Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Driver Model Update* ARIES IFE Meeting LLNL March 8-9, 2001 * This work was performed under the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary studies for T2 primary target for the NA61 fragmentation beam run 11 th October 2010 – NA61 Collaboration Meeting M. Calviani on behalf of.
Advertisements

Systems Analysis for Modular versus Multi-beam HIF Drivers * Wayne Meier – LLNL Grant Logan – LBNL 15th International Symposium on Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion.
Update on Self Pinch Transport of Heavy Ion Beams for Chamber Transport D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, Mission Research Corp. S. S. Yu, Lawrence Berkeley National.
Liquid Wall Thickness, Life, Pumping Power, COE trade-offs Wayne R. Meier and Ryan P. Abbott LLNL ARIES Meeting Oct. 2-5, 2002 PPPL.
Beamline Design Issues D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation W. M. Sharp and S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Presented.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update - Spot Size Model Changes* ARIES Meeting April 22-23, 2002 * This work.
Error Propagation. Uncertainty Uncertainty reflects the knowledge that a measured value is related to the mean. Probable error is the range from the mean.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Efficiencies IDS Target Meeting CERN December 17, 2008.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update* ARIES e-Meeting October 17, 2001 * This work was performed under the auspices.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.
An Update Point Design for Heavy Ion Fusion Wayne Meier LLNL ARIES Meeting Jan. 8-9, 2003 UC San Diego Work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department.
Optimization of Target Parameters for a Tungsten Target (Half Density) at 8GeV X. Ding Target Studies Nov. 2, 2010.
Simulations of Neutralized Drift Compression D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation Albuquerque, NM S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Comparison of final focus magnetic systems for the Assisted Pinched Transport and the RPD-2002 J. Barnard,
Stewart Shen October 27, LCLS-XTOD Gas Attenuator LCLS FAC Meeting October 27, 2005 Stewart Shen, Keith Kishiyama and Marty Roeben.
Propagation of HI Beams in Chamber Metal Vapor Atmosphere C. Olson, Sandia National Laboratories D. Welch, D. Rose, B. Oliver, T. Genoni, and R. Clark,
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory ARIES-IFE Meeting Atlanta, Georgia September 4, 2003 “Modular Solenoid with Assisted Pinch” by S. Yu,
Modeling of Assisted and Self- Pinch Transport D. V. Rose and D. R. Welch Mission Research Corporation C. L. Olson Sandia National Laboratories S. S. Yu.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Towards An Analytic Model for Beam Spot Size in Ballistic Neutralized Transport Simon Yu, J. Barnard,
Richard M. Bionta X-Ray Transport, Diagnostic, & Commissioning September 22, 2004 UCRL-PRES Two Problems... LCLS Diagnostics.
Coupling of APT Transported Ion beam to Hybrid Target D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation C. L. Olson Sandia National Laboratories.
Shielding of the Final Focusing System in the HIF Point Design* by Jeff Latkowski and Wayne Meier ARIES Projct Meeting January 8-9, 2003 *Work performed.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Per Peterson UC Berkeley Updated Heavy Ion Driver Parameters for Snowmass Point Design ARIES Meeting July.
Status of Operational Windows for HIF Chamber Transport Modes D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, C. L. Olson, S. Neff, and S. S. Yu ARIES Project Meeting January.
Laser accelerated ions and their potential for therapy accelerators I. Hofmann, GSI Accelerator Department HIAT09, Venezia, June 8-12, Introduction.
Systems Modeling Update including Magnetic Deflection HAPL Program Meeting General Atomics August 8-9, 2006 Wayne Meier LLNL Work performed under the auspices.
Meson Productions for Target System with GA/HG Jet and IDS120h Configuration X. Ding (Presenter), D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J.S. Berg, BNL Muon Accelerator.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Analytical and Numerical Studies of Ion Beam Plasma Interaction for Heavy Ion Driven Inertial Fusion Igor.
1 BeamBeam3D: Code Improvements and Applications Ji Qiang Center of Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SciDAC II, COMPASS collaboration.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
ASTRA Injector Setup 2012 Julian McKenzie 17/02/2012.
LCLS-II Magnet Error Sensitivities. Sensitivities of dipole magnets, from injector output (95 MeV) to SXR undulator input (4 GeV), where each plotted.
How does laser cost scaling affect the power plant optimization? HAPL Program Meeting PPPL Dec 12-13, 2006 Wayne Meier LLNL Work performed under the auspices.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Pulsed Normal Quadrupoles for a Heavy Ion Fusion Driver Final Focus Section D. Shuman, S. S. Yu, LBNL.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
CLIC RF manipulation for positron at CLIC Scenarios studies on hybrid source Freddy Poirier 12/08/2010.
Alexei Fedotov, 02/02/12 1 Potentials for luminosity improvement for low-energy RHIC (with electron cooling) February 2, 2012.
UCRL-PRES Magnet Design Considerations & Efficiency Advantages of Magnetic Diversion Concept W. Meier & N. Martovetsky LLNL HAPL Program Meeting.
Robust Heavy Ion Fusion Target Shigeo KAWATA Utsunomiya Univ. Japan U.S.-J. Workshop on HIF December 18-19, 2008 at LBNL & LLNL.
Aerosol Limits for Target Tracking Ronald Petzoldt ARIES IFE Meeting, Madison, WI April 22-23, 2002.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
In order to satisfy the requirements of focusing high-power density for high-energy-density physics and inertial-fusion targets, we should be able to transport.
“Sizing” of solid state laser driver requirements for inertial fusion energy 1) Efficiency > %, including cooling Key issue is recycled power: f.
Luminosity of the Super-Tau-Charm Factory with Crab Waist D. Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk TAU’08 Workshop, Satellite Meeting “On the Need for a Super-Tau-Charm.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Neutralized Transport Experiment (NTX) P. K. Roy, S. S. Yu, S. Eylon, E. Henestroza, A. Anders, F. M.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 1 PRoy LINAC06 Neutralized Drift Compression and Related Experiments* P. K. Roy 1, W. L. Waldron.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory Question 1: Assess and document target preheat effects from beams and plasma for the various options.
Status and Plans for Systems Modeling for Laser IFE HAPL Progress Meeting November 2001 Pleasanton, CA Wayne Meier, Charles Orth, Don Blackfield.
Slide 1 The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory Why heavy ions? Target requires: 3.5 – 6 MJ in ~ 10 ns  500 TW Range ~ 0.02 – 0.20 g/cm.
Mercury DPSSL Driver: Smoothing, Zooming and Chamber Interface Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Ray Beach, John Perkins, Wayne Meier, Chris Ebbers,
Velocity bunching from S-band photoinjectors Julian McKenzie 1 st July 2011 Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop Cockcroft Institute STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Conceptual Design for HYLIFE-II Maintenance Ryan P. Abbott ARIES Project Meeting May 6, 2003 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department.
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
Ion Mitigation for Laser IFE Optics Ryan Abbott, Jeff Latkowski, Rob Schmitt HAPL Program Workshop Atlanta, Georgia, February 5, 2004 This work was performed.
ILC Positron Production and Capturing Studies: Update Wei Gai, Wanming Liu and Kwang-Je Kim Posipol Workshop, Orsay, France May 23-25, 2007 Work performed.
NEAR DETECTOR SPECTRA AND FAR NEAR RATIOS Amit Bashyal August 4, 2015 University of Texas at Arlington 1.
Update on RF parameters A.Lachaize11 th HPPS design meeting04/09/13.
April 17, Dejan TrbojevicFFAG07 -Non-Scaling FFAG gantries1 Non-Scaling FFAG Gantries Introduction: Motives: The most challenging problem in the carbon/proton.
Production of coherent X-rays with a free electron laser based on optical wiggler A.Bacci, M.Ferrario*, C. Maroli, V.Petrillo, L.Serafini Università e.
ILC Positron Production and Capturing Studies: Update Wei Gai, Wanming Liu and Kwang-Je Kim ILC GDE Meeting DESY May 30 – Jun2, 2007 Work performed for.
Update on Systems Modeling and Analyses
Target Gain Curves for Systems Modeling*

