Status of FTK simulation June 16,2005 G. Punzi, Pisa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

FTKSim Status: Ghost Busting part. II The Hit Warrior F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, P. Gianetti G. Punzi, G. Volpi FTK Meeting 10/19/2006.
First results on 6M training sample and Bs->mumu analisys F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, P. Giannetti, G. Punzi, G. Volpi.
TRACK DICTIONARY (UPDATE) RESOLUTION, EFFICIENCY AND L – R AMBIGUITY SOLUTION Claudio Chiri MEG meeting, 21 Jan 2004.
1 introduction FTK, which stands for Fast Tracker, is an upgrade for ATLAS detector aims to provide tracking information for level 2 trigger of ATLAS detector.
Track quality - impact on hardware of different strategies Paola FTK meeting Performances on WH and Bs   2.Now we use all the layers.
1 Athena Issues and B-tagging Efficiency Monica Dunford continuing the work of Meena Narain.
FTKSIM with rawhits Last week's updates October 9, 2007 Anton Kapliy.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
WH  bb and WH  uu Studies Monica Dunford FTK Monthly Meeting March 13 th, 2007.
Progress on jet trigger response functions FTK Physics Case Meeting 06/16/05 Erik Brubaker University of Chicago.
Current plans FTK meeting 2/23/06 F. Crescioli, P.Giannetti, M. Dell’Orso, G. Punzi, G.Volpi, + Cheng-Ju Lin.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
Progress on B-tagging Efficiency Monica Dunford May 22 nd, 2007.
TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. Introduction SCT Week – March 03 Jose E. Garcia TB & Simulation results Simulation results Inner detector.
RawHits in Pixel/SCT Kohei Yorita The University of Chicago FTK Meeting on Feb. 21 st 2007.
SVT L.Ristori1 SVT Workshop July 22, 2003 Summary (1) Minimal upgrade for run IIb silicon –Detailed bit level format for hits from HF’s to Mergers needs.
MonteCarlo simulation of neutrino interactions in PEANUT Giovanni De Lellis on behalf of Alberto Marotta and Andrea Russo Naples University.
Simulation Tasks  Understanding Tracking  Understanding Hardware 1.Two types of tasks: a.Implementing known functions in ATLAS framework b.Understanding.
FTK poster F. Crescioli Alberto Annovi
Simulation issue Y. Akiba. Main goals stated in LOI Measurement of charm and beauty using DCA in barrel –c  e + X –D  K , K , etc –b  e + X –B 
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
26 Jan, MEG Software Status Framework for MEG MC, Unification of LargePrototype/beam test, Schedule and DC reconstruction MEG Software Group.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
LAV Software Status Emanuele Leonardi – Tommaso Spadaro Photon Veto WG meeting – 2015/03/24.
17-Aug-00 L.RistoriCDF Trigger Workshop1 SVT: current hardware status CRNowFinal Hit Finders64242 Mergers31616 Sequencers2312 AMboards4624 Hit Buffers21212.
The CDF Online Silicon Vertex Tracker I. Fiori INFN & University of Padova 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies and Particle Physics Villa.
Selection cuts on Bs→ with FTK F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi 2/5/2006.
Global Tracking Software Status H. Greenlee Run II Meeting May 12, 2000.
AMB HW LOW LEVEL SIMULATION VS HW OUTPUT G. Volpi, INFN Pisa.
