APOLLOAPOLLO Testing Gravity via Laser Ranging to the Moon Testing Gravity via Laser Ranging to the Moon Tom Murphy (UCSD)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By: Rubi Almanza.  Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) started in 1969, when the crew of the Apollo 11 mission placed an initial array consisting of one-hundred.
Advertisements

MAROON-X: An instrument for identifying another Earth
Moon Phases and eclipses.
Calibration for LHAASO_WFCTA Yong Zhang, LL Ma on behalf of the LHAASO collaboration 32 nd International Cosmic Ray Conference, Beijing 2011.
A SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM INSPIRALING NEUTRON STARS AND BLACK HOLES Using data taken between July 2009 and October 2010, researchers from the.
Preliminary Results of Laser Ranging to Un-cooperative Targets at Shanghai SLR Station Yang FuMin, Zhang ZhongPing, Chen JuPing, Chen WanZhen, Wu ZhiBo,
Pre-Launch Testing of NGSLR Ranging to LRO Anthony Mallama Jan McGarry Tom Zagwodzki Jack Cheek Christopher Clarke All at NASA/GSFC.
Time Transfert by Laser Link T2L2 On Jason 2 OCA –UMR Gemini Grasse – FRANCE E. Samain – Principal.
Gravitational physics, planetary science and exploration with laser retroreflectors Manuele Martini Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati (LNF) dell’INFN, Frascati.
Outline of the Lectures Lecture 1: The Einstein Equivalence Principle Lecture 2: Post-Newtonian Limit of GR Lecture 3: The Parametrized Post-Newtonian.
APOLLO: One-millimeter LLR
Testing Gravity with Lunar Laser Ranging James Battat August 9, 2005.
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
Optical Reflection Measurements Lecture-3. Optical Reflection Measurements Total Return Loss Technique A total return-loss measurement results in a single.
Photon counting detectors for future space missions Ivan Prochazka, Josef Blazej Ulrich Schreiber * presented at 16 th International Workshop on Laser.
APOLLO: Next-Generation Lunar Laser Ranging Tom Murphy UCSD Tom Murphy UCSD.
Summary: Scientific Achievement, Applications and Future Requirements Zueheir Altamimi Steve Klosko Richard Gross Aleksander Brzezinski.
Measuring Signal Strength Measure relative cross section of existing GNSS retroreflector arrays Measure transmitted beam pattern in absolute units using.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2006 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29 Lecture Notes 5.
C.D. Hoyle for the Eöt-Wash Group at the University of Washington ? Testing Gravity from the Dark Energy Scale to the Moon and Beyond C.D. Hoyle.
Varun Bhalerao Dual Channel Photometer for KBO search by occultations Varun Bhalerao Advisor: Shri Kulkarni 24 Sep 2007.
Preliminary Results from an Advanced Mission Concept Study Mars Laser Ranging UCSD: Tom Murphy (PI) JPL: Slava Turyshev (JPL PI) William Farr Bill Folkner.
D epartment of P hysics Brown APJC – August 2008 Recent Precision Tests of General Relativity Thomas P. Kling Brown Astrophysics Journal Club August 2008.
Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) within LUNAR Tom Murphy 1 Doug Currie 2 Stephen Merkowitz 3 D. Carrier, Jan McGarry 3, K. Nordtvedt, Tom Zagwodski 3 with help.
Physics 151: Principles of Physics: Mechanics & Heat (Honors) Prof. Stan Zygmunt Neils
Space-Based Optical Communications with Precision Ranging Capability For Testing Relativity Stephen M. Merkowitz and Jeff Livas NASA/GSFC May 22, 2006.
Gravitomagnetism The Myth and the Legend
Types of Analyses Single Collector –Uses only one collector or detector –This is the case with a Daly or EM Advantages: –Need only one detector –Peaks.
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
Purity measurement at SOLEIL Nicolas HUBERT # on behalf of the diagnostics group: N. Hubert, L. Cassinari, F. Dohou, M. El Ajjouri, M. Labat, D. Pédeau,
