Need for NGA-East: EPRI CEUS Ground Motion Report, Summary and Issues Norm Abrahamson Mar 7, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPRI/SOG Mmax –Six earth-science teams, diverse methods largest observed eq (+ increment) catalog statistics – extreme occurrences seismogenic feature:
Advertisements

PREDICTION OF RESPONSE SPECTRAL PARAMETERS FOR BHUJ EARTHQUAKE (26TH JANUARY 2001) USING COMPONENT ATTENUATION MODELLING TECHNIQUE By DR. SAROSH.H. LODI.
Ground Motion Scaling Based on 1-D Rock Simulations N. Abrahamson NGA Workshop #5 March 24, 2004.
Ground Motions Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Steve Kramer
10/09/2007CIG/SPICE/IRIS/USAF1 Broadband Ground Motion Simulations for a Mw 7.8 Southern San Andreas Earthquake: ShakeOut Robert W. Graves (URS Corporation)
TBI Committee Members Y. Bozorgnia C.B. Crouse J.P. Stewart
Ground motion simulations and site effect estimation for Istanbul, Turkey Mathilde Bøttger Sørensen 1, Nelson Pulido 2, Sylvette Bonnefoy-Claudet 3, Kuvvet.
Prague, March 18, 2005Antonio Emolo1 Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Characteristic Earthquake Scenario: Integrating Probabilistic and Deterministic Approaches.
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Earliest approach taken to seismic hazard analysis Originated in nuclear power industry applications Still used for.
Multivariate Methods Pattern Recognition and Hypothesis Testing.
PEER Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles May 22, 2002 Geotechnical Uncertainties for PBEE.
1 SSHAC Guidelines in NGA-East Project Dr. Annie Kammerer, P.E. (Most slides borrowed from Dr. Kevin Coppersmith) NGA-East Sigma Workshop Organizational.
Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Gail M. Atkinson, UWO David M. Boore, USGS (BSSA, 2006)
NGA-East: National Seismic Hazard Mapping Perspective Mark Petersen USGS Golden, CO.
March 7, 2008NGA-East 2nd Workshop1 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN STRONG MOTION SIMULATIONS FOR CEUS Paul Somerville and Robert Graves URS Pasadena MOTIVATION:
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
1 NRC Perspective on NGA-East Project NGA-East Stakeholder Workshop Dr. Annie Kammerer, P.E.
03/24/2004NGA Workshop: Validation1 BROADBAND SIMULATION METHODOLOGY: A HYBRID DETERMINISTIC AND STOCHASTIC APPROACH  Use Deterministic Methodology at.
Overview of GMSM Methods Nicolas Luco 1 st Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification (GMSM) for Nonlinear Analysis – 27 October 2006.
Time-dependent seismic hazard maps for the New Madrid seismic zone and Charleston, South Carolina areas James Hebden Seth Stein Department of Earth and.
Project Review and Summary of NGA Supporting Research Norm Abrahamson NGA Workshop #6 July, 2004.
Database of Ground Motions For NGA East A Presentation by Chris Cramer at the Stakeholder NGA East Workshop NIST Gaithersburg, MD March 7, 2008.
UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment Department of Geophysics and Geothermics A. Agalos (1), P. Papadimitriou (1), K. Makropoulos.
Selection of Time Series for Seismic Analyses
Roberto PAOLUCCI Department of Structural Engineering
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency US NRC Approach for Seismic Hazard Assessments INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON LESSONS LEARNED FROM STRONG EARTHQUAKES.
Comparison of Recorded and Simulated Ground Motions Presented by: Emel Seyhan, PhD Student University of California, Los Angeles Collaborators: Lisa M.
GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE MARMARA REGION: ATTENUATION OF SEISMIC WAVES (1) M.B.SØRENSEN, (2) A. AKINCI, (2) L. MALAGNINI and (3) R. B. HERRMANN (1)
1 Fault Dynamics of the April 6, 2009 L'Aquila, Italy Earthquake Sequence Robert B. Herrmann Saint Louis University Luca Malagnini INGV, Roma.
Description of selected broadband ground motion simulation methods Paul Somerville, URS Yuehua Zeng, USGS Golden.
FEASIBILITY STUDY OF A REGIONAL EEW SYSTEM FOR THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN REGION ZUCCOLO Elisa, SALAZAR Walter, DI SARNO Luigi, FARRELL Anthony, GIBBS Tony,
Major Ongoing Ground Motion Research Programs at PEER Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER, University of California, Berkeley.
