Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment and Activation Analysis L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison ARIES E-Meeting October.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scoping Neutronics Analysis in Support of FDF Design Evolution Mohamed Sawan University of Wisconsin-Madison With input from R. Stambaugh, C. Wong, S.
Advertisements

Neutronics Analysis on a Compact Tokamak Fusion Reactor CREST Q. HUANG 1,2, S. ZHENG 2, L. Lu 2, R. HIWATARI 3, Y. ASAOKA 3, K. OKANO 3, Y. OGAWA 1 1 High.
Views on Neutronics and Activation Issues Facing Liquid-Protected IFE Chambers L. El-Guebaly and the ARIES Team Fusion Technology Institute University.
Benefits of Radial Build Minimization and Requirements Imposed on ARIES Compact Stellarator Design Laila El-Guebaly (UW), R. Raffray (UCSD), S. Malang.
January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 IFE Structural Materials: ARIES Assessment M. C. Billone, A. R. Raffray, D. K. Sze, L. El-Guebaly and the ARIES team December.
ARIES-CS Radial Build Definition and Nuclear System Characteristics L. El-Guebaly, P. Wilson, D. Henderson, T. Tautges, M. Wang, C. Martin, J. Blanchard.
Liquid Wall Thickness, Life, Pumping Power, COE trade-offs Wayne R. Meier and Ryan P. Abbott LLNL ARIES Meeting Oct. 2-5, 2002 PPPL.
Recycling Issues Facing Target and RTL Materials of Inertial Fusion Designs L. El-Guebaly, P. Wilson, M. Sawan, D. Henderson, A. Varuttamaseni and the.
1 ANS 16 th Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy September , 2004 Madison, Wisconsin.
ARIES Meeting April 22-23, 2002 U. Wisconsin, Madison Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence.
University of Cambridge Stéphane Forsik 5 th June 2006 Neural network: A set of four case studies.
Impact of Liquid Wall on Fusion Systems Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego NRC Fusion Science Assessment Committee November 17, 1999.
Single particle properties of heavy and superheavy nuclei. Aleksander Parkhomenko.
Action Items For ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi ARIES Project Meeting June 19-21, 2000 University of Wisconsin, Madison Electronic copy:
ARIES-IFE Assessment of Operational Windows for IFE Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego 16 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
Radial Build Definition for Solid Breeder System Laila El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison With input from: S. Malang.
Status of 3-D Analysis, Neutron Streaming through Penetrations, and LOCA/LOFA Analysis L. El-Guebaly, M. Sawan, P. Wilson, D. Henderson, A. Ibrahim, G.
1 ARIES IFE - Some Concluding Comments on Thick Liquid Walls Wayne Meier, Ryan Abbott, Jeff Latkowski, Ralph Moir, Susana Reyes ARIES Project Meeting September.
STRUCTURAL & NOZZLE MATERIALS ASSESSMENT M.C. Billone (ANL) ARIES EVALUATION OF HYLIFE-II DESIGN October 10, 2002.
1 Radiation Environment at Final Optics of HAPL Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI HAPL GIMM Conference Call.
Initial Activation Assessment for ARIES Compact Stellarator Power Plant L. El-Guebaly, P. Wilson, D. Paige and the ARIES Team Fusion Technology Institute.
Minimum Radial Standoff: Problem definition and Needed Info L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison With Input from:
Final Focus Magnet Shielding Update Jeff Latkowski and Wayne Meier ARIES Meeting October 2-4, 2002 Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department.
The Nature of Molecules
Periodic Table – Filling Order
Metals, Nonmetals, Metalloids. Metals and Nonmetals Li 3 He 2 C6C6 N7N7 O8O8 F9F9 Ne 10 Na 11 B5B5 Be 4 H1H1 Al 13 Si 14 P 15 S 16 Cl 17 Ar 18 K 19 Ca.
Neutronics Parameters for Preferred Chamber Configuration with Magnetic Intervention Mohamed Sawan Ed Marriott, Carol Aplin UW Fusion Technology Inst.
