25 9. Direct reactions - for example direct capture: Direct transition from initial state |a+A> to final state <f| (some state in B) a + A -> B +  geometrical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutron-induced Reactions
Advertisements

? Nuclear Reactions Categorization of Nuclear Reactions
Basic Nuclear Properties
Stellar Structure Section 5: The Physics of Stellar Interiors Lecture 11 – Total pressure: final remarks Stellar energy sources Nuclear binding energy.
Energy Consumption Fossil Fuel Contribution to Global Energy Demand Year.
Physics of Fusion Lecture 1: The basics Lecturer: A.G. Peeters.
Natural Broadening From Heisenberg's uncertainty principle: The electron in an excited state is only there for a short time, so its energy cannot have.
Microscopic time-dependent analysis of neutrons transfers at low-energy nuclear reactions with spherical and deformed nuclei V.V. Samarin.
Neutron interaction with matter 1) Introduction 2) Elastic scattering of neutrons 3) Inelastic scattering of neutrons 4) Neutron capture 5) Other nuclear.
RFSS: Lecture 9 Nuclear Reactions
Monday, Nov. 11, 2013PHYS , Fall 2013 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #17 Monday, Nov. 11, 2013 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Alpha Particle.
1 Fusion enhancement due to energy spread of colliding nuclei* 1. Motivation: anomalous electron screening or what else ? 2. Energy spread  fusion enhancement.
 -decay theory.  -particle penetration through Coulomb Barrier Goal: estimate the parent lifetime for  -decay Assume an  -particle is formed in the.
Astrophysical Reaction Rate for the Neutron-Generator Reaction 13 C(α,n) in Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars Eric Johnson Department of Physics Florida State.
Astrophysical S(E)-factor of the 15 N(p,α) 12 C reaction at sub-Coulomb energies via the Trojan-horse method Daniel Schmidt, Liberty University Cyclotron.
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
15 N Zone 8 Zone 1 Zone 28 p Zone 1 Zone O Zone 1 Zone 4 Zone 8 Zone N 16 O p Reaction rates are used to determine relative abundance of elements.
Week 11 Lecture 27 Monday, Oct 30, 2006 NO CLASS : DPF06 conference Lecture 28 Wednesday, Nov 1, 2006 GammaDecaysGammaDecays Lecture 29 Friday, Nov 3,
Introduction to stellar reaction rates Nuclear reactions generate energy create new isotopes and elements Notation for stellar rates: p 12 C 13 N  12.
Introduction to stellar reaction rates

