DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 1 Analysis of Oct. 04 Test Beam RPC Data Jay Hauser, Martin von der Mey University of California Los Angeles.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Level-1 Trigger CMS Week, Brussels 14 Sep C.-E. Wulz Deputy Trigger Project Manager Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna Prepared with slides/material.

Advertisements

22 May 2007G. Rakness (UCLA) 1 At minus-side slice test… Complete description of how to bring back slice test all the way from (power=off) to (local run=physics.

CPT Week, Nov 2003, B. Paul Padley, Rice University1 CSC Trigger Status, MPC and Sorter B. Paul Padley Rice University November 2003.

MDC-II LVL-1 Trigger Khaled Teilab for the MDC Trigger Team.

TMB-RAT Software Update USCMS Slice Test Rice University August 16, 2004 Martin Von der Mey / Yangheng Zheng* University of California, Los.

TMB and RAT Status Report Endcap Muon OSU April 16, 2004 Yangheng Zheng University of California, Los Angeles  TMB Status  RAT Status.

CSC Muon Trigger September 16, 2003 CMS Annual Review 1 Current Status of CSC Trigger Elements – Quick Summary Jay Hauser, with many slides from Darin.

J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,

US Test Beam Results Of Front End Timing T. Ferguson, N. Terentiev* (Carnegie Mellon University) CMS EMU Meeting University of California, Davis Feb 25.

CSC Synchronization Procedure and Plans CMS Endcap Muon FNAL October 29, 2004 Jay Hauser* / Martin Von der Mey / Yangheng Zheng University of.

Endcap Muon meeting: FNAL, Oct , 2004 J. Hauser UCLA 1 TMB and RAT Status Report Jay Hauser University of California Los Angeles.

Endcap Muon meeting: CMU, Oct 19, 2003 J. Hauser UCLA 1 CSC Trigger Primitives Test Beam Studies Main Test Beam 2003 Goals: Verify the peripheral crate.

The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 1 Analysis of Oct. 04 Test Beam RPC Data Jay Hauser, Martin von der Mey University of California Los Angeles.

Jay Hauser, Emu meeting at Florida, 9 January CSC Trigger Meeting Summary Cast of many.

Preliminary Results from Structured Beam Test CMS Trigger Meeting June 3, 2003 Brian Mohr UCLA Dept. of Physics.

TMB and RAT Status Report Endcap Muon OSU June 6, 2004 Martin von der Mey University of California, Los Angeles  Previous Status (OSU, April)

The Track-Finding Processor for the Level-1 Trigger of the CMS Endcap Muon System D.Acosta, A.Madorsky, B.Scurlock, S.M.Wang University of Florida A.Atamanchuk,

Emulator System for OTMB Firmware Development for Post-LS1 and Beyond Aysen Tatarinov Texas A&M University US CMS Endcap Muon Collaboration Meeting October.

An Asynchronous Level-1 Tracking Trigger for Future LHC Detector Upgrades A. Madorsky, D. Acosta University of Florida/Physics, POB , Gainesville,

20 Oct 2009G. Rakness (UCLA)1 Powering on… Last week: CMS off to give evaporation time to dry out the experiment Monday – Tuesday: Began powering on CSCs.

15 Sept 2009G. Rakness (UCLA)1 Paper progress On the Analysis Review Committee for the paper: “Performance of the CMS Cathode Strip Chambers with Cosmic.

13 March 2007G. Rakness (UCLA) 1 Minus side slice test status Greg Rakness University of California, Los Angeles UCLA phone meeting 13 March 2007.

Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.

Status of the CSC Track-Finder Darin Acosta University of Florida.

Track-Finder Trigger at the Beam Test Results and Features Darin Acosta, Rick Cavanaugh, Victor Golovtsov, Lindsey Gray, Khristian Kotov, Alex Madorsky,

Design of a readout system for RPCs Olu Amoda2 The LODEN Group The group is an association of Fermilab scientists who teamed up to build a cosmic ray.

Annual Review Cern -June 13th, 2006 F. Loddo I.N.F.N. Bari RPC Electronics: Technical Trigger Flavio Loddo I.N.F.N. Bari On behalf of the RPC-Trigger group.

CSC Track-Finder Plans for Commissioning at Bat.904 and Point 5 Darin Acosta University of Florida.

