; Fostering advances in science and technology BIO TT Workshop November.
Progress Towards Regional Coastal Ocean Observing Systems: Interactions between the NERRS, RAs and Sub-regional Monitoring and Observing Efforts 3 rd Meeting.
JCOMM Observations Programme Area Report to the DBCP Angra dos Reis, 20 October 2003 Observations Programme Area Coordination Group (OCG) Mike Johnson,
The Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) is envisioned as a coordinated national and international network of observations, data management and analyses.
1 NOAA’s Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Program Brief to NOAA Climate Observation Division 5 th Annual System Review 05 June 2007 CAPT Christopher.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO September 24, 2009.
Why We Are Here Eric Lindstrom, Co-chair Interagency Ocean Observation Committee Great Lakes Industry Workshop June 21, 2011.
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Update
1 GEO Science and Technology Committee, Melbourne, 16 September 2009 Coordinating Implementation of the Global Ocean Observing System Peter Dexter Co-President.
Vision of an Integrated Global Observing System Gregory W. Withee Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS ® ) Z Improve safetyEnhance our economyProtect our environment CIMAR-GOMC meeting – 25 Feb 2015 Zdenka Willis.
Deerin Babb-Brott, Director National Ocean Council Office National Boating Federation 2013 Annual Meeting.
Sustainable Beaches: Weather Impacts VADM Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. US Navy (Ret.) Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere NOAA Administrator.
U.S. IOOS ® Update – SECOORA Annual Meeting Jack Harlan & Rob Ragsdale US IOOS Program Office.
FY 2005 NOAA Research Budget Request Dr. Richard D. Rosen Assistant Administrator for NOAA Research March 2004.
A U.S. non-profit Corporation Recipient of NOAA planning grants and Congressionally directed funding Membership to include federal, state, provincial.
The mandate to establish a Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) was formally articulated and ratified in 1992 at the UN Conference on Environment and Development.
Developing a User-Driven, Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS)
Ocean Prediction Center
Associate Director for Research, Education and Marine Operations
President’s Report Robert B. Gagosian October 15, 2009
US IOOS®, NDBC, CO-OPS Partnership Discussion
Candyce Clark JCOMM Observations Programme Area Coordinator
William Corso Deputy Assistant Administrator
Presentation transcript:

1 The Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) and the U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System Thomas Malone, Ocean.US Office Worth D. Nowlin, Jr., Texas A&M University GCOOS Stakeholder Council 10 January 2005

2 Outline Global Ocean Observing System U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System - The Political Environment - The IOOS Architecture - The Global Module - The Coastal Module - The Current Status Engaging The Private Sector

3 Global Ocean Observing System

4 Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) GOOS is an end-to-end system of observations, data management, and production and delivery of products/services. GOOS is being coordinated by United Nation agencies with the participation of some 100 ocean nations. Together with the World Weather Watch, Global Atmospheric Watch, Global Climate Observing System and Global Terrestrial Observing System, GOOS is an element of the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS).

5 The GOOS Modules The Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) has been designed and is being implemented in two modules: The global module is designed to monitor, predict, and understand marine surface conditions and climate variability/change; and The coastal module is designed to sustain healthy marine ecosystems, ensure human health, promote safe and efficient marine transportation, enhance national security, and predict and mitigate against coastal hazards.

6 U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System

7 An End–to–End System that Routinely Provides Data & Information Specified by (1) Analysis, Modeling (2) Data Management & Communications (3) Observing In Situ & Remote Sensing Groups that Use, Depend on, Manage or Study Oceans & Coasts GOOS End To End Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS)

8 Integrated End – to – End System Rapid Access to Diverse Data from Many Sources Satellites Aircraft Fixed Platforms Ships Drifters & Floats AUVs Metadata standards Data discovery Data transport Online browse Data archival Maritime Navigational Services Search & Rescue Coastal Flooding & Erosion Beach Closures Water Management Nutrient Management Data Management Data Management & Communications Fisheries Management Products & Services Observations Modeling & Analysis Data Telemetry 8

