Alec Habig, UMD, for the SNEWS group SNEWS – The Supernova Early Warning System Light from a core-collapse Supernova will not escape from star until the shock wave breaks out through the photosphere. But star is transparent to within ms after the formation of the neutron star so precede photons by the time it takes the shock to traverse the radius of the star, hours of advance notice of the impending SN – if you can see the Many experiments sensitive to  from nearby SN (in our galaxy) (expected rates below for kpc) Super-Kamiokande (Japan) 50kton Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (Canada) 1.7kton H 2 O, 1kton D 2 O (Mini-BooNE, KamLAND, Borexino, LIGO also sensitive to nearby SN but not yet sending alarms to SNEWS) 7000 inv.  decay, 410 on 16 O, 300 elast. scattering, 4 o pointing 710 inv.  decay, H breakup, 45 elast. scattering, 17 o pointing Server 10s coincidence window alarms to astronomers and experimenters SSL sockets PGP signed SNEWS is a coincidence network between these experiments’ own SN alarm triggers Goal – eliminate possible false alarms which occur in an individual experiment due to local conditions A real SN will be observed ~simultaneously in all! Removing the need to have a shiftworker manually vette alarms allows automated, fast alert to take advantage of lead time Will allow observation of the next nearby SN from times near zero HST Target of Opportunity time allocated, an example of a pre-prepared observing plan to exploit this information Bonus – this existing collaboration between experiments allows the coordination of downtime between experiments, to help ensure someone somewhere is live for supernova at any given time Bonus #2 – experiments can send “Gold”, no-doubt alarms, or “silver” alarms which might have some problems (during calibration or maintenance runs, for example). If a coincidence is formed due to “Silver” alarms, the alert does not go to the world, but back to the experiments so the operators can verify things (and upgrade to a Gold alarm if appropriate) This is some comfort to experimenters, after all Murphy’s Law says that the next SN will come when you’re not ready for it SN 1987A was seen by previous expts. SNEWS supported by NSF grants # and # Coincidence server securely hosted by Brookhaven National Lab Given that the best pointing information is from elastic scattering, leaving a search field of many square degrees at best, how will observers find the new Supernova to take advantage of the early alert and get observations from the earliest possible epoch? One avenue is high energy satellites with all-sky capability, a alert will let them prepare. Shock breakout should produce a strong UV/X-ray transient. SNEWS will tie into GCN soon in order to make this easier. Another – Amateur astronomers have many eyes, wide angle instruments, and intimate knowledge of the sky Sky & Telescope and the AAVSO have experience in coordinating amateur efforts On Feb , a carefully labeled test message was sent: This Sky & Telescope AstroAlert is being issued [as a test] in support of the SuperNova Early Warning System (SNEWS). We seek your assistance in pinpointing the location of a possible supernova explosion. Neutrino detectors give the target‘s approximate coordinates (equinox ) in the constellation Bootes, as follows: Right ascension: 13h 38m Declination: +8.1 degrees Uncertainty radius: 13 degrees Expected magnitude: unknown Please check this region of the sky as soon as possible using your naked eyes, binoculars, a telescope, or a camera. You are looking for a starlike point of light... Vesta (mag 6.7) was at a stationary point in its retrograde loop in the given error box –Not a regular star, not moving It worked, given the small statistics of those wishing to participate in a known test – –~90 responses, all over the world, wide variety of instruments –70% of people got the alert within 8 hours (a dozen right away) –Given time of day and weather, many found Vesta, and had good search strategies –Will do more such tests, for practice and to maintain interest Looking for ~1 SN/century, cannot tolerate more false alarms than SNe False Alarms are Poissonian, uncorrelated. If rate is at most 1/10days /expt, (for 2 of 4 coincidence), above is the false coincidence rate 2001 “high rate test” using artificially lowered experimental thresholds confirms Poissonian, uncorrelated nature of the alarms and coincidence network All alarm data normally kept confidential, internal to the SNEWS server Summary SNEWS operational, waiting for galactic supernova Four participating experiments at present Adding others as their SN triggers mature Sign up for your own once-per-career galactic supernova alert: What would you do with ~hours warning of a supernova? See astro-ph/ (New J.Phys. 6, 114) for far more details about SNEWS than fit on a poster and references How to pin down SN location? Sign up yourself to receive an alert at: LVD (Italy) 1kton Liquid scint ~300 e ~ 12 MeV ~ 15 MeV ~ 18 MeV AMANDA (South Pole) 1.6kt ice/PMT, 667 PMTs ~16  singles rate increase In final SNEWS test phase GCN alert (coming soon!)