Guidance for Hyperbolic Rendezvous Damon Landau April 30, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solar Sail Attitude Control using a Combination of a Feedforward and a Feedback Controller D. Romagnoli, T. Oehlschlägel.
Advertisements

15th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Copper Mountain, Colorado Low Energy Interplanetary Transfers Using the Halo Orbit Hopping Method with STK/Astrogator.
Dr. Andrew Ketsdever Lesson 3 MAE 5595
Comparative Assessment of Human Missions to Mars Damon F. Landau Ph. D. Preliminary Exam September 13, 2005.
Space conveyer Space conveyer Results of Advanced Research.
Mission To Mars In Kerbal Space Program, Where distances are 1/9 real world values.
An insertion burn at local noon has the advantage that the spacecraft is kicked into a 11 resonant orbit, with an inexpensive recovery manoeuvre, if the.
Thruster failure recovery strategies for libration point missions Maksim Shirobokov Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics Moscow Institute of Physics.
Inner Guides=Text Boundary Outer Guides=Inner Boundary Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration Michele Gates Human Exploration and Operations Mission.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Analysis of Trans-Lunar Spiral Trajectory [Levi Brown] [Mission Ops] February 12,
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Sizing and Trajectory Design for 100 g/10kg Payloads [Levi Brown] [Mission Ops] March 12,
AAE450 Spring 2009 LEO Atmospheric Drag Analysis and Lunar Orbit Circularization [Andrew Damon] [Mission Ops] February 19,
Chapter 6: Maneuvering in Space By: Antonio Batiste.
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Chris Bush Week 5: February 15 th, 2007 D&C Group High Thrust Trajectories ET, dE, aM.
28 October st Space Glasgow Research Conference, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
28 October st Space Glasgow Research Conference, Glasgow, United Kingdom Solar Sailing: How to Travel on a Light Beam Alessandro Peloni Supervisor:
Marco Concha Charles Petruzzo June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Flight Dynamics.
Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU) Samara 2015 SELECTION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS AND OPTIMIZATION TRAJECTORY OF MOTION OF ELECTRIC PROPULSION SPACECRAFT.
AE 1350 Lecture #14 Introduction to Astronautics.
Understand the factors and requirements associated with a spacecraft launch Understand the dynamics of Gravity Assist and the basic principles of placing.
Two Interesting (to me!) Topics Neither topic is in Goldstein. Taken from the undergraduate text by Marion & Thornton. Topic 1: Orbital or Space Dynamics.
Camille Flammarion Freedman and Madore (2010)
What can you tell me about gravity?. Gravity is usually assumed to be a uniform vertical downward force......it is actually radial.
Ch 22: Exploring Space. “Imagination is more important than knowledge” -Albert Einstein.
PLANETARY PROBE LASER PROPULSION CONCEPT 7 TH INTERNATIONAL PLANETARY PROBE WORKSHOP JUNE 2009, BARCELONA LE, T. (1), MOBILIA, S. (2), PAPADOPOULOS,
Spacecraft Trajectories You Can Get There from Here! John F Santarius Lecture 9 Resources from Space NEEP 533/ Geology 533 / Astronomy 533 / EMA 601 University.
Team 5 Moscow State University Department of Mechanics and Mathematics I.S. Grigoriev, M.P. Zapletin 3rd Global.
Space Mission Design: Interplanetary Super Highway Hyerim Kim Jan. 12 th st SPACE Retreat.
STRATEGIES FOR MARS NETWORK MISSIONS VIA AN ALTERNATIVE ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING ARCHITECTURE 10 TH INTERNATIONAL PLANETARY PROBE WORKSHOP June,
8. Gravity 1.Toward a Law of Gravity 2. Universal Gravitation 3. Orbital Motion 4. Gravitational Energy 5. The Gravitational Field.
FAST LOW THRUST TRAJECTORIES FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM
Use of Lunar Volatiles in Chemical and Nuclear-Thermal Rockets John F Santarius April 30, 1999 Lecture 41, Part 2 Resources from Space NEEP 533/ Geology.