12C(p,g)13N g III. Nuclear Reaction Rates 12C 13N Nuclear reactions
Higher Order Multipole Transition Effects in the Coulomb Dissociation Reactions of Halo Nuclei Dr. Rajesh Kharab Department of Physics, Kurukshetra University,
P461 - nuclear decays1 General Comments on Decays Use Fermi Golden rule (from perturbation theory) rate proportional to cross section or 1/lifetime the.
Astrophysical S(E)-factor of the 15N(p,α)12C reaction at sub-Coulomb energies via the Trojan-horse method Daniel Schmidt, Liberty University Cyclotron.
Nuclear de-excitation Outline of approach… Source of radiation Propagation of radiation field Detection of radiation ?? nucleus.
Reminder n Please return Assignment 1 to the School Office by 13:00 Weds. 11 th February (tomorrow!) –The assignment questions will be reviewed in next.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Reactions Categorization of Nuclear Reactions According to: bombarding.
Resonant Reactions The energy range that could be populated in the compound nucleus by capture of the incoming projectile by the target nucleus is for.
Pierre Descouvemont Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium The 12 C(  ) 16 O reaction: dreams and nightmares theoretical introduction.
1 III. Nuclear Reaction Rates Nuclear reactions generate energy create new isotopes and elements Notation for stellar rates: p 12 C 13 N  12 C(p,  )
Measuring (n, ɣ) cross sections of the r-process Lothar Buchmann TRIUMF.
Lecture 10 Energy production. Summary We have now established three important equations: Hydrostatic equilibrium: Mass conservation: Equation of state:
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
Lecture 5: Electron Scattering, continued... 18/9/2003 1
Nuclear Astrophysics Lecture 7 Mon. Dec. 1, 2011 Prof. Shawn Bishop, Office 2013, Ex
W. Udo Schröder, 2007 Semi-Classical Reaction Theory 1.
Coupled-Channel Computation of Direct Neutron Capture and (d,p) reactions on Non- Spherical Nuclei Goran Arbanas (ORNL) Ian J. Thompson (LLNL) with Filomena.
Cross section for potential scattering
Gamma and Beta Decay Basics
Α - capture reactions using the 4π γ-summing technique Α. Lagoyannis Institute of Nuclear Physics, N.C.S.R. “Demokritos”
University of Victoria Astr 501 Matt Penrice
One-proton Breakup of 24 Si and the 23 Al( p, γ ) 24 Si Reaction in Type I X-ray Bursts How can we measure capture cross-sections for 23 Al(p,γ) 24 Si.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Reactions Sample.
Cross Sections One of the most important quantities we measure in nuclear physics is the cross section. Cross sections always have units of area and in.
Nuclear Level Density 1.What we know, what we do not know, and what we want to know 2.Experimental techniques to study level densities, what has been done.
Lecture 16: Beta Decay Spectrum 29/10/2003 (and related processes...) Goals: understand the shape of the energy spectrum total decay rate sheds.
Atoms in stellar atmospheres are excited and ionized primarily by collisions between atoms/ions/electrons (along with a small contribution from the absorption.
Conception of cross section 1) Base conceptions – differential, integral cross section, total cross section, geometric interpretation of cross section.
What temperature would provide a mean kinetic energy of 0.5 MeV? By comparison, the temperature of the surface of the sun  6000 K.
Lecture 12: The neutron 14/10/ Particle Data Group entry: slightly heavier than the proton by 1.29 MeV (otherwise very similar) electrically.
Nuclear Reactors, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Physics at BAU This course
Nucleon DIffusion in Heavy-Ion Collisions
Effects Of Distortion On Trojan Horse Applications Rosario Gianluca Pizzone INFN – Laboratori Nazionali del Sud Catania.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1.
A. Dokhane, PHYS487, KSU, 2008 Chapter1- Neutron Reactions 1 NEWS Lecture1: Chapter 0 is already on my Website.
Laboratory system and center of mass system
Relativistic Kinematics for the Binding Energy of Nuclear Reactions
M. Sc Physics, 3rd Semester
The Strong Force: NN Interaction
PHL424: α-decay Why α-decay occurs?
Open quantum systems.
12C(p,)13N Nuclear Reaction Rates  12C 13N Nuclear reactions
Elastic Scattering in Electromagnetism
PHL424: γ-decay γ-decay is an electromagnetic process where the nucleus decreases in excitation energy, but does not change proton or neutron numbers This.
Constraints on Nuclear Fusion Reactions
Parametrisation of Binding Energies
Chapter 4 Mechanisms and Models of Nuclear Reactions
Nuclear Decays Unstable nuclei can change N,Z.A to a nuclei at a lower energy (mass) If there is a mass difference such that energy is released, pretty.
PHL424: α-decay Why α-decay occurs?
Presentation transcript:

25 9. Direct reactions - for example direct capture: Direct transition from initial state |a+A> to final state <f| (some state in B) a + A -> B +  geometrical factor (deBroglie wave length of projectile - “size” of projectile) Interaction matrix element Penetrability: probability for projectile to reach the target nucleus for interaction. Depends on projectile Angular momentum l and Energy E III.25

26 Penetrability: 2 effects that can strongly reduce penetrability: 1. Coulomb barrier V r R Coulomb Barrier V c Potential for a projectile with Z 2 and a nucleus with Z 1 or Example: 12 C(p,  ) V C = 3 MeV Typical particle energies in astrophysics are kT=1-100 keV ! Therefore, all charged particle reaction rates in nuclear astrophysics occur way below the Coulomb barrier – fusion is only possible through tunneling

27 2. Angular momentum barrier Incident particles can have orbital angular momentum L p d Classical: Momentum p Impact parameter d In quantum mechanics the angular momentum of an incident particle can have discrete values: With l = 0 l = 1 l = 2 s-wave p-wave d-wave … For radial motion (with respect to the center of the nucleus), angular momentum conservation (central potential !) leads to an energy barrier for non zero angular momentum. Classically, if considering the radial component of the motion, d is decreasing, which requires an increase in momentum p and therefore in energy to conserve L. And parity of the wave function: (-1) l