WAG 2013, Bern, Nov. 14, 2013 True Tests of the Weak Equivalence Principle for Antiparticles Unnikrishnan. C. S. Gravitation Group & Fundamental Interactions.
The ANTARES experiment is currently the largest underwater neutrino telescope and is taking high quality data since Sea water is used as the detection.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Next-Generation Lunar Laser Ranging Tom MurphyUCSD.
Laser Ranging Technique for ASTROD I Mission
Telescope Technologies
Recent determination of Gamma with Cassini M.T. Crosta, F. Mignard CNRS-O.C.A. 5th RRFWG, June, Estec.
LLR/Interplanetary Session Summary Jürgen Müller Tom Murphy.
Free Association well, Cheap Association. 1 Potpourri.
Pioneer Anomaly Test – Jonathan Fitt 1 Design Assessment of Lunar, Planetary and Satellite Ranging Applied to Fundamental Physics Jonathan Fitt Friday,
Testing Gravity with Lunar Laser Ranging DoE Site Visit James Battat August 21, 2006.
Radius To use a Compton polarimeter, the possible range of the backscattered photons’ energy should be calculated. Applying the laws of conservation of.
LLR Progress in Relation to LUNAR A snapshot of the last year Tom Murphy photo credit: Jack Dembicky.
Fundamental Principles of General Relativity  general principle: laws of physics must be the same for all observers (accelerated or not)  general covariance:
Spaceborne 3D Imaging Lidar John J. Degnan Geoscience Technology Office, Code Code 900 Instrument and Mission Initiative Review March 13, 2002.
1 Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1) S.Gomi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, M.Taguchi, (Kyoto University) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura, (KEK) Oct
Franz Hofmann, Jürgen Müller, Institut für Erdmessung, Leibniz Universität Hannover Institut für Erdmessung Hannover LLR analysis software „LUNAR“
Space-Time coordinates are not fundamental,
The HESSI Imaging Process. How HESSI Images HESSI will make observations of the X-rays and gamma-rays emitted by solar flares in such a way that pictures.
LLR Analysis – Relativistic Model and Tests of Gravitational Physics James G. Williams Dale H. Boggs Slava G. Turyshev Jet Propulsion Laboratory California.
Prospects to Use Silicon Photomultipliers for the Astroparticle Physics Experiments EUSO and MAGIC A. Nepomuk Otte Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München.
What Goes into a Pulsar Timing Model? David Nice Physics Department, Princeton University Pulsar Timing Array: A Nanohertz Gravitational Wave Telescope.
GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons M. Kavaya & G. Koch NASA/LaRC D. Emmitt & S. Wood SWA Lidar Working Group Meeting Sedona, AZ January 2004.
INTEGRATION OF IFE BEAMLET ALIGNMENT, TARGET TRACKING AND BEAM STEERING Graham Flint March 3, 2005.
January 6, 2005 URSI Nation Radio Science Meeting, Boulder, CO. Pointing and Focusing the GBT K. T. Constantikes NRAO Green Bank.
Soichiro Isoyama Collaborators : Norichika Sago, Ryuichi Fujita, and Takahiro Tanaka The gravitational wave from an EMRI binary Influence of the beyond.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Circular Motion and Gravitation: Velocity = distance/time, so therefore - v = 2  r / T Topic 6: Circular motion and gravitation 6.1 – Circular motion.
Testing general relativity experimentally: Equivalence Principle Tests
Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1)
Motions of the Moon, Phases and Eclipses (Ch 3)
Gravity Assists and the use of the Slingshot method
Fabio, Francesco, Francesco and Nicola INFN and University Bari
02/04/17 1.
10th Inkaba yeAfrica/!Khure Africa (AEON) Conference/Workshop
Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu and Tom Stone
The Moon.
Mark A. Bourassa and Qi Shi
Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 2017
Antenna Efficiency Optimization in Coherent Lidar Systems   Sammy Henderson, Pat Kratovil, and Charley Hale Beyond Photonics beyondphotonics.com.
Presentation transcript:

APOLLOAPOLLO Testing Gravity via Laser Ranging to the Moon Testing Gravity via Laser Ranging to the Moon Tom Murphy (UCSD)

Q2C32 The Full Parameterized Post Newtonian (PPN) Metric Generalized metric abandoning many fundamental assumptions GR is a special case Allows violations of conservations, Lorentz invariance, etc. Generalized metric abandoning many fundamental assumptions GR is a special case Allows violations of conservations, Lorentz invariance, etc.

Q2C33 Simplified (Conservative) PPN Equations of Motion Newtonian piece

Q2C34 Relativistic Observables in the Lunar Range Lunar Laser Ranging provides a comprehensive probe of gravity, currently boasting the best tests of: Equivalence Principle (mainly strong version, but check on weak)  a/a  10  13 ; SEP to 4  10  4 time-rate-of-change of G fractional change < 10  12 per year geodetic precession to  0.5% 1/r 2 force law to 10  10 times the strength of gravity at 10 8 m scales gravitomagnetism (origin of frame-dragging) to 0.1% (from motions of point masses—not systemic rotation) APOLLO effort will improve by 10  ; access new physics Lunar Laser Ranging provides a comprehensive probe of gravity, currently boasting the best tests of: Equivalence Principle (mainly strong version, but check on weak)  a/a  10  13 ; SEP to 4  10  4 time-rate-of-change of G fractional change < 10  12 per year geodetic precession to  0.5% 1/r 2 force law to 10  10 times the strength of gravity at 10 8 m scales gravitomagnetism (origin of frame-dragging) to 0.1% (from motions of point masses—not systemic rotation) APOLLO effort will improve by 10  ; access new physics

Q2C35 Aside on Gravitomagnetism Stems from “motional” term in equation of motion: If earth has velocity V, and moon is V+u, two terms of consequence emerge: One proportional to V 2 with 6.5 meter cos2D signal One proportional to Vu with 6.1 meter cosD signal LLR determines cosD to 4 mm precision and cos2D to < 8 mm Constitutes a  0.1% measurement of effect The same exact v  v  g term can be used to derive the precession of a gyroscope in the presence of a spinning mass recovers the full effect sought by GPB see Murphy et al. 2007, PRL 98, Stems from “motional” term in equation of motion: If earth has velocity V, and moon is V+u, two terms of consequence emerge: One proportional to V 2 with 6.5 meter cos2D signal One proportional to Vu with 6.1 meter cosD signal LLR determines cosD to 4 mm precision and cos2D to < 8 mm Constitutes a  0.1% measurement of effect The same exact v  v  g term can be used to derive the precession of a gyroscope in the presence of a spinning mass recovers the full effect sought by GPB see Murphy et al. 2007, PRL 98,

Q2C36 LLR through the decades Previously 200 meters APOLLO

Q2C37 APOLLO: the next big thing in LLR APOLLO offers order-of-magnitude improvements to LLR by: Using a 3.5 meter telescope Operating at 20 pulses/sec Using advanced detector technology Gathering multiple photons/shot Achieving millimeter range precision Tightly integrating experiment and analysis Having the best acronym funded by NASA & NSF

Q2C38 The APOLLO Collaboration UCSD: Tom Murphy (PI) Eric Michelsen U Washington: Eric Adelberger Erik Swanson Harvard: Chris Stubbs James Battat JPL: Jim Williams Slava Turyshev Dale Boggs Lincoln Lab: Brian Aull Bob Reich Northwest Analysis: Ken Nordtvedt Apache Point Obs. Russet McMillan Humboldt State: C. D. Hoyle CfA/SAO: Bob Reasenberg Irwin Shapiro John Chandler