Low Thrust Transfer to Sun-Earth L 1 and L 2 Points with a Constraint on the Thrust Direction LIBRATION POINT ORBITS AND APPLICATIONS Parador d'Aiguablava,
ARO309 - Astronautics and Spacecraft Design
1 SATELLITESSATELLITES 2 Newton’s Law of Gravitation M1M1 M2M2 r F F.
Orbital Mechanics Principles of Space Systems Design U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND Orbital Mechanics Energy and velocity in orbit Elliptical orbit parameters.
Space : missions and telescopes. Space missions PASTMERCURY GEMINI APOLLO SPACE SHUTTLE World War 2 A2 1 st soviet in orbit.
The Solar System The Planets. Celestial Bodies Is an old term that means the sun, moon and stars Is an old term that means the sun, moon and stars Thousands.
Victor Becerra Cybernetics The University of Reading, UK
AAE450 Spring 2009 Low Thrust Spiral Transfer Maneuvers and Analysis [Andrew Damon] [Mission Ops] February 5,
Optimization of Preliminary Low- Thrust Trajectories From GEO- Energy Orbits To Earth-Moon, L 1, Lagrange Point Orbits Using Particle Swarm Optimization.
Apollo Flight Path Clayton Cantrall. Lunar Orbit Rendezvous Concept (LOR) One of three concepts considered for Apollo 11 mission One of three concepts.
The Cold War and the Space Race  At the conclusion of World War 2 both the United States and Russia set themselves up to be super powers  This rivalry.
Daniel, Alex, Zak Group 3. Jacksonville Florida Orbital Mechanics  Orbit  An orbit is a fixed path in space that the spacecraft follows. Depending.
Satellite Engineering Research Corporation Precise Time Synchronization Throughout the Solar System Robert A. Nelson Satellite Engineering Research Corporation.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 6008 Interplanetary Mission Design Spring 2015 Kate Davis Tisserand Plots 1.
ASEN 5050 SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICS Interplanetary Prof. Jeffrey S. Parker University of Colorado – Boulder Lecture 29: Interplanetary 1.
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Nathan Payne March 29 th, 2007 Final Presentation.
How Far/How Fast. What are some important questions that you formed about your journey to the moon? List 2 or 3 of the most important things you need.
Mission Development: Putting It All Together ASEN 6008 Interplanetary Mission Design.
Final Version Gary Davis Robert Estes Scott Glubke Propulsion May 13-17, 2002 Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
Newton’s Universal Law of Gravitation. Questions If the planets are orbiting the sun, what force is keeping them in orbit? What force keeps the moon in.
ERAU Space Physics Program1 Space Physics Program College of Arts & Sciences ERAU-Prescott Dr. Darrel Smith World Space Congress October 17, 2002.
1AAE 450 Spring 2008 Scott Breitengross Mar 27, 2008 Trajectory group, Delta V, Saturn V, Feasability Determination, 1 kg Final Design Final Presentation.
Speed, Velocity & Acceleration. Speed (s) – rate at which an object is moving Does not depend on direction speed = distance ÷ time (s = d/t) Constant.
Rockets and Satellites. How Do Rockets Lift Off? Rockets and space shuttles lift into space using Newton’s third law of motion.
Kepler’s Laws. Kepler and the Physics of Planetary Motion Laws of Planetary Motion Law 1 - Law of Ellipses Law 2 - Law of Equal Areas Law 3 - Harmonic.
Nuclear Thermal Propulsion for Robotic and Piloted Titan Missions Brice Cassenti University of Connecticut.
Small Spacecraft Interplanetary Missions: The Art of Trajectory Design Mikhail Ovchinnikov Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics Maksim Shirobokov Keldysh.
Propellant-free Spacecraft Relative Maneuvering via Atmospheric Differential Drag Riccardo Bevilacqua Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Lunar Trajectories.
Gravity & Motion Unit 1 Lesson 4
Future In-Space Operations (FISO) Telecon Colloquium
Scientific Mission Applications
Three-Body Trajectory Model and Spiral Transfer Matching
Advisor:Nortren Tsai Speaker:B.Y. Wu
Particle F=ma (n-t): Example Problem 3
Try Lam Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology
Three Programs and One Goal
Presentation transcript:

Guidance for Hyperbolic Rendezvous Damon Landau April 30, 2005

Damon Landau2 Earth-Mars Cycler Mission E5 E3 E1 M4 M2 E1-M2 170 days gravity assist E3 flyby from Mars cycler taxi

April 30, 2005Damon Landau3 Getting There cycler V ∞ =5 km/s taxi V ∞ =5 km/s r = 477,000 km one-day transfer lunar orbit Earth one hour before rendezvous  V = 284 m/s  V from LEO = 4.30 km/s cycler frame

April 30, 2005Damon Landau4 Relative Motion Earth cycler taxi

April 30, 2005Damon Landau5 Guidance Algorithm taxi cycler docking axis x,y frame r,  frame

April 30, 2005Damon Landau6 Rendezvous Begin thrusting after 23 hours. Design for 1/2-hour settling time,  = 2, v f = 0.1 m/s  dock = 180°  V = 294 m/s (ideal  V = 284 m/s)  f = m, v f = m/s time to rendezvous = 4.1 hours Earth centered cycler centered taxi mass = 50 mt

April 30, 2005Damon Landau7 Rendezvous Begin thrusting after 23 hours. Design for 1/2-hour settling time,  = 2, v f = 0.1 m/s  dock = 0°  V = 1,837 m/s  f = m, v f = m/s time to rendezvous = 3.8 hours Earth centered cycler centered taxi mass = 50 mt

April 30, 2005Damon Landau8 Departure Error  V error of 50 m/s from LEO Begin thrusting after 23 hours. Design for 1/2-hour settling time,  = 2, v f = 0.1 m/s  dock = 180°  V = 6,572 m/s  f = m, v f = m/s time to rendezvous = 5.3 hours Earth centered cycler centered taxi mass = 50 mt

April 30, 2005Damon Landau9 Lower Gains Begin thrusting after 23 hours. Design for 1/2-hour settling time,  = 0.8, v f = 0.1 m/s  f = m, v f = 83.8 m/s Rendezvous speed is too fast Will the speed approach zero? cycler centered 1 st loop GES, but not practical  f = 1 cm, v f = 1.6 cm/s

April 30, 2005Damon Landau10 Future (Fun)Work 3-D analysis Limit controls to thruster capabilities Include navigational errors Failure analysis Optimize for  V and time Conclusions Hyperbolic rendezvous is possible with a relatively simple controller. The  V and time for rendezvous can be similar to the ideal case. Poor choice of docking axis significantly increases  V. The state near  = 0 is more important than the response as t  ∞.

April 30, 2005Damon Landau11 References Byrnes, D. V., Longuski, J. M., and Aldrin, B., “Cycler Orbit Between Earth and Mars,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 30, No. 3, May-June 1993, pp Kluever, C. A., “Feedback Control for Spacecraft Rendezvous and Docking,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 22, No. 4, July-August 1999, pp McConaghy, T. T., Landau, D. F., Yam, C. H., and Longuski, J. M., “A Notable Two-Synodic-Period Earth-Mars Cycler,” to appear in Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. Penzo, P. A., and Nock, K. T., “Hyperbolic Rendezvous for Earth-Mars Cycler Missions,” Paper AAS , AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, San Antonio, TX, Jan , 2002, pp Prussing, J. E., and Conway, B. A., Orbital Mechanics, New York, Oxford University Press, Shaohua, Y., Akiba, R., and Matsuo, H., “Control of Omni-Directional Rendezvous Trajectories,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 32, No.2, 1994, pp Wang, P. K. C., “Non-linear guidance laws for automatic orbital rendezvous,” International Journal of Control, Vol. 42, No. 3, 1985, pp