28  reduced mass of projectile-target system Peaks again at nuclear radius (like Coulomb barrier) Energy E of a particle with angular momentum L (still classical) Similar here in quantum mechanics: Or in MeV using the nuclear radius and mass numbers of projectile A 1 and target A 2 :

Direct reactions – the simplest case: s-wave neutron capture No Coulomb or angular momentum barriers: V l =0 V C =0 But, change in potential still causes reflection – even without a barrier Recall basic quantum mechanics: Incoming wave transmitted wave Reflected wave Potential Transmission proportional to s-wave capture therefore always dominates at low energies

30 Example: 7 Li(n,  ) Penetrability Therefore, for direct s-wave neutron capture: Cross section (use Eq. III.19): Or ~1/v Deviation from 1/v due to resonant contribution thermal cross section =45.4 mb (see Pg. 27)

31 Why s-wave dominated ? Level scheme: Li 7 Li + n / /2 +  Entrance channel 7 Li + n : 3/2  + 1/2  + l (-1) = 1 , 2  Exit channel 8 Li +  Recall: Photon angular momentum/parity depend on multiploarity: For angular momentum L (=multipolarity) electric transition EL parity (-1) L magnetic transition ML parity (-1) L+1 Angular momentum and parity conservation: ( l =0 for s-wave ) ? (photon spin/parity) l

32 Also recall: E.M. Transition strength increases: for lower L for E over M for higher energy Entrance channel 7 Li + n : 3/2  + 1/2  + l (-1) = 1 , 2  Exit channel 8 Li +  ( l =0 for s-wave ) 2  + 1  = 1 , 2 , 3  E1 photon lowest EL that allows to fulfill conservation laws match possible Same for 1 + state “At low energies 7 Li(n,  ) is dominated by (direct) s-wave E1 capture”.

33 Stellar reaction rate for s-wave neutron capture: Because Thermal neutron cross section: Many neutron capture cross sections have been measured at reactors using a “thermal” (room temperature) neutron energy distribution at T= K (20 0 C), kT=25.3 meV The measured cross section is an average over the neutron flux spectrum  (E) used: (all Lab energies) For a thermal spectrum so

34 Why is a flux of thermalized particles distributed as ? The number density n of particles in the beam is Maxwell Boltzmann distributed BUT the flux is the number of neutrons hitting the target per second and area. This is a current density j = n * v therefore The cross section is averaged over the neutron flux (the number of neutrons hitting the target for each energy bin) because that is what determines the event rate. This is the same situation in the center of a star. The number density of particles is M.B. distributed, but the number of particles passing through an area per second is distributed, and so is the stellar reaction rate !

35 For s-wave neutron capture (which is generally the only capture mechanism for room temperature neutrons) one can relate the thermal cross section to the actual cross section value at the energy kT with (most frequent velocity, corresponding to E CM =kT) for reactor neutrons (thermal neutrons) v T =2.20e5 cm/s and that’s usually tabulated as “thermal cross section” which is for example useful to read cross section graphs With these definitions one can show that the measured averaged cross section and the stellar reaction rate are related simply by

Direct reactions – neutron captures with higher orbital angular momentum For neutron capture, the only barrier is the angular momentum barrier The penetrability scales with and therefore the cross section (Eq III.19) for l>0 cross section decreases with decreasing energy (as there is a barrier present) Therefore, s-wave capture in general dominates at low energies, in particular at thermal energies. Higher l-capture usually plays only a role at higher energies. What “higher” energies means depends on case to case - sometimes s-wave is strongly suppressed because of angular momentum selection rules (as it would then require higher gamma-ray multipolarities)

37 Example: p-wave capture in 14 C(n,  ) 15 C (from Wiescher et al. ApJ 363 (1990) 340)

38 14 C+n 15 C /2 + 5/2 + Entrance channel: s-wave /2 + p-wave /2 + 1/2 - 3/2 - Exit channel ( 15 C +  ) E1 M1 E /2 - 3/2 - 1/2 + 3/2 + 3/2 + 5/2 +  total to 1/2 + total to 5/2 + 3/2 - 5/2 - 7/2 - 3/2 + 5/2 + 7/2 + 1/2 + 3/2 + 5/2 + 7/2 + 9/2 + Why p-wave ? ll 14 C n total strongest ! strongest possible Exit multipole into 1/2 + into 5/2 + M1 E2 E1 despite of higher barrier, for relevant energies (1-100 keV) p-wave E1 dominates. At low energies, for example thermal neutrons, s-wave still dominates. But here for example, the thermal cross section is exceptionally low (<1  b limit known)

