Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May 2009. Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Goals Just Arent Enough: Strategies for Putting Learning Outcomes into Words Dr. Jill L. Lane Research Associate/Program Manager Schreyer Institute.
Advertisements

Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Information Systems (CIS) CIP Code: Program Code: 411.
For AS 229 (Environmental Technology). 1. A competent environmental technologist with strong understanding of fundamental scientific and technological.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
Dr Jim Briggs Masterliness Not got an MSc myself; BA DPhil; been teaching masters students for 18 years.
Good Afternoon Program Assessment Committee (PAC) Data Assessment Records and Analysis For the first three year Cycle Semesters Dr. Hussain Al-Zaher.
Cyber Education Project Accreditation Committee November 2014.
© Copyright CSAB 2013 Future Directions for the Computing Accreditation Criteria Report from CAC and CSAB Joint Criteria Committee Gayle Yaverbaum Barbara.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology ABET 1Advisory committee of
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
1. An ability to:  Understand the academic requirements you need to obtain your degree  Calculate your GPA  Prepare a draft schedule 2.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Assessment College of Engineering A Key for Accreditation February 11, 2009.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
OBE Briefing.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
BUSINESS INFORMATICS descriptors presentation Vladimir Radevski, PhD Associated Professor Faculty of Contemporary Sciences and Technologies (CST) Linkoping.
Learning outcomes for BUSINESS INFORMATCIS Vladimir Radevski, PhD Associated Professor Faculty of Contemporary Sciences and Technologies (CST)
GLOBAL ACCREDITATION TRENDS Russel C. Jones. Ph.D., P.E. World Expertise LLC USA and UAE.
Venue: M038 Date: Monday March 28,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.2 Guidelines on: IMapping of PEOs to Mission Statement IIMapping of SOs to PEOs.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluations during the Accreditation Cycle.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Supporting ABET Assessment and Continuous Improvement for Engineering Programs William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
MEDICAL EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT FIRST SEMESTER 2014/2015 Medical Equipment Department November 2015.
N ational Q ualifications F ramework N Q F Quality Center National Accreditation Committee.
Course File seminar NCAAA SSR Preparation (3rd dec 2015)
First week. Catalog Description This course explores basic cultural, social, legal, and ethical issues inherent in the discipline of computing. Students.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.
EXPERT SYSTEM WEEK 1. C ATALOG D ESCRIPTION Knowledge Acquisition techniques, Knowledge representation, Analysis and Design of an ES, Reasoning strategies,
UGSC: Undergraduate Studies Committee Haiyun Bian, Jay Dejongh, Travis Doom, Natsuhiko Futamura, Prabhaker Mateti *, Eric Matson, Karen Meyer, Michael.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Industry Advisory Board May 30 th, 2014
Accreditation of study programs at the Faculty of information technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
Advanced Database Course Syllabus 1 Advanced Database System Lecturer : H.Ben Othmen.
Computer Security Course Syllabus 1 Computer Security Lecturer : H.Ben Othmen.
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
Industry Advisory Board June 8 th, 2012
Using core competencies in curriculum design
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
College of Computer Science OBE Implementation on Curriculum Revisions
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Neeraj Mittal September 29, 2017
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Information Technology (IT)
Five-Year Undergraduate Enrollments
Assessment and Accreditation
Presentation transcript:

Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May 2009

Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation Work New Initiatives MS in Software Engineering MS in Information Security and Assurance BS in Information Technology Third IAC Meeting 20092

Update on CS Program Assessment Work Third IAC Meeting 20093

CS & SWE ABET Preparation The ABET self-study report for CS & SWE were prepared and sent to the ABET steering committee for feedback. ABET visit is expected in 091. Third IAC Meeting 20094

Review Program Educational Objectives Old program educational objectives 1-2 below were hard to assess. The new ones are much easier to assess. (New) Prepare graduates, who are entering immediately into professional practice upon graduation, to be capable of performing duties on an entry-level computing-related position. (Old) Critically analyze and apply a range of concepts, principles, and practices in net-centric computing, information management, or intelligent systems; showing a range of problem solving skills and effective judgment in the selection and use of corresponding tools and techniques. (New) Prepare graduates to pursue graduate studies to successfully complete an advanced degree. (Old) Demonstrate a sound understanding of the main areas of the body of knowledge and the theories of computer science, with an ability to exercise critical judgment across a range of related issues. Third IAC Meeting 20095

Review Program Educational Objectives (Cont.) New program educational objectives 3-5 below are exactly similar to the old ones, but with rewording so that they are all consistent. (New) Prepare graduates to work as individuals with minimum guidance and as leaders or members of a team. (Old) Demonstrate the ability to work as an individual with minimum guidance and as a leader/member of a team. (New) Prepare graduates to follow appropriate practices within a professional, legal, and ethical framework. (Old) Follow appropriate practices within a professional, legal, and ethical framework. (New) Prepare graduates to recognize the need for and be capable of pursuing life-long learning. (Old) Identify mechanisms for continuing professional development and life-long learning. Third IAC Meeting 20096

CS Program Educational Objectives 1. Prepare graduates, who are entering immediately into professional practice upon graduation, to be capable of performing duties on an entry-level computing-related position. 2. Prepare graduates to pursue graduate studies to successfully complete an advanced degree. 3. Prepare graduates to work as individuals with minimum guidance and as leaders or members of a team. 4. Prepare graduates to follow appropriate practices within a professional, legal, and ethical framework. 5. Prepare graduates to recognize the need for and be capable of pursuing life-long learning. Third IAC Meeting 20097