What is in my contribution area Nick Sinev, University of Oregon.
Cosmic Rays for ATLAS Commissioning Commissioning Meeting ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens May 2003 Halo+Cosmics group: M.Boonekamp, F.Gianotti, R.McPherson,
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
August 26, 2003P. Nilsson, SPD Group Meeting1 Paul Nilsson, SPD Group Meeting, August 26, 2003 Test Beam 2002 Analysis Techniques for Estimating Intrinsic.
G. Volpi - INFN Frascati ANIMMA Search for rare SM or predicted BSM processes push the colliders intensity to new frontiers Rare processes are overwhelmed.
A New Tool For Measuring Detector Performance in ATLAS ● Arno Straessner – TU Dresden Matthias Schott – CERN on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Computing.
Sensor testing and validation plans for Phase-1 and Ultimate IPHC_HFT 06/15/ LG1.
FTKSim Status and plans FTK Meeting 07/13/2006 F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G.Volpi, P. Giannetti.
ATLAS Trigger Development
Rawhits Status A short update on only pattgen “sector mode” Kohei Yorita University of Chicago March 13 th FTK Meeting.
CMS Torino meeting, 4 th June, 2007 R. Castello on behalf of Torino Tracker’s group Tracker Alignment with MillePede.
The “Comparator” Atlfast vs. Full Reco Automated Comparison Chris Collins-Tooth 19 th February 2006.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System Mark Neubauer 1, Laura Sartori 2 1 University.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
Mark Dorman Separation Of Charged Current And Neutral Current Events In The MINOS Far Detector Using The Hough Transform Mark Dorman 16/12/04.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
FTK high level simulation & the physics case The FTK simulation problem G. Volpi Laboratori Nazionali Frascati, CERN Associate FP07 MC Fellow.
Future evolution of the Fast TracKer (FTK) processing unit C. Gentsos, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki FTK FP7-PEOPLE-2012-IAPP FTK executive.
11/20/01Giovanni Punzi Items for restart of run Unify.gcon and.ifit (gcon V3.0 (fcon?)) –Got more comments/did some format changes –Code written to produce.
SVT 4/5 operation CDF meeting 1/16/2003 G. Punzi for the SVT group.
Status of FTK Paola Giannetti INFN Pisa for the FTK Group ATLAS Italia November 17, 2009.
GUIDO VOLPI – UNIVERSITY DI PISA FTK-IAPP Mid-Term Review 07/10/ Brussels.
New AMchip features Alberto Annovi INFN Frascati.
Ftksim at high luminosity Monthly meeting September 22, 2008 Anton Kapliy.
NIPHAD meeting 16 September 2005, T. Cornelissen 1 Tracking results in the testbeam Thijs Cornelissen.
Alpine, very forward, EOS…
More technical description:
Project definition and organization milestones & work-plan
2018/6/15 The Fast Tracker Real Time Processor and Its Impact on the Muon Isolation, Tau & b-Jet Online Selections at ATLAS Francesco Crescioli1 1University.
Update of pattern recognition
FTK variable resolution pattern banks
TPC status - Offline Q&A
Silicon Tracking with GENFIT
F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi
Fast Track Fitting in the SiD01 Detector
Samples and MC Selection
F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi
Recent Results on TRT Alignment
Presentation transcript:

Status of FTK simulation June 16,2005 G. Punzi, Pisa

FTKSIM PEOPLE: –Chiara Roda, Giulio Usai, Iacopo Vivarelli –Mauro Dell’Orso, Giovanni Punzi Francesco Crescioli, Guido Volpi TASK: –Build an FTK simulator taking input from ATLAS full simulation –Evaluate performance parameters on fully simulated ATLAS events

Code organization CORRGEN MC tracks+hits fit constants (.fcon) PATTGEN Patterns (.patt) Linearized resolution Eff. Existing (SVT) In progress ATLSIM (ATHENA) Detector Hits FTKSIM FTK tracks Performance parameters From existing Red: basic performance parameters than can be brought inside ATLFAST DoneATLAS Sectors (Trivial in CDF) PATTGEN’ Done

Projection on the X-Y plane of the muminus_4040 sample (10000 tracks) Every hit belongs to a specific module of the detector and uses global x-y-z coordinates. Each module in this plane is identified by the kind of detector (Pixel or SCT), the layer number and the phi_module id Hit distribution (barrel)

We need to transform global coordinates to local, according to some data files mapping ATLAS detector/layer/phi_sector ids to plane/sector and defining the local coordinate space ATLAS hits format FTKSIM hits format atltrackToHits() detector/layer to plane.pmap phi_module to sectors.psmap sector phi offset for global to local coordinats.offmap

3 pixel 4 SCT pixel 0 plane 0 pixel 2 plane 1 SCT 0 plane 2 SCT 1 plane 3 SCT 2 plane 4 SCT 3 plane 5.pmap file format Number of layers per detector detector/layer pair to plane number Example.pmap file that maps all detector/layer pairs to a plane. Note: pixel layer number 1 does not exists so it's not mapped.

planes 6 phi_module0 22 phi_module1 52 phi_module2 32 phi_module3 40 phi_module4 48 phi_module5 56 sectors 156 plane 0 phi_module 0 nsectors 8: plane 5 phi_module 55 nsectors 2: psmap file format Number of planes used Number of phi_modules per plane Number of sectors defined Sectors assigned to plane/phi_module pair. Note: In case a module belongs to multiple sectors, the real hits in that module generate multiple virtual hits, one for each sector.

planes 6 sectors 156 plane 0 sector 0 offset plane 5 phi_module 155 offset offmap file format Number of planes used Number of sectors defined Global offset of the sector in the coordinate used for global to local transformation. We are using hit's phi as one dimensional coordinate, so we need to know phi region covered by every plane/sector pair to map global hit's phi to local one. In this case we use the phi of the right end of every plane/sector pair to perform the transformation.

Sector generation Define sector with the same method used for patterns: 1 detector element= 1 superstrip Run a MC track sample Define sectors as combinations that have larger occupancies Depends on Pt-> need realistic distribution in training sample

Results with current input track data Samples currently used: –µ+, µ- samples, fixed Pt 5 GeV, ~10000 tracks each We use iPat 3D hits (Poppleton’s) –2D hits from different detectors are associated to produce them –This is NOT what FTK is going to see: purpose is to compare FTK performance with offline exercise code with smaller number of patterns, ecc. Our current tests are: Barrel only, 2D only Sectors: generated 156 sectors, each with very few tracks in it (we will eventually have much more) Many tracks have multiple hits –Good as test of the code, but we need >>statistics

A great number of tracks have many hits, typically multiple hits in a single detector plane.

Sample tracks

Useful events Useful events are events with 6 hits in 6 plane for a given sector. 7-8% of total tracks

Status Interface ATHENA->FTKSIM created Brought CORRGEN and PATTGEN to work with ATLAS data Created new piece of code to build a sector map in automated (and optimal) way (useful for real implementation) Need to produce an appropriate sample of single tracks to actually start making constants

BACKUP

Job Breakdown Athena interface (C. Roda, G. Usai) FTKSIM code organization (G. Punzi, M. Dell’Orso) Core code (Francesco, Guido) Production of real Geometry Constants –(Giovanni, Guido) Production of real Patterns (Mauro, Francesco) Measurement of linearized resolution and background rejection (Giovanni, Guido) Measurement of tracking efficiency (AM workload) (Mauro, Francesco)

Next steps Chiara+Giulio –Produce a sample of ~10^5 good tracks –Go to lower-level (non associated) hits for next round Francesco –Generate sectorization and patterns Guido –Generate geometry constants (“.fcon”)

Next to Next steps Mauro+Francesco –Produce pattern files (“.patt”) for ATLAS –Evaluate efficiency and verify AM workload Giovanni+Guido –Measure performance of linearized fit Chiara+Giulio –Produce module for creating FTKSIM input from fully simuted ATLAS events.

Detailed physics studies ATLSIM (ATHENA) Detector Hits FTKSIM Patterns (.patt) FTK tracks fit constants (.fcon) ATLFAST (ATHENA) Physics-study sample ATLFAST Root-ple + FTK block More complex performance indicators