Broadband Ground Motion Simulation Plans Paul Somerville URS SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation Progress Workshop Sept 9, 2012.
The kinematic representation of seismic source. The double-couple solution double-couple solution in an infinite, homogeneous isotropic medium. Radiation.
Napa Earthquake - Results Strong shaking in epicentral area, low-level shaking throughout Bay area Recorded strong motion: 340 ground response stations.
FEMA/ EARTH SCIENCE ASPECTS OF HAZUS Ivan Wong Seismic Hazards Group URS Corporation Oakland, CA.
CENA GMPEs from Stochastic Method Simulations: Review, Issues, Recent Work David M. Boore Blue Castle Licensing Project (BCLP) Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis.
Next Generation Attenuation Models for Central & Eastern US (NGA-East) Stakeholder Workshop: Introduction March 7, 2008 Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER.
SCEC Workshop on Earthquake Ground Motion Simulation and Validation Development of an Integrated Ground Motion Simulation Validation Program.
Probabilistic Ground Motions for Scoggins Dam, Oregon Chris Wood Seismotectonics & Geophysics Group Technical Service Center July 2012.
Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E.
Sigma - Background Norm Abrahamson Sep 30, Sigma for CEUS EPRI (2006) –Truncation of log-normal distribution –Evaluation of Application of NGA sigma.
Epistemic Uncertainty on the Median Ground Motion of Next-Generation Attenuation (NGA) Models Brian Chiou and Robert Youngs The Next Generation of Research.
E E R I D I S T I N G U I S H E D L E C T U R E S E R I E S State of Practice of Seismic Hazard Analysis: From the Good to the Bad Norm Abrahamson,
GROUND MOTION VARIABILITY: COMPARISON OF SURFACE AND DOWNHOLE GROUND MOTIONS Adrian Rodriguez-Marek, Washington State University, USA Fabrice Cotton, LGIT,
Ground motion simulations in the Pollino region (Southern Italy) for Mw 6.4 scenario events.
HIGH FREQUENCY GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE YUNNAN REGION W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD Robert.
GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS AT RAPID RESPONSE SITES IN ISTANBUL, TURKEY Mathilde Bøttger Sørensen 1, Nelson Pulido 2, Anibal Ojeda 3, Kuvvet Atakan 1, Mustafa.
4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering Taipei, Taiwan October 12-13, 2006 Site-specific Prediction of Seismic Ground Motion with Bayesian.
Near Fault Ground Motions and Fault Rupture Directivity Pulse Norm Abrahamson Pacific Gas & Electric Company.
Process for 2007 Maps CA Oct 2006 PacNW Mar 2006 InterMtn West June 2006 CEUS May 2006 National User-Needs Workshop DEC 2006 CA Draft maps (Project 07)
Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran A Probabilistic Approach To Modeling Fatigue.
Towards a standard model for present-day signals due to postglacial rebound H.-P. Plag, C. Kreemer Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.
Repeatable Path Effects on The Standard Deviation for Empirical Ground Motion Models Po-Shen Lin (Institute of geophysics, NCU) Chyi-Tyi Lee (Institute.
Ground-Motion Attenuation Relationships for Cascadia Subduction Zone Megathrust Earthquakes Based on a Stochastic Finite-Fault Model Nick Gregor 1, Walter.
NGA Project Review and Status Norm Abrahamson NGA Workshop #5 March, 2004.
Probabilistic hazard analysis of earthquake-induced landslides – an example from Kuohsing, Taiwan Liao, Chi-Wen Industrial Technology Research Institute.
Novel Approach to Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Modeling Vladimir Graizer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Erol Kalkan California Geological Survey.
Yelena Kropivnitskaya, Kristy F. Tiampo,
British Seismology Meeting 5th – 7th April 2017, Reading, UK
Color Variation: o Fixed Probability of Exceedance & Duration:
SCEC UGMS Committee Meeting
Summary of Prev. Lecture
Kris Vasudevan and David W. Eaton Department of Geoscience
Treatment of kappa in Recent Western US Seismic Nuclear Plant Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Studies AGU Fall Meeting, 12/17/2015 rev.1 12/20/2015 Gabriel.
NGA-East Tentative Plan
Color Variation: o Fixed Probability of Exceedance & Duration:
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis
Color Variation: o Fixed Probability of Exceedance & Duration:
AMRA’s contribution to WP4
Presentation transcript:

Need for NGA-East: EPRI CEUS Ground Motion Report, Summary and Issues Norm Abrahamson Mar 7, 2008

EPRI 2004 Approach Develop weights for existing ground motion models Median and standard deviation are separated

Regionalization Followed EPRI (1993)

Model Clusters 1Single Corner Stochastic 2Double Corner Stochastic 3Hybrid 4Finite source / Greens Function

Models Grouped by Class ClusterModel TypeModels 1Single Corner Stochastic Hwang and Huo (1997) Silva et al (2002) - SC-CS Silva et al (2002) - SC-CS-Sat Silva et al (2002) - SC-VS Toro et al (1997) Frankel et al (1996) 2Double Corner Stochastic Atkinson and Boore (1995) Silva et al (2002) DC Silva et al (2002) DC - Sat 3HybridAbrahamon & Silva (2002) Atkinson (2001) & Sadigh et al (1997) Campbell (2003) 4Finite Source /Greens Function Somerville et al. (2001)

Candidate Models, Median M5 10 Hz 1 Hz

Candidate Models, Median M6 10 Hz 1 Hz

Candidate Models, Median M7 10 Hz 1 Hz

Candidate Models, Std Dev 1 Hz 10 Hz

Cluster Evaluation Consistency of the cluster median with CEUS ground motion data Strength of the seismological principals used in the model development Degree to which modeling of epistemic uncertainty was considered in developing individual ground motion models

EUS Data Used for Model Evaluations

Consistency with CEUS Data (Weights inversely proportional to variance) ClusterRelative Weight Single Corner Stochastic Double Corner Stochastic Hybrid Finite Source /Greens Function

Cluster Weights Based on Seismological Principles and Uncertainty Treatment Seismological Principles Single Corner Double Corner HybridGF Medium High Explicit modeling of epistemic Only Parametric No consideration 0.0 Final Weight

Weights for Clusters Importance Weights ClusterConsistency with data Seismological /Uncertainty Composite Weight

Model Weights within a Cluster ClusterModel TypeModelsWeights 1Single Corner Stochastic Hwang & Huo (1997) Silva et al (2002) - SC-CS Silva et al (2002) - SC-CS-Sat Silva et al (2002) - SC-VS Toro et al (1997) Frankel et al (1996) Double Corner Stochastic Atkinson & Boore (1995) Silva et al (2002) DC Silva et al (2002) DC - Sat HybridAbrahamon & Silva (2002) Atkinson (2001) & Sadigh et al (1997) Campbell (2003) Finite Source /Greens Function Somerville et al. (2001)1.0

Median by Cluster PGA

Median by Cluster T=1 sec

Cluster 1 Stress drops ModelMedian Stress Drop (Bars) Frankel et al (1996)150 Hwang and Huo (1997)150 Silva (2002) Constant  120 Silva (2002) Constant  with saturation 120 Silva (2002) variable  160 for M<=5.5, 70 for M8.5 Toro et al (1997)120

Adjustments for Epicentral Distance Based PSHA Some PSHA model earthquake as Epicenters Need to allow models to use epicental distance Two corrections needed –Median R JB (R epi,M), R rup (R epi,M) –Increase in standard deviation

Logic Tree

Epistemic: Stress-Drop Median (cluster 1)

Epistemic: Path (cluster 1)

Epistemic Single Corner (cluster 1)

Epistemic Double Corner (cluster 2)

Epistemic Hybrid (cluster 3)

Epistemic GF (cluster 4)

Issues Regionalization –Same two regions as EPRI 1993? –Rift vs non-rift Change in depth distribution If R JB is used, then are different models needed? Depends on scaling with depth

Regionalization Regions Considered by EPRI 1993

Issues Distance Metric –Do we need to consider epicenter distance based models? –RJB models may need to account for average depth

Issues Comparisons with Data –Hybrid models based on WUS models that were not well constrained for M<5, but most CEUS data is for M<5

Issues Finite Source /GF Simulations –Based on a single model (Somerville et al 2001) –MCEER project (1997) used multiple methods and found a large range (factors of 2-3) in the medians for the different simulation methods

Needs for NGA-East Approach Develop new models, with comprehensive evaluations and reviews –Revising weights for existing models is not going to lead to significant improvements Where possible, collect/apply new data to constrain ground motions –Site conditions for GM stations –Geological observations for GM constraints –Ground motions from M>4 stable regions would-wide Coordinated application of different numerical simulation methods