Alternate Accountability Understanding the Alternate Accountability Process in Wisconsin June 2015 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding the North Carolina School Report Card.
Advertisements

Rules and Legislation Regarding A-F Report Cards June 2013 Jennifer Stegman, Program Manager CTB.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Kentucky Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Kentucky is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Tennessee Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Tennessee is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
Burton Secondary EOC/STAAR Data INDEX 1 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STARR SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE All Students=3-8 grades spring administration.
School Performance Framework (SPF). Purpose of SPF The School Performance Framework (SPF) is a comprehensive system to help schools focus on strengths.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
1 Wisconsin Alternate Accountability Webinar Agenda: What schools participate in the Alternate Accountability process? Completing the Alternate Accountability.
Understanding Wisconsin’s New School Report Card.
ILLUMINATING COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS State Report Cards for Districts and Schools.
LOUISIANA 1 Goals for Education Challenge to Lead 2003 Louisiana.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.
1 Assessment Overview Ohio Department of Education Center for Curriculum & Assessment.
September 11,  Measurements of Student Progress (MSP) ◦ Reading and math were tested every year in grades 3 through 8. ◦ Writing was tested in.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.
A Closer Look at Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski Conference.
Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals National Network of State School Improvement.
We are a Title I school What does this mean?. We are Title I because… Our school has a high number of students who are eligible for Free and Reduced Price.
1 Educator Evaluation Overview Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
Lazbuddie ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Presenter: David Curd Database Analyst IT Kentucky Department of Education Division of Assessment Design and Implementation 1.
Castle / Kahuku Complex Area Support Team (CK CAST) Phase I Professional Development
October 25, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
AMOs 101 Understanding Annual Measurable Objectives Office of Educational Accountability Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2012.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
1.  Developed to meet the criteria set by the Learning Community and OPS Assessment Steering Committee  Developed as a measure to monitor student progress.
Our State. Our Students. Our Success. DRAFT. Nevada Department of Education Goals Goal 1 All students are proficient in reading by the end of 3 rd grade.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Legislative Requirement 2013 House File 215. Category Cut Scores Based on a Normal Distribution across Measures.
Communication Webinar:
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
Legislative Requirement 2013
Performance Goals Samples (Please note, these goals are not proficient- they are for training purposes) What do you think?
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Future ready PA Index Update 5/23/17.
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Local Growth Models for Accountability
Bennett County School District
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Mark Baxter Texas Education Agency
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
New Statewide Accountability System
Sonoraville Elementary School
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
Pennsylvania’s ESSA Submitted Plan Review
Every Student Succeeds Act Update
Meeting the challenge Every Classroom Every Student Every Day
Texas Education Agency Standards and Engagement Performance Reporting
District Assessment Report
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Presentation transcript:

Alternate Accountability Understanding the Alternate Accountability Process in Wisconsin June

Alternate Accountability is a district- supervised self-evaluation process in which schools report and evaluate their performance in three priority areas. 2 What is Alternate Accountability

Schools evaluate their performance in these priority areas: raising student achievement in reading, mathematics, and in preparing students to be on-track for success. What is Alternate Accountability 3

These priority areas align to those found in the School Report Cards, but also fulfill federal accountability requirements from the US Department of Education (ED). 4 What is Alternate Accountability

5 Who Participates Schools with fewer than 20 full academic year (FAY) students tested in grades 3-8, and 11 Schools without tested grades, such as K-2 schools Schools exclusively serving at-risk students Schools that were new in the school year

6 What Data are Used Schools may use local data and indicators of their choice to gauge student progress in the priority areas.

7 What Data are Used New schools that do not have data from a prior year should select an indicator that can measure student progress from Fall 2014 to Spring Schools that have multiple years of data may choose to measure progress from fall to spring, or from the prior school year to the current school year.

What Data are Used On-Track for Success Schools may choose measures of graduation, attendance, course completion, discipline, or other local measures. Mathematics Schools may choose measures of attainment, growth, and/or gap closing as evidence of achievement. Reading/ELA Schools may choose measures of attainment, growth, and/or gap closing as evidence of achievement. 8

9 Form Submission The Alternate Accountability Determination Form is a fillable PDF. 1.Type responses into the form. 2.Obtain the necessary signatures certifying the data and documentation. 3.Scan and the form to Forms must be submitted by September 30, 2015.

10 Completing the Determination Form What goal did the school set for this priority area? Example: Our goal was to increase the percentage of students proficient in mathematics. How did the school measure progress toward that goal? Did students meet or make progress towards the goal? Example: We used the MAP test to determine the percent proficient in mathematics in fall and spring. Example: The percentage of students scoring proficient in math increased from 54% to 60% from fall to spring.

Performance Ratings Reading/ELA Maintaining/Improving or Declining 11 Mathematics Maintaining/Improving or Declining On Track for Success Maintaining/Improving or Declining

Accountability Rating Reading/ELA Maintaining/Improving or Declining 12 Mathematics Maintaining/Improving or Declining On Track for Success Maintaining/Improving or Declining Alternate Rating-Satisfactory Progress or Alternate Rating-Needs Improvement

13 Certification School Principal District Administrator Assure data accuracy Have required documentation

Further Information Resources for Alternate Accountability are online: If you have questions about Alternate Accountability, please contact in the Office of Educational Accountability: Alison O’HaraAlison O’Hara ( ) Jason EngleJason Engle ( )