The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Heliospheric Computations Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES and NOAA/Space Environment Center Solar MURI Team Meeting, Berkeley CA, December.
Advertisements

Global Properties of Heliospheric Disturbances Observed by Interplanetary Scintillation M. Tokumaru, M. Kojima, K. Fujiki, and M. Yamashita (Solar-Terrestrial.
On the Space Weather Response of Coronal Mass Ejections and Their Sheath Regions Emilia Kilpua Department of Physics, University of Helsinki
CAS Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment, USTC The Deflection of 2008 September 13 CME in Heliosphere Space ISEST, Hvar, Croatia,2013 June 17 Collaborators:
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.
Heliospheric MHD Models (for the LWS Community) LWS Workshop, Boulder, CO, March 23-26, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil 1,2 and Vic Pizzo 2 1 University of Colorado/CIRES,
Heliospheric MHD Modeling of the May 12, 1997 Event MURI Meeting, UCB/SSL, Berkeley, CA, March 1-3, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES &
Forecasting Super CME Disturbances 1.Super CMEs, such as the 2000 July 14, 2003 October 28, 2003 October 29, and 2006 December 13 full halo CMEs, generate.
A General Cone Model Approach to Heliospheric CMEs and SEP Modeling Magnetogram-based quiet corona and solar wind model The SEPs are modeled as a passive.
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
Tucson MURI SEP Workshop March 2003 Janet Luhmann and the Solar CISM Modeling Team Solar and Interplanetary Modeling.
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
Relationship Between Magnetic Clouds and Earth-Directed CMEs: Space Weather Research in Stanford Solar Group Xuepu Zhao The Second International Space.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. Ambient Solar Wind Models SAIC 3-D MHD steady state coronal model based on photospheric field maps CU/CIRES-NOAA/SEC.
Solar system science using X-Rays Magnetosheath dynamics Shock – shock interactions Auroral X-ray emissions Solar X-rays Comets Other planets Not discussed.
When will disruptive CMEs impact Earth? Coronagraph observations alone aren’t enough to make the forecast for the most geoeffective halo CMEs. In 2002,
February 26, 2007 KIPAC Workshop on Magnetism Modeling/Inferring Coronal And Heliospheric Field From Photospheric Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University.
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
Ambient Solar Wind Simulation of ambient solar wind driven by modified daily-updated WSA model:  Latitudinal distribution of the outflow velocity at 21.5.
ENLIL 3D-MHD Modeling Support of Heliospheric Missions European Space Weather Week, Liege, Belgium, November 2014 Dusan Odstrcil (GMU & NASA/GSFC)
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection Event CU/CIRES, NOAA/SEC, SAIC, Stanford Tatranska Lomnica, Slovakia,
Coronal and Heliospheric Modeling of the May 12, 1997 MURI Event MURI Project Review, NASA/GSFC, MD, August 5-6, 2003 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
UCB MURI Team Introduction An overview of ongoing work to understand a well observed, eruptive active region, along with closely related studies…..
The First Space-Weather Numerical Forecasting Model & Reconstruction of Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao NAOC Oct.
Luhmann1 An NSF Science and Technology Center led by Boston University, involving solar partners at SAIC, U of Colorado, BU, HAO, Stanford, NRL, AFRL,
Physics of the relationship of ICMEs to their CME progenitors (Wed AM) Two major efforts are under way to address the structure of CMEs that hit the Earth,
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Solar System Missions Division Solar Orbiter Next major Solar and Heliospheric mission ESA ILWS flagship Now with the Inner Heliospheric Sentinels.
29 April 2010 Space Weather Workshop 2010 From Research To Operations: Transitioning CISM Models W. Jeffrey Hughes Center for Integrated Space Weather.
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
The Solar Wind.
Global Simulation of Interaction of the Solar Wind with the Earth's Magnetosphere and Ionosphere Tatsuki Ogino Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory.
29 August, 2011 Beijing, China Space science missions related to ILWS in China
2004 September 11CAWSES Theme 2 Meeting, Beijing Solar Sources of Geoeffective Disturbances N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Greenbelt, MD
Validation of the SWMF Coupled Model for Solar Corona – Inner Heliosphere – CME With the Observations of the May 12, 1997 Event Ofer Cohen(1), Igor V.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Detailed comparison of active regions AR9906 and AR0069 in the build-up to the SEP events of 21 Apr 2002 and 24 Aug 2002 D.
Lessons for STEREO - learned from Helios Presented at the STEREO/Solar B Workshop, Rainer Schwenn, MPS Lindau The Helios.
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
Interplanetary Shocks in the Inner Solar System: Observations with STEREO and MESSENGER During the Deep Solar Minimum of 2008 H.R. Lai, C.T. Russell, L.K.
CSI 769 Fall 2009 Jie Zhang Solar and Heliospheric Physics.
Publications in Comparative Magnetospheres Siscoe, G. L.: Towards a comparative theory of magnetospheres, in Solar System Plasma Physics, Vol. II, edited.