4 Dec 2008G. Rakness (UCLA)1 Online Software Updates and RPC data in the RAT …including Pad Bit Mapping and Efficiency… Greg Rakness University of California,

TGC Timing Adjustment Chikara Fukunaga (TMU) ATLAS Timing Workshop 5 July ‘07.

A. Meneguzzo Padova University & INFN Validation and Performance of the CMS Barrel Muon Drift Chambers with Cosmic Rays A. Meneguzzo Padova University.

CMS Latency Review, 13th March 2007CSC Trigger 1 Latency and Synchronization update.

CSC High Pileup Sumulations Vadim Khotilovich Alexei Safonov Texas A&M University June 15, 2009.

US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, B.Paul Padley, Rice University1 CSC Muon Trigger On Detector Components B. Paul Padley Rice University June, 2002.

Track-Finder Test Beam Results Darin Acosta. Darin Acosta, University of Florida 30 July 2004 Trigger Meeting CSC Beam Test (Muon Slice Test) ME.

US CMS DOE/NSF Review, 20 November Trigger - W. Smith1 WBS Trigger Wesley H. Smith, U. Wisconsin CMS Trigger Project Manager DOE/NSF Status.

US CMS DOE/NSF Review: April 11-13, Trig. - Estimate to Complete.

13 March 2007G. Rakness (UCLA) 1 RPC efficiency in RAT Greg Rakness University of California, Los Angeles UCLA phone meeting 13 March 2007.

22 Sept A slight reformulation of (ALCT) muonic timing… In terms of brass tacks.

3 Nov 2009G. Rakness (UCLA)1 Weekend of 24 – 25 October Loaded all TMB firmware –Version 15 Oct 2009 XML file created using Jay’s muonic timing constants.

US AFEB timing in CSCs in splash events, run N. Terentiev, CMU CSC Synchronization meeting Nov. 16, 2009, CERN.

CSC Ops/DPG meeting, 05-Oct-2011 Hauser1 ALCT boards for ME4/2 etc.

10/20/09 UCLA Meeting Hauser 1/9 Various updates Update on LHC/CMS schedule: First shots into collimator: Nov. 7 and 8! Circulating beam ~Nov. 18, less.

CMS Week, 3-7 November CSC Trigger Test Beam Report Cast of many.

6 April 2007G. Rakness (UCLA) 1 CSC runs at minus side slice test 27 Mar – 5 Apr Color scheme: Successes Problems/questions Greg Rakness University.

Update on “Muonic Timing” of CSC Electronics

CSC Synchronization Procedure and Plans

CSC EMU Muon Port Card (MPC)

University of California Los Angeles

University of California Los Angeles

“Golden” Local Run: Trigger rate = 28Hz

CMS EMU TRIGGER ELECTRONICS

University of California Los Angeles

University of California Los Angeles

University of California Los Angeles

University of California Los Angeles

Current Status of CSC Trigger Elements – Quick Summary

Darin Acosta University of Florida

September CSC Beam Test Report

ALCT, TMB Status, Peripheral Crate Layout, CSC Event Display

CSC Trigger Primitives Test Beam Studies

Analysis of Oct. 04 Test Beam RPC Data

Changes in Level 1 CSC Trigger in ORCA by Jason Mumford and Slava Valuev University of California Los Angeles June 11,

TMB and RAT Status Report

Preliminary CSC Trigger Results from September Testbeam

CSC Trigger Meeting Summary

Effect of an ALCT SEU Much-overlooked good stuff

University of California Los Angeles

Global Trigger Finds Correct BX

Presentation transcript:

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 1 Analysis of Oct. 04 Test Beam RPC Data Jay Hauser, Martin von der Mey University of California Los Angeles

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 2 RPCs in Test Beam 1 RE1/2 (call it RE1) 2 free-standing (call them RE2, RE3) Readout info for experts only: RPC0  RE1 RPC3  RE2 RPC2  RE3 ME1/1 RE1 on ME1/2 ME2/2ME3/2 RE2, RE3 behind 

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 3 Link Board to RAT Board Setup RAT receives 4 cables, one from each RPC chamber Cables 0, 1, 2 were connected Appears that phasing RAT-TMB incorrect, so that 0  2 and 1  3 in readout N.B. RE1 seems the healthiest chamber

