Behavioral Health/Juvenile Justice (BH/JJ) Part I Presented by: Dr. Mark Singer Leonard W. Mayo Professor of Family and Child Welfare Mandel School of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moving Toward More Comprehensive Assessments American Humanes 2007 Conference on Differential Response Patricia Schene, Ph.D.
Advertisements

Project First Step: Approaches to Co-occurrence of Child Maltreatment & Substance Abuse in New Hampshire 2007 CAPTA State Liaison Meeting Bernie Bluhm,
Treatment Alternatives to Prison A Health Impact Assessment Scope of research February 2012 Health Impact Assessment – a structured yet flexible research.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
MHSA Full Service Partnership (FSP) For YOUTH (Ages 0-15) and TAY (Transition-Age Youth) (Ages 16-25) Santa Clara County Mental Health Board System Planning.
Center for Innovative the Begun Center for Violence Prevention Research and Education 1.
Setting the Stage: The Current Landscape of Children’s Mental Illness in North Carolina E. Jane Costello, Ph.D. Duke University.
Site Dev Highlighted article or topic – Transport Findings Update and Summary _____________________________________ Website: Pre Sonja Schoenwald, Ph.D.
Juvenile and young offenders: speech, language & communication needs Professor Karen Bryan Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey.
Kayla Pope, MD, JD Boys Town National Research Hospital December 6, 2012.
Assessing for Key Child Welfare Issues Version 1.0 | 2014.
Childhood Violence Exposure and the Behavioral Health/Juvenile Justice Initiative Jeff Kretschmar, Ph.D. Begun Center for Violence Prevention Research.
Division of Behavioral Health Department of Health & Social Services Clinical Application of the Alaska Screening Tool & Client Status Review of Life Domains.
1 Behavioral Health/Juvenile Justice (BH/JJ) Part 2 Presented by Jeff Kretschmar, Ph.D. Project Director: Institute for the Study and Prevention of Violence.
Transforming Juvenile Justice: Integrating Systems, Practice, and Policy Daniel J. Flannery, PhD Institute for the Study and Prevention of Violence Kent.
Vermilion County Action Team Laurie Krolikowski & Susan Werner.
1 Behavioral Health/Juvenile Justice (BH/JJ) Evaluation Report ( ) Presented by Jeff Kretschmar, Ph.D. Project Director: Institute for the Study.
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Strengthening Communities-Youth (SCY) Presented by Dr. David Hussey Institute for the Study and Prevention of Violence at Kent State University.
1 Adolescent Mental Health: Key Data Indicators Gwendolyn J. Adam, Ph.D., L.C.S.W. Assistant Professor - Department of Pediatrics Section of Adolescent.
Child & Family Mental Health: Re-empowering Families Frank C. Sacco, Ph.D. Community Services Institute Springfield & Boston, Massachusetts
Enhancing Health Coverage for Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth OJJDP Coordinating Council November 13, 2013 Diane Justice, Senior Program Director National.
Collaborative Mental Health Care Pilot Program Bidder’s Conference October 27, 2014.
Co-Occurring Disorder Treatment with People Involved in the Criminal Justice System Presented by Center for Evidence Based Practices at Case/ Ohio Substance.
CHILDREN OF INCARCARATED PARENTS (C.O.I.P). Introduction of C.O.I.P. Children of Incarcerated Parents (C.O.I.P.), is a nonprofit advocacy organization.
Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
‘Can you hear me?’ How a holistic approach incorporates the voice of children who have a disability and/or mental health issue and are exposed to poverty.
Creating Trauma-Informed Systems Susan Ko, PhD Director, Service Systems National Center for Child Traumatic Stress.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH ADULT SYSTEMS OF CARE – JAIL MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT Full Service Partnership.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Needs and Gaps FY
WRAPAROUND MILWAUKEE “Never doubt that a small group of committed citizens can change the world: indeed, it’s the only thing that ever does.” Margaret.
Cuyahoga County Strengthening Communities – Youth (SCY) Project: Findings & Implications for Juvenile Justice David L. Hussey, Ph.D. Associate Professor.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Needs and Gaps FY 2013.
Crossover Youth: Research, Policy and Practice CYPM Overview
Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.
Intervening with Domestic Violence Perpetrators: How Focusing on Perpetrators Improves Community- Wide Practice for Families Kristen Selleck, MSW David.
LA County Cases: An Overview of Characteristics & Disposition Outcomes Denise C. Herz, Ph.D. California State University—Los Angeles School of Criminal.
Incarcerated Mothers: Their Histories of Victimization and the Consequences for Their Children Toni Johnson, Associate Professor
How State, Local Communities and Universities Work Together To Implement Evidenced Based Practices and Reduce Recidivism of Juvenile Offenders Eric Shafer.
DYS and Arkansas’ Juvenile Justice System Entrance Children age who are proven to have broken the law and are under the authority of a juvenile.
Background Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide a coordinated and comprehensive array of community-based services and supports to families.
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives September 30 – October 1, 2014 Twin Falls,
Voices of Families at Team Meetings Presentation May 18, 2015 Victor Medrano, CalWorks, FCS Linkages Carol Sentell-Bassett, Child Welfare Supervisor Danielle.
Profiles Dr Diana Birch Youth Support. Introduction ► Profiles’ - provides a detailed description of the individuals and families who have been referred.
A Systems Approach to Improving Substance Abuse Treatment for Latino Youth: Latino Caucus of the APHA Annual Meeting November 6, 2006 URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER.
Services Overview: Mental Health/Substance Use Disorders Programs and Managed Care Plans 1 Medi-Cal Managed Care Plans (MCP) County Mental Health Plan.
The Safe and Together™ model: A perpetrator pattern, child centered, survivor strength based approach to the intersection of domestic violence and child.
Wraparound in Washington State: Coordinating Care and Why it Matters Skagit Results: Dawn Scott and Terrance Ellison Pilot Site Results: Ericka Wiggins.
How Domestic Violence Perpetrators Harm Children and Case-planning with Perpetrators.
Partner Violence Screening Wendy A. Lutz, MSW Brenda A. Miller, Ph.D Center for Development of Human Services Spring 2002.
Lundy Bancroft. KEY CONCEPTS There are multiple sources of psychological injury to children from exposure to men who batter. Professional responses need.
Perspectives on Abnormal Behavior
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
Improving Access to Mental Health Services: A Community Systems Approach Leslie Mahlmeister, MBA PhD Student Department of Political Science Wayne State.
KITS V JUNE , 2014 BREAKING DOWN AND UNDERSTANDING THE PSYCHOLOGICAL : WHAT YOU DON’T KNOW CAN HURT YOU M. Connie Almeida, PhD, LSSP, Licensed Psychologist.
Nashville Community Health Needs for Children and Youth, 0-24 GOAL 6 Children and Youth are Mentally Well.
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant Preliminary Findings Crown Ward Review 2011 February 28-March 10, 2011.
TRAUMA AND THE BHJJ INITIATIVE Jeff Kretschmar Begun Center for Violence Prevention Research and Education Case Western Reserve University Jeff Spears.
Children’s MOSAIC Project Update to the Springfield Public Schools Board of Education Jan Gambach, President, Mental Health Centers of Central Illinois,
Mental Health America of San Diego County Programs & Services
Youth Forensic Service
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant
Ohio’s Behavioral Health Juvenile Justice Initiative: Effectively diverting juvenile justice-involved youth with behavioral health issues into community-based.
the Safe and Together™ model approach:
Livingston County Children’s Network: Community Scorecard
MHSA Full Service Partnership (FSP) For YOUTH (Ages 0-15) and TAY (Transition-Age Youth) (Ages 16-25) Santa Clara County Mental Health Board System Planning.
Addressing dual diagnosis within a residential treatment programme serving women with complex needs Anita Harris.
ADOLESCENT FAMILY VIOLENCE
Adverse Childhood experiences (ACE)
Randomized Controlled Trial of Family Centered Treatment in North Carolina Treatment and Study Overview for NC County Departments of Social Services September.
Presentation transcript:

Behavioral Health/Juvenile Justice (BH/JJ) Part I Presented by: Dr. Mark Singer Leonard W. Mayo Professor of Family and Child Welfare Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences Case Western Reserve University

Program Overview  Target population – mentally ill violent offending youth between the ages of 12 and 18  Target sites:  Cuyahoga County  Lorain County  Southwest Counties (Hamilton, Butler, Warren, Clermont)  For the period July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2002, 68 youth were enrolled in the project  90% Male; 51% Caucasian, 39% African-American, 9% Hispanic, 1% Biracial; Average age=16 years

Charges (N=62)  Total charges = 673  Average number of charges = 10.6 (range=0- 29)  Greatest number of youth had assault, domestic violence, and/or theft charges

N=65 DSM-IV Diagnoses – Axis I

N=68 Medications

N=51 Mean=85 Youth IQ

Ohio Scale Outcomes  Youth, parent, and worker ratings of youth’s Problem Severity and Functioning improved over time  Parents’ ratings of satisfaction with their relationship with their children improved over time  Youths’ and parents’ ratings of satisfaction with treatment improved over time

ODYS Direct Impact MH referrals* to ODYS from project counties: 2000 MH referrals MH referrals MH referrals**- 15 * Males only ** Through 10/15/02

Full Psychological Evals. N=88 Youth were highly impulsive: 74% had made a suicidal threat/gesture/act 25% made violent acts on pets/animals (e.g. killing, mutilating burning) 40% had been noted as firesetters

Full Psychological Evals. N=88 Compromised intellectual functioning: 42/88 had I.Q. scores at borderline level or below About 1 in 4 had provisional diagnosis of learning disability

Full Psychological Evals. N=88 Parents had significant problems: 55% of fathers noted as abusing alcohol/drugs 43% of mothers noted as abusing alc./drugs About 1 in 3 fathers and 1 in 5 mothers were noted as having been incarcerated or on probation.

Focus Groups: Systems Issues Mental Health BoardsJudgesParents/Families  Positive youth outcomes  Safety not an issue or concern  Important to engage families  Fills gap for low functioning youth with co- occurring disorders  Another option for youth.  There is a large mental health need  Need to be educated about available networks and services  Level of security is appropriate.  Therapy was good.  Were treated respectfully.  Parent was available and asked for input.  Youth placed in program was considered a “success” Juvenile Court StaffProviders  Security is adequate  Helped to build trust with family and identified youth  A different option than DYS that addresses a gap in services  Families had positive experiences  Need to work with schools to reintegrated youth in education  Collaboration between systems is vital to success  Need more community-based services

Discussion