TP Calorimetry Jaewon Park. 2 Full Minerva Detector.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
Advertisements

Adil Khan Kyungpook National university Korea-Japan Joint ScECAL Group Meeting kobe University Japan 3 rd September 2010.
FVTX dEdx digitization Zhengyun You Peking University Los Alamos National Lab Jun 05, 2007.
Analysis on TP detector Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Dec 19, 2007.
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
TP Calorimetry Jaewon Park. Reference (old plot, full minerva)
Photostatistics Error Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Sep 5, 2006.
TP Calorimetry and particle ID Jaewon Park. 2 Calorimetry We assumed that (dE/dx) min is constant for differe nt particles. In previous study:  Hcal.
OD Calorimetry Study Update — Z vertex position dependence Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, May 17, 2006.
MINERvA Simulation - HCAL and ECAL Calorimetry Jaewon Park University of Rochester Jupiter/MINERvA Group Meeting, Oct 4, 2006.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Apr 04, 2007.
1 In last Friday meeting, containment plot had some error.  10T-10E containment using 10T-10E and 10T-10E-20H geometries sho wed inconsistent values.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Feb 7, 2007.
Detector Alignment using cosmic muon data Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter group Meeting, Oct 31, 2007.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Feb 14, 2007.
E/  Final state Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Jan 31, 2007.
ECAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson May 25, ECAL Digitization CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) EcalElectronicsSim EBDataFrame EEDataFrame.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop 5 – 05/08/29 F. Piron & E. Nuss (IN2P3/LPTA – Montpellier) 1 Comprehensive review of CAL calibrations Gamma-ray.
MINERvA Calorimetry Resolution function Jaewon Park University of Rochester Jupiter/MINERvA Group Meeting, Nov 22, 2006.
MINERvA Simulation - HCAL and ECAL Calorimetry Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA Collaboration Meeting, Sep 29, 2006.
MINERvA Simulation - HCAL and ECAL Calorimetry Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA Collaboration Meeting, Sep 29, 2006.
Conditions Database for Minerva Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter group meeting, Nov 07, 2007.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Feb 21, 2007.
OD Calorimetry Study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Mar 8, 2006.
TP Calorimetry Jaewon Park. 2 Semi-infinite ID Proton shows much hi gher calibration const ant. Calibration const for p roton for medium/high energy is.
1 Calorimetry Study Update — Dependence of energy and phi Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Apr 19, 2006.
MINERvA Calorimetry Calibration with infinite detector Jaewon Park University of Rochester Jupiter/MINERvA Group Meeting, Nov 15, 2006.
Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London CALICE Si-W EM calorimeter Preliminary Results of the testbeams st part On behalf of the CALICE Collaboration.
TP EM Containment Jaewon Park University of Rochester Rochester Group Meeting Mar 26, 2008.
1 Calorimetry Study Update — Angle dependence with cut Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, May 03, 2006.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Mar 07, 2007.
Tail Catcher/Muon Tracker at DESY & FNAL TB Facilities Northern Illinois Center for Accelerator and Detector Development Northern Illinois University and.
EM Calorimetry Study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Sep 5, 2006.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Mar 14, 2007.
7/6/2011ECAL Studies1/7 ECAL Studies Jacopo Nardulli.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
COMPTON POLARIMETRY Collected data Cavity power Status on counting methods Systematic errors and hardware issues.
ScECAL BeamTest Analysis Asian ScECAL Meeting Jan 14 th, 2010 Adil, Satoru Uozumi, DongHee Kim.
PrimEx collaboration meeting Energy calibration of the Hall B bremsstrahlung tagging system using magnetic pair spectrometer S. Stepanyan (JLAB)
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
Supervisor: Samir Arfaoui By: Fatma Helal Sawy
May 1-3, LHC 2003V. Daniel Elvira1 CMS: Hadronic Calorimetry & Jet/ Performance V. Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
BigCal Calibration E04-108& Wei Luo Lanzhou University, China January 2008 Hall C Users Meeting.
Positional and Angular Resolution of the CALICE Pre-Prototype ECAL Hakan Yilmaz.
Observation of light nuclei with PAMELA Roberta Sparvoli Laura Marcelli, Valeria Malvezzi, Cristian De Santis and the PAMELA Collaboration.
S.MonteilCaloPiquet1 August 2010 – A typical online Calo Piquet Analysis - Outline of the analysis (Fill 1264 – Run #77195) 1. Calorimeter 2DViews, inclusive.
The experimental setup of Test Beam HE EE ES BEAM  A slice of the CMS calorimter was tested during summer of 2007 at the H2 test beam area at CERN with.
1 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Experimental Methods for Determining Photodetector Working Points By: Victor Rykalin Mike Smith Jim Maloney.
SRS Calibration Michael Phipps, Bob Azmoun, Craig Woody 1.
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
ICARUS T600: low energy electrons
Time over Threshold (ToT) signal discrimination
Activities on straw tube simulation
CLAS12 software workshop
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
Data Quality Monitoring of the CMS Silicon Strip Tracker Detector
Jaewon Park University of Rochester
MINERvA Simulation -OD calibration
Hit Overflow Jaewon Park.
Status of Instrumental Beam Studies and Technical Description of Detectors and DAQ February 24, 2017.
Update on HCAL and ECAL Calorimetry
Current status Minjung Kim
BESIII TOF Digitization
Presentation transcript:

TP Calorimetry Jaewon Park

2 Full Minerva Detector

3

4

5 TP Detector

6

7

8

9

10 Ecal calibration constant Old study showed Ecal calibration constant 2.5 is better than 1.5 Mean of (recoE-trueE)/t rueE become constant for theta, Vz depedenc e Value 1.5 is from dE/dx weighting. K_ecal=1.5K_ecal=1.75 K_ecal=2.5

11 Ecal calibration constant K_ecal=1.5K_ecal=1.75 K_ecal=2.5

12 Nu_e electron energy (k_ecal=2.5)

13 Nu_e electron energy (k_ecal=2.5) When electro n track is rec onstructed.

14 Nu_e electron energy (k_ecal=1.5)

15 Fake ADC -- Scan Time adc hit for 120 sec (rate=~83 adc/s)  This is the rate in manual taken data. Nominal pedestal position=371 Nominal pedestal sigma=10 nADC = rate*scanTime Fill Gaus(371+Shift,sigma) nADC times. Two pedestal histogram (PedA, PedB) are made with Ga us(371,sigma) No photoelectron ADC, just pedestal No systematic error No strip-to-strip variation No electronics channel-to-channel variation

16 120s 12s 0.6s

sec pedApedB

sec pedApedB