J.B. Rosenzweig and Scott Anderson UCLA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update*
Jeff Latkowski and Wayne Meier
Simulations for the LCLS Photo-Injector C
Study of coherent c.s. dependence on Energy, what was done
Presentation transcript:

Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Driver Model Update* ARIES IFE Meeting LLNL March 8-9, 2001 * This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by the University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. W-7405-Eng-48.

Modifications have been made to the heavy ion driver systems code More design parameters can be varied in a single run to allow more rapid parameter scans – added these: –E = total driver energy, MJ –A = ion mass, amu –T f = final ion energy, eV –  min = minimum pulse duration in accelerator section, s –  f = final pulse duration on target after drift compression, s Previously, the above were fixed for a given calculation Unit costs for near-term (IRE) and long-term (power plant driver) cases have been added

HI driver cost vs driver energy for two different ions and target types R_spot = 1.7 mm typical of close-coupled targets R_spot = 2.7 mm typical of full sized target

Likely operating space for heavy ion targets Y = 500 MJ Y = 300 MJ Full size target Close-coupled target Beam spot size (mm) Plot shows target gain curves for 1) fixed case-to-capsule ratio (red) for close-coupled and full sized designs, 2) fixed target yield (green) ranging from MJ, and 3) fixed beam spot size (avg.) on target (blue) ranging from mm.

What does it take to get small spot size? Driver example: Cs +1 (A = 133), E = 5 MJ, T f = 2.25 GeV –2 mm spot gives G ~ 100, Y ~ 500 MJ Following design variables are examined (reference case values in parenthesis) –Initial pulse duration (15  s) –Number of beams (96) –Final normalized emittance (2 mm-mrad) –Neutralization fraction prior to final focus (98%) –Final focus length (6 m) –Final focus half angle (9 mrad) R spot = 1.9 mm for the reference case values

… many beams and short initial pulse duration Note: driver cost optimizes at about 100 beams mm

… control of beam emittance growth and high neutralization fraction at final focus mm

… short final focus length and careful choice of final focus half angle mm

Relationship between number of beams, emittance and neutralization for a given spot size Number of beams Final normalized emittance (transverse), mm-mrad Neutralization: 90% 95% 98% Example:  n = 2 mm-mrad f n = 98% neutralization requires ~ 80 beams Assumes Cs +1 Ed = 5 MJ Rspot = 2.0 mm  P/P = 0.1%

Next steps for HIF systems modeling (LLNL) Improve spot size model to include emittance growth and chromatic aberrations as a function of number of half-lattice periods (from John Barnard) Create simplified driver cost and efficiency scaling model from results of detailed code Put HYLIFE-II and Osiris cost models into Mathcad Combine gain curve, simplified driver, spot size, and chamber cost models to create a new power plant model