Bohm 1 Preliminary Neutronics Analysis of 3x2 Toroidal and Poloidal Legs of ELM Coils Tim Bohm and Mohamed Sawan University of Wisconsin 7/22/2010.
Please do not write on this document. Thank you. Atomic Radius Data Element Name Atomic Number Atomic Radius (pm) Height of Straws (cm) H He
Plan to Develop A First Wall Concept for Laser IFE.
US/Japan Workshop on Power Plant Studies and Related Advanced Technologies With EU Participation April 6-7, 2002, Hotel Hyatt Islandia, San Diego, CA Design.
Periodic Table Of Elements
NEEP 541 – Material Properties Fall 2003 Jake Blanchard.
Bellwork, Fri. Sept. 14 Which element is LEAST likely to combine with another element to form a molecule? -Chlorine (Cl), a halogen -Iron (Fe), a metal.
HAPL Concrete Shielding Requirements Mohamed Sawan UW Fusion Technology Inst. HAPL Project Meeting UW-Madison October 22-23, 2008.
Identification of most promising candidate alloys for fuel cladding and core internal structures SCWR Information Meeting - April 29-30, 2003 UW-Madison.
LEADER meeting WP2 – Task 2.5 DPA, dose and activation calculations D. Gugiu (INR) – C. Petrovich (ENEA) Karlsruhe, November 21 st 2012.
Modern Periodic Table Objective:
Electron Configuration Filling-Order of Electrons in an Atom.
1 Neutronics Assessment of Self-Cooled Li Blanket Concept Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.
1 Neutronics Parameters for the Reference HAPL Chamber Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.
Alkali Metals, Group 1 H N OF Cl Br I Li Na K Fr Be Mg Ca Ra Sc Ac He Ne Ar Kr Rn Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu ZnGa Ge As Se Rb Sr Y Xe Zr Nb Mo Tc Ru Rh Pd.
Burning Simulation and Life-Cycle Assessment of Fusion Reactors Kozo YAMAZAKI Nagoya University, Nagoya , Japan (with the help of T. Oishi, K.
PROGRESS ON LOW ACTIVATION STRUCTURAL STEELS RECENT RESULTS ON NANOSTRUCTURED FERRITIC ALLOYS A.F.ROWCLIFFE (ORNL) ARIES PROJECT MEETING U.C.S.D. Jan 22.
1 Nuclear Assessment of HAPL Chamber with Magnetic Intervension Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.
D x 2 – y 2 Lanthanides Actinides G block Inrt P x P y P z D x y D x z D y z D z 2 New periodic table of elements Nodal point.
Periodic Table Li 3 He 2 C6C6 N7N7 O8O8 F9F9 Ne 10 Na 11 B5B5 Be 4 H1H1 Al 13 Si 14 P 15 S 16 Cl 17 Ar 18 K 19 Ca 20 Sc 21 Ti 22 V 23 Cr.
Periodic Table of Elements
Required Dimensions of HAPL Core System with Magnetic Intervention Mohamed Sawan Carol Aplin UW Fusion Technology Inst. Rene Raffray UCSD HAPL Project.
The Neutronics of Heavy Ion Fusion Chambers Jeff Latkowski and Susana Reyes 15 th Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion Symposium Princeton, NJ June 9, 2004 Work performed.
Radiological Issues for Thin Liquid Wall Options L. El-Guebaly, P. Wilson, and D. Henderson Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison.
Periodic Table Li 3 He 2 C6C6 N7N7 O8O8 F9F9 Ne 10 Na 11 B5B5 Be 4 H1H1 Al 13 Si 14 P 15 S 16 Cl 17 Ar 18 K 19 Ca 20 Sc 21 Ti 22 V 23 Cr.
Electron Configuration
Neutronics Issues for Final Optics of HAPL Mohamed Sawan, Ahmad Ibrahim, Tim Bohm, Paul Wilson Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin,
Introduction To Chemistry
1 H 2 He 3 Li 4 Be 5 B 6 C 7 N 8 O 9 F 10 Ne 11 Na 12 Mg 13 Al 14 Si
Chemeketa Community College
Can We achieve the TBR Needed in FNF?
Periodensystem Biomaterials Research - Manfred Maitz H He Li Be B C N
Emission of Energy by Atoms and Electron Configurations
Periodic Table Kelter, Carr, Scott, Chemistry A Wolrd of Choices 1999, page 74.
Soil processes and trace metals
Periodic Table of the Elements
4.2 IONIZATION ENERGY 4.6 TABLE 4.2 Ionization Energy of the Elements
PERIODIC TABLE OF ELEMENTS
Jeff Latkowski and Wayne Meier
Electron Configurations
DETECTION LIMITS < 1 ppt ng/L 1-10 ppt ng/L ppt ng/L
Line Spectra and the Bohr Model
Electron Configurations and the Periodic Table
Presentation transcript:

Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment and Activation Analysis L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison ARIES E-Meeting October 10, 2002 (Full presentation )

2 Assess nuclear performance of structure-free blanket concept using ARIES design rules –Lifetime of FS based on radiation damage: dpa Helium production –Breeding potential of candidate breeders: Flibe Flinabe. –Waste disposal rating of FS-based components (shield, nozzles, feeding tubes). Estimate reduction in waste for thick liquid wall concept. Objectives

3 ARIES Requirements and Design Limits dpa* to: ODS-FS structure ≤ 200 dpa 304-SS structure ≤ 25 dpa Overall TBR≥ 1.08 Helium production for reweldability of FS≤ 1 He appm WDR for Class C low level waste≤ 1 ___________________ * Thermal creep EOL could be more restrictive than radiation damage, per M. Billone (ANL).

4 Key Parameters Target yield MJ Rep rate4 Hz Average source neutron energy11.75 MeV Penetrations coverage3% Plant lifetime 40 FPY Availability85%

5 Schematic of Radial Build FS Shield (90% FS, 10% Liquid) Gap Target Liquid Blanket Jets (58% Liquid, 42% void) 0.5 m Radius 3 m Radius | | | Nozzles |

6 83 cm Thick Flibe and 150 cm Thick Flinabe Meet ARIES Breeding Requirement

7 dpa Limit Can be Met with cm Flibe Blanket and 150 cm Flinabe Blanket 85 cm Flibe blanket meets FS 200 dpa limit. 130 cm Flibe overbreeding blanket meets 304-SS 25 dpa limit. 1.5 m Flinabe blanket meets both limits.

8 Lifetime of Steel Structure Based on Radiation Damage BreederFlibe Flinabe Blanket Thickness85 cm 130 cm* 150 cm (meets both breeding requirement and dpa limit) Overall TBR ODS-FS40 FPY>> 40 FPY 304-SS40 FPY55 FPY _________________ * Overbreeding blanket.

9 Helium Production is Excessive Innermost shield layer/nozzles/feeding tubes cannot be re-welded at any time during operation.

10 Steel Composition (in wt%) Fe C N O – Si P– S Ti V – Cr Mn Co– Ni Cu Nb – Mo Ta–0.08– W2.442– Y – _____________________________________________________ * R. Klueh et al., “Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Oxide Dispersion-Strengthened Steels” fusion materials semiannual progress report for the period ending June 30, 2000 (DOE/ER-0313/28), pp Fe-12Cr-3W-0.4Ti-0.25Y 2 O 3 (12YWT) experimental alloy. ** IEA Modified F82H FS wt% Y 2 O 3, per M. Billone (ANL). Other elements include: B, Al, As, Pd, Ag, Cd, Sn, Sb, Os, Ir, Bi, Eu, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, U. # Starfire report: C. Baker et. al, "Starfire-A Commercial Tokamak Fusion Power Plant Study," Argonne National Laboratory Report, ANL/FPP-80-1 (1980). ODS-12YWT-FS * (Experimental Alloy) 304-SS # ODS M-F82H-FS **

11 All Steel Alloys Generate High Level Waste ODS-MF82H-FS offers lowest WDR. Thicker Flinabe blanket results in lower WDR. Main contributors to WDR: 94 Nb (from Nb), 99 Tc (from Mo), and 192n Ir (from W). Potential solutions to meet waste requirement (WDR < 1): –Control Mo and Nb, –Thicken blanket (and readjust TBR).

12 Effect of Mo and Nb on WDR In practice, Mo and Nb impurities cannot be zeroed out. Actual level depends on $/kg to keep Mo and Nb < 1 wppm. Flibe shield with Mo/Nb control should be > 50 cm thick to qualify as LLW. Flinabe shield without Mo/Nb control meets waste requirement if ≥ 45 cm thick. Nozzles/feeding tubes generate high level waste unless protected by thicker blanket or mixed with shield and disposed as single unit at EOL.

13 Thick liquid wall concept developed to eliminate blanket replacement, reduce waste, and increase availability by 10%  20% lower COE, per R. Moir (UCRL-JC , April 1994). In IFE solid wall designs, blanket generates only 2-4% of total waste  Thick liquid wall concept offers small waste reduction. (same conclusion made for MFE - APEX project)  Insignificant difference in waste volume generated by thin and thick liquid wall concepts. Revisiting Logic Behind Thick Liquid Wall Concept HYLIFE-II

14 Class C LLW requirement is more restrictive than breeding and dpa requirements. No breeding problem identified for Flibe and Flinabe. 85/150 cm thick Flibe/Flinabe blankets provide TBR of 1.08 and meet FS dpa limit. Helium production in FS is excessive and precludes FS reweldability during operation. All steel alloys produce high level waste (WDR >> 1). Low level waste can be achieved with combination of Mo/Nb control and blanket/shield adjustment. Nozzles/Feeding tubes need additional protection to qualify as LLW unless combined with shield. Both thin and thick liquid wall concepts generate ~ same volume of waste. Conclusions