9 Political Background

U.S. Congress Called for an Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Provide Data/Info Required for More Rapid Detection & Timely Prediction of State Changes Improve the safety & efficiency of marine operations Improve homeland security Mitigate effects of natural hazards more effectively Improve predictions of climate change & their effects Minimize public health risks Protect & restore healthy ecosystems in coastal environments more effectively Sustain living marine resources 1 System, 7 Goals

11 Ocean.US Established in 2000 Executive Committee (EXCOM) Functions & Responsibilities  Prepare & maintain IOOS Development Plans  Coordinate interagency implementation Past, Present & Future Directors  Past: David Martin, Eric Lindstrom  Current: Tom Malone  Future: Mary Altalo (Early 2006)

U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy Implement an Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS)  Make more effective use of existing resources  Enhance operational capabilities over time to address all 7 societal goals Implement Ecosystem–Based Approaches to Managing  Natural resources &  Water quality Strengthen Regional Approach  Locally relevant, nationally coordinated

13 President’s Ocean Action Plan Enhance Ocean Leadership & Coordination  Establish ocean governance structure Establish an IOOS as part of the GEOSS Optimize & Harmonize Use & Conservation of  Ocean, Coastal, & Great Lakes Resources Manage Coasts & their Watersheds Establish strong partnerships among stakeholders

14 Ecosystem-Based, Adaptive Management WE DO NOT HAVE THIS CAPABILITY TODAY Rapid & Repeated Detection of changes  over a broad spectrum of time-space scales Timely Predictions of such changes Tune the flow of environmental data & information to the Time scales on which decisions should be made

15 Why? Cultural divides –Engaging both data providers & users in design, implementation, operation & improvement of IOOS Inefficient, ineffective data management –Data lost or not accessible –Time required to acquire, process & analyze data of known quality Under sampling in time, space & ecological complexity –Inputs to coastal ecosystems poorly quantified –Lack of long term, high resolution time series –Lack of synoptic measurements of physical, chemical & biological properties & processes Lack of capacity for rapid data acquisition & analysis –Remote & Autonomous in situ sensing & real time telemetry of geological, biological & chemical properties –Operational models for assimilating & analyzing data with speed & skill

16 The IOOS Architecture

17 The Integrated Ocean Observing System End – to – End Multi – Disciplinary Multi – Scale

18 U.S. IOOS Multi – Scale Hierarchy of Observations Global Ocean Climate Component GOOS/GCOS Resolution Low High C Cal Carrib MAB GLs NE SE Go Mex S Cal H Isl NW GoA Coastal Ocean Component National Backbone Regional Observing Systems

19 Inter – Disciplinary Coastal Phenomena of Interest Climate, Marine Ops, Natural Hazards  Surface currents, waves  Sea level, Temperature, Salinity  Coastal flooding & erosion Public Health Risks  Seafood contamination  Waterborne pathogens Ecosystem Health & LMRs  Loss of habitat, Biodiversity  Nutrient pollution, Anoxia  HABs, Invasive species  Mass mortalities  Chemical contamination  Declines in living resources  Aquaculture production Globally ubiquitous, Local Expressions of Large Scale Changes 19

20 The Global Module

21 Global Component of the Observing Subsystem Integrate Remote & In Situ Sensing An International Collaboration

22 Implementation Plan for the Global Observing System for Climate in support of the U.N. Framework Convention for Climate Change Recommended for implementation by the Tenth Conference of Parties in Buenos Aires in December 2004 Integration of satellite and in situ observations collected by operational and research groups to be synthesized into information products.

