Pan-STARRS and TGBN Paul Price Institute for Astronomy University of Hawaii.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Astrophysics with TPF-C David Spergel Princeton.
Advertisements

Bruce Gendre Osservatorio di Roma / ASI Science Data Center Recent activities from the TAROT/Zadko network.
Taiwan America Occultation Survey TAOS 2002/8/28 TAOS photometry using IRAF Shao-Er Chuang Department of Earth sciences, National Taiwan Normal University,
Pi of the Sky – preparation for GW Advance Detector Era Adam Zadrożny Wilga 2014.
Ultimate wide field Imaging: The Large Synoptic Sky Survey Marek Kowalski Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn.
Observational techniques meeting #5. Future surveys Narrow (pencil beam): HDF UDF GOODs Cosmos MCT JWST.
Intro P an- STARRS Moving Object Processing S ystem Robert Jedicke Institute for Astronomy University of Hawaii.
Tile or Stare? Optimal Search Strategies for GRBs and Afterglows Robert J. Nemiroff Michigan Technological University.
Growth of Structure Measurement from a Large Cluster Survey using Chandra and XMM-Newton John R. Peterson (Purdue), J. Garrett Jernigan (SSL, Berkeley),
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Existing Transient Surveys: Optical II: Robot Telescopes Geoff Bower.
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Extra Solar Planets Geoff Bower.
AURA 2 Sep Context  National Academy’s Decadal Review recommended a ‘large synoptic survey telescope’ (LSST) 6m class aperture –dedicated wide-field.
Jamie Holder School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, U.K Optical SETI at Leeds Using Cherenkov Light Buckets as Optical SETI Detectors RAS.
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Existing Transient Surveys: Optical I: Big Apertures Geoff Bower.
May stars be the actors and dark energy direct shoot a movie in the sky Chihway Chang Oct.8 ‘2008.
Detection of Terrestrial Extra-Solar Planets via Gravitational Microlensing David Bennett University of Notre Dame.
3rd Potsdam Thinkshop Robotic Astronomy Gamma-ray burst optical follow-ups with robotic telescopes M.I. Andersen Gamma-ray burst optical follow-ups with.
Pan-STARRS PY2 EOC Review #2 3 August 2004 U NIVERSITY OF H AWAII I NSTITUTE FOR A STRONOMY Approved for Public Release - Distribution is Unlimited 1 Astro.
1 HOT-WIRING THE TRANSIENT UNIVERSE | SANTA BARBARA, CA | MAY 12-15, 201 Name of Meeting Location Date - Change in Slide Master LSST Alert Production Pipelines.
NEO Research Project in Korea Wonyong Han 1, Yong-Ik Byun 2, Hong-Suh Yim 1, Young-Jun Choi 1, Hong-Kyu Moon 1 & NESS Team 1 Korea Astronomy and Space.
Memorandam of the discussion on FMOS observations and data kicked off by Ian Lewis Masayuki Akiyama 14 January 2004 FMOS Science Workshop.
22 February 2006 Quo Vadis ? Wide Field Imaging A Wide Angle Very Low Threshold Air Cherenkov Imaging Telescope Razmick Mirzoyan MPI Munich, Germany.
1 New Frontiers with LSST: leveraging world facilities Tony Tyson Director, LSST Project University of California, Davis Science with the 8-10 m telescopes.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
Wilga 2007 π of the Sky Full π system and simulation Janusz Użycki Faculty of Physics Warsaw University of Technology.
The Chinese SONG proposal: scientific concerns Jianning Fu (Beijing Normal University) and Chinese SONG team Beijing ─ March 29, 2010 The third workshop.
The Observations of LAMOST Jianrong Shi NAOC 1/
A goal of the LSST project is to capture the optical sky into a database so effectively that observing the database is a satisfactory, and even superior,
15 October Observational Astronomy Direct imaging Photometry Kitchin pp ,
A Search for Earth-size Planets Borucki – Page 1 Roger Hunter (Ames Research Center) & Kepler Team March 26, 2010.
Good UNM Telescopes and the Evil Atmosphere John McGraw.
Astrometry & the Yale/WIYN ODI Survey. Potential astrometric projects Local luminosity function (van Altena, et al.) obtain  ≤ 0.10 parallaxes to 150.
 of the Sky Innovative approach to GRB optical counterparts and other short optical transients detection Study of astrophysical phenomena with time scale.