Program Learning Outcomes (OLD) Knowledge in major: Graduates will be able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of essential facts, concepts, principles, and theories relating to computational processes and systems. Modeling: Graduates will be able to use the acquired knowledge and understanding in the modeling and design of computational processes and systems in a way that demonstrates comprehension of the tradeoff involved in design choices. Problem solving: Graduates will be able to identify and analyze criteria and specifications appropriate to specific problems, and plan and design strategies for their solution. Critical evaluation and testing: Graduates will be able to use quality models in analyzing the extent to which a computational process or a computational system meets the criteria defined for its current use and future development Methods and tools: Graduates will be able to employ appropriate methods and tools for the specification, design, implementation, and evaluation of computational processes and systems. Professional responsibility: Graduates will be able to recognize and be guided by the social, professional, legal, and ethical issues involved in the use and development of computer technology. Risk analysis: Graduates will be able to identify and assess different types of risk related to the development and management of computational processes and systems. Communication: Graduates will be able to express ideas persuasively, in written and oral form. Teamwork: Graduates will be able to work effectively as leader/member of a development team. Self management: Graduates will be able to manage their own learning and development, including time management and organizational skills Professional development: Graduates will be able to keep abreast of current developments in the discipline to continue their own professional development. Computing and society: Graduates will be able to understand the impact of computing solutions in a global and societal context. Third IAC Meeting 20098

Review Program Learning Outcomes Some program outcomes are hard to assess (e.g. Knowledge in Major) Some program outcomes are not really outcomes for the CS program (e.g. “Risk Analysis” and “Critical Evaluation and Testing”) In late 2007, ABET published it’s a-k program outcomes for Computing Programs. These outcomes did not include “Risk Analysis” and “Critical Evaluation and Testing”. Both outcomes were identified as weak when we assessed them earlier, before looking at ABET’s published outcomes. Therefore, the low assessment was due to the fact that they are not expected outcomes of our CS program. Hence, the CS Program Curriculum Committee decided to adopt the published ABET a-k outcomes as is. Third IAC Meeting 20099

Review Program Learning Outcomes (NEW) (Adopted As Is from Latest ABET Self Study Guide) a. An ability to apply knowledge of computing and mathematics appropriate to the discipline b. An ability to analyze a problem, and identify and define the computing requirements appropriate to its solution c. An ability to design, implement, and evaluate a computer-based system, process, component, or program to meet desired needs d. An ability to function effectively on teams to accomplish a common goal e. An understanding of professional, ethical, legal, security and social issues and responsibilities f. An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences g. An ability to analyze the local and global impact of computing on individuals, organizations, and society h. Recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in continuing professional development i. An ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice. j. An ability to apply mathematical foundations, algorithmic principles, and computer science theory in the modeling and design of computer-based systems in a way that demonstrates comprehension of the tradeoffs involved in design choices. k. An ability to apply design and development principles in the construction of software systems of varying complexity. Third IAC Meeting

CS Program Assessment Cycle Third IAC Meeting

Third IAC Meeting Program Learning Outcomes Assessment (Course Learning Outcomes Surveys)

Third IAC Meeting Update on SWE Program Assessment Work

ABET preparation and assessment Program objectives and outcomes have not changed Third IAC Meeting

Indirect measure values for each program learning outcome based on students survey Third IAC Meeting

CS & SWE Programs Assessment Plans Program Educational Objectives Third IAC Meeting Academic Year Semester Alumni Survey June 2009 June 2011 Employer Survey June 2011 Academic Year Semester Alumni Survey June 2013 June 2015 Employer Survey June 2015

New Initiatives

Graduate Programs in Software Engineering

New Graduate Programs in Software Engineering Two new masters in Software Engineering Master of Science in Software Engineering (MS. SWE) Course work and a thesis (thesis option) Full and part-time time graduate students. Master of Software Engineering (M. SWE) Consists of course work only (non-thesis option) Part-time graduate students only Third IAC Meeting

The Objectives of the programs M.S.SWE Prepare graduates with the necessary core skills based on the core body of knowledge in software engineering so that the individual can formulate research models and select the best solution to solve real world problem. M.SWE Develop future leaders of industrial software engineering practice – the future chief engineers, head designers, and principal technical officers of their companies. Third IAC Meeting

Graduate Programs in Information Security and Assurance

Importance of CSIA KSA ranked first in the GCC for online attacks, according to April 2009 report by Symantec Attacks are on the increase, and becoming very sophisticated Third IAC Meeting

New graduate programs in Information Security and Assurance (IS&A) Two new MS programs in IS&A Master of Science in Information Security and Assurance (MS.IS&A) Course work and a thesis (thesis option) Full and part-time time graduate students. Master of Information Security and Assurance (M.IS&A) consists of course work only (non-thesis option) Part-time graduate students only Third IAC Meeting

The Program Objective M.S.IS&A – Provide the needed leaders and professionals who will be capable of securing and protecting KSA cyber network and critical infrastructure from inside and outside threats and attacks that now face KSA and the GCC region. M.IS&A – Build the local experts and leaders of information security and assurance who will be responsible for building security solutions for the protection of the Saudi IT infrastructures Third IAC Meeting

Concentration Areas Applied Cryptography Network Security Computer Security Computer Forensics Information Security Secure Software Biometrics Third IAC Meeting

BS in Information Technology

Focuses on integrating information technology and business solutions to meet the needs of corporations and other institutions and enable them to achieve their objectives effectively and efficiently IT Program Objective Prepare graduates with the necessary IT skills based on the core body of knowledge in information technology recommended by professional societies so that the individual can be productive contributor to the local industry Third IAC Meeting

Third IAC Meeting Source:

Third IAC Meeting Source:

Third IAC Meeting Source:

Third IAC Meeting Source:

Third IAC Meeting Source:

Third IAC Meeting Source:

Thank you