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 4 RPC-RAT Interface RAT receives 4 cables with 20 pairs each (3 cables active at test beam) For each cable/RPC chamber implemented: 4 bits of bunch crossing 12 bits of RPC pad data 1 clock (FYI CMS specification is 16 pads, 2 bx, 1 clock, 1 GND) New full-size backplane was used

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 5 Data Conditions Run conditions: Link boards arrived Saturday p.m., run ended Sunday evening Runs have RPC data. Data triggered by Sector Processor, not scintillators Beam spot roughly 30 cm each dimension RAT latches bits on falling edge of 40 MHz clock where they are stable Analysis conditions: Comparison CSC chamber always ME3/2 - part of SP trigger (ALCT&CLCT required) Run 548 taken Sunday. Corrupted RPC events not included –Seen at 1% level –Symptom: as if no RPC cables connected to RAT (?)

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 6 TMB Bunch Crossings - Data Flat Distribution seen 0-15 (4 bits): N.B. no ALCT or TMB data transmission errors (CRC check) seen in these runs

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 7 Internal RPC BXN diff BXN difference for consecutive RPC data arriving at TMB Always incrementing by 1.

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 8 No CRC errors for TMB/ALCT ALCT CRC TMB CRC

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 9 RPC Bunch Crossings - Expectations Emu electronics used orbit=924 bx, RPC used orbit=3564 bx These are incommensurate. What are lowest 4 bits if synch is perfect? OrbitEmu BXRPC BXEmu starts (mod16) RPC starts (mod16) Difference (mod16) , , , 84, 0 4, 8 Therefore, expect various differences in jumps of 4 bx In general, there can also be an offset due to time delay of BX0

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 10 RPC Bunch Crossings - Data TMB vs RPC see perfect agreement with expectations. At least, ALCT/CLCT bx reset/bx0 protocol = Link board protocol

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 11 RPC BX from different RPC Chambers? Nice diagonals, but offsets (2, 7 bx) due either to TTCrx offset or reset timing at Link board

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 12 Test clock sent to TMB Inverted RPC clock sent to TMB (Runs=553,554)

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 13 Reset with SPS Orbit Better agreement (run=563) Still issues to understand

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 14 Beam Spot Size Data triggered by SP covers roughly 30x30 cm (Scintillators are 10x10 cm) Key ½-Strip Key Wire Group

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 15 RPC configuration Run 548 (Wires 9-20) Run 562 (Wires 0-11)

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 16 RE1 Pad Data Quality Compare ME3/2 (rear chamber) CLCT key half-strips (not strips) to RE1 pad (vertical dimension) Good position agreement (one dead pad) Modest RPC efficiency within readout region Fiducial region for RE1 select half-strips RPC Pad Key ½-Strip

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 17 RE1 Efficiency Within Fiducial Region Unsure exactly where pads are, so plot efficiency versus CSC wire group This RPC chamber fairly efficient Key Wire Group

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 18 RE2 Pad Data Quality Same comparison Active part of chamber appears far from beam center  low statistics Fiducial region: select half-strips Key ½-Strip RPC Pad

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 19 RE2 Efficiency Within Fiducial Region This RPC chamber not so efficient Key Wire Group

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 20 RE3 Pad Data Quality Same comparisons Fiducial region: select half-strips Key ½-Strip RPC Pad

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 21 RE3 Efficiency Within Fiducial Region RE3 efficiency reaches a high value, but is not flat with wire number Key Wire Group

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 22 RPC timing versus TMB RE1 RE2 RE3

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 23 RPC versus ALCT Timing First RPC hit per chamber: RE1, RE2 all in one BX RE3 not as good Note RE1 later by 1 BX RE1 RE2 RE3

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 24 RPC Afterpulsing? Number of time bins per chamber per event RE1 and RE2 good, RE3 shows considerable after-pulsing: RE1 RE2 RE3

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 25 RPC Pads Hit Pads hit per event (summed over time bins) All look okay (RE1 slightly more pads) RE1 RE2 RE3

DRAFT version Oct. 15, 2004 Hauser/Mey UCLA 26 Summary RPC Link Board to RAT-TMB data transmission worked well RPC pads well correlated to CSC position Timing looks strange on one RPC chamber RPC efficiency hard to study Instrumented region was small Gas was not optimal due to safety concerns Will be useful to do simultaneous analysis of RPC data taken through Link board readout – is it possible to double-check? N.B. time for doing tests was way too short. Is there some way to set up a cosmic ray test bench for a longer time?