GEOEFFECTIVE INTERPLANETARY STRUCTURES: 1997 – 2001 A. N. Zhukov 1,2, V. Bothmer 3, A. V. Dmitriev 2, I. S. Veselovsky 2 1 Royal Observatory of Belgium.
CME Propagation CSI 769 / ASTR 769 Lect. 11, April 10 Spring 2008.
What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.
Modeling 3-D Solar Wind Structure Lecture 13. Why is a Heliospheric Model Needed? Space weather forecasts require us to know the solar wind that is interacting.
Heliospheric Simulations of the SHINE Campaign Events SHINE Workshop, Big Sky, MT, June 27 – July 2, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil 1,2 1 University of Colorado/CIRES,
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
A tool for improved space weather predictions: the CME expansion speed. Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau Germany Instituto Nacional.
Shocks in the IPS Wageesh Mishra Eun-kyung Joo Shih-pin Chen.
The CME geomagnetic forecast tool (CGFT) M. Dumbović 1, A. Devos 2, L. Rodriguez 2, B. Vršnak 1, E. Kraaikamp 2, B. Bourgoignie 2, J. Čalogović 1 1 Hvar.
State of NOAA-SEC/CIRES STEREO Heliospheric Models STEREO SWG Meeting, NOAA/SEC, Boulder, CO, March 22, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
30 April 2009 Space Weather Workshop 2009 The Challenge of Predicting the Ionosphere: Recent results from CISM. W. Jeffrey Hughes Center for Integrated.
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
Driving 3D-MHD codes Using the UCSD Tomography
Y. C.-M. Liu, M. Opher, O. Cohen P.C.Liewer and T.I.Gombosi
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
Predicting the Probability of Geospace Events Based on Observations of Solar Active-Region Free Magnetic Energy Dusan Odstrcil1,2 and David Falconer3,4.
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
Solar Wind Transients and SEPs
Heliosphere - Lectures 5-7
Corona Mass Ejection (CME) Solar Energetic Particle Events
Solar and Heliospheric Physics
Introduction to Space Weather
CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS
Presentation transcript:

The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO observations of halo CMEs- which were known to produce geoeffects more often than other CMEs. This poster provides an update on the approach that CISM is taking to develop a simplified model of a CME’s effects on the solar wind, namely the transient disturbances known as ICMEs that are the major cause of large geomagnetic storms. Case studies with the cone model include the halo CME in May 1997 that is also being simulated by CISM in a more detailed way starting at the Sun (see accompanying poster on the initiation of this event in the coronal model). Other potential case studies are described here, including cases involving multiple CME disturbances that interact in ways that modify their individual effects. Overall the cone model allows us to proceed in developing the heliospheric portions of the model, to explore the effects of interaction with the solar wind structure, and to develop model products necessary for SEP event simulations and geospace coupling. CISM Cone Model Approach to Interplanetary CME (ICME) Simulation D. Odstrcil 3,4, X-P. Zhao 5, Y. Liu 5, T.J. Hoeksema 5, C.N. Arge 6, S. Ledvina 1, P.Riley 2, J. Linker 2 1 University of California, Berkeley, 2 SAIC, 3 University of Colorado, 4 NOAA-SEC, 5 Stanford, 6 AFRL May 12, 1997 May 1, 1998 The ejecta has no magnetic structure and so best represents an ICME’s leading shock, sheath, and trailing rarefaction region. This may be useful for providing a global context, predicting whether shocks and/or ejecta will hit geospace, and some SEP applications. ICMEs (white shaded structures), IMF lines (colored by normalized density), during the April/May 1998 events. Geospace is magnetically connected to stronger shock front when a rarefaction region, caused by the preceding ICME, is present. ICMEs and IMF Connectivity Simulation of Interplanetary CMEs Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) and the Cone Model High Resolution of Shocks at Geospace Multiple Transient Events  5 halo CMEs between April 27 and May 2, 1998  total 18 CMEs between April 27 and May 2, 1998 CME-1 CME-3CME-4CME-5CME-2 CME-3 April 21, 2002 August 24, Nested grids with progressively finer resolution centered on geospace is used to achieve high resolution of interplanetary shocks hitting the magnetosphere. Global (left) and detail (right) view show an interplanetary transient with the distorted shock front as it propagates through a moderate streamer. Upper and lower half show solution on single and nested grids. L1-point and Earth position is marked by white diamond and rectangle, respectively. CME-1 CME-4 CME-2 CME-3 CME-5 Weak (top left) and strong (top right) energetic particle events were observed by GOES spacecraft. The IMF line traced from the geospace to inner boundary of the heliospheric domain shows proximity of two solar active regions and an interplanetary shock in the latter case. First, background solar wind is computed using the output from either the WSA empirical or MAS numerical coronal model. Then, an over-pressured plasma cloud (with location, diameter, and speed from the cone model) is launched into heliosphere. Resulting interplanetary disturbance has two-part structure (shock+ejecta) and forward-reverse shock pair structure may form by cloud expansion.