Q2C39 Photo by NASA

Q2C310 Lunar Retroreflector Arrays Corner cubes Apollo 14 retroreflector array Apollo 11 retroreflector array Apollo 15 retroreflector array

Q2C311 The Reflector Positions Three Apollo missions left reflectors Apollo 11: 100-element Apollo 14: 100-element Apollo 15: 300-element Two French-built, Soviet-landed reflectors were placed on rovers Luna 17 (lost!) Luna 21 similar in size to A11, A14 Signal loss is huge:  10  8 of photons launched find reflector (atmospheric seeing)  10  8 of returned photons find telescope (corner cube diffraction) >10 17 loss considering other optical/detection losses

Q2C312 APOLLO’s Secret Weapon: Aperture The Apache Point Observatory’s 3.5 meter telescope Southern NM (Sunspot) 9,200 ft (2800 m) elevation Great “seeing”: 1 arcsec Flexibly scheduled, high-class research telescope APOLLO gets 8–10 < 1 hour sessions per lunar month 7-university consortium (UW NMSU, U Chicago, Princeton, Johns Hopkins, Colorado, Virginia)

Q2C313 APOLLO Laser Nd:YAG; flashlamp-pumped; mode-locked; cavity-dumped Frequency-doubled to 532 nm 57% conversion efficiency 90 ps pulse width (FWHM) 115 mJ (green) per pulse after double-pass amplifier 20 Hz pulse repetition rate 2.3 Watt average power GW peak power!! Beam is expanded to 3.5 meter aperture Less of an eye hazard Less damaging to optics

Q2C314 Catching All the Photons Several photons per pulse necessitates multiple “buckets” to time-tag each one Avalanche Photodiodes (APDs) respond only to first photon Lincoln Lab prototype APD arrays are perfect for APOLLO 4  4 array of 30  m elements on 100  m centers Lenslet array in front recovers full fill factor Resultant field is 1.4 arcsec on a side Focused image is formed at lenslet 2-D tracking capability facilitates optimal efficiency

Q2C315 Differential Measurement Scheme Corner Cube at telescope exit returns fiducial pulse Same optical path, attenuated by 10 O.D. Same APD detector, electronics, TDC range Diffused to present identical illumination on detector elements Result is differential over 2.5 seconds Must correct for distance between telescope axis intersection and corner cube

Q2C316 APOLLO Random Error Budget Error SourceTime Uncert. (ps) (round trip) Range error (mm) (one way) Retro Array Orient.100–30015–45 APD Illumination609 APD Intrinsic<60< 9 Laser Pulse Width507.5 Timing Electronics304.5 GPS-slaved Clock71 Total Random Uncert143–31722–48 Ignoring retro array, APOLLO system has 104 ps (16 mm) error per photon

Q2C317 Laser Mounted on Telescope

Q2C318 Laser Illumination of Telescope

Q2C319 Gigantic Laser Pointer

Q2C320 Out the Barn Door

Q2C321 Blasting the Moon

Q2C322 Breaking All Records Reflector prev. max photons/run APOLLO max photons/run prev. max photons/5-min APOLLO max photons/5-min Apollo Apollo Apollo Lunokhod APOLLO has seen rates higher than 2 photons per pulse for brief periods max rates for French and Texas stations about 0.1 and 0.02, respectively APOLLO has collected more return photons in 100 seconds than these other stations typically collect in months or years APOLLO can operate at full moon other stations can’t (except during eclipse), though EP signal is max at full moon! Often a majority of APOLLO returns are multiple-photon events record is 11 photons in one shot (out of 12 functioning APD elements) APD array (many buckets) is crucial APOLLO has seen rates higher than 2 photons per pulse for brief periods max rates for French and Texas stations about 0.1 and 0.02, respectively APOLLO has collected more return photons in 100 seconds than these other stations typically collect in months or years APOLLO can operate at full moon other stations can’t (except during eclipse), though EP signal is max at full moon! Often a majority of APOLLO returns are multiple-photon events record is 11 photons in one shot (out of 12 functioning APD elements) APD array (many buckets) is crucial

