Background comparison between 20 mrad and 2 mr crossings Takashi Maruyama SLAC Machine-Detector Interface Workshop SLAC January 6-8, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
Advertisements

EXTRACTION BEAM LOSS AT 1 TEV CM WITH TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov, G. White August 25, 2014.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
1 Vacuum Requirements in the Detector Region from Beam Gas and other Considerations Takashi Maruyama (SLAC) LCWA 2009, Albuquerque October 2, 2009.
Zero Degree Extraction using an Electrostatic Separator Take another look at using an electrostatic separator and a weak dipole to allow a zero degree.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Snowmass July 2001.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
Stanford – Mar , 2005 LCWS-2005 Norbert Meyners Upstream Polarimetry with 4-Magnet Chicane 1 Introduction & Overview O Compton polarimetry basics.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
1 4 Oct 05 Optimization of anti-DID for SiD, GLD and LDC A.Seryi October 4, 2005.
Background Studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC ALCPG 2004 Winter Workshop January 8, 2004.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Snowmass 2001, 05 July 2001 LCD Meeting, 25 September.
LCWS ’05 Machine Detector Interface Design Updates Tom Markiewicz SLAC 22 March 2005.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Working Group Summary Tom Markiewicz LC R&D Workshop, UCSC June 29, 2002.
Beam Crossing Angle for  Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University International Linear Collider January 2005 MDI Workshop SLAC.
A.Seryi, Nov 22, 2005, slide 1 Evaluation of Aug9 2mrad Use 2mrad extraction, version Aug 9, Use high.
1 27 Sep 05 Discussion of anti-DID ( “DIDNT” ? ) A.Seryi September 27, 2005.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
IR Beamline and Sync Radiation Takashi Maruyama. Collimation No beam loss within 400 m of IP Muon background can be acceptable. No sync radiations directly.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
1 LumiCal Optimization and Design Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, Boulder, September 18, 2008.
NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.
Jan MDI WS SLAC Electron Detection in the Very Forward Region V. Drugakov, W. Lohmann Motivation Talk given by Philip Detection of Electrons and.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
Backgrounds in the NLC BDS ISG9 December 10 – Takashi Maruyama SLAC.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
Collimation and Backgrounds Summary N. Mokhov,T. Tauchi, N. Watson.
19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06.
Karsten Büßer Instrumentation of the Forward Region of the TESLA Detector International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics Aachen, July 19th.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Global Design Effort ILC Crab Cavity Overview and requirements Andrei Seryi SLAC on behalf of ILC Beam Delivery and Crab-Cavity design teams Joint BNL/US-LARP/CARE-HHH.
Interaction Region Issues and Beam Delivery R&D Issues & IR Design Status R&D Plans T. Markiewicz Klaisner Review 4/15/1999.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Geometries & Constraints on Forward Detectors Tom Markiewicz SLAC ALCPG SLAC 08 January 2004.
Philip Burrows Snowmass 2005: SiD Concept Plenary, 15/8/05 SiD and MDI issues Philip Burrows Queen Mary, University of London Thanks to: Toshiaki Tauchi,
Initial (FLUKA) calculations for synchrotron radiation at TLep April 4 th, 2013 F. Cerutti, A. Ferrari, L. Lari* *BE Dept.
Working Group D Backgrounds M Sullivan for everyone in WG D IRENG07 Sept 20, 2007.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Machine-Detector Interface Tom Markiewicz LC R&D Opportunities, SLAC May 21, 2002.
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
Location of the LW detector- Simulation of the LW signals Lawrence Deacon RHUL ATF2 meeting August 23 rd 2006 KEK.
1 M. Sullivan IR update IR Update M. Sullivan for the 3 rd SuperB workshop SLAC June14-16, 2006.
An Hybrid QD0 for SID ? Marco Oriunno (SLAC), Nov. 14, 2013 LCWS13, TOKYO.
Beam Delivery (wg4) update since Snowmass Andrei Seryi for WG4 GDE meeting December 8, 2005 Snowmass 2005 GDE Meeting at INFN-LNF.
Tungsten-Silicon Luminosity Detector with Flat Geometry Ronen Ingbir Tel Aviv University High Energy Physics Experimental Group.
1/24 SiD FCAL Takashi Maruyama Tom Markiewicz SLAC TILC’09, Tskuba, Japan, April 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K.
1 LoI FCAL Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K. Krempetz T. MarkiewiczBNLW.
MDI Simulations at SLAC Takashi Maruyama, Lew Keller, Thomas Markiewicz, Uli Wienands, SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting, FNAL June 21, 2013.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
The design of the 2mrad extraction line Rob Appleby Daresbury Laboratory On behalf of the SLAC-BNL-UK-France task force ILC European Regional Meeting and.
Machine Detector Interface Design Updates
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
Analysis of 14/20 mrad Extraction Line Energy Chicane
The MDI at CEPC Dou Wang, Hongbo Zhu, Huamin Qu, Jianli Wang, Manqi Ruan, Qinglei Xiu, Sha Bai, Shujin Li, Weichao Yao, Yanli Jin, Yin Xu, Yiwei Wang,
Neutron and Photon Backscattering from the ILC Beam Dump
Updates on IR and FF for super-B factory
The 2mrad horizontal crossing angle IR layout for the ILC
Tony Hill Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
in c-tau factory detector
GLD IR optimization and background study
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK Feb.4, 2008
Presentation transcript:

Background comparison between 20 mrad and 2 mr crossings Takashi Maruyama SLAC Machine-Detector Interface Workshop SLAC January 6-8, 2005

Two Crossing Angle Schemes with SiD Detector 20 mrad2 mrad L* = 3.51 m L* = 4.05 m R =2.5 cm R = 1 cm Geant 3 (e+/e-, photons) and FLUKA (neutrons)

More Geometry BNL Compact SC for QD0 QF1 for 2 mrad crossing Extract beam through coil pocket Spencer’s iron magnet with field map Poletip field: 10.5 kGauss, r=0.5 cm Length: 1.7 m

Background sources Sync radiations from beam halo - 2 mrad crossing Beam-beam pairs –120 K / BX – = 2.7 GeV Radiative Bhabhas –460 K / BX – = 195 GeV  hadrons (Barklow’s new calculation) –  =3.2  10 5 pb (0.77 events/BX) Beam parameters: TESLA TDR for 500 GeV

Beam extraction the 2 mr horizontal crossing scheme Sync radiations hit the face of QF1 RED: halo, upstream quads GREEN: halo, QD0 BLUE: disrupted beam, QD0 Disrupted beam with sync photons Beam can be extracted through QF1 coil pocket. QF1 fringe field ~3 kGauss.

Sync radiations in 2mrad crossing No sync radiations from beam core or disrupted beam would hit QF1. Sync radiations from beam halo hit QF1. QD0 upstream QD0 (MeV) # N/e Hit rate (%) Power (kW) 2.0*f halo 0.78*f halo –Photons backscattered to IP < 200 photons/BX for f halo =10 -3 –Photo-neutrons (FLUKA) < 1  10 8 neutrons/cm 2 /yr for f halo = Energy (MeV) From QD0From upstream QD0 f halo : halo fraction We really don’t know.

Pairs at Z = 315 cm r 2 cm X (cm) 20 mrad 2 mrad

Pairs in two schemes 20 mrad2 mrad QD0 QF1 QD0 QF1 < 40 GeV e+/e- hit LUMON or QD0 QD1

Energy Deposition 20 marad2 mrad

Neutron flux at Z = 0 cm (FLUKA) 20 mrad Pairs: 3.6  10 8 n s /cm 2 /yr Rad. Bhabhas: 1.1  10 8 n s /cm 2 /yr 2 mrad Pairs: 2.3  10 8 n s/ cm 2 /yr 20 mrad 2 mrad Neutron source (cm) M1 QD0 QF1 Beam pipe R at Z = 0 cm Energy (MeV)

Conclusions Background seems tolerable for both crossing angle schemes. More pair-energy will be deposited in –LUMON for 20 mrad –QD0 for 2 mrad. Similar neutron flux at 2-4  10 8 /cm 2 /yr