Patrizia Ferrero 3rd Integral Bart Work Shop Chocerady - November 1-3, Fast dissemination of GRB afterglow information Patrizia Ferrero (IASF-BO,
AST3-1 photometry from Dome A Bin Ma, Peng Wei, Yi Hu, Zhaohui Shang NAOC AST3
Prospects for observing quasar jets with the Space Interferometry Mission Ann E. Wehrle Space Science Institute, La Canada Flintridge, CA, and Boulder,
Chinese- international collaboration solved the central question: ”How common are planets like the Earth”
2003 DPS KBO Workshop Program 1:00 - 1:10 Introductory comments - Asantha Cooray (Caltech) 1:10 - 1:30 Formation of KBOs and expectations for their size.
Initial Results from the Chandra Shallow X-ray Survey in the NDWFS in Boötes S. Murray, C. Jones, W. Forman, A. Kenter, A. Vikhlinin, P. Green, D. Fabricant,
1 The DES Calibrations Effort Douglas L. Tucker (DES Calibrations Scientist) DES NSF/DOE Review, 8-9 June 2009 The DES Calibrations Effort has connections.
1 Optical observations of asteroids – and the same for space debris… Dr. D. Koschny European Space Agency Chair of Astronautics, TU Munich Stardust school.
Wide Field Astronomy from Space Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute January 9, 2002.
The RAPTOR (RAPid Telescopes for Optical Response) telescopes and GeV/TeV gamma-ray astronomy vestrandAspen Meeting---Galactic GeV/TeV sources.
1 Imaging Surveys: Goals/Challenges May 12, 2005 Luiz da Costa European Southern Observatory.
From photons to catalogs. Cosmological survey in visible/near IR light using 4 complementary techniques to characterize dark energy: I. Cluster Counts.
Pan-STARRS and SNe Paul Price Institute for Astronomy University of Hawaii.
LSST and VOEvent VOEvent Workshop Pasadena, CA April 13-14, 2005 Tim Axelrod University of Arizona.
AROMA-W Ichiro Takahashi Takanori Sakamoto for the AROMA team (Aoyama Gakuin University)
Space Part 06, Beijing, China, April 21, Lobster-Eye (LE) Novel Wide Field X-ray Telescopes FOV of 100 sq. deg. and more easily possible (classical.
Pan-STARRS Seminar: IPPEugene Magnier Pan-STARRS Image Processing Pipeline An Overview IFA Pan-STARRS Seminar 735 October 6, 2004.
M. Pilar Esquej, XMM-Newton European Space Astronomy Centre Page 1 Status of the XMM-Newton Slew Survey P. Esquej, R. Saxton, B. Altieri, A. Read, M. Freyberg,
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Project Bob Mann LSST:UK Project Leader Wide-Field Astronomy Unit, Edinburgh.
Dynamic Andromeda: Novae and Variable Stars in M31 Yi Cao 2 nd year graduate at Caltech On Behalf of the Palomar Transient Factory collaboration.
25s detection of the Sy1 galaxy NGC3516 The Palermo BAT survey project Application to a sample of SDSS LINERs V. La Parola, A.Segreto, G. Cusumano, V.
Optical Astronomy with Cerenkov telescopes E. Oña-Wilhelmi 1,2, O.C. de Jager 1, J. Cortina 3, V. Fonseca 2 1 NWU, Potchefstroom, South Africa. 2 UCM,
MMT Observation Database for Light Curve Analysis Vladimir Agapov Presentation for the WG1 session 33rd IADC meeting, Houston.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
MPI Semiconductor Laboratory, The XEUS Instrument Working Group, PNSensor The X-ray Evolving-Universe Spectroscopy (XEUS) mission is under study by the.
A Search For Untriggered GRB Afterglows with ROTSE-III Eli Rykoff ROTSE Collaboration University of Michigan Santorini GRB Meeting September 2 nd, 2005.
Astronomy 3040 Astrobiology Spring_2016 Day-7. Homework -1 Due Monday, Feb. 8 Chapter 2: 1, 3, 16 23, 24, 26 29, 30, , 54, 56 The appendices will.
Z Equals Twenty from Antarctica Lifan Wang. 宇宙学 Type Ia SNe at Maximum.
Pan-STARRS observational requirements specification.
T. Axelrod, NASA Asteroid Grand Challenge, Houston, Oct 1, 2013 Improving NEO Discovery Efficiency With Citizen Science Tim Axelrod LSST EPO Scientist.
V. Agapov, N. Sakva, D.Davydov, E.Katkova
DEEP LENS SURVEY Long term dual hemisphere campaign
C.Baltay and S. Perlmutter December 15, 2014
Frequency of Mature Planets orbiting neighboring stars
Observational Prospect of NIREBL
Multi-Messenger Astronomy with Subaru II
Observational Astronomy
Presentation transcript:

Pan-STARRS and TGBN Paul Price Institute for Astronomy University of Hawaii

Pan-STARRS ● Panoramic Survey Telescope And Rapid Response System ● A fore-runner to the LSST, funded by AFRL ● A dedicated optical survey instrument, 54 m 2 deg 2 ● Collaboration between: – IfA – MHPCC: Data processing – SAIC: Databases – MITLL: Detectors ● Prototype (PS1) operational in 2006

Optics ● 4 x 1.8m telescopes, f/4, 7 deg 2 FoV, ADC option ●  = 4 x 13.5 m 2 deg 2 – MEGACAM, SuPrimeCam ~ 8 m 2 deg 2 ● Filters: grizy, w = g+r+i

Detector News Front side OTA Focal plane scale and controller Test Camera 1 Clocking in a 32x32 square

OT CCDs M13 I band 300 sec Telescope guiding only With OT tracking 0.59" FWHM psf 0.45" FWHM psf 7 Hz frame rate

Image Reduction ● 4 Gpix / 32 sec --> 10 TB raw data per night, 3 PB per year ● Process data in near-real time (30-60 sec each): – Bias, flat-field, fringe, sky-subtraction – Map individual images to static sky representation – Combine individual images from each telescope – Subtract static sky and identify transients – Add to static sky ● Desire is to create a flexible system that can be used to reduce other mosaic data Sky B,FF,F,SS,Warp,Add + - Identify transients

Data Products ● Instrumental catalogues – Instrumental magnitudes, coordinates – For precision astrometry/photometry – Postage stamps of bright objects ● Cumulative static sky images – Signal + exposure maps – Best + working + compressed intermediate saves ● Static sky catalogues – Includes time history of object magnitudes ● Difference image detection stream ● Recent (~1 month) source and difference images

Pan-STARRS 1

Replacement of LURE MAGNUM Dome Currently being replaced by University of Tokyo (at increased height) LURE Dome - To be Replaced by IceStorm Enclosure housing PS1 Telescope Service Building To be Refurbished LURE building To be Demolished (excavated to rock)

LURE and MAGNUM

LURE replaced with PS1

Enclosure Overview (Perspective) Level 3 : Observing Floor Mirror Cart / Camera Cart Rails 1200mm wide Access Door to Level 1 : Equipment / Rack Room (door not shown) Service Balcony Access Stair Access Balcony Level 2 : Floor below Ground Level : Storage

hdmy33 1.0d 0.2b SS KBO d28 0.5d 0.7b Ultra Deep d d 0.9b Med. Deep d33 1.3d 2.5b 33 min d 0.8b Var h/d/m d 0.2b SS NEO YzirB/gSSCad.AreaPSYMode 5-  limit (AB) Total int. (min) PS4 Survey Modes ● 7 deg 2, 30 sec integrations --> 6000 deg 2 /night, or visible sky thrice per lunation to R ~ 24 mag

Rate Estimates (1): Inputs ● N Trans ~ R Trans. FoV. t proj. .  – R trans is the rate of transients per square degree per day – FoV is the field of view – t proj is the amount of time spent on the project –  is the observing efficiency –  = max(1, min(N fields, t dur /t exp )) is the temporal multiplex: we don't miss events going off in other fields if the duration of the event (t dur ) is longer than the time between exposures (t exp ) ● Note: this does not include brightness distribution

Rate Estimates (2): Orphans ● Assume: – 2 GRBs/day over 4  (BATSE) – Jet correction of 500 (Frail et al.) – Dark burst fraction of 50% – 30 sec exposures, 2 sec readout – Duration of orphan afterglow brighter than limiting magnitude (R ~ 24 mag) is ~ 1 day, so big multiplex – Observe each field twice per night (SS survey) ● Expect ~ 20 per night

Rate Estimates (3): DLS Transients ● Assume: – R Trans = 1.4 / ˚/ day (Becker et al.) – 30 sec exposures reach sufficient depth (R ~ 24 mag) – Transient timescale is ~ 1000 sec (Becker et al.) so decent multiplex (~30) ● Expect about 120 per night ● Why haven't we seen any with CFHTLS? – FoV (1 ˚ --> 7 ˚ ) – Multiplex (1 --> 30) – Not looking at individual exposures?

Solution: Campaigns ● Not piggy-backing off other surveys, but targeted campaigns designed to detect transients (multiplex!) ● Strong synergy with solar system science, stellar variability ● IfA Variability Survey: – CFHT+MegaCam – Ecliptic field, galaxy cluster – Cycle between four fields over 4 hours – 4 runs gives same sky exposure as DLS

Real-time classification? ● Weed out asteroids by proper motion – PSF shape – Nearby detections in previous images ● Previous variable detections at the same position should give variable stars and AGNs ● Inspect static sky for quiescent source – Point source? – Colours ● No colour information for transient ● Do we need a slaved follow-up telescope

Looking Ahead ● 1: Regular detection of transients – Would like to have ~ 10 detections by end 2006 ● Light curve taxonomy ● Measure rate with good precision; luminosity function ● Search for and study quiescent sources ● 2: Real-time detection system – Feed positions to robotic telescopes ● Better time resolution of light curves ● Colours? ● 3: False positive discrimination – Inspection of static sky, real-time feedback? – Can start to throw in large telescopes in real time ● Spectroscopy of the transient