23 The ocean component of this observing system is developed with broad objectives Monitoring and detection of climate change Seasonal-to-interannual climate prediction Marine and weather forecasts Short-range ocean forecasts Understanding decadal variations Support of scientific research Routine ocean state estimation

24 Key Actions Full implementation of the surface and subsurface observing networks Designate and support national Agents for Implementation and establish research-operational partnerships Timely, free, unrestricted data exchange and comprehensive data management procedures International standards for metadata for Essential Climate Variables Develop more cost effective two-way communication technologies Develop integrated global climate product needs

25 Coordination and Oversight of the global Ocean Component is by the WMO-IOC Joint Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine Meteorology

26 73% complete

27 70% complete

Initial Ocean Observing System Milestones including international contributions Tide Gauges Real-time Stations Initial GCOS Subset Surface Drifting Buoys Tropical Moored Buoys Ships of Opportunity Argo Floats Reference Stations Arctic System System Evaluation Ocean Carbon Network Dedicated Ship Time High resolution and frequently repeated lines occupied Number of floats Number of moorings Number of buoys Days at sea (NOAA contribution) Product evaluation and feedback loops implemented (NOAA contribution) Repeat Sections Committed, One inventory per 10 years Number of observatories, flux, and ocean transport stations Ice buoys, drifting and Moored stations Total System System % Complete Multi-year Phased Implementation Plan (representative milestones)

29 The Coastal Module

30 Coastal Component Federal Agencies Responsible EEZ & Great Lakes Core variables required by regions & Federal Agencies Network of sentinel & reference stations Standards/Protocols Regional Associations Responsible Involve private & public sectors Inform Federal Agencies of user needs Enhance the backbone based on user needs Incorporate sub–regional systems Regional COOSs National Backbone

31 ACOOS NANOOS SCCOOS CenCOOS PacIOOSGCOOS CaRA SECOORA MACOORA NERA GLOS 11 Groups Funded to Establish Regional Associations (RAs)

32 Coastal Backbone Core Variables Geophysical  Sea surface meteorological variables  Land–Sea Stream flows  Sea level  Surface waves, currents  Ice distribution  Temperature, Salinity  Bathymetry Biophysical  Optical properties  Benthic habitats Chemical  pCO 2  Dissolved inorganic nutrients  Contaminants  Dissolved oxygen Biological  Fish species, abundance  Zooplankton species, abundance  Phytoplankton species, biomass (ocean color)  Waterborne pathogens

33 National Backbone Initial Operational Observing Subsystem EEZ, Great Lakes Remote Sensing  POES & GOES (NOAA) In Situ Sensing  Stream gauge program (USGS)  Tide gauge network (NOAA, USGS)  Buoy programs (NOAA, Navy)  Wave gauge programs (NOAA, Navy, USACE)  Hydrographic surveys (NOAA, USGS)  Habitat surveys & assessments (NOAA, EPA)  Fish stock assessments (NOAA, USGS)  Protected resources surveys (NOAA)

34 Coastal Component High Priority Research & Pilot Projects Surface current mapping  Product: real–time surface current maps  HF–radar, remote & in situ sensing  Data assimilation–numerical modeling Space–based remote sensing  Improve chl algorithms for ocean color  Increase spatial, temporal, & spectral resolution  Sea surface salinity Aircraft remote sensing of near shore environments  LIDAR Coupled physical–water quality/ecosystem models  Ecosystem – Based Management Glider development for in situ sensors In situ sensors for core variables  Chemical & biological

35 The Current Status

36 Summary: Current Status 1 st Annual IOOS Development Plan  Global ocean– climate component being implemented  Initial backbone in place  Sub– regional coastal ocean observing systems funded  DMAC Plan completed Regional groups funded to  Form Regional Associations  Engage User Groups: Public & Private Sectors  Establish RCOOSs Government support  Current Funding: ~ $ 125 M  Executive order  Legislation in Congress to Authorize Additional Funding

37 Engaging the Private Sector

38 Engaging Private Sectors in IOOS Development Two convergent, interdependent approaches  Regional: Focus on involving private sectors, NGOs, and state agencies early in the development of RCOOSs Regional Associations – Establish & Maintain User Forums Conduct Regional Workshops, e.g., Houston 2004  National: Focus on serving data & information to attract the interest of private sectors & stimulate product development Industry Days Annual IOOS Implementation Conference to formulate & update the IOOS Development Plan

39 Thank You