39 This depends on cross section shape and temperature: s-wave n-capture: What is the energy range the cross section needs to be known to determine the stellar reaction rate for n-capture ? Example: kT=10 keV M.B. distribution  (E)  (E)  (E)  (E) E = E 1/2 exp(-E/kT) relevant for stellar reaction rate of the order of KT (somewhat lower than MB distribution)

40 p-wave n-capture: Example: kT=10 keV M.B. distribution  (E)  (E)  (E)  (E) E = E 3/2 exp(-E/kT) relevant for stellar reaction rate of the order of KT (close to MB distribution)

The concept of the astrophysical S-factor (for n-capture) recall: III.25 “trivial” strong energy dependence “real” nuclear physics weak energy dependence (for direct reactions !) S-factor concept: write cross section as strong “trivial” energy dependence X weakly energy dependent S-factor The S-factor can be easier graphed easier fitted and tabulated easier extrapolated and contains all the essential nuclear physics Note: There is no “universally defined S-factor - the S-factor definition depends on P l (E) and therefore on the type of reaction and the dominant l-value !!!

42 For neutron capture with strong s-wave dominance with corrections. Then define S-factor S(E) and expand S(E) around E=0 as powers of withdenoting in practice, these are tabulated fitted parameters typical S(E) units with this definition: barn MeV 1/2

43 and for the astrophysical reaction rate (after integrating over the M.B. distribution) of course for pure s-wave capture for pure s-wave capture the S-factor is entirely determined by the thermal cross section measured with room temperature reactor neutrons: using one finds (see Pg. 35)

44 For neutron capture that is dominated by p-wave, such as 14 C(p,  ) one can define a p-wave S-factor: which leads to a relatively constant S-factor because of or (typical unit for S(E) is then barn/MeV 1/2 ) S-factor

Charged particle induced direct reactions again but now incoming particle has to overcome Coulomb barrier. Therefore (for example proton capture - such as 12 C(p,  ) in CN cycle) incoming projectile Z 1 A 1 (for example proton or  particle) target nucleus Z 2 A 2 with (from basic quantum mechanical barrier transmission coefficient) 9.3.1Cross section and S-factor definition

46 so the main energy dependence of the cross section (for direct reactions !) is given by therefore the S-factor for charged particle reactions is defined via So far this all assumed s-wave capture. However, the additional angular momentum barrier leads only to a roughly constant addition to this S-factor that strongly decreases with l Therefore, the S-factor for charged particle reactions is defined independently of the orbital angular momentum typical unit for S(E): keV barn

47 Given here is the partial proton width R=nuclear radius  reduced width (matrix element) (from Rolfs & Rodney)

48 Example: 12 C(p,  ) cross section need cross section here !

49 Need rate about here S-Factor: From the NACRE compilation of charged particle induced reaction rates on stable nuclei from H to Si (Angulo et al. Nucl. Phys. A 656 (1999) 3

Relevant cross section - Gamov Window for charged particle reactions Gamov Peak Note: relevant cross section in tail of M.B. distribution, much larger than kT (very different from n-capture !)

51 The Gamov peak can be approximated with a Gaussian centered at energy E 0 and with 1/e width  E Then, the Gamov window or the range of relevant cross section can be easily calculated using: with A “reduced mass number” and T 9 the temperature in GK

52 Example: Note: kT=2.5 keV !

Reaction rate from S-factor Often (for example with theoretical reaction rates) one approximates the rate calculation by assuming the S-factor is constant over the Gamov WIndow S(E)=S(E 0 ) then one finds the useful equation: Equation III.53 (A reduced mass number !)

54 better (and this is often done for experimental data) one expands S(E) around E=0 as powers of E to second order: If one integrates this over the Gamov window, one finds that one can use Equation III.46 when replacing S(E 0 ) with the effective S-factor S eff with and E 0 as location of the Gamov Window (see Pg. 51)