Q2C323 Killer Returns Apollo 15 Apollo photons in 5000 shots 369,840,578,287.4  0.8 mm 4 detections with 10 photons 2344 photons in 5000 shots 369,817,674,951.1  0.7 mm 1 detection with 8 photons which array is physically smaller? red curves are theoretical profiles: get convolved with fiducial to make lunar return represents system capability: laser; detector; timing electronics; etc. RMS = 120 ps (18 mm)

Q2C324 Sensing the Array Size & Orientation

Q2C325 Reaching the Millimeter Goal? 1 millimeter quality data is frequently achieved especially since Sept represents combined performance for single (< 1 hour) observing session random uncertainty only Virtually all nights deliver better than 4 mm, and 2 mm is typical 1 millimeter quality data is frequently achieved especially since Sept represents combined performance for single (< 1 hour) observing session random uncertainty only Virtually all nights deliver better than 4 mm, and 2 mm is typical shaded  recent results median = 1.8 mm 1.1 mm recent

Q2C326 Residuals During a Contiguous Run Breaking 10,000-shot run into 5 chunks, we can evaluate the stability of our measurement Comparison is against imperfect prediction, which can leave linear drift No scatter beyond that expected statistically Breaking 10,000-shot run into 5 chunks, we can evaluate the stability of our measurement Comparison is against imperfect prediction, which can leave linear drift No scatter beyond that expected statistically 15 mm individual error bars:    1.5 mm

Q2C327 Residuals Run-to-Run We can get 1 mm range precision in single “runs” (<10- minutes) The scatter about a linear fit is small: consistent with estimated random error 0.5 mm effective data point for Apollo 15 reflector on this night 1.45 mm 1483 photons; 3k shots 0.66 mm 8457 photons; 10k shots 1.73 mm 901 photons; 2k shots 1.16 mm 2269 photons; 3k shots Apollo 15 reflector

Q2C328 Residuals Against JPL Model APOLLO data points processed together with 16,000 ranges over 38 years shows consistency with model orbit Fit is not yet perfect, but this is expected when the model sees high-quality data for the first time, and APOLLO data reduction is still evolving as well Weighted RMS is about 8 mm   3 for this fit plot redacted: no agreement from JPL to make public

Q2C329 APOLLO Impact on Model If APOLLO data is down-weighted to 15 mm, we see what the model would do without APOLLO- quality data Answer: large (40 mm) adjustments to lunar orientation—as seen via reflector offsets (e.g., arrowed sessions) May lead to improved understanding of lunar interior, but also sharpens the picture for elucidating grav. physics phenomena plot redacted: no agreement from JPL to make public

Q2C330 Summary & Next Steps APOLLO is a millimeter-capable lunar ranging station with unprecedented performance Given the order-of-magnitude gains in range precision, we expect order-of-magnitude gains in a variety of tests of fundamental gravity Our steady-state campaign is not quite 2 years old began October 2006, one year after first light Now grappling with analysis in the face of vastly better data much new stuff to learn, with concomitant refinements to data reduction and to the analytical model Modest improvements in gravity seen already with APOLLO data; more to follow in the upcoming months and years Next BIG step: interplanetary laser ranging (e.g., Mars) see talk by Hamid Hemmati later in this session APOLLO is a millimeter-capable lunar ranging station with unprecedented performance Given the order-of-magnitude gains in range precision, we expect order-of-magnitude gains in a variety of tests of fundamental gravity Our steady-state campaign is not quite 2 years old began October 2006, one year after first light Now grappling with analysis in the face of vastly better data much new stuff to learn, with concomitant refinements to data reduction and to the analytical model Modest improvements in gravity seen already with APOLLO data; more to follow in the upcoming months and years Next BIG step: interplanetary laser ranging (e.g., Mars) see talk by Hamid Hemmati later in this session